Tag: Germany

Interdisciplinary, collaborative D-A-CH (Germany, Austria and Switzerland) consensus statement concerning the diagnostic and treatment of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

in English, German

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a severe, chronic multisystemic disease which, depending on its severity, can lead to considerable physical and cognitive impairment, loss of ability to work and the need for nursing care including artificial nutrition and, in very severe cases, even death.

The aim of this D-A-CH (Germany, Austria, Switzerland) consensus statement is 1) to summarize the current state of knowledge on ME/CFS, 2) to highlight the Canadian Consensus Criteria (CCC) as clinical criteria for diagnostics with a focus on the leading symptom post-exertional malaise (PEM) and 3) to provide an overview of current options and possible future developments, particularly with regard to diagnostics and therapy. The D-A-CH consensus statement is intended to support physicians, therapists and valuer in diagnosing patients with suspected ME/CFS by means of adequate anamnesis and clinical-physical examinations as well as the recommended clinical CCC, using the questionnaires and other examination methods presented.

The overview of the two pillars of therapy for ME/CFS, pacing and symptom-relieving therapy options, is intended not only to provide orientation for physicians and therapists, but also to support decision-makers from healthcare policy and insurance companies in determining which therapy options should already be reimbursable by them at this point in time for the indication ME/CFS.

Source: Hoffmann K, Hainzl A, Stingl M, Kurz K, Biesenbach B, Bammer C, Behrends U, Broxtermann W, Buchmayer F, Cavini AM, Fretz GS, Gole M, Grande B, Grande T, Habermann-Horstmeier L, Hackl V, Hamacher J, Hermisson J, King M, Kohl S, Leiss S, Litzlbauer D, Renz-Polster H, Ries W, Sagelsdorff J, Scheibenbogen C, Schieffer B, Schön L, Schreiner C, Thonhofer K, Strasser M, Weber T, Untersmayr E. Interdisziplinäres, kollaboratives D-A-CH Konsensus-Statement zur Diagnostik und Behandlung von Myalgischer Enzephalomyelitis/Chronischem Fatigue-Syndrom [Interdisciplinary, collaborative D-A-CH (Germany, Austria and Switzerland) consensus statement concerning the diagnostic and treatment of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome]. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2024 Aug;136(Suppl 5):103-123. German. doi: 10.1007/s00508-024-02372-y. Epub 2024 May 14. PMID: 38743348. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38743348/

Multimodal treatment strategies for homebound people with severe ME/CFS: a scoping review

Abstract:

Purpose: This scoping review aims to provide an overview of previously published treatment strategies that are multimodal, rather than purely drug-based and may be considered for home- or bedbound ME/CFS patients. Thus, the focus lies upon the analyses of telemedicine as well as home treatment elements. In addition, the evaluation and assessment methods used in these studies will be further discussed.

Methods: Using the scoping review method, a literature analysis was conducted resulting in a total of 14 publications which met the predefined criteria. Inclusion was based on models applicable to housebound individuals with ME/CFS, focusing on social medicine and psychological support services rather than individual drug strategies.

Results: The analysis demonstrated that the appropriate treatment methods were predominantly home visits (n=5) or a telemedicine format (n=7). Studies which used alternative settings were included if conversion to a telemedicine format was viable. The important factors highlighted in several studies (n=8), when considering this patient group, were individualisation and flexibility of the treatment methods – and thus the ability to address the day-to-day levels of impairment. The explicit involvement of families in the treatment plan were described in a total of six studies. In ten articles, the treatment concept was additionally evaluated, predominantly using questionnaires (n=7), whilst the questionnaires used were not consistent. Qualitative evaluations were invariably conducted using Brown and Clarke‘s thematic analysis (n=3).

Conclusion: Publications on multimodal treatment strategies for homebound ME/CFS patients are rare. However approaches using home visits or telemedicine are described. The majority of identified publications addressed the need for individualised as well as flexible patient care, whilst some were dedicated to the added value of involving the patients’ family. The data outline the specific challenges associated with the care of severely affected ME/CFS patients that should also be considered in the context of research.

