Tag: general practice

Epidemiologic study of chronic fatigue in primary care (general practice)

Abstract:

The results of a cross sectional study of fatigue in two large samples of patients attending primary care physicians are reported. The level of complaint of fatigue was higher in the prospective sample, which consisted of patients who had been diagnosed as suffering from a viral infection six months earlier. Duration and frequency of experience of fatigue correlated with severity in both samples. Severity, duration and frequency were continuously distributed in these populations.

Attribution of fatigue in these two samples was mixed: social stresses, current physical illness and psychological problems all being offered as explanations. 11% of the cross sectional sample and 17% of the prospective sample met study operational criteria for a possible chronic fatigue state. These patients were assessed in greater detail. The majority had a diagnosable psychiatric disorder, predominantly depression. Physical illnesses were not adequate to explain these fatigue states.

These studies in primary care do not support a clinical entity of a “chronic fatigue syndrome”. Some patients in primary care settings have complaints of fatigue that are both disabling and long lasting, but they do not form a distinct group although the majority are likely however to be suffering from a concurrent psychiatric disorder. In contrast to similar patients with chronic fatigue syndromes attending hospital clinics, primary care patients with complaints of fatigue are much more varied in their ideas of causation with considerable less evidence of disease conviction.

 

Source: Mann AH, Mc Donald E, Cope H, Pelosi A, David A. Epidemiologic study of chronic fatigue in primary care (general practice). Encephale. 1994 Nov;20 Spec No 3:575-9. [Article in French] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7843054

 

Population based study of fatigue and psychological distress

Abstract:

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of fatigue in the general population and the factors associated with fatigue.

DESIGN: Postal survey.

SETTING: Six general practices in southern England.

SUBJECTS: 31,651 men and women aged 18-45 years registered with the practices.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Responses to the 12 item general health questionnaire and a fatigue questionnaire which included self reported measures of duration, severity, and causes of fatigue.

RESULTS: 15,283 valid questionnaires were returned, giving a response rate of 48.3%, (64% after adjustment for inaccuracies in the practice registers). 2798 (18.3%) of respondents reported substantial fatigue lasting six months or longer. Fatigue and psychological morbidity were moderately correlated (r = 0.62). Women were more likely to complain of fatigue than men, even after adjustment for psychological distress. The commonest cited reasons for fatigue were psychosocial (40% of patients). Of 2798 patients with excessive tiredness, only 38 (1.4%) attributed this to the chronic fatigue syndrome.

CONCLUSION: Fatigue is distributed as a continuous variable in the community and is closely associated with psychological morbidity.

Comment in:

Patients with a self diagnosis of myalgic encephalomyelitis. [BMJ. 1995]

Twists in the tale of impossible means. The reviewer shows that the gremlins might have attacked on several fronts. [BMJ. 2000]

Twists in the tale of impossible means. In which a copy of the original manuscript is found safe in Norway. [BMJ. 2000]

Fatigue and psychological distress. Statistics are improbable. [BMJ. 2000]

 

Source: Pawlikowska T, Chalder T, Hirsch SR, Wallace P, Wright DJ, Wessely SC. Population based study of fatigue and psychological distress. BMJ. 1994 Mar 19;308(6931):763-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2539651/

You can read the full article here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2539651/pdf/bmj00432-0041.pdf

 

General practitioners acceptance of the validity of chronic fatigue syndrome as a diagnosis

Abstract:

AIM: To identify whether general practitioners accept the validity of a diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS).

METHOD: An anonymous questionnaire was sent out to 98 general practitioners in Otago.

RESULTS: The clinical validity of chronic fatigue syndrome was accepted by 74 (90%); 57 believed they had sufficient knowledge about the condition to make a differential diagnosis; 72 indicated they had had patients with chronic fatigue syndrome in the past; 62 currently had patients; there is a minimum prevalence rate of 167/100,000 in the general practice population; 83 replies were received.

