Tag: ME/CFS vs depression

Use and Perceived Helpfulness of Different Intervention Strategies in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Depression

Abstract:

Background: Patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) or depression both frequently report debilitating exhaustion, yet the two conditions differ in their etiological and diagnostic clarity, and clinical management. This study aimed to examine differences in the use and perceived helpfulness of a broad range of conventional treatments and complementary interventions, including nutritional approaches, between patients with ME/CFS and depression.

Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted in 2024. A total of 819 participants self-identified as having either ME/CFS (n = 576) or depression (n = 243). Participants (80% female) reported their use and perceived helpfulness of 52 treatments and interventions, encompassing behavioral therapies, medications, and dietary supplements. Group differences were examined using multivariate analyses of variance and covariance (MANOVA/MANCOVA). Open-ended responses were analyzed descriptively using thematic grouping and frequency counts.

Results: Participants with depression most commonly reported the use of psychotherapy (M = 2.49, SD = 1.00) and antidepressant medication (M = 2.44, SD = 2.30), and they rated fewer interventions as helpful compared to participants with ME/CFS. In contrast, participants with ME/CFS reported a significantly broader engagement with diverse intervention modalities, particularly pacing (M = 2.73, SD = 0.80) and dietary supplements (M = 2.43, SD = 1.09), and perceived many of them as helpful. Group differences remained significant after controlling for age, gender, and whether treatment was medically recommended. Supplements targeting energy metabolism (e.g., CoQ10, NADH) were especially favored among ME/CFS participants.

Conclusions: Findings suggest that participants with ME/CFS tend to adopt an exploratory and expansive intervention approach, potentially reflecting the lack of standardized guidelines and limited effectiveness of available treatment options. Participants with depression, in contrast, appeared to follow more guideline-concordant, evidence-based treatment pathways. Taken together, the findings point to a need for further development and evaluation of empirically supported, patient-centered treatment and intervention strategies for ME/CFS and suggest differences in clinical care structures between ME/CFS and depression.

Source: Dorczok MC, Mossaheb N, Mittmann G, Thomas MF, Bartova L, Schrank B, Steiner-Hofbauer V. Use and Perceived Helpfulness of Different Intervention Strategies in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Depression. J Clin Med. 2026 Jan 20;15(2):849. doi: 10.3390/jcm15020849. PMID: 41598786. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/2/849 (Full text)

Relationship between major depressive disorder and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: a two-sample mendelian randomization study analysis

Abstract:

Major depressive disorder (MDD) and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) frequently occur together; yet their causal relationship remains unclear. To investigate the potential genetic causal link between these conditions, we conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis.

Summary data from Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) for MDD were sourced from the UK Biobank and the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, while GWAS data for ME/CFS were retrieved from the UK Biobank. Inverse-variance weighting (IVW), the MR-Egger method, and weighted median, simple and weighted modes were used to perform the MR analysis. In addition, Cochrane’s Q-test was used to detect heterogeneity among the MR results. Horizontal pleiotropy was detected using the MR-Egger intercept and the MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO) tests. Leave-one-out analysis was performed to investigate the sensitivity of the association between MDD and ME/CFS.

The results of the MR analysis revealed no causal relationship between MDD and ME/CFS. The pleiotropy test revealed that causality bias was improbable, and no evidence of heterogeneity was found among the genetic variants. Finally, the leave-one-out test confirmed the stability and robustness of our findings.

Source: Song, W., Hou, X., Wu, M. et al. Relationship between major depressive disorder and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: a two-sample mendelian randomization study analysis. Sci Rep 15, 1155 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-85217-6 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-85217-6 (Full text)

Major Depressive Disorder and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Show Characteristic Heart Rate Variability Profiles Reflecting Autonomic Dysregulations: Differentiation by Linear Discriminant Analysis

Abstract:

Major depressive disorder (MDD) and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) have overlapping symptoms, and differentiation is important to administer the proper treatment.

The present study aimed to assess the usefulness of heart rate variability (HRV) indices.

Frequency-domain HRV indices, including high-frequency (HF) and low-frequency (LF) components, their sum (LF+HF), and their ratio (LF/HF), were measured in a three-behavioral-state paradigm composed of initial rest (Rest), task load (Task), and post-task rest (After) periods to examine autonomic regulation.

It was found that HF was low at Rest in both disorders, but was lower in MDD than in CFS. LF and LF+HF at Rest were low only in MDD. Attenuated responses of LF, HF, LF+HF, and LF/HF to task load and an excessive increase in HF at After were found in both disorders.

The results indicate that an overall HRV reduction at Rest may support a diagnosis of MDD. HF reduction was found in CFS, but with a lesser severity.

Response disturbances of HRV to Task were observed in both disorders, and would suggest the presence of CFS when the baseline HRV has not been reduced.

Linear discriminant analysis using HRV indices was able to differentiate MDD from CFS, with a sensitivity and specificity of 91.8% and 100%, respectively. HRV indices in MDD and CFS show both common and different profiles, and can be useful for the differential diagnosis.

Source: Shinba T, Kuratsune D, Shinba S, Shinba Y, Sun G, Matsui T, Kuratsune H. Major Depressive Disorder and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Show Characteristic Heart Rate Variability Profiles Reflecting Autonomic Dysregulations: Differentiation by Linear Discriminant Analysis. Sensors. 2023; 23(11):5330. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23115330 https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/11/5330 (Full text)