Source: Mayer-Huber S, Kircher A, Eberhartinger M, Stojanov S, Behrends U. Multimodale Behandlungsstrategien für hausgebundene Menschen mit schwerem ME/CFS: ein Scoping Review. Gesundheitswesen. 2024 May 10. German. doi: 10.1055/a-2323-4108. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38729210. https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/a-2323-4108

Systems thinking, subjective findings and diagnostic “pigeonholing” in ME/CFS: A mainly qualitative public health study from a patient perspective

Abstract:

in English, German

Background: ME/CFS (Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome) is an illness that is predominantly viewed as a neuroimmunological multisystem disease, which is still unknown to many doctors in Germany or which they classify as a psychosomatic disease. From their perspective, ME/CFS patients report significant deficits in terms of medical treatment and a doctor-patient relationship (DP relationship) that is perceived as problematic. The aim of the present study is to more precisely analyse the process of finding a diagnosis as an influencing factor on the DP relationship in ME/CFS from the point of view of those affected.

Method: As part of an explorative qualitative survey, 544 ME/CFS patients (> 20 years; 455 ♀, 89 ♂) with a medical diagnosis of ME/CFS were asked in writing about their experiences with regard to the process of finding a diagnosis. The sampling was previously done by self-activation and via the snowball principle. The questionnaire to be answered was structured analogously to a focused, standardized guideline interview. The evaluation was carried out as part of a qualitative content analysis according to Mayring. Some of the results were subsequently quantified.

Results: The participants described what they saw as the inadequate process of making a diagnosis as a central factor in a problematic DP relationship in ME/CFS. From their point of view, many doctors deny the existence of ME/CFS or classify it as a solely psychosomatic illness, insist on their level of knowledge, ignore patient knowledge and disregard scientific information provided. They follow the standard program, think in “pigeonholes” and are incapable of systemic thinking. This has a significant impact on the DP relationship.

Discussion: From the point of view of ME/CFS patients, the process of making a diagnosis and the recognition of ME/CFS as a neuroimmunological multisystem disease are the central aspects of a DP relationship that they experience as problematic. In the past, findings classified as “subjective” and thus ignored, the pigeonholing that is characteristic of biomedically oriented medicine and a healthcare system that opposes systemic thinking when making a diagnosis have all been identified as factors that may have a significant impact on the DP relationship.

Source: Habermann-Horstmeier L, Horstmeier LM. Systemisches Denken, subjektive Befunde und das diagnostische „Schubladendenken“ bei ME/CFS – Eine vorwiegend qualitative Public-Health-Studie aus Patientensicht [Systems thinking, subjective findings and diagnostic “pigeonholing” in ME/CFS: A mainly qualitative public health study from a patient perspective]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2023 Dec 14. German. doi: 10.1055/a-2197-6479. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38096913. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38096913/

Implications of the quality of the doctor-patient relationship on health in adult ME/CFS patients. A qualitative public health study from a patient perspective

Abstract:

in English, German

Background: Most patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) are dissatisfied with medical care. They complain about e. g. the lack of medical recognition of ME/CFS as a neuroimmunological disease and the medical perception of those affected as “difficult patients”.

Method: As part of an exploratory qualitative survey, 544 medically diagnosed ME/CFS patients (> 20 years; 455 ♀, 89 ♂) were asked about their subjective experiences with regard to the doctor-patient relationships (DP relationship) to their treating physicians. The questionnaire was structured analogously to a focused, standardized guideline interview. The written answers were evaluated using a qualitative content analysis according to Mayring.

Results: The participants reported a significant deterioration in their health situation and their quality of life as a result of misdiagnoses and incorrect treatments, the strained DP relationship and the lack of support from the physicians. All of this leads to fear of visiting the doctor, a general loss of trust in physicians, a feeling of helplessness up to bitterness and resignation – with suicide as the last mental option for some patients to escape from this precarious situation. During medical consultations, other participants only addressed health problems that were not related to ME/CFS, or only went to the doctor in an emergency, or refrained from contacting doctors entirely.

Conclusions: The DP relationship described by the participants as problematic in their opinion has significant negative health consequences for them. It is therefore of great urgency to develop a patient-centred treatment concept that focuses on ME/CFS patients as experts on their own illness.

