Sulodexide: A Benefit for Cardiovascular Sequelae of Long COVID Patients?

Dear Editor,

The elaborate and precise review of Harry N. Magnani didactically demonstrates the complex pathophysiological aspects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emphasizing the roles of vascular endothelial dysfunction and coagulation cascade as key features of disease progression.  Moreover, this article brings up that glycosaminoglycane (GAG) antithrombotics likely interfere with inflammatory and coagulation activity in an effective fashion.  Thereafter this postulate has become advocated as the application of sulodexide (Vessel Due F; ALFASIGMA, Italy) (SDX), an unexpensive and orally administrable GAG antithrombotic drug reduced the necessity for both hospital admission and oxygen supplementation in the early phase of SARS-Cov-2 infection under a randomized placebo-controlled out-patient trial.  Interestingly, these patients also showed lower serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and D-dimer as markers of inflammation and prothrombotic state. Of note, instead of regularly recommended and prescribed 250 RLU twice-daily dose, the clinical trial applied the higher, 500 RLU twice-daily dosing regimen in which an antithrombotic effect was safely achieved in a clinical setting.

Read the rest of this article HERE.

Source: Szolnoky G, González-Ochoa AJ. Sulodexide: A Benefit for Cardiovascular Sequelae of Long COVID Patients? Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2022 Jan-Dec;28:10760296221084300. doi: 10.1177/10760296221084300. PMID: 35333125; PMCID: PMC8961374. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8961374/ (Full text)

Sex-Related Differences in Long-COVID-19 Syndrome

Abstract:

Background: Sex differences have been demonstrated in the acute phase of COVID-19. Women (F) were found to be less prone to develop a severe disease than men (M), but few studies have assessed sex-differences in Long-COVID-19 syndrome.

Methods: The aim of this prospective/retrospective study was to characterize the long-term consequences of this infection based on sex. For this purpose, we enrolled 223 patients (89 F and 134 M) who were infected by SARS-CoV-2. In the acute phase of the illness, F reported the following symptoms more frequently than M: weakness, dysgeusia, anosmia, thoracic pain, palpitations, diarrhea, and myalgia-all without significant differences in breathlessness, cough, and sleep disturbance.

Results: After a mean follow-up time of 5 months after the acute phase, F were significantly more likely than M to report dyspnea, weakness, thoracic pain, palpitations, and sleep disturbance but not myalgia and cough. At the multivariate logistic regression, women were statistically significantly likely to experience persistent symptoms such as dyspnea, fatigue, chest pain, and palpitations. On the contrary, myalgia, cough, and sleep disturbance were not influenced by sex.

Conclusion: We demonstrated that F were more symptomatic than M not only in the acute phase but also at follow-up. Sex was found to be an important determinant of Long-COVID-19 syndrome because it is a significant predictor of persistent symptoms in F, such as dyspnea, fatigue, chest pain, and palpitations. Our results suggest the need for long-term follow-up of these patients from a sex perspective to implement early preventive and personalized therapeutic strategies.

Source: Pelà G, Goldoni M, Solinas E, Cavalli C, Tagliaferri S, Ranzieri S, Frizzelli A, Marchi L, Mori PA, Majori M, Aiello M, Corradi M, Chetta A. Sex-Related Differences in Long-COVID-19 Syndrome. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022 Mar 25. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2021.0411. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35333613. https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/jwh.2021.0411 (Full text)

Efficacy of Adaptogens in Patients with Long COVID-19: A Randomized, Quadruple-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Abstract:

Currently, no effective treatment of comorbid complications or COVID-19 long-haulers during convalescence is known. This randomized, quadruple-blind, placebo-controlled trial aimed to assess the efficacy of adaptogens on the recovery of patients with Long COVID symptoms. One hundred patients with confirmed positive SARS-CoV-2 test, discharged from COVID Hotel isolation, Intensive Care Unit (ICU), or Online Clinics, and who experienced at least three of nine Long COVID symptoms (fatigue, headache, respiratory insufficiency, cognitive performance, mood disorders, loss of smell, taste, and hair, sweatiness, cough, pain in joints, muscles, and chest) in the 30 days before randomization were included in the study of the efficacy of Chisan®/ADAPT-232 (a fixed combination of adaptogens Rhodiola, Eleutherococcus, and Schisandra) supplementation for two weeks.

