exercise – Page 9 – American ME and CFS Society

Follow up of patients presenting with fatigue to an infectious diseases clinic

Abstract:

OBJECTIVES: To determine the symptomatic and functional status during follow up of patients referred to hospital with unexplained fatigue and to identify patient variables associated with persistent functional impairment.

DESIGN: Follow up by postal questionnaire six weeks to four years (median 1 year) after initial clinical assessment of patients referred to hospital during 1984-8.

SETTING: Infectious diseases outpatient clinic in a teaching hospital.

PATIENTS: 200 consecutive patients with fatigue of uncertain cause for at least six weeks; 177 fulfilled the inclusion criteria.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Findings at initial assessment; current symptoms, beliefs about the cause of illness, coping behaviours emotional disorder, social variables including membership of self help organizations, and degrees of recovery and functional impairment from questionnaire responses.

RESULTS: 144 (81%) patients returned completed questionnaires. Initial assessment did not indicate the cause of fatigue, other than preceding infection. The proportion of patients with functional impairment was significantly smaller with longer follow up (33% (11/33) at two to four years, 73% (29/40) at six weeks to six months; chi 2 for trend = 12.5, df = 1; p less than 0.05). Functional impairment was significantly associated with belief in a viral cause of the illness (odds ratio = 3.9; 95% confidence interval 1.5 to 9.9), limiting exercise (3.2; 1.5 to 6.6), avoiding alcohol (4.5; 1.8 to 11.3), changing or leaving employment (3.1; 1.4 to 6.9), belonging to a self help organization (7.8; 2.5 to 23.9), and current emotional disorder (4.4; 2.0 to 9.3).

CONCLUSIONS: Short term prognosis for recovery of function was poor but improved with time. Most patients had made a functional recovery by two years after initial clinic attendance. Impaired functioning was more likely with certain patient characteristics. Prospective studies are required to clarify whether these associations are the consequences of a more disabling illness or indicate factors contributing to impaired function.

Comment in

Outcome in the chronic fatigue syndrome. [BMJ. 1992]

Source: Sharpe M, Hawton K, Seagroatt V, Pasvol G. Follow up of patients presenting with fatigue to an infectious diseases clinic. BMJ. 1992 Jul 18;305(6846):147-52. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1515828

Note: You can read the full article here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1883193/

Chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

The chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a poorly understood condition with nonspecific signs and symptoms, especially debilitating fatigue. Most patients can pinpoint the onset of their illness and usually describe a flu-like state. The search for an etiologic agent has focused on a number of viruses such as Epstein-Barr, enteroviruses, retroviruses, and human herpesvirus-6.

Evidence supports persistent viral infection in a small percentage of CFS patients. Immunologic abnormalities do exist in CFS, which indicate the presence of immune activation in CFS patients.

Although abnormal muscle biopsies have been found in some patients with CFS, strength and endurance appear normal, but perception of exertion may be abnormal. Patients with chronic fatigue have a high incidence of premorbid and concurrent psychiatric disorders, and on physical examination many often have reproducible tender points similar to fibromyalgic patients. Clinical evaluation should rule out other potential causes of fatigue, but elaborate diagnostic tests are seldom required.

Presently, no specific treatment exists for CFS. A cognitive behavioral approach with or without the use of tricyclics has been advocated. Patients should be encouraged to maintain functional status and should not be discouraged from exercise. Several medications have been tried but with no definite clinical benefit.

Source: Winters EG, Quinet RJ. Chronic fatigue syndrome. J La State Med Soc. 1992 Jun;144(6):260-70. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1619343

Chronic fatigue syndrome: a joint paediatric-psychiatric approach

Comment in: Chronic fatigue syndrome: a joint paediatric-psychiatric approach. [Arch Dis Child. 1992]

Prolonged fatigue after an apparent viral infection, occurring sporadically or as an epidemic, has been described over the past 50 years. It has been given various names including Royal Free disease (1) and myalgic encephalomyelitis, but the preferred terms in the medical literature have been postviral fatigue syndrome (2) or chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). (3)

