Immunological and psychological dysfunction in patients receiving immunotherapy for chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Associations between immunological and psychological dysfunction in 33 patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) were examined before and in response to treatment in a double blind, placebo-controlled trial of high dose intravenous immunoglobulin. Only those patients who received active immunotherapy demonstrated a consistent pattern of correlations between improvement in depressive symptoms and markers of cell-mediated immunity (CMI).

This finding lends some support to the hypothesis that depressive symptoms in patients with CFS occur secondary to, or share a common pathophysiology with, immunological dysfunction. This pattern and the lack of strong associations between depression and immunological disturbance prior to treatment are less supportive of the view that CFS is primarily a form of depressive disorder or that immunological dysfunction in patients with CFS is secondary to concurrent depression.

 

Source: Hickie I, Lloyd A, Wakefield D. Immunological and psychological dysfunction in patients receiving immunotherapy for chronic fatigue syndrome. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1992 Jun;26(2):249-56. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1642616

 

Fluctuations in perceived energy and mood among patients with chronic fatigue syndrome

Comment in: Fluctuations in perceived energy and mood among patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. [J R Soc Med. 1992]

Comment on: Fluctuations in perceived energy and mood among patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. [J R Soc Med. 1992]

 

I find it surprising that Wood et al. (April 992 JRSM, p 195) no longer appear to consider,that the presence of a precipitating infection should be necessary for the selection of patients involved in the study of chronic fatigue syndromes. The reference they quote, which refers to guidelines laid down at Oxford in 1990, states very clearly that post-infectious patients with chronic fatigue do indeed form a distinct subgroup, and that to fulfil research criteria there, must be,’definite evidence of infection at onset or presentation’.

Having failed to make such a distinction it is not, altogether surprising that they go on to conclude that the higher levels of depression found in their study …. serve to reinforce the now widely–current, notion that such patients may be suffering from a depressive illness, of which physical fatigue is a somatic manifestation’.

You may read the rest of this comment as well as the author’s response here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1293670/pdf/jrsocmed00107-0092b.pdf

 

Source: Shepherd C. Fluctuations in perceived energy and mood among patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. J R Soc Med. 1992 Sep;85(9):588. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1293670/

 

Monospot and VP1 tests in chronic fatigue syndrome and major depression

Abstract:

Thirty-four patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) were compared with controls with DSM-III-R major depression on the Monospot and VP1 antigen tests.

There was no significant difference in the numbers initially VP1 positive in the groups (11/34 and 7/34 positive in the chronic fatigue and major depression group respectively). Four CFS but no depressed patients were Monospot positive initially. No patient was both Monospot and VP1 positive. Patients positive on the tests were offered a repeat 6 months later. Eight of the 11 VP1 positive patients in the CFS group were retested and four remained positive, but none of the four depressed patients retested remained positive. No patient retested remained Monospot positive.

The Monospot and VP1 tests appear to have little discriminating ability between these groups as screening tests and their predictive validity is unclear.

 

Source: Lynch SP, Seth RV, Main J. Monospot and VP1 tests in chronic fatigue syndrome and major depression. J R Soc Med. 1992 Sep;85(9):537-40. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1293640/ (Full article)

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome criteria. A critique of the requirement for multiple physical complaints

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that the patients with chronic fatigue who have the highest number of medically unexplained physical symptoms over their lifetime would also have the highest prevalence of current and lifetime affective and anxiety disorders, lifetime affective symptoms, and the most functional disability. A further goal was to use this information to modify the current case definition to better identify a subgroup of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome who are less likely to have psychiatric illness.

DESIGN: Two hundred eighty-five consecutive patients with chronic fatigue were interviewed with the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule and completed four self-rating questionnaires measuring psychologic distress, functional disability, and the tendency to amplify symptoms. Based on previously published data, patients were divided into four groups with a progressively higher number of lifetime medically unexplained physical symptoms. The prevalence of current and lifetime psychiatric disorders, lifetime psychologic symptoms, and extent of functional impairment was then compared in these four groups of patients.

MAIN RESULTS: The prevalence of current and lifetime psychiatric diagnosis and lifetime depressive symptoms increased linearly with the number of lifetime physical symptoms that the patient experienced. The extent of impairment in activities of daily living and the tendency to amplify symptoms also increased linearly with the number of medically unexplained physical symptoms.

