Tag: medical attitudes

Chronic fatigue syndrome: a patient’s perspective

In 1999 I contracted a throat infection that receded after many weeks, but I was still unbelievably exhausted with the most intense flu-like malaise. Two years later I was diagnosed with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) and joined the 240 000-plus people in the UK with this illness. I assumed that a diagnosis would lead to effective treatment, but I was in for a shock.

Initially my GP suggested I see a psychotherapist. It seemed a strange recommendation, but I trusted his judgement and decided to see if this would help. Unfortunately it had no impact at all on the illness. My GP then referred me to an endocrinologist who boldly announced that, as the test results were all normal, everything was fine and offered to prescribe antidepressants. I was deeply frustrated by the suggestion that clear test panels meant I should be treated as a depressed patient. I was not inclined to agree that antidepressants were the best treatment when my experience of the symptoms was closer to that of an infection than a mood disorder. In fact, I have been told a number of times that I’m simply depressed, or that I am de-conditioned and just need to exercise. I wouldn’t mind if either diagnosis were true, as there are effective treatments available, but they are inadequate explanations.

CFS/ME waxes and wanes but also causes post-exertional malaise: when patients go beyond their usual (restricted) activity level they suffer a worsening of symptoms which can be severe. Patients often refer to this as a crash. For me this can mean being bedridden for weeks with muscle weakness, dizziness, loss of appetite, and indescribable physical and mental exhaustion. It’s worth noting that my GP has only ever seen me when the symptoms are at the lesser end of the scale. During a crash I am too ill to leave my bed, let alone travel to the surgery.

When I first got sick, CFS/ME seemed to be largely treated as a mysterious psychological condition, with doctors encouraged to limit the number of tests done, and with patients left to self-manage. Since then things have improved a little in that there are fatigue clinics in some areas, but the overall treatment situation remains poor, with most patients receiving little or no effective treatment through the NHS.

The PACE trial is the largest study performed into CFS/ME treatments, primarily cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and graded exercise therapy (GET). I think the £5 million cost would have been better spent on immunological studies, exercise physiology testing, and understanding the disease mechanisms. A recently published PACE trial paper reported on ‘recovery’ rates.1 However, the letters published in response to the paper show that the study’s post-hoc definition of ‘recovery’ was seriously flawed, and so much looser than the recovery criteria outlined in the trial’s protocol that the ‘recovery’ outcomes bear no relation to what an average person, or clinician, would define as recovery of health. PACE was an un-blinded study and the primary outcomes were all subjective self-report measures at risk of response bias. Changes from the trial protocol2 also meant that it was easier for patients to be classed as improved, yet even then the addition of CBT and GET to specialist medical care led to only an extra 11–15% of patients reporting improvement.3 This simply underscores the need for more research across all areas to find effective treatments.

CFS/ME presents difficulties for both patients and doctors, reinforcing the need for them to work together in partnership. A recent BMJ editorial4 entitled Let the Patient Revolution Begin could not have said it better:

‘ … health care won’t get better until patients play a leading role in fixing it.’

You can read the full comment here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3839372/

 

Source: Cornes O. Chronic fatigue syndrome: a patient’s perspective. Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Dec;63(617):648. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X675458. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3839372/ (Full article)

 

Understanding medical students’ views of chronic fatigue syndrome: a qualitative study

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome receives little attention in the medical curriculum. This study explores UK medical students’ knowledge of and attitudes towards chronic fatigue syndrome. Semi-structured interviews (average length 22 minutes) were conducted with 21 participants (7 females and 14 males) in years 3 (n = 4), 4 (n = 11) and 5 (n = 6) of their studies. Inductive thematic analysis taking a realist perspective produced three themes: limited knowledge, influences on attitudes and training needs.

Students acquired their knowledge and attitudes largely from informal sources and expressed difficulty understanding chronic fatigue syndrome within a traditional biomedical framework. Incorporating teaching about chronic fatigue syndrome into the medical curriculum within the context of a biopsychosocial understanding of illness could encourage more positive attitudes towards chronic fatigue syndrome.