However, the validity of this syndrome as a nosological entity has created a good deal of controversy and remains in doubt. (4) A constellation of symptoms make up the syndrome. There is fatigue of defined onset that is generally reported to follow a viral illness, often an influenza-like illness or an infection of the upper respiratory tract. The patient experiences profound fatigue with the initial illness and then fails to make the expected recovery, with fatigue that can persist over months or years. Fatigue is defined as a subjective sensation, which the patient often describes as tiredness or weariness and that occurs at rest. These patients also report a clear relationship of fatigue to activity. The term fatiguability has been used to describe the greater than normal fatigue that occurs after physical and sometimes after mental exertion in these patients. A great variety of associated symptoms have been described that include increased sleepiness, dizziness, vertigo, headache, difficulty in concentrating, sore throat, muscle weakness, and myalgia. The majority of patients have some emotional symptoms. There can be irritability and anxiety, tearfulness and depression. The fatigue and associated symptoms are of such severity as to impair significantly normal daily activities. There is a remarkable absence of physical signs and physical investigations fail to detect any organic pathology or current infection to account for the symptoms.

You can read the rest of this article here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1793327/pdf/archdisch00639-0088.pdf

Source: Vereker MI. Chronic fatigue syndrome: a joint paediatric-psychiatric approach. Arch Dis Child. 1992 Apr;67(4):550-5. ht tp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1793327/

Chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Fatigue is one of the most common complaints among patients seen in the primary care setting. Chronic fatigue syndrome, which has recently been called chronic fatigue immune dysfunction syndrome, is distinctive, with an abrupt onset of symptoms that wax and wane for at least six months.

Usually there is low-grade fever, pharyngitis and tender, but not enlarged, lymph nodes. The fatigue can be disabling and is often made worse by physical activity. Some patients with this disorder have also been found to have highly characteristic immunologic abnormalities.

Treatment can be rewarding and is based on patient education and support, exercise and symptomatic therapies for abnormal sleep patterns, musculoskeletal pain and other symptoms.

Source: Calabrese L, Danao T, Camara E, Wilke W. Chronic fatigue syndrome. Am Fam Physician. 1992 Mar;45(3):1205-13. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1543105

Conversation piece

Dr E.G. Dowsett is Honorary Consultant Microbiologist, Basildon and Thurrock Health Authority and is the President of the Myalgic Encephalomyelitis Society.

DR P.D. WELSBY: I, and indeed many general physicians, are often asked to see patients whose main complaint is ‘tiredness all the time (TATT)’. From my previous experience also of general practice it seems that there is a wide continuous spectrum of debility ranging from a few days or weeks, but sometimes, distressingly, lasting for years. Such illnesses may or may not follow symptoms of an infection. Does the Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME) Society differentiate between post-viral debility, postinfectious (often an undefined infection) fatigue syndrome, chronic fatigue syndrome and ME? If so, how, and should it make any difference to medical management?

DR E.G. DOWSETT: One of the most striking features of ME is that the patient is not tired all the time! Extreme and sudden variability of energy levels both within and between episodes of illness differentiate this syndrome from other diseases associated with fatigue. One can only deplore the current fashion in the United States as well as the United Kingdom to redefine and rename a disability which has been clearly described in the literature for at least 100 years.’ There is nothing to be said in favour of the American acronym CFIDS (chronic fatigue immune deficiency syndrome) with its connotation of a primary immune dysfunction. The term ‘chronic fatigue syndrome’ recently adopted in this country also is nonspecific and non-descriptive because most of the definition is based on a vast number of exclusions (some of which, for example, endocrine disturbance, are actually found in ME). ‘Post-viral fatigue syndrome’, another British name, describes one essential feature (the association of the illness with viral infection) but gives the impression that the infection was antecedent rather than, as we now know, persistent. I prefer to use the more specific term ‘myalgic encephalomyelitis’ as it emphasizes the essential encephalitic component of the illness, the muscle pain, and the close clinical and epidemiological similarity to poliomyelitis.

You can read the rest of this interview here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2399326/pdf/postmedj00061-0066.pdf

Source: E. G. Dowsett. Conversation piece. Interview by P. D. Welsby.Postgrad Med J. 1992 Jan; 68(795): 63–65. PMCID: PMC2399326 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2399326/