‘I’m still here, I’m alive and breathing’: The experience of Black Americans with long COVID

Abstract:

Aims and objectives: In this study, we aimed to characterize the impact of long COVID on quality of life and approaches to symptom management among Black American adults.

Background: As a novel condition, qualitative evidence concerning long COVID symptoms and their impact on quality of life can inform the refinement of diagnostic criteria and care plans. However, the underrepresentation of Black Americans in long COVID research is a barrier to achieving equitable care for all long COVID patients.

Design: We employed an interpretive description study design.

Methods: We recruited a convenience sample of 15 Black American adults with long COVID. We analysed the anonymized transcripts from race-concordant, semi-structured interviews using an inductive, thematic analysis approach. We followed the SRQR reporting guidelines.

Results: We identified four themes: (1) The impact of long COVID symptoms on personal identity and pre-existing conditions; (2) Self-management strategies for long COVID symptoms; (3) Social determinants of health and symptom management; and (4) Effects on interpersonal relationships.

Conclusion: Findings demonstrate the comprehensive ramifications of long COVID on the lives of Black American adults. Results also articulate how pre-existing conditions, social risk factors, distrust due to systemic racism, and the nature of interpersonal relationships can complicate symptom management.

Relevance to clinical practice: Care approaches that support access to and implementation of integrative therapies may be best suited to meet the needs of long COVID patients. Clinicians should also prioritize eliminating patient exposure to discrimination, implicit bias, and microaggressions. This is of particular concern for long COVID patients who have symptoms that are difficult to objectively quantify, such as pain and fatigue.

No patient or public contribution: While patient perspectives and experiences were the focus of this study, patients were not involved with the design or conduct of the study, data analysis or interpretation, or writing the manuscript.

Source: Bergmans RS, Chambers-Peeple K, Yu C, Xiao LZ, Wegryn-Jones R, Martin A, Dell’Imperio S, Aboul-Hassan D, Williams DA, Clauw DJ, DeJonckheere M. ‘I’m still here, I’m alive and breathing’: The experience of Black Americans with long COVID. J Clin Nurs. 2023 May 4. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16733. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37140186. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocn.16733 (Full text)

Long COVID: a review and proposed visualization of the complexity of long COVID

Abstract:

Post-Acute Sequelae of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus – 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, or Long COVID, is a prevailing second pandemic with nearly 100 million affected individuals globally and counting. We propose a visual description of the complexity of Long COVID and its pathogenesis that can be used by researchers, clinicians, and public health officials to guide the global effort toward an improved understanding of Long COVID and the eventual mechanism-based provision of care to afflicted patients. The proposed visualization or framework for Long COVID should be an evidence-based, dynamic, modular, and systems-level approach to the condition.

Furthermore, with further research such a framework could establish the strength of the relationships between pre-existing conditions (or risk factors), biological mechanisms, and resulting clinical phenotypes and outcomes of Long COVID. Notwithstanding the significant contribution that disparities in access to care and social determinants of health have on outcomes and disease course of long COVID, our model focuses primarily on biological mechanisms. Accordingly, the proposed visualization sets out to guide scientific, clinical, and public health efforts to better understand and abrogate the health burden imposed by long COVID.

Source: Perumal R, Shunmugam L, Naidoo K, Abdool Karim SS, Wilkins D, Garzino-Demo A, Brechot C, Parthasarathy S, Vahlne A, Nikolich JŽ. Long COVID: a review and proposed visualization of the complexity of long COVID. Front Immunol. 2023 Apr 20;14:1117464. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1117464. PMID: 37153597; PMCID: PMC10157068. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10157068/ (Full text)

Risk factors for post-COVID-19 condition (Long Covid) in children: a prospective cohort study

Abstract:

Background: Adults and children can develop post-Covid-19 condition (PCC) (also referred to as Long Covid). However, existing evidence is scarce, partly due to a lack of a standardised case definition, short follow up duration, and heterogenous study designs, resulting in wide variation of reported outcomes. The primary aim of this study was to characterise risk factors for PCC and longitudinal rates of recovery in a cohort of children and young people using a standardised protocol.

