neurasthenia – Page 3 – American ME and CFS Society

Chronic fatigue syndrome. Clinical, social psychological problems and management

Abstract:

Fatigue chronic syndrome (SFC) is the heir-at-law of neurasthenia. Both are seen like physical diseases and share certain therapeutic measures, such as sleep; they have the same symbolic function and enable patients as well as doctors reluctant to psychological dimensions of pathology, to get and express sympathy and attention. A strong controversy developed these last years concerning the SFC physiopathology particularly concerning the responsibility of viral infectious agents or psychiatric troubles.

The SFC fatigue is unlikely hysterical or neuromuscular but it probably depends on several associated factors; cerebral neurobiochemistry anomalies (possibly induced by an infection or immune reactions), effort perception trouble, affective trouble, lack of physical activity. The handicap seems to be worse on account of unsuitable care and inefficacious treatment. Especially sleep, which is often beneficial in a short term, is source of ulterior chronicisation. Antidepressants are the only justified pharmacological treatment for SFC at the moment. Referring to the existence and the nature of cognitive distortions, the author suggests a cognitive-behavioural therapy, whose aim is a progressive activity resumption.

Source: Wessely S. Chronic fatigue syndrome. Clinical, social psychological problems and management. Encephale. 1994 Nov;20 Spec No 3:581-95. [Article in French] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7843055

Neurasthenia, yesterday and today

Abstract:

Neurasthenia was described and explained in very mechanistic terms, at the end of the 19th century, by G.M. Beard to account for physical and mental exhaustion and for varied somatic troubles imputed to failure of too much solicited nervous resources. This concept was then universally adopted and gave rise to diverse interpretations, among which was the Freud’s one. Later, in Occident, came a deterioration, the diagnostic of neurasthenia giving way to those of anxious or affective disorders. In the same time, at least for ideological and cultural reasons, the concept remained lively in Russia and in Asia. During the last decade the western psychiatry has been led to accept that there are clinical situations focussed on fatigue and fatigability, even if it coined for them new terminologies (post-infectious fatigue, chronic fatigue syndrome, etc.) and while DSMs keep on ignoring neurasthenia, the ICD 10 gives it an important place.

Source: Pichot P. Neurasthenia, yesterday and today. Encephale. 1994 Nov;20 Spec No 3:545-9.[Article in French] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7843049

Chronic fatigue syndrome and psychiatric diseases

Abstract:

The chronic fatigue syndrome consists of a combination of non-specific symptoms. Some believe that the CFS is subcategory of major depression, because the symptoms are similar to those of major depression. We believe that the CFS is quite different from major depression or neurotic depression, since the CFS has no lack of initiative and effort, no inhibition which is seen in endogenous depression, and sharp fluctuations in general fatigue, anxiety, and various persisting somatic symptoms, such as, malaise and mild fever. CFS seems to be similar to the neurasthenia. It is harmful, at least, in aetiology and treatment, to neglect the diagnosis of the CFS.

Source: Matsuno T, Hikita K, Matsuo T. Chronic fatigue syndrome and psychiatric diseases. Nihon Rinsho. 1994 May;52(5):1339-44. [Article in Japanese] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8007411

Chronic fatigue in primary care attenders

Abstract:

From 686 patients attending primary care physicians, 77 were identified by a screening procedure as having chronic fatigue. Of these, 65 were given a comprehensive psychological, social and physical evaluation.

Seventeen cases (26%) met criteria for the chronic fatigue syndrome. Forty-seven (72%) received an ICD-9 diagnosis of whom 23 had neurotic depression, with a further 5 meeting criteria for neurasthenia.

Forty-nine were ‘cases’ as defined by the revised Clinical Interview Schedule (CIS-R), and 42 if the fatigue item was excluded. Psychiatric morbidity was more related to levels of social stresses than was severity of fatigue.

