exercise avoidance – American ME and CFS Society

Does a decrease in avoidance behavior and focusing on fatigue mediate the effect of cognitive behavior therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome?

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) leads to a significant reduction in fatigue severity and impairment in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the effect of CBT for CFS on fatigue and impairment is mediated by a decrease in avoidance behavior and focusing on fatigue.

METHODS: For this purpose, we reanalyzed a randomized controlled trial which was previously conducted to test the efficacy of CBT for CFS. Two hundred nineteen patients completed assessment prior and subsequent to treatment or a control group period.

RESULTS: Mediation analysis revealed that a decrease in focusing on fatigue mediated the effect of CBT for CFS on fatigue and impairment. Avoidance of activity and avoidance of aversive stimuli were not significantly changed by treatment and were therefore excluded from mediation analysis.

CONCLUSION: A decrease in the focus on fatigue seems to contribute to the treatment effect of CBT for CFS.

Source: Wiborg JF, Knoop H, Prins JB, Bleijenberg G. Does a decrease in avoidance behavior and focusing on fatigue mediate the effect of cognitive behavior therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome? J Psychosom Res. 2011 Apr;70(4):306-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.12.011. Epub 2011 Feb 12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21414449

Kinesiophobia in chronic fatigue syndrome: assessment and associations with disability

Abstract:

OBJECTIVES: To investigate aspects of the validity of the total scores of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), Dutch Version, which was modified to make it an appropriate questionnaire for the assessment of kinesiophobia (fear of movement) in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) patients (the Dutch TSK-CFS), and, using this assessment tool, to examine the associations between kinesiophobia, exercise capacity, and activity limitations and participation restrictions in patients with CFS.

DESIGN: Prospective observational studies.

SETTING: An outpatient fatigue clinic.

PARTICIPANTS: In the first study, 40 patients fulfilling the 1994 US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria for CFS were enrolled. The sample of the second study consisted of 51 CDC-defined patients with CSF.

INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. Main outcome measures Study 1: Subjects completed a set of questionnaires; the Utrechtse Coping List (UCL), the Dutch TSK-CFS, and the Dutch Baecke Questionnaire of Habitual Physical Activity. Study 2: All patients completed 2 questionnaires (Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Activities and Participation Questionnaire [CFS-APQ], Dutch TSK-CFS) and performed a maximal exercise stress test on a bicycle ergometer. The heart rate was monitored continuously by use of an electrocardiograph. Metabolic and ventilatory parameters were measured through spirometry.

RESULTS: Study 1: The Cronbach alpha coefficient for the individual item scores on the TSK-CFS was .80. The total scores on the Dutch TSK-CFS showed a statistically significant correlation with both the avoidance/abide subscale of the UCL (Spearman rho=.35, P=.029) and the total score of the Baecke Questionnaire (rho=-.45, P=.004). Study 2: The total scores on the Dutch TSK-CFS showed a statistically significant correlation with the total scores on the CFS-APQ (rho=.39, P=.004). No statistically significant associations were observed between the exercise capacity parameters and the total scores on the Dutch TSK-CFS.

CONCLUSIONS: These results provide evidence for the internal consistency and the convergent and congruent validity of the scores obtained by use of the Dutch TSK-CFS. Kinesiophobia appears to be associated with activity limitations/participation restrictions but not with exercise capacity in patients with CFS.