Methods: We performed a prospective “disease-based” cohort study between 01/02/2020 to 31/10/2022 including children aged 0-18 years old, with a previous diagnosis of Covid-19. Children with microbiologically confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, were invited for an in-clinic follow-up assessment at a paediatric post-covid clinic in Rome, Italy, at serial intervals (3-, 6-, 12- and 18-months post-onset). PCC was defined as persistence of otherwise unexplained symptoms for at least three months after initial infection. The statistical association between categorical variables was obtained by Chi-squared tests or Fisher’s exact tests. Multivariable logistic regressions are presented using odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Findings: 1243 children were included, median age: 7.5 (4-10.3) years old; 575 (46.3%) were females. Of these, 23% (294/1243) were diagnosed with PCC at three months post-onset. Among the study population, 143 patients remained symptomatic at six months, 38 at 12 months, and 15 at 18 months follow up evaluation. The following risk factors were associated with PCC: >10 years of age (OR 1.23; 95% CI 1.18-1.28), comorbidities (OR 1.68; 95% CI 1.14-2.50), and hospitalisation during the acute phase (OR 4.80; 95%CI 1.91-12.1). Using multivariable logistic regression, compared to the Omicron variant, all other variants were significantly associated with PCC at 3 and 6 months. At least one dose of vaccine was associated with a reduced, but not statistically significant risk of developing PCC.

Interpretation: In our study, acute-phase hospitalisation, pre-existing comorbidity, being infected with pre-Omicron variants and older age were associated with a higher risk of developing PCC. Most children recovered over time, but one-in-twenty of those with PCC at three months reported persistent symptoms 18 months post-Sars-CoV-2 infection. Omicron infection was associated with shorter recovery times. We did not find a strong protective effect of vaccination on PCC development. Although our cohort cannot be translated to all Italian children with PCC as more nationwide studies are needed, our findings highlight the need of new strategies to prevent and treat pediatric PCC are needed.

Funding: This study has been funded by Pfizer non-competitive grant, granted to DB (# 65925795).

Source: Morello R, Mariani F, Mastrantoni L, De Rose C, Zampino G, Munblit D, Sigfrid L, Valentini P, Buonsenso D. Risk factors for post-COVID-19 condition (Long Covid) in children: a prospective cohort study. EClinicalMedicine. 2023 May;59:101961. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101961. Epub 2023 Apr 14. PMID: 37073325; PMCID: PMC10101848. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(23)00138-4/fulltext (Full text)

Risk factors for psychiatric symptoms in patients with long COVID: A systematic review

Abstract:

Prolonged symptoms of COVID-19 have been found in many patients, often known as Long COVID. Psychiatric symptoms are commonly seen in Long COVID patients and could last for weeks, even months, after recovery. However, the symptoms and risk factors associated with it remain unclear.

In the current systematic review, we provide an overview of psychiatric symptoms in Long COVID patients and risk factors associated with the development of those symptoms. Articles were systematically searched on SCOPUS, PubMed, and EMBASE up to October 2021. Studies involving adults and geriatric participants with a confirmed previous COVID-19 diagnosis and reported psychiatric symptoms that persist for more than four weeks after the initial infection were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for observational studies. Prevalence rates and risk factors associated with psychiatric symptoms were collected. This present study was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42021240776). In total, 23 studies were included.

Several limitations in this review were the heterogeneity of studies’ outcomes and designs, studies limited to articles published in English, and the psychiatric symptoms mainly were assessed using self-report questionnaires. The most prevalent  reported psychiatric symptoms, from the most to the least reported, were anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), poor sleep qualities, somatic symptoms, and cognitive deficits. Being female and having previous psychiatric diagnoses were risk factors for the development of the reported symptoms.

Source: Zakia H, Pradana K, Iskandar S. Risk factors for psychiatric symptoms in patients with long COVID: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2023 Apr 7;18(4):e0284075. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284075. PMID: 37027455; PMCID: PMC10081737. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10081737/ (Full text)

Data-driven analysis to understand long COVID using electronic health records from the RECOVER initiative

Abstract:

Recent studies have investigated post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC, or long COVID) using real-world patient data such as electronic health records (EHR). Prior studies have typically been conducted on patient cohorts with specific patient populations which makes their generalizability unclear. This study aims to characterize PASC using the EHR data warehouses from two large Patient-Centered Clinical Research Networks (PCORnet), INSIGHT and OneFlorida+, which include 11 million patients in New York City (NYC) area and 16.8 million patients in Florida respectively.