Source: Habermann-Horstmeier L, Horstmeier LM. Auswirkungen der Qualität der Arzt-Patient-Beziehung auf die Gesundheit von erwachsenen ME/CFS-Erkrankten : Eine qualitative Public-Health-Studie aus Patientensicht [Implications of the quality of the doctor-patient relationship on health in adult ME/CFS patients. A qualitative public health study from a patien perspective]. MMW Fortschr Med. 2023 Dec;165(Suppl 5):16-27. German. doi: 10.1007/s15006-023-2894-z. PMID: 38062324.

Incidence and persistence of post-COVID condition in children – a matched cohort study in Germany

Abstract:

Introduction: Long-term health effects of COVID-19 have been investigated by several large cohort studies. As most of these studies have been conducted in adults, data on the incidence and persistence of post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) among children and adolescents are still limited.
Methods: Using routine healthcare data from statutory health insurance in Germany, children and adolescents with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 in 2020 were matched to controls (neither documented nor clinically suspected COVID-19) and followed for incident health conditions until 2021-09-30. To study PCC in children we considered selected health outcomes including malaise/fatigue (R53), dyspnea (R06.0), and cognitive dysfunction (F06.7, U51, R41), developmental delay (F80-89), adjustment disorder (F43), chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS; G93.3), and altered smell/anosmia (R43). The incidence of PCC was determined based on the lack of related diagnoses in the 12 months preceding the index quarter. For each outcome incidence rate ratios (IRR) were estimated using Poisson regression.
Results: At 3-month-follow-up, about 40% more individuals with COVID-19 suffered from at least one of the specified health conditions compared to controls. IRR were highest for smell/anosmia and CFS. IRR were generally higher among adolescents (≥12 years) than among younger children. Only a minority of PCC diagnoses persisted for 12 months within the COVID cohort. Diagnoses were more frequently persistent in the younger age group after one year.
Conclusions: Despite that long-term consequences of COVID-19 are less common and usually less severe in children, a considerable share of those diagnosed with PCC still suffered from specific symptoms 12 months after acute infection. Considering the high number of infected persons our findings suggest a relevant PCC related burden for health care even among children and adolescents.
Key messages:

• In routine healthcare data adolescents showed stronger associations between COVID-19 and post COVID-19 related ICD-10 diagnoses than children < 12 years of age.

• Serious ICD-10 diagnoses persisted for a longer time in younger children than adolescents.

Source: F Ehm, D Wende, F Loser, A Vivirito, S Menzer, M Batram, T Buschmann, G Sarganas, C Scheidt-Nave, J Schmitt, Incidence and persistence of post-COVID condition in children – a matched cohort study in Germany, European Journal of Public Health, Volume 33, Issue Supplement_2, October 2023, ckad160.095, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.095 https://academic.oup.com/eurpub/article/33/Supplement_2/ckad160.095/7327923 (Full text available as PDF file)

Interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy in postviral syndromes and ME/CFS : Features, pitfalls and model concept

Abstract:

in English, German

Background: Multimodal pain therapy usually take place in the context of group therapy lasting several weeks and is based on a generally activating approach. Due to the specificity of stress intolerance with postexertional malaise (PEM) in patients with postviral syndromes, physical as well as psychological overload must be urgently avoided in these cases; however, these aspects can only be insufficiently considered in current medical pain therapy concepts.

Methods: Summary of the current literature and presentation of clinical characteristics as well as presentation of a model project for a multimodal pain therapy in postviral syndromes with PEM.

Model concept: The presented model project describes a day clinic treatment setting for interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy adapted to the individual resilience with minimization of the risk of strain-induced deterioration of the condition.

Source: Luchting B, Behrends U, Eigner B, Stojanov S, Warlitz C, Haegele M, Neuwirth E, Mihatsch L, Richter HP. Interdisziplinäre multimodale Schmerztherapie bei postviralen Syndromen und ME/CFS : Besonderheiten, Fallstricke und Modellkonzept [Interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy in postviral syndromes and ME/CFS : Features, pitfalls and model concept]. Schmerz. 2023 Oct 20. German. doi: 10.1007/s00482-023-00761-2. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37864020/864020.

Long-term symptom severity and clinical biomarkers in post-COVID-19/chronic fatigue syndrome: results from a prospective observational cohort

Summary:

Background: Post-COVID-19 syndrome (PCS) is characterised by a wide range of symptoms, primarily fatigue and exertion intolerance. While disease courses in the early months post-infection have been well-described, the long-term health consequences for patients with PCS with disabling fatigue remain unclear.

