Chronic debilitating fatigue in Irish general practice: a survey of general practitioners’ experience

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Doctors are called upon to treat chronic debilitating fatigue without the help of a protocol of care.

AIMS: To estimate the incidence of chronic debilitating fatigue in Irish general practice, to obtain information on management strategy and outcome, to explore the attitudes of practitioners (GPs) towards the concept of a chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), and to recruit practitioners to a prospective study of chronic fatigue in primary care.

METHOD: A total of 200 names were selected from the database of the Irish College of General Practitioners (ICGP); 164 of these were eligible for the study.

RESULTS: Altogether, 118 questionnaires were returned (72%). Ninety-two (78%) responders identified cases of chronic fatigue, giving an estimated 2.1 cases per practice and an incidence of 1 per 1000 population. All social classes were represented, with a male to female ratio of 1:2. Eleven disparate approaches to treatment were advocated. Many (38%) were dissatisfied with the quality of care delivered, and 45% seldom or hardly ever referred cases for specialist opinion. The majority (58%) accepted CFS as a distinct entity, 34% were undecided, and 8% rejected it. Forty-two (35%) GPs volunteered for a prospective study.

CONCLUSION: Chronic fatigue is found in Irish general practice among patients of both sexes and all social classes. Doctors differ considerably in their management of patients and are dissatisfied with the quality of care they deliver. Many cases are not referred for specialist opinion. A prospective database is required to accurately assess the scale of this public health problem and to develop a protocol of care.

 

Source: Fitzgibbon EJ, Murphy D, O’Shea K, Kelleher C. Chronic debilitating fatigue in Irish general practice: a survey of general practitioners’ experience. Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Oct;47(423):618-22. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1410094/ (Full article)

 

Managing chronic fatigue syndrome in children

Last month the British press made much of a study purporting to show that chronic fatigue syndrome was the single commonest cause of long term absence from school in Britain.1 The authors claimed to have calculated prevalence figures for both pupils (0.07%) and teachers (0.5%) similar to previously reported figures for the general population.2-4 Dowsett and Colby make much of “clusters” of cases, defined as three or more cases in a school. The press release distributed by one of the authors states that 39% of cases occurred in such clusters, saying that this “suggests that ME results from an infection.” It refers to one cluster extending over several schools in an area where there was “recreational water heavily polluted by sewage.” The published paper contains no reference to pollution by sewage or anything else, but only to several cases in “schools near two new towns in a rural environment alongside recreational water.”

You can read the full article here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2126833/pdf/9193280.pdf

Comment in:

Graded exercise in chronic fatigue syndrome. Including patients who rated themselves as a little better would have altered results. [BMJ. 1997]

Chronic fatigue syndrome in children. Journal was wrong to critizise study in schoolchildren. [BMJ. 1997]

Chronic fatigue syndrome in children. Patient organisations are denied a voice. [BMJ. 1997]

Comment on:

Randomised controlled trial of graded exercise in patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome. [BMJ. 1997]

 

Source: Marcovitch H. Managing chronic fatigue syndrome in children. BMJ. 1997 Jun 7;314(7095):1635-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2126833/pdf/9193280.pdf (Full article)

 

Randomised controlled trial of graded exercise in patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To test the efficacy of a graded aerobic exercise programme in the chronic fatigue syndrome.

DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial with control treatment crossover after the first follow up examination.

SETTING: Chronic fatigue clinic in a general hospital department of psychiatry.

SUBJECTS: 66 patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome who had neither a psychiatric disorder nor appreciable sleep disturbance.

INTERVENTIONS: Random allocation to 12 weeks of either graded aerobic exercise or flexibility exercises and relaxation therapy. Patients who completed the flexibility programme were invited to cross over to the exercise programme afterwards.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The self rated clinical global impression change score, “very much better” or “much better” being considered as clinically important.

RESULTS: Four patients receiving exercise and three receiving flexibility treatment dropped out before completion. 15 of 29 patients rated themselves as better after completing exercise treatment compared with eight of 30 patients who completed flexibility treatment. Analysis by intention to treat gave similar results (17/33 v 9/33 patients better). Fatigue, functional capacity, and fitness were significantly better after exercise than after flexibility treatment. 12 of 22 patients who crossed over to exercise after flexibility treatment rated themselves as better after completing exercise treatment 32 of 47 patients rated themselves as better three months after completing supervised exercise treatment 35 of 47 patients rated themselves as better one year after completing supervised exercise treatment.