Source: Nijs J, De Meirleir K, Duquet W. Kinesiophobia in chronic fatigue syndrome: assessment and associations with disability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Oct;85(10):1586-92. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15468015

Chronic fatigue syndrome: lack of association between pain-related fear of movement and exercise capacity and disability

Abstract:

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients who experience pain, a symptom of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), often exhibit kinesiophobia (irrational fear of movement). The purpose of this study was to examine whether pain-related fear of movement is associated with exercise capacity, activity limitations, or participation restrictions in patients with CFS who experience widespread pain.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Sixty-four subjects met the inclusion criteria. All subjects fulfilled the 1994 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention case definition for CFS and experienced widespread myalgias or arthralgias. The subjects completed the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-Dutch Version (TSK-DV) and the Dutch Chronic Fatigue Syndrome-Activities and Participation Questionnaire (CFS-APQ). They then performed a maximal exercise test on a bicycle ergometer. Heart rate was monitored continuously by use of an electrocardiograph. Ventilatory factors were measured through spirometry. Correlations between the TSK-DV scores and both the exercise capacity data and the CFS-APQ scores were assessed using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Using the Mann-Whitney U test, the TSK-DV scores were compared between subjects who performed a maximal exercise stress test and those who did not perform the test.

RESULTS: Forty-seven subjects (73.4%) attained a total score of greater than 37 on the TSK-DV, indicating high fear of movement. Neither the exercise capacity data nor the CFS-APQ scores indicated a correlation with the TSK-DV scores (n=64). Subjects who did not perform a maximal exercise capacity test had more fear of movement (median TSK-DV score=43.0, interquartile range=10.3) compared with those who did perform a maximal exercise capacity test (median TSK-DV score=38.0, interquartile range=13.2; Mann-Whitney U-test score=322.5, z=-1.974, P=.048), but the correlation analysis was unable to reveal an association between exercise capacity and kinesiophobia in either subgroup.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: These results indicate a lack of correlation between kinesiophobia and exercise capacity, activity limitations, or participation restrictions, at least in patients with CFS who are experiencing widespread muscle or joint pain.

Source: Nijs J, Vanherberghen K, Duquet W, De Meirleir K. Chronic fatigue syndrome: lack of association between pain-related fear of movement and exercise capacity and disability. Phys Ther. 2004 Aug;84(8):696-705. http://ptjournal.apta.org/content/84/8/696.long (Full article)

The role of fear of physical movement and activity in chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To examine beliefs in relation to avoidance of activity in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) patients.

METHODS: The first phase consisted of modifying an existing chronic pain measure of kinesiophobia-fear of physical movement and activity-and validating it on the CFS population [Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-Fatigue (TSK-F); n=129; test-retest: r=.89, P<.001; alpha=.68]. Subscales of Illness Beliefs (alpha=.78) and Beliefs about Activity (alpha=.70) were identified. The second phase consisted of evaluating whether behavioural persistence was predicted by the TSK-F (n=33). Participants were asked to ride an exercise bike for as long as they felt able.

RESULTS: Analyses indicated that behavioural persistence did not correlate with maximal heart rate or resting heart rate, level of tiredness, symptom severity, illness identity or emotional distress. However, the TSK-F did correlate highly with distance travelled and added a significant 15% of the variance in distance after adjustments for gender and physical functioning (PF). The TSK-F Beliefs about Activity subscale appears to be the predictive factor, explaining 12% of the variance in excise performance or rather 12% of the avoidance of exercise.

CONCLUSION: Beliefs about Activity appear to be an important variable in predicting behaviour and avoidance of exercise. As avoidance has been suggested as a key to the maintenance of symptoms, disability and distress in CFS patients, this research has important theoretical, clinical and research implications.

Source: Silver A, Haeney M, Vijayadurai P, Wilks D, Pattrick M, Main CJ. The role of fear of physical movement and activity in chronic fatigue syndrome. J Psychosom Res. 2002 Jun;52(6):485-93. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12069873

Discriminating between chronic fatigue syndrome and depression: a cognitive analysis

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and depression share a number of common symptoms and the majority of CFS patients meet lifetime criteria for depression. While cognitive factors seem key to the maintenance of CFS and depression, little is known about how the cognitive characteristics differ in the two conditions.