CONCLUSION: The 90% acceptance rate of chronic fatigue syndrome as a clinically valid diagnosis suggests that amongst the Otago general practitioners the controversy had receded. The low numbers suggest that they are on the conservative end of the diagnostic spectrum.

 

Source: Denz-Penhey H, Murdoch JC. General practitioners acceptance of the validity of chronic fatigue syndrome as a diagnosis. N Z Med J. 1993 Apr 14;106(953):122-4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8474729

 

Service delivery for people with chronic fatigue syndrome: a pilot action research study

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a symptom complex which while mild in some cases is severely debilitating in others. Long-term ill health leads to greater use of resources but in the case of long-term CFS the anecdotal evidence suggested a low compliance with the available options and a high level of both patient and general practitioner dissatisfaction.

This pilot study sought through repeated action research cycles to start to identify culturally and contextually sensitive forms of language and models for service delivery suitable for people with CFS in a general practice setting. It worked through a number of action research cycles, to initiate the identification of conceptual models acceptable to both doctors and to patients suffering from CFS, self-management options which encouraged the body’s ability to heal itself and services and delivery mechanisms which met patient needs within health provider options.

 

Source: Denz-Penhey H, Murdoch JC. Service delivery for people with chronic fatigue syndrome: a pilot action research study. Fam Pract. 1993 Mar;10(1):14-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8477887

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Fatigue is one of the most common complaints among patients seen in the primary care setting. Chronic fatigue syndrome, which has recently been called chronic fatigue immune dysfunction syndrome, is distinctive, with an abrupt onset of symptoms that wax and wane for at least six months.

Usually there is low-grade fever, pharyngitis and tender, but not enlarged, lymph nodes. The fatigue can be disabling and is often made worse by physical activity. Some patients with this disorder have also been found to have highly characteristic immunologic abnormalities.

Treatment can be rewarding and is based on patient education and support, exercise and symptomatic therapies for abnormal sleep patterns, musculoskeletal pain and other symptoms.

 

Source: Calabrese L, Danao T, Camara E, Wilke W. Chronic fatigue syndrome. Am Fam Physician. 1992 Mar;45(3):1205-13. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1543105

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome. A review from the general practice perspective

Abstract:

There is no doubt that the chronic fatigue syndrome exists. It is a condition that is debilitating and of unknown cause. Research into chronic fatigue syndrome demonstrates possible psychiatric or organic causes. The truth may be somewhere in between. Evidence for the existence of an ongoing chronic infection is now not convincing. Treatment should be based on supportive counselling, explanation, psychiatric help (both pharmacological and non pharmacological) and a graded programme of increased activity with the eventual aim of resumption of full functioning.

Comment in: Chronic fatigue syndrome. [Aust Fam Physician. 1993]

 

Source: Holmwood C, Shannon C. Chronic fatigue syndrome. A review from the general practice perspective. Aust Fam Physician. 1992 Mar;21(3):278-9, 283-5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1318714

 

Tired all the time

General practitioners often see a syndrome they call “tired all the time.” How often doctors see it depends on how tiredness is defined and where it is measured. Morrell recorded fatigue as the most important reason for consultation in 24 per 2000 registered patients in one year 1; Jerrett recorded fatigue as a presenting or supporting symptom in 150 per 2000 registered patients.2 Yet patients may not necessarily mention fatigue when they consult. A survey of patients waiting in one surgery found that a tenth reported “substantial fatigue” for a month or more 3; 18-34% of respondents in a community survey reported always feeling tired in the past month 4; and when young women patients were asked to record symptoms in diaries 400 episodes of fatigue were recorded for every one reported to the doctor.5 Clinicians may regard this iceberg as a puzzle, and a blessing. But how should they manage the cases that do present?

Little has been published on tiredness in primary care, with only one prospective study from Britain2 and two retrospective ones from American family practice.67 The results suggest that psychosocial causes are paramount in 40-51% of cases and physical causes in 21-39%.267 The remaining cases are of mixed or undetermined cause. Fatigue presents three times more often in women of childbearing age,2 who often have a working day that is long and difficult to organise, with no boundary between home and work.8 The wise doctor steers between the extremes of trivialising and medicalising such “social” fatigue. If the cause is existential rather than medical counselling may help the patient consider various alternatives and make new choices.

