Disorder of adrenal gland function in chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is defined as constellation of the prolonged fatigue and several somatic symptoms, in the absence of organic or severe psychiatric disease. However, this is an operational definition and conclusive biomedical explanation remains elusive. Similarities between the signs and symptoms of CFS and adrenal insufficiency prompted the research of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA) derangement in the pathogenesis of the CFS.

Early studies showed mild glucocorticoid deficiency, probably of central origin that was compensated by enhanced adrenal sensitivity to ACTH. Further studies showed reduced ACTH response to vasopressin infusion. The response to CRH was either blunted or unchanged. Cortisol response to insulin induced hypoglycaemia was same as in the control subjects while ACTH response was reported to be same or enhanced. However, results of direct stimulation of the adrenal cortex using ACTH were conflicting.

Cortisol and DHEA responses were found to be the same or reduced compared to control subjects. Scott et al found that maximal cortisol increment from baseline is significantly lower in CFS subjects. The same group also found small adrenal glands in some CFS subjects. These varied and inconsistent results could be explained by the heterogeneous study population due to multifactorial causes of the disease and by methodological differences. The aim of our study was to assess cortisol response to low dose (1 microgram) ACTH using previously validated methodology.

We compared cortisol response in the CFS subjects with the response in control and in subjects with suppressed HPA axis due to prolonged corticosteroid use. Cortisol responses were analysed in three subject groups: control (C), secondary adrenal insufficiency (AI), and in CFS. The C group consisted of 39 subjects, AI group of 22, and CFS group of nine subjects. Subject data are presented in table 1.

Low dose ACTH test was started at 0800 h with the i.v. injection of 1 microgram ACTH (Galenika, Belgrade, Serbia). Blood samples for cortisol determination were taken from the i.v. cannula at 0, 15, 30, and 60 min. Data are presented as mean +/- standard error (SE). Statistical analysis was done using ANOVA with the Games-Howell post-hoc test to determine group differences. ACTH dose per kg or per square meter of body surface was not different between the groups.

Baseline cortisol was not different between the groups. However, cortisol concentrations after 15 and 30 minutes were significantly higher in the C group than in the AI group. Cortisol concentration in the CFS group was not significantly different from any other group (Graph 1). Cortisol increment at 15 and 30 minutes from basal value was significantly higher in C group than in other two groups. However, there was no significant difference in cortisol increment between the AI and CFS groups at any time of the test.

On the contrary, maximal cortisol increment was not different between CFS and other two groups, although it was significantly higher in C group than in the AI group. Maximal cortisol response to the ACTH stimulation and area under the cortisol response curve was significantly larger in C group compared to AI group, but there was no difference between CFS and other two groups.

Several previous studies assessed cortisol response to ACTH stimulation. Hudson and Cleare analysed cortisol response to 1 microgram ACTH in CFS and control subjects. They compared maximum cortisol attained during the test, maximum cortisol increment, and area under the cortisol response curve. There was no difference between the groups in any of the analysed parameters. However, authors commented that responses were generally low. On the contrary Scott et al found that cortisol increment at 30 min is significantly lower in the CFS than in the control group. Taking into account our data it seems that the differences found in previous studies papers are caused by the methodological differences.

We have shown that cortisol increment at 15 and 30 min is significantly lower in CFS group than in C group. Nevertheless, maximum cortisol attained during the test, maximum cortisol increment, and area under the cortisol response curve were not different between the C and CFS groups. This is in agreement with our previous findings that cortisol increment at 15 minutes has the best diagnostic value of all parameters obtained during of low dose ACTH test. However, there was no difference between CFS and AI group in any of the parameters, although AI group had significantly lower cortisol concentrations at 15 and 30 minutes, maximal cortisol response, area under the cortisol curve, maximal cortisol increment, and maximal cortisol change velocity than C group. Consequently, reduced adrenal responsiveness to ACTH exists in CFS.

In conclusion, we find that regarding the adrenal response to ACTH stimulation CFS subjects present heterogeneous group. In some subjects cortisol response is preserved, while in the others it is similar to one found in secondary adrenal insufficiency.

 

Source: Zarković M, Pavlović M, Pokrajac-Simeunović A, Cirić J, Beleslin B, Penezić Z, Ognjanović S, Savić S, Poluga J, Trbojević B, Drezgić M. Disorder of adrenal gland function in chronic fatigue syndrome. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2003 Sep-Oct;131(9-10):370-4. [Article in Serbian] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15058215 (Abstract) http://srpskiarhiv.rs/global/pdf/articles-2003/septembar-oktobar/Adrenalcortexfunctionimpairmentinchronicfatiguesyndrome.pdf (Full article)

 

 

Hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis dysfunction in chronic fatigue syndrome, and the effects of low-dose hydrocortisone therapy

Abstract:

These neuroendocrine studies were part of a series of studies testing the hypotheses that 1) there may be reduced activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in chronic fatigue syndrome and 2) low-dose augmentation with hydrocortisone therapy would improve the core symptoms.

We measured ACTH and cortisol responses to human CRH, the insulin stress test, and D-fenfluramine in 37 medication-free patients with CDC-defined chronic fatigue syndrome but no comorbid psychiatric disorders and 28 healthy controls. We also measured 24-h urinary free cortisol in both groups. All patients (n = 37) had a pituitary challenge test (human CRH) and a hypothalamic challenge test [either the insulin stress test (n = 16) or D-fenfluramine (n = 21)].