Chisan® decreased the duration of fatigue and pain for one and two days, respectively, in 50% of patients. The number of patients with lack of fatigue and pain symptoms was significantly less in the Chisan® treatment group than in the placebo group on Days 9 (39% vs. 57%, pain relief, p = 0.0019) and 11 (28% vs. 43%, relief of fatigue, * p = 0.0157). Significant relief of severity of all Long COVID symptoms over the time of treatment and the follow-up period was observed in both groups of patients, notably decreasing the level of anxiety and depression from mild and moderate to normal, as well as increasing cognitive performance in patients in the d2 test for attention and increasing their physical activity and workout (daily walk time).

However, the significant difference between placebo and Chisan® treatment was observed only with a workout (daily walk time) and relieving respiratory insufficiency (cough). A clinical assessment of blood markers of the inflammatory response (C-reactive protein) and blood coagulation (D-dimer) did not reveal any significant difference over time between treatment groups except significantly lower IL-6 in the Chisan® treatment group. Furthermore, a significant difference between the placebo and Chisan® treatment was observed for creatinine: Chisan® significantly decreased blood creatinine compared to the placebo, suggesting prevention of renal failure progression in Long COVID. In this study, we, for the first time, demonstrate that adaptogens can increase physical performance in Long COVID and reduce the duration of fatigue and chronic pain. It also suggests that Chisan®/ADAPT-232 might be useful for preventing the progression of renal failure associated with increasing creatinine.

Source: Karosanidze I, Kiladze U, Kirtadze N, Giorgadze M, Amashukeli N, Parulava N, Iluridze N, Kikabidze N, Gudavadze N, Gelashvili L, Koberidze V, Gigashvili E, Jajanidze N, Latsabidze N, Mamageishvili N, Shengelia R, Hovhannisyan A, Panossian A. Efficacy of Adaptogens in Patients with Long COVID-19: A Randomized, Quadruple-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022 Mar 11;15(3):345. doi: 10.3390/ph15030345. PMID: 35337143; PMCID: PMC8953947. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8953947/ (Full text)

New Clinical Phenotype of the Post-Covid Syndrome: Fibromyalgia and Joint Hypermobility Condition

Abstract:

Fibromyalgia can be defined as a chronic pain condition, affecting the musculoskeletal system, etiology and pathophysiology of which is sufficiently understudied. Despite the fact that many authors consider this entity to be a manifestation of central sensitization, and not an autoimmune disease, the high prevalence of fibromyalgia in patients with post-COVID-19 conditions requires taking a fresh look at the causes of the disease development.

During the patient examination, the authors identified a combination of symptoms that occurs so often, that they can be carefully described as a clinical pattern. These manifestations include young age, female gender, joint hypermobility, the onset of pain after COVID-19, physical traumatization of one particular tendon and the development of the fibromyalgia pain syndrome during the next several weeks. As well as an increase in the titer of antinuclear antibodies and some other systemic inflammation factors. It can be assumed with great caution that local damage to the connective tissue in patients with joint hypermobility, having COVID-19 as a trigger factor can lead to the development of fibromyalgia syndrome. This article presents three clinical cases that illustrated this hypothesis.

Source: Gavrilova N, Soprun L, Lukashenko M, Ryabkova V, Fedotkina TV, Churilov LP, Shoenfeld Y. New Clinical Phenotype of the Post-Covid Syndrome: Fibromyalgia and Joint Hypermobility Condition. Pathophysiology. 2022 Jan 19;29(1):24-29. doi: 10.3390/pathophysiology29010003. PMID: 35366287. https://www.mdpi.com/1873-149X/29/1/3/htm (Full text)

Autoimmunity is a hallmark of post-COVID syndrome

Abstract:

Autoimmunity has emerged as a characteristic of the post-COVID syndrome (PCS), which may be related to sex. In order to further investigate the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 and autoimmunity in PCS, a clinical and serological assessment on 100 patients was done. Serum antibody profiles against self-antigens and infectious agents were evaluated by an antigen array chip for 116 IgG and 104 IgM antibodies.

