Rehabilitation of decreased motor performance in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: should we treat low effort capacity or reduced effort tolerance?

Abstract:

AIM: The aetiology, pathophysiology, diagnostic delineation and treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) remain a matter of debate. Here some aspects of the debate are elucidated, with a particular focus on the patients’ decreased motor performance.

HYPOTHESIS: The pathophysiological basis of decreased motor performance in CFS may, theoretically, involve three components: (1) a peripheral energetic deficit (impaired oxidative metabolism and/or physical deconditioning); (2) a central perceptual disturbance (higher effort sense or increased ‘interoception’); and (3) a fundamental failure of the neurobiological stress system, leading to an abnormal ‘sickness response’. It is proposed that the first two components may lead to low effort capacity, while the third component may lead to reduced effort tolerance. Although there is evidence for low effort capacity influencing symptoms and functional limitations in CFS, it is assumed that reduced effort tolerance might be the primary disturbance in CFS.

DIAGNOSTIC IMPLICATIONS: Distinguishing low effort capacity and reduced effort tolerance may contribute to a refinement of current diagnostic criteria of CFS and the identification of subgroups.

THERAPEUTIC IMPLICATIONS: The above-mentioned distinction may make it possible to formulate a rationale for an effective implementation and adequate outcome evaluation of rehabilitation strategies in CFS.

RESEARCH IMPLICATIONS: This new heuristic framework may inform future research aimed at disentangling the complex determination of impaired motor performance in CFS, as well as studies aimed at customizing treatment to different subtypes of patients.

 

Source: Van Houdenhove B, Verheyen L, Pardaens K, Luyten P, Van Wambeke P. Rehabilitation of decreased motor performance in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: should we treat low effort capacity or reduced effort tolerance? Clin Rehabil. 2007 Dec;21(12):1121-42. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18042608

 

Sense of effort during a fatiguing exercise protocol in chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to determine whether chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) subjects would produce greater force production in their matching limb during a fatiguing contralateral limb-matching task of the elbow flexors, compared with healthy, matched controls.

Eight CFS subjects and 8 healthy, matched control subjects participated in a fatiguing task that consisted of intermittent submaximal contractions (30% maximal voluntary contraction) of the nondominant arm performed over a 45 min duration. Each minute, the subject attempted to match the force of the nondominant arm with their dominant arm (without visual feedback for the dominant arm).

Results showed that average matching force and ratings of perceived effort values were significantly higher in the CFS group during the fatiguing task (P = 0.04, P = 0.02, respectively). This study demonstrated objectively that CFS subjects experienced a greater sense of effort in the elbow flexors while performing a fatiguing task.

 

Source: Wallman KE, Sacco P. Sense of effort during a fatiguing exercise protocol in chronic fatigue syndrome. Res Sports Med. 2007 Jan-Mar;15(1):47-59. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17365951

 

Exercise responses and psychiatric disorder in chronic fatigue syndrome

Comment in: Exercise responses in the chronic fatigue syndrome. Objective assessment of study is difficult without knowledge of data. [BMJ. 1995]

 

Fatigue, exercise intolerance, and myalgia are cardinal symptoms of the chronic fatigue syndrome, but whether they reflect neuromuscular dysfunction or are a manifestation of depression or other psychiatric or psychological disorders diagnosed in a high proportion of fatigued patients in the community is unclear.’ In previous studies patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome showed exercise intolerance in incremental exercise tests, which seemed to be related to an increased perception of effort; also, blood lactate concentrations in some patients tended to increase more rapidly than normal at low work rates, implying inefficient aerobic muscle metabolism.2 We examined venous blood lactate responses to exercise at a work rate below the anaerobic threshold in relation to psychiatric disorder.

You can read the rest of this article here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2550606/pdf/bmj00607-0028.pdf

 

Source: Lane RJ, Burgess AP, Flint J, Riccio M, Archard LC. Exercise responses and psychiatric disorder in chronic fatigue syndrome. BMJ. 1995 Aug 26;311(7004):544-5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2550606/pdf/bmj00607-0028.pdf

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome. Clinical, social psychological problems and management

Abstract:

Fatigue chronic syndrome (SFC) is the heir-at-law of neurasthenia. Both are seen like physical diseases and share certain therapeutic measures, such as sleep; they have the same symbolic function and enable patients as well as doctors reluctant to psychological dimensions of pathology, to get and express sympathy and attention. A strong controversy developed these last years concerning the SFC physiopathology particularly concerning the responsibility of viral infectious agents or psychiatric troubles.

The SFC fatigue is unlikely hysterical or neuromuscular but it probably depends on several associated factors; cerebral neurobiochemistry anomalies (possibly induced by an infection or immune reactions), effort perception trouble, affective trouble, lack of physical activity. The handicap seems to be worse on account of unsuitable care and inefficacious treatment. Especially sleep, which is often beneficial in a short term, is source of ulterior chronicisation. Antidepressants are the only justified pharmacological treatment for SFC at the moment. Referring to the existence and the nature of cognitive distortions, the author suggests a cognitive-behavioural therapy, whose aim is a progressive activity resumption.

 

Source: Wessely S. Chronic fatigue syndrome. Clinical, social psychological problems and management. Encephale. 1994 Nov;20 Spec No 3:581-95. [Article in French] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7843055

 

Exercise performance and fatiguability in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

To examine the role of delay in recovery of peripheral muscle function following exercise in the fatigue experienced by patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and to examine the influence of effort perception in limiting exercise performance in these patients, a study was carried out on a group of twelve patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and 12 sex and age-matched sedentary control subjects.

Symptom limited incremental cycle exercise tests including measurements of perceived exertion were performed followed by examination of the contractile properties of the quadriceps muscle group for up to 48 hours. Muscle function was assessed by percutaneous electrical stimulation and maximum voluntary contractions.

Muscle function at rest and during recovery was normal in CFS patients as assessed by maximum isometric voluntary contraction, 20:50 Hz tetanic force ratio and maximum relaxation rate. Exercise duration and the relationship between heart rate and work rate during exercise were similar in both groups.

CFS patients had higher perceived exertion scores in relation to heart rate during exercise representing a reduced effort sensation threshold of 3.2 units on an unmodified Borg scale in CFS patients. Patients with chronic fatigue syndrome show normal muscle physiology before and after exercise. Raised perceived exertion scores during exercise suggest that central factors are limiting exercise capacity in these patients.

Comment in: Lactate responses to exercise in chronic fatigue syndrome. [J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994]

 

Source: Gibson H, Carroll N, Clague JE, Edwards RH. Exercise performance and fatiguability in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993 Sep;56(9):993-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC489735/ (Full article)