© The Author(s) 2013

 

Source: Stenhoff AL, Sadreddini S, Peters S, Wearden A. Understanding medical students’ views of chronic fatigue syndrome: a qualitative study. J Health Psychol. 2015 Feb;20(2):198-209. doi: 10.1177/1359105313501534. Epub 2013 Sep 20. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24058124

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome–a patient centred approach to management

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Chronic fatigue syndrome (myalgic encephalomyelitis) is a diagnosis that can attract feelings of stigma in the patient due to the lack of a definite diagnostic biomarker. To ensure that the patient firstly understands the diagnosis, and subsequently is comfortable with the treatment suggested, a patient centred approach is advised within the consultation.

OBJECTIVE: This article presents a hypothetical case and uses this to give guidance on methods for negotiating the diagnosis and treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome.

DISCUSSION: It is important to reassure the patient that negative investigation results and the suggestion of treatment options that are also used for depressive illness (eg. antidepressants and cognitive behavioural therapy), does not mean that their illness experience is fabricated or that they are being treated for depression. Once red flag features are ruled out and any exclusory illnesses identified, a multidisciplinary pragmatic rehabilitation program can be implemented. This includes strategies for increasing social support, liaising with employers and graded return to activities in a ‘What matters to you?’ approach.

 

Source: Arroll M, Arroll B. Chronic fatigue syndrome–a patient centred approach to management. Aust Fam Physician. 2013 Apr;42(4):191-3. http://www.racgp.org.au/afp/2013/april/chronic-fatigue-syndrome/ (Full article)

 

Views on the nature of chronic fatigue syndrome: content analysis

Abstract:

OBJECTIVES: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), also known as myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME), has provoked much controversy and led to arguments between the medical profession and patient organizations. A particular focus for debate is the categorization of the condition as physical or psychological in its nature. The aim of this study was to compare how the written media, patient organizations and medical authorities regard the illness.

DESIGN: Content analysis of newspaper articles, ME patient organization websites, and medical websites and textbooks were assessed by two independent assessors.

SETTING:Three national UK newspapers, UK ME websites, and UK medical websites and textbooks, were accessed during 2010.

PARTICIPANTS: 146 source files were scored from 36 patients’ organizations, 72 media articles and 38 medical authorities.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURED: The overall opinion of an article or website was rated using a five point Likert scale, from ‘extremely psychological’ (scored as 1), ‘moderately psychological’ (2), ‘both psychological and physical’ (3), ‘moderately physical’ (4) or ‘extremely physical’ (5).

RESULTS: Eighty-nine percent (32 of 36) of ME patient organizations considered the illness to be physical, compared with 58% (42/72) of newspaper articles, and 24% (9/38) of medical authorities. Sixty-three percent (24/38) of medical authorities regarded the illness as both physical and psychological. The inter-group differences of the Likert scores were statistically significant (χ(2) = 27.37, 2 df, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION: The considerable disagreement, particularly between ME patient organizations and medical authorities, may help to explain the gulf in understanding between doctors and patients and the consequent reluctance of some patients to engage in behavioural treatments.

 

Source: Hossenbaccus Z, White PD. Views on the nature of chronic fatigue syndrome: content analysis. JRSM Short Rep. 2013 Jan;4(1):4. doi: 10.1258/shorts.2012.012051. Epub 2013 Jan 14. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3572659/ (Full articles)

 

Do you think it’s a disease? a survey of medical students

Abstract:

BACKGROUND:

The management of medical conditions is influenced by whether clinicians regard them as “disease” or “not a disease”. The aim of the survey was to determine how medical students classify a range of conditions they might encounter in their professional lives and whether a different name for a condition would influence their decision in the categorisation of the condition as a ‘disease’ or ‘not a disease’.

METHODS: We surveyed 3 concurrent years of medical students to classify 36 candidate conditions into “disease” and “non-disease”. The conditions were given a ‘medical’ label and a (lay) label and positioned where possible in alternate columns of the survey.

RESULTS: The response rate was 96% (183 of 190 students attending a lecture): 80% of students concurred on 16 conditions as “disease” (eg diabetes, tuberculosis), and 4 as “non-disease” (eg baldness, menopause, fractured skull and heat stroke). The remaining 16 conditions (with 21-79% agreement) were more contentious (especially obesity, infertility, hay fever, alcoholism, and restless leg syndrome). Three pairs of conditions had both a more, and a less, medical label: the more medical labels (myalgic encephalomyelitis, hypertension, and erectile dysfunction) were more frequently classified as ‘disease’ than the less medical (chronic fatigue syndrome, high blood pressure, and impotence), respectively, significantly different for the first two pairs.