Thirty pre-pandemic healthy individuals were included as a control group. The median age of patients was 49 years (IQR: 37.8 to 55.3). There were 47 males. The median post-COVID time was 219 (IQR: 143 to 258) days. Latent autoimmunity and polyautoimmunity were found in 83% and 62% of patients, respectively.

Three patients developed an overt autoimmune disease. IgG antibodies against IL-2, CD8B, and thyroglobulin were found in more than 10% of the patients. Other IgG autoantibodies, such as anti-interferons, were positive in 5-10% of patients. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies were found in > 85% of patients and were positively correlated with autoantibodies, age, and body mass index (BMI). Few autoantibodies were influenced by age and BMI. There was no effect of gender on the over- or under-expression of autoantibodies. IgG anti-IFN-λ antibodies were associated with the persistence of respiratory symptoms.

In summary, autoimmunity is characteristic of PCS, and latent autoimmunity correlates with humoral response to SARS-CoV-2.

Source: Rojas M, Rodríguez Y, Acosta-Ampudia Y, Monsalve DM, Zhu C, Li QZ, Ramírez-Santana C, Anaya JM. Autoimmunity is a hallmark of post-COVID syndrome. J Transl Med. 2022 Mar 16;20(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03328-4. PMID: 35296346; PMCID: PMC8924736. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8924736/ (Full text)

What Are the Long-term Pulmonary Sequelae of COVID-19 Infection?

The COVID-19 pandemic has been ongoing for almost two years. Over this period, Radiology and other peer-reviewed journals have distributed information regarding the nature of the pandemic with unprecedented speed. Based upon the extensively documented clinical and imaging manifestations of acute COVID-19 infection, expert thoracic imagers have developed imaging categories that classify patterns according to the likelihood that they represent COVID-19 infection(1).

Acute COVID-19 has a somewhat unique appearance amongst viral infections on CT. It manifests as ground-glass opacities and/or consolidation often with a strong peripheral distribution. Also, there are CT findings suggesting that organizing pneumonia is a common pattern of injury. Organizing pneumonia is associated with a wide variety of different infections, however, it appears particularly common with COVID-19(2). However, the long-term pulmonary manifestations of COVID-19 pneumonia (part of so-called “long-COVID”) remain lacking in the literature.

It is important to understand our current knowledge of viral infections and their typical manifestations within the lungs. The long-term sequela of viral pneumonia, in general, vary depending upon two factors: 1) direct injury caused by the viral organisms, and 2) the host’s immune reaction to those organisms. These result in a variety of different patterns of injury, each of which is associated with specific permanent long-term sequela. The histologic manifestations of acute pulmonary viral infections can be divided broadly into two primary patterns: 1) bronchiolitis and inflammation adjacent to airways, and 2) diffuse alveolar damage. On imaging, bronchiolitis and airway inflammation manifest as bronchial wall thickening, centrilobular nodules, and tree-in-bud opacities; whereas diffuse alveolar damage manifests as bilateral ground-glass opacity and/or consolidation.

The long-term effects of these two patterns are also characteristic. Inflammation within and around the airways may induce concentric fibrosis around the bronchioles resulting in airway narrowing or obliteration. This is termed constrictive (or obliterative) bronchiolitis. Development of constrictive bronchiolitis may result in persistent dyspnea after resolution of the acute infection with an associated obstructive defect on pulmonary function tests. Typical CT findings of constrictive bronchiolitis include mosaic attenuation and air trapping, sometimes associated with bronchiectasis. The long-term manifestations of diffuse alveolar damage (DAD), on the other hand, are quite different. Histologically, fibrosis develops 1-2 weeks after the development of acute symptoms. On imaging, this is associated with the development of reticulation and traction bronchiectasis. Over time, usually months, this fibrosis may improve, although residual fibrosis is common(3). This residual fibrosis is often located in the anterior subpleural lung and may be associated with restrictive physiology on pulmonary function testing.

