Tag: encephalitis

Neuro-COVID-19

Abstract:

Neuromuscular manifestations of new coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection are frequent, and include dizziness, headache, myopathy, and olfactory and gustatory disturbances. Patients with acute central nervous system disorders, such as delirium, impaired consciousness, stroke and convulsive seizures, have a high mortality rate.

The encephalitis/encephalopathy that causes consciousness disturbance and seizures can be classified into three conditions, including direct infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, encephalopathy caused by central nervous system damage secondary to systemic hypercytokinemia (cytokine storm) and autoimmune-mediated encephalitis that occurs after infection.

The sequelae, called post-acute COVID-19 syndrome or long COVID, include neuromuscular manifestations, such as anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, muscle weakness, brain fog and cognitive impairment. It is desirable to establish diagnostic criteria and treatment for these symptoms. Vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia, Guillain-Barré syndrome, bilateral facial paralysis, encephalitis and opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome have been reported as adverse reactions after the COVID-19 vaccine, although these are rare.

Source: Shimohata T. Neuro-COVID-19. Clin Exp Neuroimmunol. 2021 Sep 29:10.1111/cen3.12676. doi: 10.1111/cen3.12676. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34899999; PMCID: PMC8652810.  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8652810/ (Full text)

Neuropsychiatric sequelae of Nipah virus encephalitis

Abstract:

The authors followed nine patients with Nipah virus encephalitis over the course of 24 months. Eight of the nine developed psychiatric features assigned to the encephalitis. Three patients developed major depressive disorder immediately after recovering from the encephalitis, and two developed depression approximately 1 year after the outbreak. Two patients developed personality changes, and two suffered chronic fatigue syndrome.

Neuropsychological testing was accomplished in eight of the nine patients. Deficits in attention, verbal, and/or visual memory were substantial in seven of the eight patients tested. Verbal memory was more impaired than visual memory in these patients. Comparison between psychiatric and cognitive impairment and total number of brain lesions showed no discernible trends.

 

Source: Ng BY, Lim CC, Yeoh A, Lee WL. Neuropsychiatric sequelae of Nipah virus encephalitis. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2004 Fall;16(4):500-4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15616178

 

GPs’ attitudes to a self diagnosis of myalgic encephalomyelitis. Evidence supports presence of encephalitis

Comment on: General practitioners’ attitudes to patients with a self diagnosis of myalgic encephalomyelitis. [BMJ. 1995]

 

EDITOR,-Although the precise pathoaetiology of myalgic encephalomyelitis remains the subject of debate, Shonagh Scott and colleagues are incorrect in asserting that “no evidence exists” of encephalitis. Buchwald et al carried out a large cohort study in which neurological symptoms, results of magnetic resonance imaging, and lymphocyte phenotyping suggested that the patients were experiencing “a chronic, immunologically mediated inflammatory process of the central nervous system.”2 More recently, Schwartz et al, who used single photon emission computed tomography, described abnormalities that were consistent with the hypothesis that “a chronic viral encephalitis” may be present.3 Furthermore, in the only postmortem study to have been published the polymerase chain reaction showed enteroviral sequences (compatible with coxsackie virus B3) in samples from the hypothalamus and brain stem,4 indicating that viral persistence within selective parts of the central nervous system may also play a part.

Given the uncertainties surrounding both the pathoaetiology and the diagnostic criteria for myalgic encephalomyelitis, it is not surprising to learn that self diagnosis produces difficulties in the doctor-patient relationship. The conclusions of and motives behind Scott and colleagues’ study must, however, be questioned in view of the fact that the fictitious patients had a list of vague symptoms that failed to satisfy diagnostic criteria for either a chronic fatigue syndrome (as defined by the International Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Study Group)5 or a postinfectious fatigue syndrome (as defined by current British criteria).6 Neither did the symptoms accord with those that patient support organisations would agree constitute a satisfactory diagnosis of myalgic encephalomyelitis.

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2549699/pdf/bmj00593-0058b.pdf

 

Source: Shepherd C. GPs’ attitudes to a self diagnosis of myalgic encephalomyelitis. Evidence supports presence of encephalitis. BMJ. 1995 May 20;310(6990):1330. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2549699/