Jason – Page 13 – American ME and CFS Society

Are stamina and fatigue polar opposites? A case study

Abstract:

Most individuals with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) (Carruthers et al., 2003 ), Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME) (Carruthers et al., 2011 ), and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) (Fukuda et al., 1994 ) indicate that they experience fatigue and sharp decreases in energy levels, which hinder the ability to engage in physical activities (Friedberg & Jason, 1998 ). However, there are some individuals who reduce activity engagement in order to avoid a worsening of symptoms; thus these individuals may endorse lower levels of fatigue.

Accordingly, those with low levels of fatigue but low endurance/stamina might be inadvertently excluded from some criteria based on the fatigue requirement. The current study serves as an exploration of the relationship between fatigue and stamina and the effects of these constructs on illness symptomology and their implications for assessment and diagnosis.

Source: So S, Evans M, Jason LA, Brown A. Are stamina and fatigue polar opposites? A case study. J Prev Interv Community. 2015;43(1):32-41. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2014.973235. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4295717/ (Full article)

Problems in defining post-exertional malaise

Abstract:

Post-exertional malaise (PEM) is a cardinal symptom of the illnesses referred to as Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME), Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). PEM is reported to occur in many of these patients, and with several criteria (e.g., ME and ME/CFS), this symptom is mandatory (Carruthers et al., 2003 , 2011 ).

In the present study, 32 participants diagnosed with CFS (Fukuda et al., 1994 ) were examined on their responses to self-report items that were developed to capture the characteristics and patterns of PEM. As shown in the results, the slight differences in wording for various items may affect whether one is determined to have PEM according to currently used self-report criteria to assess CFS. Better understanding of how this symptom is assessed might help improve the diagnostic reliability and validity of ME, ME/CFS, and CFS.

Source: Jason LA, Evans M, So S, Scott J, Brown A. Problems in defining post-exertional malaise. J Prev Interv Community. 2015;43(1):20-31. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2014.973239. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4295644/ (Full article)

Examining the Institute of Medicine’s Recommendations Regarding Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Clinical Versus Research Criteria

Abstract:

The Institute of Medicine (2015) has proposed a new clinical case definition for what had been known as chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). This new criteria involved the following domains: substantial reduction or impairment in the ability to engage in pre-illness levels of occupational, educational, social, or personal activities; post-exertional malaise; unrefreshing sleep; and at least one of the two following symptoms: cognitive impairment or orthostatic intolerance.

In addition, in August of 2015, the CFS Advisory Committee, which makes recommendations to the Secretary of US Department of Health and Human Services, proposed that the Canadian 2003 criteria should serve as the research case for CFS. Up to now, there have not been any published investigations comparing these clinical and research criteria.

Using patient samples collected in the United States, Great Britain, and Norway, the current study compared and contrasted patients who met the clinical and research criteria. Overall findings indicated that those meeting the research criteria in comparison to those meeting the clinical criteria were significantly more impaired on a wide variety of symptoms and functional areas. The implications of these findings are discussed.

Source: Jason LA, McManimen S, Sunnquist M, Brown A, Newton JL, Strand EB. Examining the Institute of Medicine’s Recommendations Regarding Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Clinical Versus Research Criteria. J Neurol Psychol. 2015;2015(Suppl 2). pii: http://www.avensonline.org/wp-content/uploads/JNP-2332-3469-S2-0002.pdf. Epub 2015 Nov 25. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5008852/ (Full article)

The impact of symptom stability on time frame and recall reliability in CFS

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: This study is an investigation of the potential impact of perceived symptom stability on the recall reliability of symptom severity and frequency as reported by individuals with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Symptoms were recalled using three different recall timeframes (the past week, the past month, and the past six months) and at two assessment points (with one week in between each assessment).

METHODS: Participants were 51 adults (45 women and 6 men), between the ages of 29 and 66 with a current diagnosis of CFS. Multilevel Model (MLM) Analyses were used to determine the optimal recall timeframe (in terms of test-retest reliability) for reporting symptoms perceived as variable and as stable over time.

RESULTS: Headaches were recalled more reliably when they were reported as stable over time. Furthermore, the optimal timeframe in terms of test-retest reliability for stable symptoms was highly uniform, such that all Fukuda CFS symptoms were more reliably recalled at the six month timeframe. Furthermore, the optimal timeframe for CFS symptoms perceived as variable, differed across symptoms.

DISCUSSION: Symptom stability and recall timeframe are important to consider in order to improve the accuracy and reliability of the current methods for diagnosing this illness.

Source: Evans M, Jason LA. The impact of symptom stability on time frame and recall reliability in CFS. Cogent Psychol. 2015;2(1). pii: 1079945. Epub 2015 Aug 28. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4831646/ (Full article)

The use of mixed methods in studying a chronic illness

Abstract:

This article explores mixed methods approaches with an illness called Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME) and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS). Qualitative and Quantitative data were used to investigate the epidemiology of this illness, as well as explore attributions based on the name of the illness, and finally treatment approaches.