Organizing pneumonia (OP) is particularly common with COVID-19. The clinical and imaging features of OP have been studied (4) mainly in the setting of cryptogenic (idiopathic) disease. Organizing pneumonia is usually a highly steroid-responsive disease with opacities that quickly improve or resolve with treatment, although residual fibrosis may occur. This residual fibrosis often has a pattern that resembles nonspecific interstitial pneumonia with basilar predominant reticulation, traction bronchiectasis, and subpleural sparing(5). It is also important to note that OP and DAD may co-exist with overlapping imaging findings.

Understanding the different patterns of injury associated with viral infections and their long-term sequela is important in putting the long-term effects of COVID-19 infection in context. Han et al(6). were among the first to describe the persistent CT findings of COVID-19 six months after the onset of acute symptoms. In their study, over one-third of patients showed evidence of fibrotic changes.

In this issue of Radiology, Cho and Villacreses and colleagues (7) address these long-term pulmonary manifestations in a prospective study of 100 patients with persistent (>30 days) pulmonary symptoms after an acute COVID-19 infection. One hundred and six healthy controls were also evaluated. The particular emphasis of this investigation was on the presence of air trapping on expiratory CT. The severity of disease among studied patients varied and included outpatients, hospitalized patients, and those requiring admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Cho and Villacreses et al. discovered that air trapping was present in 58% of patients with post-COVID-19 and had its highest prevalence in the group of patients hospitalized for their infection (73%). Using quantitative analysis, air trapping affected a mean of 25-35% of the lungs in patients with post-COVID-19 depending on the clinical severity of disease compared to 7% in controls (p<.001). The authors did not identify obstructive airways disease on spirometry in any of the groups. This lack of obstruction on spirometry in patients with air trapping is not surprising. In a cohort of soldiers deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan with biopsy-proven constrictive bronchiolitis(8), the majority did not have obstruction on pulmonary function tests. Restriction was present on spirometry in the patients with COVID-19 in the study by Cho and Villacreses et al., specifically in the inpatient and ICU groups. Ground-glass opacity, traction bronchiectasis, and other signs of fibrosis were most frequent in patients admitted to the ICU (94%, 69%, 81% of patients, respectively compared with 36%, 8%, and 3% of outpatients, respectively).

In summary, the study by Cho and Villacreses et al. demonstrates that air trapping on CT is common in patients with persistent symptoms after COVID-19 infection. When considering the long-term pulmonary effects of COVID-19 infection, this is an important finding and may correspond to the development of post-viral constrictive bronchiolitis, an entity seen with other viral infections and in particular, adenovirus infection. Interestingly, the CT findings of acute COVID-19 are not highly airway-centric. Centrilobular nodules and tree-in-bud opacities, reflecting airway-centric inflammation, are not a typical finding of acute COVID-19 infection. Regardless, these results indicate a long-term impact on bronchiolar obstruction. In the study by Cho and Villacreses et al, the presence of ground glass opacity and/or fibrosis on CT were most common in the patients admitted to the ICU and likely correspond to post-OP and/or post-DAD fibrosis.

It is important to note that not all pulmonary fibrosis, including that of the airway and of the parenchyma, is permanent. Collagen may be absorbed for months after the acute insult, thus it is not entirely clear if the abnormalities seen in the current study will be permanent. The median time from COVID-19 diagnosis to the clinic visit for persistent post-COVID-19 symptoms was only 75 days. However, 8 of 9 patients (out of 100 patients total) with imaging more than 200 days from the acute infection had persistent air trapping. Regardless of the imaging findings, the most important question is whether the airway obstruction and/or fibrosis result in clinical symptoms. This paper suggests that airways obstruction and post-OP/DAD fibrosis contribute to persistent symptoms after COVID-19 infection with the contribution of airways disease higher in the outpatients, and the contribution of OP/DAD greater in the patients admitted to ICU. Longer-term studies assessing the clinical and imaging manifestations 1-2 years after the initial infection are needed to fully ascertain the permanent manifestations of post-COVID fibrosis.