CONCLUSIONS: Some conditions excluded from the classification of “disease” were unexpected (eg fractured skull and heat stroke). Students were mostly concordant on what conditions should be classified as “disease”. They were more likely to classify synonyms as ‘disease’ if the label was medical. The findings indicate there is still a problem 30 years on in the concept of ‘what is a disease’. Our findings suggest that we should be addressing such concepts to medical students.

 

Source: Erueti C, Glasziou P, Mar CD, van Driel ML. Do you think it’s a disease? a survey of medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2012 Apr 3;12:19. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-19. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3383512/ (Full article)

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome: labels, meanings and consequences

Abstract:

In this month’s issue, we report a survey of members of the Association of British Neurologists, which asked if they viewed chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) as a neurological condition–84% of respondents did not. This is at odds with current classification in ICD-10. We discuss the difficulties of classifying CFS and myalgic encephalopmeylitis (ME), including historical and sociological factors, the pitfalls of the physical/psychological dichotomy and why classification matters to doctors and patients.

 

Source: Wojcik W, Armstrong D, Kanaan R. Chronic fatigue syndrome: labels, meanings and consequences. J Psychosom Res. 2011 Jun;70(6):500-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2011.02.002. Epub 2011 Apr 9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21624573

 

U.S. healthcare providers’ knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and perceptions concerning Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a debilitating illness with particular difficulties for healthcare providers because there are no diagnostic signs or laboratory tests and because management aims to merely improve symptoms. Further complicating management, healthcare providers’ awareness concerning CFS has not been rigorously assessed. The present study aimed to ascertain United States (U.S.) healthcare providers’ awareness of CFS and to assess their knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs (KAB) related to diagnosis and management of the illness. This information forms the foundation for developing CFS educational strategies.

METHODS: We combined convenience and probability samples to measure CFS KAB among healthcare providers. In the convenience sample, 1,255 healthcare providers (81% response rate) from 13 professional conferences completed a 12-item form. Descriptive statistics were reported for 9 KAB item responses and chi-square tests were performed for examining their association with giving a diagnosis of CFS. We used principal component analysis to construct multidimensional subscales and perform a general linear model to examine factors associated with subscales. The probability sample involved data on 15 CFS-specific questions from 2006 and 2007 DocStyles web-based panel surveys collected from 2,750 physicians (average response rate 55%). We calculated descriptive and chi-square statistics. The significance was set at two-tailed with the alpha level of 0.05.

RESULTS: Healthcare providers in both samples were aware of CFS and exhibited a high level of knowledge. Overall, 96% of respondents in the DocStyles (probability) sample had heard about CFS. Healthcare providers in the conference (convenience) sample demonstrated good KAB scores; physicians’ scores were highest on KAB scales and lowest in perception. Nurses’ scores were lowest in knowledge. More than 40% of physicians reported ever giving a CFS diagnosis and in the DocStyles (probability) sample more than 80% of physicians correctly identified CFS symptoms. Physicians reported professional journals, the Internet, and continuing education programs as the top 3 sources from which they obtain CFS information.

CONCLUSIONS: Findings from these combined samples fill a gap in the evidence-base of U.S. healthcare providers’ and knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs concerning CFS. Importantly, respondents in both samples expressed similar knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and perceptions. Awareness was high and negative attitudes were low. The primary areas for future education should address diagnosis and management of CFS and should be delivered through those venues providers indicated they primarily use. Data from this study provide a benchmark for evaluation the success of these future efforts.

 

Source: Brimmer DJ, Fridinger F, Lin JM, Reeves WC. U.S. healthcare providers’ knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and perceptions concerning Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Apr 21;11:28. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-28. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2875206/ (Full article)

 

The doctor-patient relationship in chronic fatigue syndrome: survey of patient perspectives

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: When confronted with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), general practitioners (GPs) need to deal with diverse complaints. This may introduce a sense of powerlessness and frustration in the GP, which could possibly undermine the doctor-patient relationship.

