Immune responsiveness in chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

We have endeavoured to find immunological indications of chronic virus infection in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (myalgic encephalomyelitis) and to investigate immune responsiveness to viruses in such patients in comparison with normal subjects and patients with muscular dystrophy.

Levels of circulating IgM immune complexes were elevated (above the 95% normal control range) in 10 (17%) of 58 patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, which was not significantly different from the normal controls or from dystrophy controls (by Mann Whitney U test). Levels of IgG complexes were only increased in 10% of patients. Lymphocyte proliferation in response to concanavalin A (Con A), assessed by increase in 3H-thymidine incorporation, did not differ between 14 patients and 18 normal subjects.

The proliferative response to Coxsackie B virus antigen did not differ between chronic fatigue patients and normal subjects when expressed either as an increase in counts or as a stimulation index. Adjustment of the counts in relation to the proliferation response to Con A, as an indication of the overall proliferative response of the cell preparation, did not reveal any hidden difference. IgM antibodies to Coxsackie B viruses were not found in any of 20 patients and in 1 of 20 dystrophy controls.

Significant levels of neutralizing antibodies to Coxsackie B viruses 1-5 were found in 6 out of 19 (32%) patients compared with 4 out of 17 (24%) dystrophy controls, which does not differ from currently expected normal incidence. Antibody titres to other respiratory viruses were also not notably different between the patient and control groups.

In conclusion we can find no evidence for a definable viral aetiology for the chronic fatigue syndrome, neither in terms of a persistent infection nor an altered ability to respond to virus.

Comment in: Immune responsiveness in chronic fatigue syndrome. [Postgrad Med J. 1992]

 

Source: Milton JD, Clements GB, Edwards RH. Immune responsiveness in chronic fatigue syndrome. Postgrad Med J. 1991 Jun;67(788):532-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1656416

Note: You can read the full article herehttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2398884/

 

Review of laboratory findings for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Various abnormalities revealed by laboratory studies have been reported in adults with chronic fatigue syndrome. Those most consistently reported include depressed natural killer cell function and reduced numbers of natural killer cells; low levels of circulating immune complexes; low levels of several autoantibodies, particularly antinuclear antibodies and antithyroid antibodies; altered levels of immunoglobulins; abnormalities in number and function of lymphocytes; and modestly elevated levels of two Epstein-Barr virus-related antibodies, immunoglobulin G to viral capsid antigen and to early antigen.

 

Source: Buchwald D, Komaroff AL. Review of laboratory findings for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Rev Infect Dis. 1991 Jan-Feb;13 Suppl 1:S12-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1902321

 

A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

PURPOSE: The chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is characterized by profound fatigue, neuropsychiatric dysfunction, and frequent abnormalities in cell-mediated immunity. No effective therapy is known.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-nine patients (40 with abnormal cell-mediated immunity) participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of high-dose intravenously administered immunoglobulin G. The patients received three intravenous infusions of a placebo solution or immunoglobulin at a dose of 2 g/kg/month. Assessment of the severity of symptoms and associated disability, both before and after treatment, was completed at detailed interviews by a physician and psychiatrist, who were unaware of the treatment status. In addition, any change in physical symptoms and functional capacity was recorded using visual analogue scales, while changes in psychologic morbidity were assessed using patient-rated indices of depression. Cell-mediated immunity was evaluated by T-cell subset analysis, delayed-type hypersensitivity skin testing, and lymphocyte transformation with phytohemagglutinin.

RESULTS: At the interview conducted by the physician 3 months after the final infusion, 10 of 23 (43%) immunoglobulin recipients and three of the 26 (12%) placebo recipients were assessed as having responded with a substantial reduction in their symptoms and recommencement of work, leisure, and social activities. The patients designated as having responded had improvement in physical, psychologic, and immunologic measures (p less than 0.01 for each).

CONCLUSION: Immunomodulatory treatment with immunoglobulin is effective in a significant number of patients with CFS, a finding that supports the concept that an immunologic disturbance may be important in the pathogenesis of this disorder.

Comment in:

Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment for the chronic fatigue syndrome. [Am J Med. 1990]

Immunoglobulin treatment for chronic fatigue syndrome. [Am J Med. 1991]

Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome. [Am J Med. 1991]

Placebo responses in patients complaining of chronic fatigue. [Am J Med. 1991]

 

Source: Lloyd A, Hickie I, Wakefield D, Boughton C, Dwyer J. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome.  Am J Med. 1990 Nov;89(5):561-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2146875