In each of the domains within the ME and CFS research reviewed, our analyses were richer and our findings ultimately more impactful when we integrated qualitative and quantitative research methods. The use of a multiphase mixed methods research program provided our team unique vantage points for better understanding social and community issues involving this controversial chronic illness.

Further, this approach allowed us to implement the insights gained through an advocacy lens to change policy, recommend and evaluate treatments, and amplify voices within the patient population. In this way, we believe that the practice of methodological pluralism is especially applicable and effective to the study of chronic illness, and believe other investigators will benefit from the use of these approaches with similar disenfranchised and unfairly treated populations.

Source: Jason LA, Reed J. The use of mixed methods in studying a chronic illness. Health Psychol Behav Med. 2015;3(1):40-51. Epub 2015 Jan 9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4831644/ (Full article)

Variability in Symptoms Complicates Utility of Case Definitions

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Ambiguities in case definitions have created difficulties in replicating findings and estimating the prevalence rates for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME).

PURPOSE: The current study examined differences in occurrence rates for CFS and ME cardinal symptoms (i.e. post-exertional malaise, unrefreshing sleep, and neurocognitive deficits).

RESULTS: Findings indicated that there is a wide range of occurrence rates on critical symptoms of the case definition, suggesting that either the types of patients recruited differ in various settings or the questions assessing core symptoms vary in their wording or criteria among different researchers.

CONCLUSIONS: The polythetic nature of the case definition may contribute to the wide ranges of symptom occurrence that was found. In order to increase assessed reliability of the symptoms and case definitions, there is a need to better standardize data collection methods and operationalization of symptoms. This solution would reduce the heterogeneity often seen in populations of CFS patients.

Source: McManimen SL, Jason LA, Williams YJ. Variability in Symptoms Complicates Utility of Case Definitions. Fatigue. 2015;3(3):164-172. Epub 2015 May 12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4831632/ (Full article)

Defining Essential Features of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Abstract:

Considerable debate surrounds the search for the defining features of patients with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME) and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Current case definitions were created through clinical consensus. Failure to operationalize these case definitions has led to considerable variability in the identification of patients. In addition, some case definitions (e.g., Fukuda et al., 1994) do not require cardinal symptoms of this illness, where as other case definitions do require core symptoms of this illness (Carruthers et al., 2003, 2011), and these latter case criteria appear to identify a more impaired group of patients.

Criterion variance is most likely to occur when operationally explicit criteria do not exist for diagnostic categories (Spitzer, Endicott, & Robins, 1978), or when there are varying criteria for contrasting case definitions, which is an impediment to the research in this field. To deal with this problem, it is possible to differentiate those that meet more loosely defined criteria from those that are more narrowly and defined, thus differentiating CFS from ME.

In order to progress the search for biological markers and effective treatments, essential features need to be operationalized and broadly used in order to increase the probability that individuals included in samples have the same underlying illness.

Source: Jason LA, Sunnquist M, Brown A, Reed J. Defining Essential Features of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. J Hum Behav Soc Environ. 2015;25(6):657-674. Epub 2015 May 6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4817848/ (Full article)

Test-Retest Reliability of the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: The DePaul Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ) was developed to provide a structured approach for collecting standardized symptomatology and health history information to allow researchers and clinicians to determine whether a patient meets the diagnostic criteria for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME), and/or chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS).

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the test-retest reliability of the DSQ.

METHODS: Test-retest reliability of the measure was examined with a sample of 26 adults self-identifying as having either ME/CFS, ME and/or CFS and 25 adults who did not self-identify as having these illnesses and were otherwise healthy controls.

RESULTS: Overall, the majority of items on the DSQ exhibited good to excellent test-retest reliability, with Pearson’s or kappa correlation coefficients that were 0.70 or higher.

CONCLUSIONS: Thus, the present study suggests that the DSQ is a reliable diagnostic measure that can provide a standardized way of examining illness constructs and symptomatology among patients who identify as having ME/CFS, ME and/or CFS.

Source: Jason LA, So S, Brown AA, Sunnquist M, Evans M. Test-Retest Reliability of the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire. Fatigue. 2015 Jan 1;3(1):16-32. Epub 2015 Jan 8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4788471/ (Full article)

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: The Current Status and Future Potentials of Emerging Biomarkers

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) remains an incompletely characterized illness, in part due to controversy regarding its definition, biological basis and diagnosis. Biomarkers are objective measures that may lead to improvements in our understanding of CFS by providing a more coherent and consistent approach to study, diagnosis and treatment of the illness. Such metrics may allow us to distinguish between CFS subtypes – each defined by characteristic biomarkers – currently conflated under the single, heterogeneous condition of CFS. These delineations, in turn, may guide more granular, focused, and targeted treatment strategies based on more precise characterizations of the illness. Here, we review potential CFS biomarkers related to neurological and immunological components of the illness, and discuss how these biomarkers may be used to move the field of CFS forward, emphasizing clinical utility and potential routes of future research.

Source: Fischer DB, William AH, Strauss AC, Unger ER, Jason L, Marshall GD Jr, Dimitrakoff JD. Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: The Current Status and Future Potentials of Emerging Biomarkers. Fatigue. 2014 Jun 1;2(2):93-109. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4052724/ (Full article)