AIM: Our aim was to list the perspectives of patients with CFS regarding the medical encounter.

METHOD: This was a questionnaire study of systematically selected patients presenting to a tertiary clinic specialising in CFS. A questionnaire was presented to every third patient attending the clinic. Statistical computations were performed using the SPSS statistical package.

RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-seven patients completed the questionnaire. A diagnosis of CFS was made by a GP in 8% of the cases. In 31% of the cases the GP had experience with general CFS complaints, and 35% of the GPs showed experience in CFS. Only 23% reported sufficient knowledge to treat the condition. According to the patients surveyed, 35% felt that their GP had experience in dealing with CFS.

CONCLUSIONS: The heterogeneity of CFS and the controversy surrounding this condition seemed to overwhelm GPs and strain the medical encounter. Patients with CFS seemed unsatisfied with the interaction with their doctor. Moreover, the results show that CFS is not addressed well by the medical community, and the failure to diagnose leads to a lack of empathetic care, with consequential loss of the capacity of the doctor to act as a healer.

 

Source: Van Hoof E. The doctor-patient relationship in chronic fatigue syndrome: survey of patient perspectives. Qual Prim Care. 2009;17(4):263-70. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19807959

 

Functional somatic syndromes from the view of cultural anthropology

Abstract:

The functional somatic syndromes have acquired major socio-cultural and political dimensions. Socio-cultural factors clearly affect symptoms, suffering, and disability perception and reporting. And knowledge of explanatory models of bodily distress for patients from different cultural backgrounds is useful in the establishment of a stable doctor -patient relationship. FSS may be an operational category to bridge between medical explanatory model and patient’s model. According to medical anthropology, sickness has two faces; illness and disease. “Disease” is the problem from the practitioner’s perspective, and “illness” is the human experience of symptoms and suffering. In this paper, the anthropological research on chronic fatigue syndrome as “not real” illness experience was described.

 

Source: Nakagami A, Tsujiuchi T. Functional somatic syndromes from the view of cultural anthropology. Nihon Rinsho. 2009 Sep;67(9):1683-8. [Article in Japanese] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19768901

 

Practice Nurses’ views of their role in the management of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalagic Encephalitis: a qualitative study

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: NICE guidelines suggest that patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalitis (CFS/ME) should be managed in Primary Care. Practice Nurses are increasingly being involved in the management of long-term conditions, so are likely to also have a growing role in managing CFS/ME. However their attitudes to, and experiences of patients with CFS/ME and its management must be explored to understand what barriers may exist in developing their role for this group of patients. The aim of this study was to explore Practice Nurses’ understanding and beliefs about CFS/ME and its management.

METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with 29 Practice Nurses. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and an iterative approach used to develop themes from the dataset.

RESULTS: Practice nurses had limited understanding about CFS/ME which had been largely gained through contact with patients, friends, personal experiences and the media rather than formal training. They had difficulty seeing CFS/ME as a long term condition. They did identify a potential role they could have in management of CFS/ME but devalued their own skills in psychological intervention, and suggested counselling would be an appropriate therapeutic option. They recognised a need for further training and on going supervision from both medical and psychological colleagues. Some viewed the condition as contentious and held pejorative views about CFS/ME. Such scepticism and negative attitudes will be a significant barrier to the management of patients with CFS/ME in primary care.

CONCLUSION: The current role of Practice Nurses in the ongoing management of patients with CFS/ME is limited. Practice Nurses have little understanding of the evidence-base for treatment of CFS/ME, particularly psychological therapies, describing management options in terms of advice giving, self-help or counselling. Practice Nurses largely welcomed the potential development of their role in this area, but identified barriers and training needs which must be addressed to enable them to feel confident managing of patients with this condition. Training must begin by addressing negative attitudes to patients with CFS/ME.

 

Source: Chew-Graham C, Dixon R, Shaw JW, Smyth N, Lovell K, Peters S. Practice Nurses’ views of their role in the management of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalagic Encephalitis: a qualitative study. BMC Nurs. 2009 Jan 22;8:2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6955-8-2. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2635361/ (Full article)