Baseline cortisol concentrations were significantly raised in the chronic fatigue syndrome group for the human CRH test only. Baseline ACTH concentrations did not differ between groups for any test. ACTH responses to human CRH, the insulin stress test, and D- fenfluramine were similar for patient and control groups. Cortisol responses to the insulin stress test did not differ between groups, but there was a trend for cortisol responses both to human CRH and D-fenfluramine to be lower in the chronic fatigue syndrome group. These differences were significant when ACTH responses were controlled. Urinary free cortisol levels were lower in the chronic fatigue syndrome group compared with the healthy group.

These results indicate that ACTH responses to pituitary and hypothalamic challenges are intact in chronic fatigue syndrome and do not support previous findings of reduced central responses in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function or the hypothesis of abnormal CRH secretion in chronic fatigue syndrome. These data further suggest that the hypocortisolism found in chronic fatigue syndrome may be secondary to reduced adrenal gland output.

Thirty-two patients were treated with a low-dose hydrocortisone regime in a double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over design, with 28 days on each treatment. They underwent repeated 24-h urinary free cortisol collections, a human CRH test, and an insulin stress test after both active and placebo arms of treatment. Looking at all subjects, 24-h urinary free cortisol was higher after active compared with placebo treatments, but 0900-h cortisol levels and the ACTH and cortisol responses to human CRH and the insulin stress test did not differ.

However, a differential effect was seen in those patients who responded to active treatment (defined as a reduction in fatigue score to the median population level or less). In this group, there was a significant increase in the cortisol response to human CRH, which reversed the previously observed blunted responses seen in these patients.

We conclude that the improvement in fatigue seen in some patients with chronic fatigue syndrome during hydrocortisone treatment is accompanied by a reversal of the blunted cortisol responses to human CRH.

 

Source: Cleare AJ, Miell J, Heap E, Sookdeo S, Young L, Malhi GS, O’Keane V. Hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis dysfunction in chronic fatigue syndrome, and the effects of low-dose hydrocortisone therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001 Aug;86(8):3545-54. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11502777

 

The 1microg short Synacthen test in chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: Many studies suggest mild hypocortisolism in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), usually assumed to be due to reduced suprahypothalamic drive to the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. We wished to explore further the state of the HPA axis in CFS using the 1 microg low dose short Synacthen test.

DESIGN: Subjects received an intravenous bolus of 1 microg Synacthen; samples for cortisol estimation were taken at baseline and 2, 10, 20, 30, 40 and 60 minutes after injection.

PATIENTS: We tested 20 subjects suffering from CFS according to the criteria of the Center for Diseases Control without psychiatric comorbidity and 20 matched healthy controls. All subjects were drug free for at least 1 month.

MEASUREMENTS: We calculated the cortisol responses to the test as the maximum cortisol attained, the incremental rise in cortisol over baseline (Deltavalue) and as the integrated area under the curve.

RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline cortisol or cortisol responses between patients and controls. However, responses generally were low, and many subjects’ peak responses were prior to the standard 30 minute sampling time.

CONCLUSIONS: These results do not lend support to the theory that patients with chronic fatigue syndrome have a low adrenal reserve. However, results from studies assessing the HPA axis are proving to be inconsistent. We suggest that many other factors may be contributing to HPA axis alterations in chronic fatigue syndrome, including sleep disturbance, inactivity, altered circadian rhythmicity, illness chronicity, concomitant medication and comorbid psychiatric disturbance. These sources of heterogeneity need to be considered in future studies, and may explain the inconsistent findings to date.

Comment in: The 1microg Synacthen test in chronic fatigue syndrome. [Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2000]

 

Source: Hudson M, Cleare AJ. The 1microg short Synacthen test in chronic fatigue syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1999 Nov;51(5):625-30. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10594524

 

Blunted adrenocorticotropin and cortisol responses to corticotropin-releasing hormone stimulation in chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Hypofunctioning of the pituitary-adrenal axis has been suggested as the pathophysiological basis for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Blunted adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) responses but normal cortisol responses to exogenous corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), the main regulator of this axis, have been previously demonstrated in CFS patients, some of whom had a comorbid psychiatric disorder. We wished to re-examine CRH activation of this axis in CFS patients free from concurrent psychiatric illness.

A sample of 14 patients with CDC-diagnosed CFS were compared with 14 healthy volunteers. ACTH and cortisol responses were measured following the administration of 100 microg ovine CRH. Basal ACTH and cortisol values did not differ between the two groups. The release of ACTH was significantly attenuated in the CFS group (P < 0.005), as was the release of cortisol (P < 0.05).

The blunted response of ACTH to exogenous CRH stimulation may be due to an abnormality in CRH levels with a resultant alteration in pituitary CRH receptor sensitivity, or it may reflect a dysregulation of vasopressin or other factors involved in HPA regulation. A diminished output of neurotrophic ACTH, causing a reduced adrenocortical secretory reserve, inadequately compensated for by adrenoceptor upregulation, may explain the reduced cortisol production demonstrated in this study.

 

Source: Scott LV, Medbak S, Dinan TG. Blunted adrenocorticotropin and cortisol responses to corticotropin-releasing hormone stimulation in chronic fatigue syndrome. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1998 Jun;97(6):450-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9669518