Tag: low-dose hydrocortisone

Cost-effectiveness of cognitive behaviour therapy for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome

Sir,

In their economic evaluations of treatments for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), Severens et al. compared the cost-effectiveness of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) with those of other interventions, and found that the percentage of CFS patients who improved with CBT performed for 8 months was 31% vs. 9% and 12% for other treatments. Considering that, in one study, 28% of CFS patients treated with low-dose hydrocortisone over just one month virtually recovered,  Severens et al. also should have compared the cost-effectiveness of CBT with that of low-dose hydrocortisone.

Treatment with low-dose hydrocortisone for CFS, besides being intuitively far less costly than CBT, is also better-founded clinically than any psychological therapy, because hydrocortisone corrects the hypocortisolism that characterizes at least some CFS patients. Given that ‘frank hypocortisolism’, rather surprisingly, was one of the exclusion criteria for enrolment in the trial of Cleare et al., the percentage of CFS patients who can be effectively treated with low-dose hydrocortisone in day-to-day health care is likely to be higher than the 28% found in that trial.

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/content/97/6/378.long

Comment on: Cost-effectiveness of cognitive behaviour therapy for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. [QJM. 2004]

 

Source: Baschetti R. Cost-effectiveness of cognitive behaviour therapy for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. QJM. 2004 Jun;97(6):378-9. http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/content/97/6/378.long (Full article)

 

Combination therapy with hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone does not improve symptoms in chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study

Abstract:

PURPOSE: Chronic fatigue syndrome has been associated with decreased function of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Although neurally mediated hypotension occurs more frequently in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome than in controls, attempts to alleviate symptoms by administration of hydrocortisone or fludrocortisone have not been successful. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of combination therapy (5 mg/d of hydrocortisone and 50 microg/d of 9-alfa-fludrocortisone) on fatigue and well-being in chronic fatigue syndrome.

METHODS: We performed a 6-month, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study in 100 patients who fulfilled the 1994 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome. Between-group differences (placebo minus treatment) were calculated on a 10-point visual analog scale.

RESULTS: Eighty patients completed the 3 months of placebo and 3 months of active treatment in a double-blind fashion. There were no differences between treatment and placebo in patient-reported fatigue (mean difference, 0.1; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.3 to 0.6) or well-being (mean difference, -0.4; 95% CI: -1.0 to 0.1). There were also no between-group differences in fatigue measured with the Abbreviated Fatigue Questionnaire, the Short Form-36 Mental or Physical Factor scores, or in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

CONCLUSION: Low-dose combination therapy of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone was not effective in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome.

 

Source: Blockmans D, Persoons P, Van Houdenhove B, Lejeune M, Bobbaers H. Combination therapy with hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone does not improve symptoms in chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study. Am J Med. 2003 Jun 15;114(9):736-41. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12829200

 

Hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis dysfunction in chronic fatigue syndrome, and the effects of low-dose hydrocortisone therapy

Abstract:

These neuroendocrine studies were part of a series of studies testing the hypotheses that 1) there may be reduced activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in chronic fatigue syndrome and 2) low-dose augmentation with hydrocortisone therapy would improve the core symptoms.

We measured ACTH and cortisol responses to human CRH, the insulin stress test, and D-fenfluramine in 37 medication-free patients with CDC-defined chronic fatigue syndrome but no comorbid psychiatric disorders and 28 healthy controls. We also measured 24-h urinary free cortisol in both groups. All patients (n = 37) had a pituitary challenge test (human CRH) and a hypothalamic challenge test [either the insulin stress test (n = 16) or D-fenfluramine (n = 21)].

Baseline cortisol concentrations were significantly raised in the chronic fatigue syndrome group for the human CRH test only. Baseline ACTH concentrations did not differ between groups for any test. ACTH responses to human CRH, the insulin stress test, and D- fenfluramine were similar for patient and control groups. Cortisol responses to the insulin stress test did not differ between groups, but there was a trend for cortisol responses both to human CRH and D-fenfluramine to be lower in the chronic fatigue syndrome group. These differences were significant when ACTH responses were controlled. Urinary free cortisol levels were lower in the chronic fatigue syndrome group compared with the healthy group.

These results indicate that ACTH responses to pituitary and hypothalamic challenges are intact in chronic fatigue syndrome and do not support previous findings of reduced central responses in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function or the hypothesis of abnormal CRH secretion in chronic fatigue syndrome. These data further suggest that the hypocortisolism found in chronic fatigue syndrome may be secondary to reduced adrenal gland output.

Thirty-two patients were treated with a low-dose hydrocortisone regime in a double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over design, with 28 days on each treatment. They underwent repeated 24-h urinary free cortisol collections, a human CRH test, and an insulin stress test after both active and placebo arms of treatment. Looking at all subjects, 24-h urinary free cortisol was higher after active compared with placebo treatments, but 0900-h cortisol levels and the ACTH and cortisol responses to human CRH and the insulin stress test did not differ.