With a high-throughput screening pipeline based on propensity score and inverse probability of treatment weighting, we identified a broad list of diagnoses and medications which exhibited significantly higher incidence risk for patients 30-180 days after the laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to non-infected patients.

We identified more PASC diagnoses in NYC than in Florida regarding our screening criteria, and conditions including dementia, hair loss, pressure ulcers, pulmonary fibrosis, dyspnea, pulmonary embolism, chest pain, abnormal heartbeat, malaise, and fatigue, were replicated across both cohorts. Our analyses highlight potentially heterogeneous risks of PASC in different populations.

Source: Zang C, Zhang Y, Xu J, Bian J, Morozyuk D, Schenck EJ, Khullar D, Nordvig AS, Shenkman EA, Rothman RL, Block JP, Lyman K, Weiner MG, Carton TW, Wang F, Kaushal R. Data-driven analysis to understand long COVID using electronic health records from the RECOVER initiative. Nat Commun. 2023 Apr 7;14(1):1948. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37653-z. PMID: 37029117; PMCID: PMC10080528. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10080528/ (Full text)

Prevalence and Characterization of Long Covid-19 Symptoms in Health Care Professionals- A Need of the Hour

Abstract:

Background: With the global advent of Covid-19, Healthcare workers (HCW) were under a lot of physical and psychological pressure. Information on persistent symptoms post Covid-19 Infection in HCWs is lacking.

Objectives: This Study is aimed at assessing the impact of the post Covid-19 syndrome in HCWs.

Materials and Methods: A Questionnaire was prepared as google form and shared with the HCWs through WhatsApp enquiring regarding the health conditions that are still persistent post recovery from Covid-19 infection.

Results: A total of 328 Health Care Professionals participated in the present survey (18-65 yrs). The gender distribution revealed 67.7% were females and 32.3% were males. 60.3% of the participants were infected with COVID-19 before taking the first dose of vaccination which is reduced to 17.5% after vaccination. The post COVID complications observed from the study were hair loss (35.4%), easy fatigability (25%), mood swings (22.9%), anxiety (18.8%), insomnia/sleeplessness (13.9%), depression (12.5%) and joint pains/arthritis (11.8%). The other complications observed were loss of taste (9%), lightheadedness/postural hypotension (8.3%), amnesia/loss of memory and anosmia/loss of smell (7.6%), gastritis (6.3%), palpitations, hypersomnia and pulmonary complications (5.6%) and chest pain (4.9%). Unpaired t-test and One-Way ANNOVA resulted in a significant value (p values of >0.05).

Discussion: Despite the fact that females experienced more post-Covid-19 symptoms (15 out of 17), males experienced more chest pain and anxiety symptoms. According to our findings, 57 of 100 Covid-19 health care workers have post-Covid complications. The participants presented with non-specific symptoms such as easy fatigability, mood swings, light headedness, anxiety but most of the participants quoted more specific symptoms such as depression, pulmonary complications, hair loss, joint pains, gastritis, chest pain, palpitations, loss of taste, amnesia, hyperglycemia, insomnia, hypersomnia and anosmia. However, non-specific symptoms such as fatigue, mood swings, lightheadedness, and anxiety were also mentioned. The symptoms of post-acute COVID-19 syndrome vary greatly. Early detection requires a unified definition of long COVID and characterization of its manifestation. Furthermore, more research should be conducted to identify risk factors and the precise mechanisms that lead to the development of long COVID syndrome. Such knowledge may aid future research aimed at preventing such a complication.

Source: Mote Srinath, Syeda Fakiha Mehreen, Surya Prem Kumar et al. Prevalence and Characterization of Long Covid-19 Symptoms in Health Care Professionals- A Need of the Hour, 05 April 2023, PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2764197/v1 (Full text)

Occupational differences in the prevalence and severity of long-COVID: Analysis of the ONS Coronavirus (COVID-19) Infection Survey

Abstract:

Objectives To establish whether prevalence and severity of long-COVID symptoms vary by industry and occupation.

Methods We utilised ONS Coronavirus Infection Survey (CIS) data (February 2021-April 2022) of working-age participants (16-65 years). Exposures were industrial sector, occupation and major Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) group. Outcomes were self-reported: (1) long-COVID symptoms; and (2) reduced function due to long-COVID. Binary (outcome 1) and ordered (outcome 2) logistic regression were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and prevalence (marginal means) for all exposures.

