Tag: neurological features

Neurologic Abnormalities in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Review

Abstract:

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is an illness characterized by fatigue lasting for at least six months, post-exertional malaise, unrefreshing sleep, cognitive impairment and orthostatic intolerance. ME/CFS has been a controversial illness because it is defined exclusively by subjective complaints. However, recent studies of neuroimaging as well as analysis of blood markers, energy metabolism and mitochondrial function have revealed many objective biological abnormalities. Specifically, it is suspected that the symptoms of ME/CFS may be triggered by immune activation – either inside or outside the brain – through release of inflammatory cytokines. In this review, we summarize potentially important recent findings on ME/CFS, focusing on objective evidence.

Source: Komaroff AL, Takahashi R, Yamamura T, Sawamura M. Neurologic Abnormalities in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Review. Brain Nerve. 2018 Jan;70(1):41-54. doi: 10.11477/mf.1416200948. [Article in Japanese] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29348374

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: The Current Status and Future Potentials of Emerging Biomarkers

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) remains an incompletely characterized illness, in part due to controversy regarding its definition, biological basis and diagnosis. Biomarkers are objective measures that may lead to improvements in our understanding of CFS by providing a more coherent and consistent approach to study, diagnosis and treatment of the illness. Such metrics may allow us to distinguish between CFS subtypes – each defined by characteristic biomarkers – currently conflated under the single, heterogeneous condition of CFS. These delineations, in turn, may guide more granular, focused, and targeted treatment strategies based on more precise characterizations of the illness. Here, we review potential CFS biomarkers related to neurological and immunological components of the illness, and discuss how these biomarkers may be used to move the field of CFS forward, emphasizing clinical utility and potential routes of future research.

 

Source: Fischer DB, William AH, Strauss AC, Unger ER, Jason L, Marshall GD Jr, Dimitrakoff JD. Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: The Current Status and Future Potentials of Emerging Biomarkers. Fatigue. 2014 Jun 1;2(2):93-109. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4052724/ (Full article)

 

A comparative review of systemic and neurological symptomatology in 12 outbreaks collectively described as chronic fatigue syndrome, epidemic neuromyasthenia, and myalgic encephalomyelitis

Abstract:

Outbreaks of illnesses of unknown etiology typified by a chronic relapsing course of constitutional symptoms and nervous system involvement have collectively been referred to as chronic fatigue syndrome, epidemic neuromyasthenia, and myalgic encephalomyelitis. To examine heterogeneity of clinical presentation, a comparative review was undertaken for 12 well-documented outbreaks reported since 1934.

A systemic syndrome characterized by excessive fatigue, myalgias, headache, low-grade fever, and other constitutional symptoms was common to cases in all outbreaks. However, marked heterogeneity in the range of neurological features was apparent.

On the basis of predominant neurological manifestations, outbreaks could be grouped into four levels of increasing neurological involvement: affective neuropsychological changes (level I); prominent cutaneous sensory symptoms with both affective and cognitive neuropsychological changes (level II); marked objective paresis with cutaneous sensory as well as affective and cognitive neuropsychological changes (level III); and cutaneous sensory, affective and cognitive neuropsychological, posterior column, cranial nerve, and mixed upper and lower motor neuron changes (level IV). Groups with the most prominent objective neurological findings (levels III and IV) comprised exclusively outbreaks reported between the 1930s and 1950s. All but one outbreak in groups with less prominent neurological findings (levels I and II) were reported between the 1960s and 1980s; a range of neurological features was observed for these groups.

Because a complete neurological examination is not emphasized as part of the diagnostic workup in current outbreaks, it is possible that less obvious neurological findings may be overlooked. Careful evaluation of neurological features in epidemic and endemic cases of what is now called chronic fatigue syndrome may be one approach to distinguishing subtypes of what has been described in the past as a nosological entity.

 

Source: Briggs NC, Levine PH. A comparative review of systemic and neurological symptomatology in 12 outbreaks collectively described as chronic fatigue syndrome, epidemic neuromyasthenia, and myalgic encephalomyelitis. Clin Infect Dis. 1994 Jan;18 Suppl 1:S32-42. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8148451