Tag: Friedberg

Politics, science, and the emergence of a new disease. The case of chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) emerged as a diagnostic category during the last decade. Initial research suggested that CFS was a relatively rare disorder with a high level of psychiatric comorbidity. Many physicians minimized the seriousness of this disorder and also interpreted the syndrome as being equivalent to a psychiatric disorder. These attitudes had negative consequences for the treatment of CFS.

By the mid-1990s, findings from more representative epidemiological studies indicated considerably higher CFS prevalence rates. However, the use of the revised CFS case definition might have produced heterogeneous patient groups, possibly including some patients with pure psychiatric disorders.

Social scientists have the expertise to more precisely define this syndrome and to develop appropriate and sensitive research strategies for understanding this disease.

Comment in: The biopsychosocial model and chronic fatigue syndrome. [Am Psychol. 1998]

 

Source: Jason LA, Richman JA, Friedberg F, Wagner L, Taylor R, Jordan KM. Politics, science, and the emergence of a new disease. The case of chronic fatigue syndrome. Am Psychol. 1997 Sep;52(9):973-83. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9301342

 

Cognitive functioning and depression in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and multiple sclerosis

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To assess cognitive function in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and multiple sclerosis (MS) and to evaluate the role of depressive symptoms in cognitive performance.

DESIGN: Case-control. All subjects were given a neuropsychological battery, self-report measures of depression and fatigue, and a global cognitive impairment rating by a neuropsychologist “blinded” to clinical diagnosis. Patients with MS and CFS were additionally evaluated with a Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Revised Third Edition) disorders.

SETTING: Institutional and private neurological practices and the community at large.

PATIENTS: Twenty patients with CFS diagnosed in accord with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-revised criteria who had cognitive complaints; 20 patients with clinically definite MS who were ambulatory and were matched for fatigue severity, age, and education to CFS subjects; and 20 age- and education-matched healthy controls.

RESULTS: Patients with CFS had significantly elevated depression symptoms compared with patients with MS and healthy controls (P < .001) and had a greater lifetime prevalence of depression and dysthymia compared with MS subjects. Patients with CFS, relative to controls, performed more poorly on the Digit Symbol subtest (P = .023) and showed a trend for poorer performance on logical memory (P = .087). Patients with MS compared with controls had more widespread differences of greater magnitude on the Digit Span (P < .004) and Digit Symbol (P < .001), Trail Making parts A (P = .022) and B (P = .037), and Controlled Oral Word Association (P = .043) tests. Patients with MS also showed a trend of poorer performance on the Booklet Category Test (P = .089). When patients with CFS and MS were directly compared, MS subjects had lower scores on all measures, but the differences reached significance only for the Digit Span measure of attention (P = .035).

CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CFS compared with MS have more depressive symptoms but less cognitive impairment. Relative to controls, a subset of CFS subjects did poorly on tests of visuomotor search and on the logical memory measure of the Wechsler Memory Scale-revised. Poor performance of logical memory in CFS appears to be related to depression, while visuomotor deficits in CFS are unrelated. Cognitive deficits in patients with MS are more widespread compared with those in patients with CFS and are independent of depressive symptoms.

 

Source: Krupp LB, Sliwinski M, Masur DM, Friedberg F, Coyle PK. Cognitive functioning and depression in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol. 1994 Jul;51(7):705-10. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8018045

 

A comparison of cognitive behavioral treatment for chronic fatigue syndrome and primary depression

Abstract:

To evaluate the effect of cognitive behavioral intervention on chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), we studied three patient groups: a CFS-treatment group (n = 22), a primary depression-treatment group (n = 20), and a no-treatment control group of subjects with CFS (n = 22). For the CFS-treatment group, a trend toward reduced depression-symptom scores was noted, but there were no significant changes in stress-related symptoms or fatigue severity.

For the most depressed treated subjects with CFS, significant score reductions were observed in measures of depression, stress, fatigue severity, and fatigue-related thinking. In the depression group, significant reductions in depression, stress, and fatigue severity scores were found. No significant changes in any measure were observed in the CFS control group.

A new fatigue-related cognitions scale, developed to assess cognitive and emotional reactions to fatigue, showed a significant reduction in such reactions in the CFS-treatment group, a finding suggesting that depression in this group was mediated by maladaptive thinking. The results suggest that a subset of CFS patients with cognition-related depressive symptomatology may respond to short-term behavioral intervention.

Comment in: Cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome. [Clin Infect Dis. 1995]

 

Source: Friedberg F, Krupp LB. A comparison of cognitive behavioral treatment for chronic fatigue syndrome and primary depression. Clin Infect Dis. 1994 Jan;18 Suppl 1:S105-10. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8148435

 

A comparison of neuropsychiatric characteristics in chronic fatigue syndrome, multiple sclerosis, and major depression

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), a controversial clinical entity characterized by severe fatigue and constitutional symptoms, has been associated with a variety of psychiatric disorders. To further understand the psychiatric profile of CFS, the authors compared patients with CFS, multiple sclerosis (MS), and major depression by using diagnostic interviews and self-report measures of Axis I disorders and personality disorders. CFS patients differed from patients with major depression, with significantly less depression and fewer personality disorders. Compared with MS patients, CFS patients did not differ with regard to personality disorders. However, they did have significantly more frequent current depression than MS patients, particularly following onset of their illness.

 

Source: Pepper CM, Krupp LB, Friedberg F, Doscher C, Coyle PK. A comparison of neuropsychiatric characteristics in chronic fatigue syndrome, multiple sclerosis, and major depression. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1993 Spring;5(2):200-5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8508039