Results Public facing industries, including teaching and education, social care, healthcare, civil service, retail and transport industries and occupations had highest odds ratios for long-COVID. By major SOC group, those in caring, leisure and other services (OR 1.44, CIs: 1.38-1.52) had substantially elevated odds than average. For almost all exposures, the pattern of odds ratios for long-COVID symptoms followed that for SARS-CoV-2 infections, except for professional occupations (OR<1 for infection; OR>1 for long-COVID). The probability of reporting long-COVID for industry ranged from 7.7% (financial services) to 11.6% (teaching and education); whereas the prevalence of reduced function by ‘a lot’ ranged from 17.1% (arts, entertainment and recreation) to 22-23% (teaching and education and armed forces) and to 27% (those not working).

Conclusions The risk and prevalence of long-COVID differs across industries and occupations. Generally, it appears that likelihood of developing long-COVID symptoms follows likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 infection, except for professional occupations. These findings highlight sectors and occupations where further research is needed to understand the occupational factors resulting in long-COVID.

Source: Theocharis KromydasEvangelia DemouRhiannon EdgeMatthew GittinsS Vittal KatikireddiNeil PearceMartie van TongerenJack WilkinsonSarah Rhodes. Occupational differences in the prevalence and severity of long-COVID: Analysis of the ONS Coronavirus (COVID-19) Infection Survey.

Long-COVID fatigue is not predicted by pre-pandemic plasma IL-6 levels in mild COVID-19 infection

Abstract:

Objective and design: Fatigue is a prominent symptom in the general population and may follow viral infection, including SARS-CoV2 infection which causes COVID-19. Chronic fatigue lasting more than three months is a major symptom of the long-COVID syndrome. The mechanisms underlying long-COVID fatigue are unknown. We hypothesized that the development of long-COVID chronic fatigue is driven by the pro-inflammatory immune status of an individual prior to COVID-19 infection.

Subjects and methods: We tested this hypothesis by analysing pre-pandemic plasma levels of IL-6, which plays a key role in persistent fatigue, in N = 1274 community dwelling adults from TwinsUK. Subsequent COVID-19 positive and COVID-19 negative participants were categorized based on antigen and antibody testing. Chronic fatigue was assessed using the Chalder Fatigue Scale.

Results: COVID-19 positive participants exhibited mild symptoms of infection. Chronic fatigue was a prevalent symptom among this population and was significantly higher in the COVID-19 positive participants than COVID-19 negative participants (17% vs 11%, respectively; p = 0.001). The qualitative nature of chronic fatigue as determined by individual questionnaire responses was similar in COVID-19 positive and COVID-19 negative participants. Pre-pandemic plasma IL-6 levels were positively associated with chronic fatigue in COVID-19 negative, but not COVID-19 positive
individuals. Raised BMI was associated with chronic fatigue in COVID-19 positive participants.

Conclusions: We found evidence that pre-existing increased levels of IL-6 provide the ground for chronic fatigue symptoms but there was no specific link seen with mild COVID-19 status. Elevated BMI increased the risk of chronic fatigue in mild COVID-19 infection consistent with previous reports.

Source: B Freidin, M., Borsini, A., Pariante, C., & MK Williams, F. (2023). Long-COVID fatigue is not predicted by prepandemic plasma IL-6 levels in mild COVID-19 infection. Inflammation Research. https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/files/201594849/Freidin_et_al._2023.pdf (Full text)

Association of Laparoscopically-confirmed Endometriosis with Long COVID: A Prospective Cohort Study

Abstract:

Background: Women are at greater risk than men of developing chronic inflammatory conditions and of developing ‘long COVID.’ However, few gynecologic health risk factors for long COVID have been identified. Endometriosis is a common gynecological disorder associated with chronic inflammation, immune dysregulation, and comorbid presentation with autoimmune and clotting disorders, all of which are pathophysiologic mechanisms proposed for long COVID. Therefore, we hypothesized that women with a history of endometriosis may be at greater risk of developing long COVID.

Objective: To investigate the association between history of endometriosis prior to SARS-CoV-2 infection and risk of long COVID.