Methods: In this prospective observational cohort study, we evaluated symptom severity and various biomarkers, including hand grip strength (HGS), cardiovascular function, and laboratory parameters, in 106 patients with PCS with moderate to severe fatigue and exertion intolerance at three time points after infection (3–8, 9–16, and 17–20 months). The study was conducted at the Charité’s Fatigue Centre and the Charité’s outpatient clinic for neuroimmunology at Berlin, Germany from July 16, 2020, to February 18, 2022. A subset of patients (PCS-ME/CFS) met the diagnostic criteria for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome according to the Canadian Consensus Criteria (CCC). The aim was to determine differences in the disease course between the two patient groups (i.e., PCS vs PCS-ME/CFS) and identify correlating biomarkers.

Findings: Patients with PCS-ME/CFS reported persistently high severity of most symptoms up to 20 months after infection, while patients with PCS showed overall health improvement. Although fatigue and post-exertional malaise (PEM), hallmarks of post-infectious fatigue syndromes, were still evident in both groups, they remained more pronounced in PCS-ME/CFS. Inflammatory biomarkers decreased in both groups, but not antinuclear antibodies. Lower HGS at onset correlated with symptom persistence, particularly in patients with PCS-ME/CFS.

Interpretation: Our findings suggest that PCS can persist beyond 20 months post-infection and encompass the full scope of post-infectious ME/CFS as defined by the CCC. Sub-classifying patients with PCS based on the CCC can assist in the management and monitoring of patients with PCS-ME/CFS due to their persistently higher symptom severity.

Source: Franziska Legler, Lil Meyer-Arndt, Lukas Mödl, Claudia Kedor, Helma Freitag, Elisa Stein, Uta Hoppmann, Rebekka Rust, Kirsten Wittke, Nadja Siebert, Janina Behrens, Andreas Thiel, Frank Konietschke, Friedemann Paul, Carmen Scheibenbogen, Judith Bellmann-Strobl,
Long-term symptom severity and clinical biomarkers in post-COVID-19/chronic fatigue syndrome: results from a prospective observational cohort, eClinicalMedicine, Volume 63, 2023, 102146, ISSN 2589-5370, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102146. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589537023003231 (Full text)

Longterm course of neuropsychological symptoms and ME/CFS after SARS-CoV-2-infection: a prospective registry study

Abstract:

A significant proportion of patients after SARS-CoV-2 infection suffer from long-lasting symptoms. Although many different symptoms are described, the majority of patients complains about neuropsychological symptoms. Additionally, a subgroup of patients fulfills diagnostic criteria for ME/CFS. We analyzed a registry of all patients presenting in the out-patients clinic at a German university center. For patients with more than one visit, changes in reported symptoms from first to second visit were analyzed.

A total of 1022 patients were included in the study, 411 of them had more than one visit. 95.5% of the patients reported a polysymptomatic disease. At the first visit 31.3% of the patients fulfilled ME/CFS criteria after a median time of 255 days post infection and and at the second visit after a median of 402 days, 19.4% still suffered from ME/CFS. Self-reported fatigue (83.7-72.7%) and concentration impairment (66.2-57.9%) decreased from first to second visit contrasting non-significant changes in the structured screening.

A significant proportion of SARS-CoV-2 survivors presenting with ongoing symptoms present with ME/CFS. Although the proportion of subjective reported symptoms and their severity reduce over time, a significant proportion of patients suffer from long-lasting symptoms necessitating new therapeutic concepts.

Source: Reuken PA, Besteher B, Finke K, Fischer A, Holl A, Katzer K, Lehmann-Pohl K, Lemhöfer C, Nowka M, Puta C, Walter M, Weißenborn C, Stallmach A. Longterm course of neuropsychological symptoms and ME/CFS after SARS-CoV-2-infection: a prospective registry study. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2023 Aug 16. doi: 10.1007/s00406-023-01661-3. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37587244. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00406-023-01661-3 (Full text)

One-Year Follow-up of Young People with ME/CFS Following Infectious Mononucleosis by Epstein-Barr Virus

Abstract:

Background: Infectious mononucleosis, caused by the Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV-IM), has been linked to the development of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue-syndrome (ME/CFS) in children, adolescents, and young adults. Our study presents the first cohort of young individuals in Germany who were diagnosed with ME/CFS following EBV-IM.