CONCLUSION: These findings support the use of appropriately prescribed graded aerobic exercise in the management of patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome.

Comment in:

Graded exercise in chronic fatigue syndrome. Including patients who rated themselves as a little better would have altered results. [BMJ. 1997]

Managing chronic fatigue syndrome in children. [BMJ. 1997]

Graded exercise in chronic fatigue syndrome. Chronic fatigue syndrome is heterogeneous condition. [BMJ. 1997]

Graded exercise in chronic fatigue syndrome. Patients should have initial period of rest before gradual increase in activity. [BMJ. 1997]

Graded exercise in chronic fatigue syndrome. Patients were selected group. [BMJ. 1997]

 

Source: Fulcher KY, White PD. Randomised controlled trial of graded exercise in patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome. BMJ. 1997 Jun 7;314(7095):1647-52. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2126868/ (Full article)

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome. Definition, diagnostic measures and therapeutic possibilities

Abstract:

This article reviews the chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), a disorder whose etiology is unknown. The diagnostic criteria proposed in 1994 by the CDC and the International Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Study Group are introduced.

In contrast to widespread belief, there are no laboratory tests available to underpin the diagnosis of CFS; the diagnosis is made solely on the basis of clinical criteria. In the differential diagnosis, the exclusion of other conditions that can cause chronic fatigue, such as neuropsychiatric or sleep disorders, is of critical importance.

In this context, the question as to whether CFS is a clinical entity that can be differentiated from psychiatric diagnoses, such as depression, somatoform disorder, or neurasthenia, is discussed. At the moment, there is no specific therapy for CFS. Therefore, therapeutic approaches are limited to symptomatic management of the concomitant sleep disturbances, pain, or psychiatric symptoms, such as depression.

Patients may benefit from cognitive behavioral therapy, as this may help then to identify and exclude factors contributing to and maintaining chronic fatigue. An integrated medical and psychological approach should be adopted, with the aim of preventing significant secondary negative results of the illness, such as interpersonal conflicts or chronic disability.

Comment in: “Chronic fatigue syndrome“. Nervenarzt. 1997

 

Source: Lieb K, Dammann G, Berger M, Bauer J. Chronic fatigue syndrome. Definition, diagnostic measures and therapeutic possibilities. Nervenarzt. 1996 Sep;67(9):711-20. [Article in German] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8992368

 

Chronic fatigue in primary care attenders

Abstract:

From 686 patients attending primary care physicians, 77 were identified by a screening procedure as having chronic fatigue. Of these, 65 were given a comprehensive psychological, social and physical evaluation.

Seventeen cases (26%) met criteria for the chronic fatigue syndrome. Forty-seven (72%) received an ICD-9 diagnosis of whom 23 had neurotic depression, with a further 5 meeting criteria for neurasthenia.

Forty-nine were ‘cases’ as defined by the revised Clinical Interview Schedule (CIS-R), and 42 if the fatigue item was excluded. Psychiatric morbidity was more related to levels of social stresses than was severity of fatigue.

The main difference between these subjects and those examined in hospital settings is that the former are less liable to attribute their symptoms to wholly physical causes, including viruses, as opposed to social or psychological factors. Identification and management of persistent fatigue in primary care may prevent the secondary disabilities seen in patients with chronic fatigue syndromes.

 

Source: McDonald E, David AS, Pelosi AJ, Mann AH. Chronic fatigue in primary care attenders. Psychol Med. 1993 Nov;23(4):987-98. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8134522

 

Evaluation and management of patients with chronic fatigue

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue is a common and disabling problem in primary care practice. The differential diagnosis of chronic fatigue is extensive and includes medical disorders, altered physiologic states (eg, pregnancy, exertion), psychiatric disorders, lifestyle derangements, drugs, and controversial entities (eg, chronic candidiasis, food allergies, environmental illness, and chronic fatigue syndrome). The most common diagnoses are psychiatric disorders, including mood, anxiety, and somatoform disorders.