Methods: We followed 46,579 women from two ongoing prospective cohort studies: the Nurses’ Health Study II and the Nurses’ Health Study 3, who participated in a series of COVID-19-related surveys administered from April 2020 to November 2022. Laparoscopic diagnosis of endometriosis was documented prospectively in main cohort questionnaires prior to the pandemic (1993-2020) with high validity. SARS-CoV-2 infection (confirmed by antigen, PCR, or antibody test) and CDC-defined long-term COVID-19 symptoms (≥4 weeks) were self-reported during follow-up. Among individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection, we fit Poisson regression models to assess the associations between endometriosis and risk of long COVID-19 symptoms, with adjustment for potential confounding variables (demographics, body mass index, smoking status, history of infertility, and history of chronic diseases).

Results: Among 3650 women in our sample with self-reported SARS-CoV-2 infections during follow-up, 386 (10.6%) had a history of endometriosis with laparoscopic confirmation and 1598 (43.8%) reported experiencing long COVID symptoms. The majority of women were Non-Hispanic White (95.4%), with a median age of 59 years (interquartile range=44-65). Women with a history of laparoscopically-confirmed endometriosis had a 22% greater risk of developing long COVID (adjusted RR=1.22, 95% CI=1.05-1.42), compared to those who had never been diagnosed with endometriosis. The association was stronger when we defined long COVID as having symptoms ≥8 weeks (RR=1.28, 95% CI=1.09-1.50). We observed no statistically significant differences in the relationship between endometriosis and long COVID by age, infertility history, or comorbidity with uterine fibroids, although there was a suggestive trend that women <50 years may be at higher risk (<50 years, RR=1.37, 95% CI=1.00-1.88; ≥50 years, RR=1.19, 95% CI=1.01-1.41). Among persons who developed long COVID, women with endometriosis reported on average one additional long-term symptom compared to women without endometriosis.

Conclusions and relevance: Our findings suggest that those with a history of endometriosis may be at modestly increased risk for long COVID. Health care providers should be aware of endometriosis history when treating patients for signs of persisting symptoms post-SARS-CoV-2 infection. Future studies should investigate the potential biological pathways underlying these associations.

Source: Wang S, Farland LV, Gaskins AJ, Mortazavi J, Wang YX, Tamimi RM, Rich-Edwards JW, Zhang D, Terry KL, Chavarro JE, Missmer SA. Association of Laparoscopically-confirmed Endometriosis with Long COVID: A Prospective Cohort Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Mar 25:S0002-9378(23)00177-1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.03.030. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36972892. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36972892/ https://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378(23)00177-1/pdf (Full text available as PDF file)

A prospective cohort study assessing the relationship between long-COVID symptom incidence in COVID-19 patients and COVID-19 vaccination

Abstract:

Current studies about the long-term effects of COVID-19 show a wide range of symptoms. This prospective cohort study aimed to find the incidence of long-COVID symptoms and the associated risk factors.

We followed 669 confirmed COVID-19 patients. Sociodemographic and clinical data were extracted from medical records and collected via semi-structured telephone interviews on days 10, 30, 60, and 90. The incidence of long-COVID symptoms was 41.6% (95% CI 37.8-45.4%). Females [aOR = 1.5 (95% CI 1.1-2.3)], the elderly [aOR = 4.9 (95% CI 2.0-11.3)], and those who required hospitalization [aOR = 5.0 (95% CI 1.3-3.7)] were at a higher risk of developing long-COVID. Patients with dyspnea at day 10 [aOR: 2.4 (95% CI 1.6-3.7] and fatigue at day 60 [aOR: 3.1 (95% CI 1.5-6.3] were also at risk. While non-vaccinated patients were almost seven times more likely to report long-COVID symptoms than vaccinated patients [aOR: 6.9 (95% CI 4.2-11.3)].

In conclusion, long-COVID was common among COVID-19 patients, with higher rates among females, older age groups, hospitalized patients, and those with dyspnea and fatigue, while vaccination provided protection. Interventions should educate health professionals, raise general public awareness about the risks and consequences of Long COVID, and the value of vaccination.

Source: Abu Hamdh B, Nazzal Z. A prospective cohort study assessing the relationship between long-COVID symptom incidence in COVID-19 patients and COVID-19 vaccination. Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 25;13(1):4896. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30583-2. PMID: 36966161; PMCID: PMC10039348. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-30583-2 (Full text)