METHODS: Fifty-three CFS patients were compared with 20 depressed patients and 38 healthy controls on perceptions of their health, illness attributions, self-esteem, cognitive distortions of general and somatic events, symptoms of distress and coping. A 6 month follow-up was also conducted to determine the stability of these factors and to investigate whether CFS-related cognitions predict ongoing disability and fatigue in this disorder.

RESULTS: Between-group analyses confirmed that the depressed group was distinguished by low self-esteem, the propensity to make cognitive distortions across all situations, and to attribute their illness to psychological factors. In contrast, the CFS patients were characterized by low ratings of their current health status, a strong illness identity, external attributions for their illness, and distortions in thinking that were specific to somatic experiences. They were also more likely than depressed patients to cope with their illness by limiting stress and activity levels. These CFS-related cognitions and behaviours were associated with disability and fatigue 6 months later.

CONCLUSIONS: CFS and depression can be distinguished by unique cognitive styles characteristic of each condition. The documented cognitive profile of the CFS patients provides support for the current cognitive behavioural models of the illness.

Source: Moss-Morris R, Petrie KJ. Discriminating between chronic fatigue syndrome and depression: a cognitive analysis. Psychol Med. 2001 Apr;31(3):469-79. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11305855

Toward a new definition of chronic fatigue syndrome

To the editor,

I agree with Lane when he writes that the operative criteria for diagnosing chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) are unsatisfactory. Some patients who have been assigned this label may be better described as having depression or somatization, and this mislabeling prejudices the understanding of CFS in cross-sectional studies.1 Lane is presumably referring to the definition of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, with its concentration on physical symptoms.2 This definition also is not all that helpful in assigning a label to individuals for the purposes of estimating prognosis or deciding on treatment because the physical symptoms cited are nonspecific.

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1071345/

Source: Robertson-Ritchie H. Toward a new definition of chronic fatigue syndrome. West J Med. 2001 Apr;174(4):241. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1071345/ (Full article)

Chronic fatigue syndrome: an update

Abstract:

The chronic fatigue syndrome is characterised by a fatigue that is disproportionate to the intensity of effort that is undertaken, has persisted for 6 months or longer, and has no obvious cause. Unless there has been a long period of patient- or physician-imposed inactivity, objective data may show little reduction in muscle strength or peak aerobic power, but the affected individual avoids heavy activity.

The study of aetiology and treatment has been hampered by the low disease prevalence (probably <0.1% of the general population), and (until recently) by a lack of clear and standardised diagnostic criteria. It is unclear how far the aetiology is similar for athletes and nonathletes. It appears that in top competitors, overtraining and/or a negative energy balance can be precipitating factors. A wide variety of other possible causes and/or precipitating factors have been cited in the general population, including psychological stress, disorders of personality and affect, dysfunction of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, hormonal imbalance, nutritional deficits, immune suppression or activation and chronic infection. However, none of these factors have been observed consistently. The prognosis is poor; often disability and impairment of athletic performance are prolonged.

Prevention of overtraining by careful monitoring seems the most effective approach in athletes. In those where the condition is established, treatment should aim at breaking the vicious cycle of effort avoidance, deterioration in physical condition and an increase in fatigue through a combination of encouragement and a progressive exercise programme.

Source: Shephard RJ. Chronic fatigue syndrome: an update. Sports Med. 2001;31(3):167-94. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11286355

Illness beliefs and treatment outcome in chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Longitudinal studies have shown that physical illness attributions are associated with poor prognosis in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Speculation exists over whether such attributions influence treatment outcome. This study reports the effect of illness beliefs on outcome in a randomized controlled trial of cognitive-behavior therapy versus relaxation.

Causal attributions and beliefs about exercise, activity, and rest were recorded before and after treatment in 60 CFS patients recruited to the trial. Physical illness attributions were widespread, did not change with treatment, and were not associated with poor outcome in either the cognitive-behavior therapy group or the control group.