Source: Brett M. Elicker. What Are the Long-term Pulmonary Sequelae of COVID-19 Infection? Radiology. Published Online:

Registered clinical trials investigating treatment of long COVID: a scoping review and recommendations for research

Abstract:

Background: A considerable proportion of individuals report persistent, debilitating and disparate symptoms despite resolution of acute COVID-19 infection (i.e. long COVID). Numerous registered clinical trials investigating treatment of long COVID are expected to be completed in 2021–2022. The aim of this review is to provide a scope of the candidate treatments for long COVID. A synthesis of ongoing long COVID clinical trials can inform methodologic approaches for future studies and identify key research vistas.

Methods: Scoping searches were conducted on multiple national and international clinical trial registries. Interventional trials testing treatments for long COVID were selected. The search timeline was from database inception to 28 July 2021.

Results: This scoping review included 59 clinical trial registration records from 22 countries with a total projected enrolment of 6718. Considerable heterogeneity was exhibited amongst component records with respect to the characterization of long COVID (i.e. name, symptoms- including frequency, intensity, trajectory and duration- mode of ascertainment, and definition of acute phase). In addition, the majority of proposed interventions were non-pharmacological and either targeted multiple long COVID symptoms simultaneously, or focussed on treatment of respiratory/pulmonary sequelae. Multiple interventions targeted inflammation, as well as tissue oxygenation and cellular recovery, and several interventions were repurposed from analogous conditions.

Conclusions: The results of this scoping review investigating ongoing clinical trials testing candidate treatments for long COVID suggest that a greater degree of definitional stringency and homogeneity is needed insofar as the characterization of long COVID and inclusion/exclusion criteria.

Source: Ceban F, Leber A, Jawad MY, Yu M, Lui LMW, Subramaniapillai M, Di Vincenzo JD, Gill H, Rodrigues NB, Cao B, Lee Y, Lin K, Mansur RB, Ho R, Burke MJ, Rosenblat JD, McIntyre RS. Registered clinical trials investigating treatment of long COVID: a scoping review and recommendations for research. Infect Dis (Lond). 2022 Mar 14:1-11. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2022.2043560. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35282780; PMCID: PMC8935463. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8935463/ (Full text)

Analysis of post COVID-19 condition and its overlap with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Background: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) disease (COVID-19) triggers the development of numerous pathologies and infection-linked complications and exacerbates existing pathologies in nearly all body systems. Aside from the primarily targeted respiratory organs, adverse SARS-CoV-2 effects were observed in nervous, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal/metabolic, immune, and other systems in COVID-19 survivors. Long-term effects of this viral infection have been recently observed and represent distressing sequelae recognised by the World Health Organisation (WHO) as a distinct clinical entity defined as post-COVID-19 condition. Considering the pandemic is still ongoing, more time is required to confirm post COVID-19 condition diagnosis in the COVID-19 infected cohorts, although many reported post COVID-19 symptoms overlap with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS).

Aims of Review: In this study, COVID-19 clinical presentation and associated post-infection sequelae (post-COVID-19 condition) were reviewed and compared with ME/CFS symptomatology.

Key Scientific Concepts of Review: The onset, progression, and symptom profile of post COVID-19 condition patients have considerable overlap with ME/CFS. Considering the large scope and range of pro-inflammatory effects of this virus, it is reasonable to expect development of post COVID-19 clinical complications in a proportion of the affected population. There are reports of a later debilitating syndrome onset three months post COVID-19 infection (often described as long-COVID-19), marked by the presence of fatigue, headache, cognitive dysfunction, post-exertional malaise, orthostatic intolerance, and dyspnoea. Acute inflammation, oxidative stress, and increased levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), have been reported in SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. Longitudinal monitoring of post COVID-19 patients is warranted to understand the long-term effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the pathomechanism of post COVID-19 condition.