Methods: We conducted a one-year follow-up of 25 young people diagnosed with ME/CFS at our specialized tertiary outpatient service by clinical criteria requiring post-exertional malaise and with documented EBV-IM as the triggering event. Demographic information, laboratory findings, frequency and severity of symptoms, physical functioning, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were assessed at first visit as well as 6 and 12 months later at follow-up visits.

Results: The physical functioning and HRQoL of the cohort were significantly impaired, with young adults displaying more severe symptoms, as well as worsening of fatigue, physical and mental functioning, and HRQoL throughout the study, compared to adolescents. After one year, we found that 6/12 (54%) adolescents no longer met the diagnostic criteria for ME/CFS, indicating partial remission, while all young adults continued to fulfill the Canadian consensus criteria. Improvement in children was evident in physical functioning, symptom frequency and severity, and HRQoL, while young adults had little improvement. EBV serology and EBV DNA load did not correlate with distinct clinical features of ME/CFS, and clinical chemistry showed no evidence of inflammation. Remarkably, the median time from symptom onset to ME/CFS diagnosis was 13.8 (IQR: 9.1-34.9) months.

Conclusions: ME/CFS following EBV-IM in young people is a severely debilitating disease with diagnoses protracted longer than one year in many patients and only limited responses to conventional symptom-oriented medical care. Although younger children may have a better prognosis, their condition can fluctuate and significantly impact their HRQoL. Our data emphasize that biomarkers and effective therapeutic options are also urgently needed for this very young age group to better manage their medical condition and pave the way to recovery.

Source: Rafael Pricoco, Paulina Meidel, Tim Hofberger, Hannah Zietemann, Yvonne Mueller, Katharina Wiehler, Kaja Michel, Johannes Paulick, Ariane Leone, Matthias Haegele, Sandra Mayer-Huber, Katrin Gerrer, Kirstin Mittelstrass, Carmen Scheibenbogen, Herbert Renz-Polster, Lorenz Mihatsch, Uta Behrends. One-Year Follow-up of Young People with ME/CFS Following Infectious Mononucleosis by Epstein-Barr Virus. medRxiv 2023.07.24.23293082; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.24.23293082 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.07.24.23293082v1 (Full text available as PDF file)

How do German General Practitioners Manage Long-/Post-COVID? A Qualitative Study in Primary Care

Abstract:

Background: Many patients with ongoing complaints after a SARS-CoV-2 infection are treated in primary care. Existing medical guidelines on how to diagnose and treat Long-/Post-COVID are far from being comprehensive. This study aims to describe how German general practitioners (GPs) deal with this situation, what problems they experience when managing such patients, and how they solve problems associated with the diagnosis and treatment of Long-/Post-COVID.
Methods and Findings: We conducted a qualitative study and interviewed 11 GPs. The most commonly described symptoms were ongoing fatigue, dyspnea, chest tightness and a decrease in physical capacity. The most common way to identify Long-/Post-COVID was by exclusion. Patients suffering from Long-/Post-COVID were generally treated by their GPs and rarely referred. A very common non-pharmacological intervention was to take a wait-and-see approach and grant sick leave. Other non-pharmacological interventions included lifestyle advices, physical exercise, acupuncture and exercises with intense aromas. Pharmacological treatments focused on symptoms, like respiratory symptoms or headaches. Our study’s main limitations are the small sample size and therefore limited generalizability of results.
Conclusions: Further research is required to develop and test pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical interventions for patients with Long-/Post-COVID. In addition, strategies to prevent the occurrence of Long-/Post-COVID after an acute infection with SARS-CoV-2 have to be developed. The routine collection of data on the diagnosis and management of Long-/Post-COVID may help in the formulation of best practices. It is up to policymakers to facilitate the necessary implementation of effective interventions in order to limit the huge societal consequences of large groups of patients suffering from Long-/Post-COVID.
Source: Bachmeier BE, Hölzle S, Gasser M, van den Akker M. How do German General Practitioners Manage Long-/Post-COVID? A Qualitative Study in Primary Care. Viruses. 2023; 15(4):1016. https://doi.org/10.3390/v15041016 https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/15/4/1016 (Full text)