However, a differential effect was seen in those patients who responded to active treatment (defined as a reduction in fatigue score to the median population level or less). In this group, there was a significant increase in the cortisol response to human CRH, which reversed the previously observed blunted responses seen in these patients.

We conclude that the improvement in fatigue seen in some patients with chronic fatigue syndrome during hydrocortisone treatment is accompanied by a reversal of the blunted cortisol responses to human CRH.

 

Source: Cleare AJ, Miell J, Heap E, Sookdeo S, Young L, Malhi GS, O’Keane V. Hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis dysfunction in chronic fatigue syndrome, and the effects of low-dose hydrocortisone therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001 Aug;86(8):3545-54. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11502777

 

Plasma leptin in chronic fatigue syndrome and a placebo-controlled study of the effects of low-dose hydrocortisone on leptin secretion

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have suggested that chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is associated with changes in appetite and weight, and also with mild hypocortisolism. Because both of these features may be related to leptin metabolism, we undertook a study of leptin in CFS.

DESIGN: (i) A comparison of morning leptin concentration in patients with CFS and controls and (ii) a randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study of the effects of hydrocortisone on leptin levels in CFS.

PATIENTS: Thirty-two medication free patients with CFS but not comorbid depression or anxiety. Thirty-two age, gender, weight, body mass index and menstrual cycle matched volunteer subjects acted as controls.

MEASUREMENTS: We measured basal 0900 h plasma leptin levels in patients and controls. All 32 patients were taking part in a randomized, placebo-controlled crossover trial of low dose (5 or 10 mg) hydrocortisone as a potential therapy for CFS. We measured plasma leptin after 28 days treatment with hydrocortisone and after 28 days treatment with placebo.

RESULTS: At baseline, there was no significant difference in plasma leptin between patients [mean 13.8, median 7.4, interquartile range (IQR) 18.0 ng/ml] and controls (mean 10.2, median 5.5, IQR 11.3 ng/ml). Hydrocortisone treatment, for both doses combined, caused a significant increase in leptin levels compared to placebo. When the two doses were analysed separately, only 10 mg was associated with a significant effect on leptin levels. We also compared the hydrocortisone induced increase in leptin between those who were deemed treatment-responders and those deemed nonresponders. Responders showed a significantly greater hydrocortisone-induced rise in leptin than nonresponders. This association between a clinical response to hydrocortisone and a greater rise in leptin levels may indicate a greater biological effect of hydrocortisone in these subjects, perhaps due to increased glucocorticoid receptor sensitivity, which may be present in some patients with CFS.

CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that, while we found no evidence of alterations in leptin levels in CFS, low dose hydrocortisone therapy caused increases in plasma leptin levels, with this biological response being more marked in those CFS subjects who showed a positive therapeutic response to hydrocortisone therapy. Increases in plasma leptin levels following low dose hydrocortisone therapy may be a marker of pretreatment physiological hypocortisolism and of response to therapy.

 

Source: Cleare AJ, O’Keane V, Miell J. Plasma leptin in chronic fatigue syndrome and a placebo-controlled study of the effects of low-dose hydrocortisone on leptin secretion. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2001 Jul;55(1):113-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11453960

 

Cortisol deficiency may account for elevated apoptotic cell population in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome

Comment in: Single aetiological agent may not be feasible in CFS patients. [J Intern Med. 1999]

Comment on: Elevated apoptotic cell population in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: the pivotal role of protein kinase RNA. [J Intern Med. 1997]

 

Dear Sir, Vojdani et al. [1] report that patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) display an increased apoptotic cell population. This abnormality, according to the authors, is due to the activation of protein kinase RNA pathway, which, in turn, ‘could result from disregulated immune system or chronic viral infection’[1].The latter explanation, however, seems unlikely, because no specific virus has been identified in CFS patients, despite extensive research [2]. Special attention, therefore, should mainly be paid to the immune system of CFS patients, because its repeatedly reported abnormalities may help reveal both the aetiology of CFS and an effective treatment against it.

As Vojdani et al. [1] point out, decreased natural killer (NK) cell activity and altered cytokine production characterize CFS patients. These immunological abnormalities, however, may simply reflect the hypocortisolism of CFS patients [3], because a mere lack of steroid restraint on the immune system may well account for its derangement [3]. In fact, since NK cell activity is directly associated with the circadian rhythm of cortisol [4], the decreased NK cell activity observed in CFS patients may simply be due to their cortisol deficiency [3]. The latter, additionally, may also explain why the release of the cytokines interleukin-lβ, interleukin-6, and tumour necrosis factor-α has been found to be increased in peripheral blood mononuclear cell cultures from patients with CFS [5]. All those cytokines, in fact, have been reported to rise during hypocortisolism [6]. This suggests, therefore, that the cortisol deficiency of CFS patients may play a central role in causing both their immunological abnormalities and, presumably, their elevated apoptotic cells.