You can read the rest of this article here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1671843/pdf/bmj00157-0008.pdf

 

Source: Ridsdale L. Tired all the time. BMJ. 1991 Dec 14;303(6816):1490-1. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1671843/

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome

Comment on: General practitioners’ experience of the chronic fatigue syndrome. [Br J Gen Pract. 1991]

 

Sir, Ho-Yen and McNamara give an interesting account of general practitioners’ experience of the chronic fatigue syndrome (August Journal, p.324). However, many of the conclusions which they draw are not supported by their study.

The problem lies in the method by which cases were identified. It seems unlikely that the doctors who responded to the questionnaire would have screened every patient on their practice lists for the condition. Even to screen only those patients who attended the surgery would have been a massive undertaking. There is no evidence that the practices involved kept a case register for this illness. I presume therefore that the cases reported were identified from memory by the doctors who responded to the survey. Thus, for patients who meet the criteria for this illness to be identified as a ‘case’ they must: decide that they are ill, decide to visit the doctor, be correctly identified as a case by the general practitioner and leave such an impression on the doctor’s mind as to be easily recalled later. It is very unlikely that, having passed through such a selection procedure, the cases identified would represent either the true number or display the typical characteristics of patients with this condition in the general population.

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1371804/pdf/brjgenprac00062-0042b.pdf

 

Source: Plummer WP. Chronic fatigue syndrome. Br J Gen Pract. 1991 Nov;41(352):480. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1371804/

 

Antidepressant therapy in the chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

The chronic fatigue syndrome is a condition receiving increasing recognition. Symptoms of depression are not infrequent and may be persistent and severe enough to warrant treatment. The controversy over the use of antidepressant therapy in this condition may present a dilemma for the general practitioner considering possible treatments. This paper draws on the literature and on the authors’ own observations of patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome to suggest guidelines for the use of antidepressant therapy.

Comment in:

Chronic fatigue syndrome. [Br J Gen Pract. 1991]

Chronic fatigue syndrome. [Br J Gen Pract. 1991]

 

Source: Lynch S, Seth R, Montgomery S. Antidepressant therapy in the chronic fatigue syndrome. Br J Gen Pract. 1991 Aug;41(349):339-42. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1822108

Note: You can read the full article here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1371759/

 

General practitioners’ experience of the chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

In order to examine the prevalence of patients with symptoms fulfilling the criteria for the chronic fatigue syndrome an extensive survey was carried out of general practitioners on 10 local government lists in two health boards (91% response rate). At the same time practitioners’ attitudes to the syndrome and their experience in terms of workload and the characteristics of patients affected were documented.

The majority of general practitioners (71%) accepted the existence of chronic fatigue syndrome, but 22% were undecided. The doctors reported a prevalence among their patients of 1.3 per 1000 patients (range 0.3-2.7 for the 10 areas) with a peak in the 30-44 years age group. Female patients were more commonly affected than males (sex ratio 1.8:1.0), but the severity of illness and the use of general practitioner’s time was the same among male and female patients. Patients in occupations where they were exposed to infection were affected (teachers and students, 22% of sample; hospital workers, 7%), but many patients were unskilled (8%) and skilled workers (9%).

Patients suffering from the chronic fatigue syndrome appear to be a real and distinct group for general practitioners and may represent a substantial part of the workload of doctors in particular areas.

Comment in:

Chronic fatigue syndrome. [Br J Gen Pract. 1991]

Chronic fatigue syndrome. [Br J Gen Pract. 1991]

 

Source: Ho-Yen DO, McNamara I. General practitioners’ experience of the chronic fatigue syndrome. Br J Gen Pract. 1991 Aug;41(349):324-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1777276

Note: You can read the full article here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1371754/