A comprehensive approach to diagnosis and management is necessary, including structured psychiatric interviewing, functional assessment, and elicitation of the patient’s diagnostic beliefs. Patients often believe they are suffering from an organic medical disorder (eg, viral or immunologic) and resist psychiatric labelling of their symptoms and referral to mental health practitioners. Establishing and maintaining rapport, having a flexible approach, and demonstrating a personal concern for the patient is essential. Drug therapy for specific psychiatric and medical illnesses and cognitive-behavioral approaches for enhancing coping mechanisms are effective.

 

Source: Matthews DA, Manu P, Lane TJ. Evaluation and management of patients with chronic fatigue. Am J Med Sci. 1991 Nov;302(5):269-77. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1750445

 

Psychiatric management of PVFS

Abstract:

Psychiatric management of PVFS (considered as a subtype of CFS) is a pragmatic approach to a disorder for which strictly biomedical treatments have so far had little to offer. Psychiatric assessment embraces a comprehensive (biopsychosocial) approach, and distinguishes factors that perpetuate the condition from those that may have precipitated it. Treatments are targeted at perpetuating factors.

Few controlled treatment trials have been reported in patients selected specifically as meeting criteria for CFS. There is evidence available, however, that suggests useful management strategies. An uncontrolled study of treatment of CFS with combined antidepressant drug and psychological treatment has produced promising results. In addition there is useful evidence arising from the study and treatment of the individual symptoms of CFS, occurring both in isolation as part of other syndromes.

The results of controlled trials of antidepressant drugs, and of psychological and rehabilitative treatment are awaited. It is already possible to offer provisional guidelines for treatment.

 

Source: Sharpe M. Psychiatric management of PVFS. Br Med Bull. 1991 Oct;47(4):989-1005. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1794095

 

The chronic fatigue syndrome. A multifactorial approach and the treatment possibilities

Abstract:

The chronic fatigue syndrome is a poorly defined symptoms complex characterized primarily by chronic or recurrent debilitating fatigue and various combinations of other symptoms, including psychological symptoms, sore throat, lymph node pain, headache, myalgia, arthralgias. Psychological disturbances, ranging from mild depression or anxiety to severe behavioral abnormalities, are always present. Chronic fatigue syndrome is the name that more accurately describes this symptom complex of unknown cause.

A viral aetiology has long been hypothesized: many viruses are potential candidates, including any of the 23 Coxsackie A or 6 Coxsackie B viruses, herpes viruses, particularly Epstein-Barr virus and varicella. These studies, though interesting, remain unconvincing because of methodological flaws such as a poor case definition and inadequate control groups.

This syndrome may represent an infection by a yet unidentified virus. It is more likely due to an abnormal immune response toward different intracellular pathogens. There is no treatment to ameliorate the chronic fatigue syndrome. Epidemiological studies are essential with explicit operational case definition before progress can be made in the management of this distressing disorder.

 

Source: Pinardi G, Scarlato G. The chronic fatigue syndrome. A multifactorial approach and the treatment possibilities. Recenti Prog Med. 1990 Dec;81(12):773-7. [Article in Italian] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2075278

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome and the psychiatrist

Abstract:

The number of patients who are identified as having chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) has increased, and as a result, chronic fatigue syndrome has received widespread attention. Research has demonstrated that cognitive, affective and behavioural symptoms are prominent in CFS. Psychiatrists are therefore being asked to participate in the assessment and management of patients with this syndrome. This paper will provide an overview of the clinical characteristics of CFS and the current empirical findings related to its pathology, and will conclude with a discussion of the management of these patients.

 

Source:  Abbey SE, Garfinkel PE. Chronic fatigue syndrome and the psychiatrist. Can J Psychiatry. 1990 Oct;35(7):625-33. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2268845

 

Patient management of post-viral fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

A case definition for post-viral fatigue syndrome is proposed within which various subgroups of patients exist. Any one treatment may not apply to all the subgroups. In particular, patients’ experiences do not show that avoidance of exercise is maladaptive. It is proposed that the recently ill often try to exercise to fitness whereas the chronically ill have learnt to avoid exercise. Recovery is more likely to be achieved if patients learn about their illness and do not exhaust their available energy.

 

Source: Ho-Yen DO. Patient management of post-viral fatigue syndrome. Br J Gen Pract. 1990 Jan;40(330):37-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2107839

Note: You may read the full article here:  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1371214/