In view of the role of hypocortisolism in CFS, Vojdani and coworkers might be interested in determining whether the enhanced apoptosis found in their subjects with CFS could be reduced by giving them small daily doses of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone. The latter, notably, already has been reported to be of great benefit to CFS patients [7]. The rationale for treating CFS patients with the two steroids that are routinely administered to Addisonian patients [8] lies primarily in the fact that no medical condition, except Addison’s disease, shares 20 features with CFS [3]. Five additional symptoms (dizziness upon standing, orthostatic tachycardia, nausea, diarrhoea, and constipation) can be found in both CFS [9] and Addison’s disease [8, 10, 11]. Rather surprisingly, however, despite the staggering similarities between CFS and Addison’s disease, as yet no published attempt has been made to treat CFS patients with both hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone.

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2796.1999.00478.x/full

 

Source: Baschetti R. Cortisol deficiency may account for elevated apoptotic cell population in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. J Intern Med. 1999 Apr;245(4):409-10. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2796.1999.00478.x/full

 

Low-dose hydrocortisone in chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomised crossover trial

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Reports of mild hypocortisolism in chronic fatigue syndrome led us to postulate that low-dose hydrocortisone therapy may be an effective treatment.

METHODS: In a randomised crossover trial, we screened 218 patients with chronic fatigue. 32 patients met our strict criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome without co-morbid psychiatric disorder. The eligible patients received consecutive treatment with low-dose hydrocortisone (5 mg or 10 mg daily) for 1 month and placebo for 1 month; the order of treatment was randomly assigned. Analysis was by intention to treat.

FINDINGS: None of the patients dropped out. Compared with the baseline self-reported fatigue scores (mean 25.1 points), the score fell by 7.2 points for patients on hydrocortisone and by 3.3 points for those on placebo (paired difference in mean scores 4.5 points [95% CI 1.2-7.7], p=0.009). In nine (28%) of the 32 patients on hydrocortisone, fatigue scores reached a predefined cut-off value similar to the normal population score, compared with three (9%) of the 32 on placebo (Fisher’s exact test p=0.05). The degree of disability was reduced with hydrocortisone treatment, but not with placebo. Insulin stress tests showed that endogenous adrenal function was not suppressed by hydrocortisone. Minor side-effects were reported by three patients after hydrocortisone treatment and by one patient after placebo.

INTERPRETATION: In some patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, low-dose hydrocortisone reduces fatigue levels in the short term. Treatment for a longer time and follow-up studies are needed to find out whether this effect could be clinically useful.

Comment in:

Hydrocortisone and chronic fatigue syndrome. [Lancet. 1999]

Hydrocortisone and chronic fatigue syndrome. [Lancet. 1999]

Chronic fatigue syndrome and functional hypoadrenia–fighting vainly the old ennui. [Lancet. 1999]

Hydrocortisone and chronic fatigue syndrome. [Lancet. 1999]

Hydrocortisone and chronic fatigue syndrome. [Lancet. 1999]

 

Source: Cleare AJ, Heap E, Malhi GS, Wessely S, O’Keane V, Miell J. Low-dose hydrocortisone in chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomised crossover trial. Lancet. 1999 Feb 6;353(9151):455-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9989716

 

Low-dose hydrocortisone for treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract:

CONTEXT: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is associated with a dysregulated hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal axis and hypocortisolemia.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose oral hydrocortisone as a treatment for CFS.

DESIGN: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind therapeutic trial, conducted between 1992 and 1996.

SETTING: A single-center study in a tertiary care research institution.

PATIENTS: A total of 56 women and 14 men aged 18 to 55 years who met the 1988 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention case criteria for CFS and who withheld concomitant treatment with other medications.

INTERVENTION: Oral hydrocortisone, 13 mg/m2 of body surface area every morning and 3 mg/m2 every afternoon, or placebo, for approximately 12 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A global Wellness scale and other self-rating instruments were completed repeatedly before and during treatment. Resting and cosyntropin-stimulated cortisol levels were obtained before and at the end of treatment. Patients recorded adverse effects on a checklist.

RESULTS: The number of patients showing improvement on the Wellness scale was 19 (54.3%) of 35 placebo recipients vs 20 (66.7%) of 30 hydrocortisone recipients (P =.31). Hydrocortisone recipients had a greater improvement in mean Wellness score (6.3 vs 1.7 points; P=.06), a greater percentage (53% vs 29%; P=.04) recording an improvement of 5 or more points in Wellness score, and a higher average improvement in Wellness score on more days than did placebo recipients (P<.001). Statistical evidence of improvement was not seen with other self-rating scales. Although adverse symptoms reported by patients taking hydrocortisone were mild, suppression of adrenal glucocorticoid responsiveness was documented in 12 patients who received it vs none in the placebo group (P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS: Although hydrocortisone treatment was associated with some improvement in symptoms of CFS, the degree of adrenal suppression precludes its practical use for CFS.

 

Source: McKenzie R, O’Fallon A, Dale J, Demitrack M, Sharma G, Deloria M, Garcia-Borreguero D, Blackwelder W, Straus SE. Low-dose hydrocortisone for treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1998 Sep 23-30;280(12):1061-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9757853