The main difference between these subjects and those examined in hospital settings is that the former are less liable to attribute their symptoms to wholly physical causes, including viruses, as opposed to social or psychological factors. Identification and management of persistent fatigue in primary care may prevent the secondary disabilities seen in patients with chronic fatigue syndromes.

Source: McDonald E, David AS, Pelosi AJ, Mann AH. Chronic fatigue in primary care attenders. Psychol Med. 1993 Nov;23(4):987-98. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8134522

The chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

The chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) including myalgic encephalomyelitis and the postviral syndrome is a term used today to describe a not fully recognized disease characterized primarily by chronic or recurrent debilitating fatigue and various combinations of neuromuscular and neuropsychological symptoms. The term CFS has been introduced and defined by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) in Atlanta. Fatigue is one of the most common symptoms in medicine, but CFS as defined by CDC has appeared to be quite rare in the general population. Researchers have suggested that the syndrome is a heterogenous immunologic disorder that follows viral infection, but despite numerous studies on the subject the etiologic factor of the syndrome is unknown. CFS is a controversial diagnosis. In a very high percentage of patients with the CFS depression, phobias or anxiety disorders have frequently preceded the onset of the chronic fatigue. There are many overlapping symptoms between CFS and major depression. Some clinicians suggest that it is not obvious that CFS can be distinguished from neurasthenia.

Source: Białyszewski A. [The chronic fatigue syndrome]. Psychiatr Pol. 1993 Nov-Dec;27(6):601-11 [Article in Polish] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8134494

Chronic fatigue in historical perspective

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue as a presenting complaint, in the absence of other evident organic illness, was seldom reported historically before the second half of the 19th century. Its first eruption was the so-called ‘bed cases’ or ‘sofa cases’ among middle-class females in the period from 1860 to about 1910. ‘Neurasthenia’ does not necessarily represent an early forerunner of chronic fatigue.

Many patients receiving that diagnosis did not complain of fatigue. Others with functional fatigue did not receive the diagnosis ‘neurasthenia’. Both medical-anecdotal and quantitative sources make it clear that by the time of the First World War, chronic fatigue was a common complaint in Europe and North America.

Medical concepts of chronic fatigue since the 1930s have run along four separate lines: (1) ‘postinfectious neuromyasthenia’, going back to an atypical ‘poliomyelitis’ epidemic in 1934; (2) ‘chronic Epstein-Barr virus’ infection, an illness attribution that increased in frequency after the discovery in 1968 that this virus caused mononucleosis; (3) ‘myalgic encephalomyelitis’, dating from an epidemic at the Royal Free Hospital in London in 1955; and (4) ‘fibrositis’, or ‘fibromyalgia’, used as a rheumatological description since the turn of the century. Recently, these four separate paths have tended to converge into the diagnosis of ‘chronic fatigue syndrome’.

Source: Shorter E. Chronic fatigue in historical perspective. Ciba Found Symp. 1993;173:6-16; discussion 16-22. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8491107

Non-pharmacological approaches to treatment

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) as currently defined overlaps with other syndromes including chronic pain, fibromyalgia, anxiety and depression. It also resembles historical descriptions of neurasthenia. The role of psychological (cognitive) and behavioural therapies in CFS is examined.

There are both pragmatic and theoretical arguments for their application to CFS. It is pragmatic to target obvious and treatable factors including inactivity and depression. A theoretical model in which psychological, physiological and social factors interact offers a plausible rationale for such treatment but is not yet empirically proven. While there is evidence for the efficacy of this type of therapy in related syndromes, the evidence in CFS is inconclusive.

A randomized controlled trial of combined cognitive and behavioural therapy currently in progress is described. Initial results suggest that most patients receiving cognitive behaviour therapy improve, especially in terms of functional impairment. It remains to be seen whether this therapy will prove to be more effective than standard general practitioner care. In the meantime cognitive behaviour therapy offers a pragmatic and rational therapy for patients with CFS.