CONCLUSION: The patients with the highest numbers of medically unexplained physical symptoms had extraordinarily high rates of current and lifetime psychiatric disorders. These data suggest that the current case definition for chronic fatigue syndrome inadvertently selects for patients with the highest prevalence of lifetime psychiatric diagnoses. A recommendation based on these results is to modify the case criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome to include patients with fatigue and few physical symptoms and to identify and consider excluding patients with high numbers of physical complaints.

Comment in: Defining the chronic fatigue syndrome. [Arch Intern Med. 1992]

 

Source: Katon W, Russo J. Chronic fatigue syndrome criteria. A critique of the requirement for multiple physical complaints. Arch Intern Med. 1992 Aug;152(8):1604-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1497394

 

Postviral fatigue syndrome

Comment on: Possible upregulation of hypothalamic 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors in patients with postviral fatigue syndrome. [BMJ. 1992]

 

EDITOR, -A M 0 Bakheit and colleagues recently reported’ a possible upregulation of hypothalamic 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors in patients with the postviral fatigue syndrome, giving some evidence for hypothalamic functional abnormalities in these patients, which are different from others with depression. There is a growing body of evidence which claims that this clinical condition is organic and cannot be simply perceived as a somatisation disorder in patients with predisposition to psychiatric disease.”

We reviewed and quantitatively analysed with Ceretec and single photon emission tomography the brain perfusion of 14 patients fulfilling the Oxford criteria for diagnosis of myalgic encephalomyelitis. They had all had disease for more than six months (more than half the time) manifested with generalised malaise and myalgia, as well as significant physical and intellectual disability. None had any medical condition known to produce fatigue or had recently or in the past had psychiatric disease. When compared with a group of 24 nondepressed age and sex matched controls (normal volunteers) there was significant reduction of the perfusion to several areas of the brain cortex but particularly the brain stem (table).

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1882397/pdf/bmj00077-0053b.pdf

 

Source: Costa DC, Brostoff J, Douli V, Ell PJ. Postviral fatigue syndrome. BMJ. 1992 Jun 13;304(6841):1567. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1882397/

 

Postviral fatigue syndrome

Comment on: Possible upregulation of hypothalamic 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors in patients with postviral fatigue syndrome. [BMJ. 1992]

 

EDITOR,-A M 0 Bakheit and colleagues report enhanced release of prolactin after administration of buspirone in patients with the postviral fatigue syndrome compared with controls and patients with depression. Their report would have been improved if they had described more fully the differences between the two groups of patients. As they point out, depression can be difficult to distinguish clinically from the postviral fatigue syndrome.

The authors used the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition, Revised to define depressive illness, but to qualify for this diagnosis a patient need complain of only four symptoms such as fatigue, hypersomnia, retardation, and loss of concentration in addition to depressed mood. The criteria they used for the postviral fatigue syndrome included depression, fatigue, reversed sleep pattern, and constipation alternating with diarrhoea. It would be surprising if there was not a substantial overlap between the two groups and if one of the main factors affecting diagnosis was not whether the patient presented first to a psychiatrist or a neurologist.

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1882437/pdf/bmj00077-0052e.pdf

 

Source: Curtis D, Bullock T. Postviral fatigue syndrome. BMJ. 1992 Jun 13;304(6841):1566-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1882437/

 

Postviral fatigue syndrome

Comment on: Possible upregulation of hypothalamic 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors in patients with postviral fatigue syndrome. [BMJ. 1992]

 

EDITOR,-A M 0 Bakheit and colleagues suggest that the buspirone challenge test may be useful in distinguishing between a “primary depressive illness” and the postviral fatigue syndrome. It is difficult to assess the truth of this from the data presented in their paper. To know the usefulness of this test the numbers of controls and patients scored above or below an appropriately chosen cut off point of serum prolactin concentration needs to be known. Unfortunately, the authors present the prolactin concentrations as mean values. If the aim of the test is to exclude major depression then a cut off which produces few false negative results should be chosen. Were the high mean values in the postviral fatigue group due to one or two extreme outliers? It is noteworthy that the standard deviations in the patients were much higher in the controls at baseline assessment. Why was this?