Beliefs about avoidance of exercise and activity changed in the cognitive behavior therapy group, but not in the control group. This change was associated with improved outcome. These findings suggest that physical illness attributions are less important in determining outcome (at least in treatment studies) than has been previously thought. In this study, good outcome is associated with change in avoidance behavior, and related beliefs, rather than causal attributions.

Source: Deale A, Chalder T, Wessely S. Illness beliefs and treatment outcome in chronic fatigue syndrome. J Psychosom Res. 1998 Jul;45(1):77-83. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9720857

Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the acceptability and efficacy of adding cognitive behaviour therapy to the medical care of patients presenting with thechronic fatigue syndrome.

DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial with final assessment at 12 months.

SETTING: An infectious diseases outpatient clinic.

SUBJECTS: 60 consecutively referred patients meeting consensus criteria for the chronic fatigue syndrome.

INTERVENTIONS: Medical care comprised assessment, advice, and follow up in general practice. Patients who received cognitive behaviour therapy were offered 16 individual weekly sessions in addition to their medical care.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportions of patients (a) who achieved normal daily functioning (Karnofsky score 80 or more) and (b) who achieved a clinically significant improvement in functioning (change in Karnofsky score 10 points or more) by 12 months after randomisation.

RESULTS: Only two eligible patients refused to participate. All randomised patients completed treatment. An intention to treat analysis showed that 73% (22/30) of recipients of cognitive behaviour therapy achieved a satisfactory outcome as compared with 27% (8/30) of patients who were given only medical care (difference 47 percentage points; 95% confidence interval 24 to 69). Similar differences were observed in subsidiary outcome measures. The improvement in disability among patients given cognitive behaviour therapy continued after completion of therapy. Illness beliefs and coping behaviour previously associated with a poor outcome changed more with cognitive behaviour therapy than with medical care alone.

CONCLUSION: Adding cognitive behaviour therapy to the medical care of patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome is acceptable to patients and leads to a sustained reduction in functional impairment.

Comment in:

Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome. Good general care may offer as much benefit as cognitive behaviour therapy. [BMJ. 1996]

Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome. Patients were not representative of all patients with the syndrome. [BMJ. 1996]

Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome. Cognitive behavior therapy should be compared with placebo treatments. [BMJ. 1996]

ACP J Club. 1996 May-Jun;124(3):71.

Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome. Use an interdisciplinary approach. [BMJ. 1996]

Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome. Patients’ beliefs about their illness were probably not a major factor. [BMJ. 1996]

Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome. Evening primrose oil and magnesium have been shown to be effective. [BMJ. 1996]

Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome. Essential elements of the treatment must be identified. [BMJ. 1996]

Source: Sharpe M, Hawton K, Simkin S, Surawy C, Hackmann A, Klimes I, Peto T, Warrell D, Seagroatt V. Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 1996 Jan 6;312(7022):22-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2349693/

Note: You can read the full article here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2349693/pdf/bmj00523-0026.pdf

Dimensional assessment of chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

The absence of laboratory tests and clear criteria to identify homogeneous (sub)groups in patients presenting with unexplained fatigue, and to assess clinical status and disability in these patients, calls for further assessment methods. In the present study, a multi-dimensional approach to the assessment of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is evaluated.

Two-hundred and ninety-eight patients with CFS completed a set of postal questionnaires that assessed the behavioural, emotional, social, and cognitive aspects of CFS. By means of statistical analyses nine relatively independent dimensions of CFS were identified along which CFS-assessment and CFS-research can be directed.

These dimensions were named: psychological well-being, functional impairment in daily life, sleep disturbances, avoidance of physical activity, neuropsychological impairment, causal attributions related to the complaints, social functioning, self-efficacy expectations, and subjective experience of the personal situation. A description of the study sample on these dimensions is presented.

Source: Vercoulen JH, Swanink CM, Fennis JF, Galama JM, van der Meer JW, Bleijenberg G. Dimensional assessment of chronic fatigue syndrome. J Psychosom Res. 1994 Jul;38(5):383-92. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7965927