Source: Sharpe M. Non-pharmacological approaches to treatment. Ciba Found Symp. 1993;173:298-308; discussion 308-17. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8491104

Hypothesis: the nasal fatigue reflex

Abstract:

Natural selection results in adaptations. I suggest that unexplained fatigue may be an adaptive response to nasal impairment.

For macrosmatic animals, intact olfaction is necessary to detect predators. In such animals, any reflex (e.g., fatigue) triggered by nasal dysfunction that limited exposure would offer great survival advantage. The “fatigued” animal would remain in its protected environment, unexposed to hungry carnivores, while the nose healed.

In humans, clinical syndromes associated with unexplained fatigue (chronic fatigue syndrome, tension fatigue syndrome, allergic fatigue, neurasthenia, etc.) are characterized by symptoms that, in part, are nasal in origin.

The older medical literature does describe the resolution of fatigue in neurasthenia after nasal treatments. Nasal reflexes in animals do cause significant systemic effects, including an inhibition of muscle action potentials that is, perhaps, analogous to the “heavy-limbed” sensation of those with fatigue.

Furthermore, reflexes similar to the one proposed do exist in humans: the diving reflex presumably served our amphibian ancestors well as an oxygen conserving technique with submersion, but serves no known useful function now. Other human nasopharyngeal reflexes with profound cardiovascular and systemic effects are well described but only occasionally studied. The proposed nasal fatigue reflex should be examined as a possible ancient adaptive response to nasal malfunction.

Source: Chester AC. Hypothesis: the nasal fatigue reflex. Integr Physiol Behav Sci. 1993 Jan-Mar;28(1):76-83. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8476744

Culture and somatic experience: the social course of illness in neurasthenia and chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

An anthropological view of culture and somatic experience is presented through elaboration of the notion that illness has a social course. Contemporary anthropology locates culture in local worlds of interpersonal experience. The flow of events and processes in these local worlds influences the waxing and waning of symptoms in a dialectic involving body and society over time.

Conversely, symptoms serve as a medium for the negotiation of interpersonal experience, forming a series of illness-related changes in sufferers’ local worlds. Thus, somatic experience is both created by and creates culture throughout the social course of illness. Findings from empirical research on neurasthenia in China, and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in the United States, corroborate this formulation. Attributions of illness onset to social sources, the symbolic linking of symptoms to life context, and the alleviation of distress with improvement in circumstances point to the sociosomatic mediation of sickness.

Transformations occasioned by illness in the lives of neurasthenic and CFS patients confirm the significance of bodily distress as a vehicle for the negotiation of change in interpersonal worlds. An indication of some of the challenges anthropological thinking poses for psychosomatic medicine concludes the discussion.

Source: Ware NC, Kleinman A. Culture and somatic experience: the social course of illness in neurasthenia and chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychosom Med. 1992 Sep-Oct;54(5):546-60. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1438658

Neurasthenia and chronic fatigue syndrome: the role of culture in the making of a diagnosis

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome is an increasingly popular diagnosis consisting of multiple psychiatric and somatic symptoms. It bears a striking resemblance to the nineteenth-century diagnosis of . Both disorders arose during periods characterized by a preoccupation with commerce and material success and major changes in the role of women. They illustrate the role of culture in the development of a new diagnosis that emphasizes a “medical” rather than “psychiatric” etiology. The authors argue that chronic fatigue syndrome will meet the same fate as neurasthenia–a decline in social value as it is demonstrated that the majority of its sufferers are experiencing primary psychiatric disorders or psychophysiological reactions and that the disorder is often a culturally sanctioned form of illness behavior.

Comment in:

Taking chronic fatigue syndrome seriously. [Am J Psychiatry. 1992]

Source: Abbey SE, Garfinkel PE. Neurasthenia and chronic fatigue syndrome: the role of culture in the making of a diagnosis. Am J Psychiatry. 1991 Dec;148(12):1638-46. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1957925