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1882426/pdf/bmj00077-0052c.pdf

 

Source: Hatcher S. Postviral fatigue syndrome. BMJ. 1992 Jun 13;304(6841):1566; author reply 1567. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1882426/

 

Sleep, Epstein-Barr virus infection, musculoskeletal pain, and depressive symptoms in chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Sleep physiology, viral serology and symptoms of 14 patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) were compared with 12 healthy controls. All patients described unrefreshing sleep and showed a prominent alpha electroencephalographic nonrapid eye movement (7.5-11.0 Hz) sleep anomaly (p less than or equal to 0.001), but had no physiologic daytime sleepiness.

There were no group differences in Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) antibody titers. The patient group had more fibrositis tender points (p less than 0.0001), described more somatic complaints (p less than 0.0001), and more depressive symptoms (p less than 0.0001). Patients with CFS do not show evidence for a specific chronic EBV infection, but show altered sleep physiology, numerous tender points, diffuse pain, and depressive symptoms. These features are similar to those found in fibromyalgia syndrome.

 

Source: Whelton CL, Salit I, Moldofsky H. Sleep, Epstein-Barr virus infection, musculoskeletal pain, and depressive symptoms in chronic fatigue syndrome. J Rheumatol. 1992 Jun;19(6):939-43. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1328633

 

Comorbidity of fibromyalgia with medical and psychiatric disorders

Abstract:

PURPOSE: Patients with fibromyalgia have been reported to display high rates of several concomitant medical and psychiatric disorders, including migraine, irritable bowel syndrome, chronic fatigue syndrome, major depression, and panic disorder. To test further these and other possible associations, we assessed the personal and family histories of a broad range of medical and psychiatric disorders in patients with fibromyalgia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subjects were 33 women (mean age 42.1 years) who each met American College of Rheumatology criteria for fibromyalgia and presented to a rheumatologist at a tertiary referral center. They received the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID); a supplemental interview, in SCID format, for other medical and psychiatric disorders, including migraine, irritable bowel syndrome, and chronic fatigue syndrome; and an interview for family history of medical and psychiatric disorders.

RESULTS: Patients with fibromyalgia displayed high lifetime rates of migraine, irritable bowel syndrome, chronic fatigue syndrome, major depression, and panic disorder. They also exhibited high rates of familial major mood disorder.

CONCLUSIONS: The finding that migraine, irritable bowel syndrome, chronic fatigue syndrome, major depression, and panic disorder are frequently comorbid with fibromyalgia is consistent with the hypothesis that these various disorders may share a common physiologic abnormality.

 

Source: Hudson JI, Goldenberg DL, Pope HG Jr, Keck PE Jr, Schlesinger L. Comorbidity of fibromyalgia with medical and psychiatric disorders. Am J Med. 1992 Apr;92(4):363-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1558082

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome: a joint paediatric-psychiatric approach

Comment in: Chronic fatigue syndrome: a joint paediatric-psychiatric approach. [Arch Dis Child. 1992]

 

Prolonged fatigue after an apparent viral infection, occurring sporadically or as an epidemic, has been described over the past 50 years. It has been given various names including Royal Free disease (1) and myalgic encephalomyelitis, but the preferred terms in the medical literature have been postviral fatigue syndrome (2) or chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). (3)

However, the validity of this syndrome as a nosological entity has created a good deal of controversy and remains in doubt. (4) A constellation of symptoms make up the syndrome. There is fatigue of defined onset that is generally reported to follow a viral illness, often an influenza-like illness or an infection of the upper respiratory tract. The patient experiences profound fatigue with the initial illness and then fails to make the expected recovery, with fatigue that can persist over months or years. Fatigue is defined as a subjective sensation, which the patient often describes as tiredness or weariness and that occurs at rest. These patients also report a clear relationship of fatigue to activity. The term fatiguability has been used to describe the greater than normal fatigue that occurs after physical and sometimes after mental exertion in these patients. A great variety of associated symptoms have been described that include increased sleepiness, dizziness, vertigo, headache, difficulty in concentrating, sore throat, muscle weakness, and myalgia. The majority of patients have some emotional symptoms. There can be irritability and anxiety, tearfulness and depression. The fatigue and associated symptoms are of such severity as to impair significantly normal daily activities. There is a remarkable absence of physical signs and physical investigations fail to detect any organic pathology or current infection to account for the symptoms.

You can read the rest of this article here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1793327/pdf/archdisch00639-0088.pdf

 

Source: Vereker MI. Chronic fatigue syndrome: a joint paediatric-psychiatric approach. Arch Dis Child. 1992 Apr;67(4):550-5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1793327/