Source: Sukocheva OA, Maksoud R, Beeraka NM, Madhunapantula SV, Sinelnikov M, Nikolenko VN, …. and Marshall-Gradisnik S. Analysis of post COVID-19 condition and its overlap with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome.  Journal of Advanced Research, Available online 26 November 2021. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090123221002320  (Full text)

Mechanisms of coronavirus infectious disease 2019-related neurologic diseases

Abstract:

Purpose of review: As of January 8, 2022, a global pandemic caused by infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV)-2, a new RNA virus, has resulted in 304,896,785 cases in over 222 countries and regions, with over 5,500,683 deaths (www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/). Reports of neurological and psychiatric symptoms in the context of coronavirus infectious disease 2019 (COVID-19) range from headache, anosmia, and dysgeusia, to depression, fatigue, psychosis, seizures, delirium, suicide, meningitis, encephalitis, inflammatory demyelination, infarction, and acute hemorrhagic necrotizing encephalopathy. Moreover, 30-50% of COVID-19 survivors develop long-lasting neurologic symptoms, including a dysexecutive syndrome, with inattention and disorientation, and/or poor movement coordination. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA within the central nervous system (CNS) of patients is rare, and mechanisms of neurological damage and ongoing neurologic diseases in COVID-19 patients are unknown. However, studies demonstrating viral glycoprotein effects on coagulation and cerebral vasculature, and hypoxia- and cytokine-mediated coagulopathy and CNS immunopathology suggest both virus-specific and neuroimmune responses may be involved. This review explores potential mechanistic insights that could contribute to COVID-19-related neurologic disease.

Recent findings: While the development of neurologic diseases during acute COVID-19 is rarely associated with evidence of viral neuroinvasion, new evidence suggests SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S) protein exhibits direct inflammatory and pro-coagulation effects. This, in conjunction with immune dysregulation resulting in cytokine release syndrome (CRS) may result in acute cerebrovascular or neuroinflammatory diseases. Additionally, CRS-mediated loss of blood-brain barrier integrity in specific brain regions may contribute to the expression of proinflammatory mediators by neural cells that may impact brain function long after resolution of acute infection. Importantly, host co-morbid diseases that affect vascular, pulmonary, or CNS function may contribute to the type of neurologic disease triggered by SARS-COV-2 infection.

Summary: Distinct effects of SARS-CoV-2 S protein and CNS compartment- and region-specific responses to CRS may underlie acute and chronic neuroinflammatory diseases associated with COVID-19.

Source: Klein RS. Mechanisms of coronavirus infectious disease 2019-related neurologic diseases. Curr Opin Neurol. 2022 Mar 11. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000001049. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35283461. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35283461/

Neurocognitive and psychiatric post-coronavirus disease 2019 conditions: pathogenic insights of brain dysfunction following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection

Abstract:

Purpose of review: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the etiological agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), can trigger a myriad of neuropsychiatric manifestations. As a 2-year-old disease (at the writing of this manuscript), its long-term cognitive and neuropsychiatric implications, known as post-COVID-19 conditions, are incompletely recognized and mechanistically obscure.

Recent findings: Fatigue, anxiety, depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, and cognitive dysfunction are reported more frequently in COVID-19 survivors than in matching, non-COVID-19 population. Risk factors are unclear, including comorbidities, age at COVID-19 onset, or disease severity; women, however, have been reported to be at increased risk than men. Although the frequency of these symptoms decreases over time, at least one in five will have persistent cognitive and neuropsychiatric manifestations one year after recovering from COVID-19.

Summary: Neurocognitive and psychiatric post-COVID-19 long-term conditions are frequent and complex multifactorial sequelae. Several acute and chronic factors such as hypoxemia, cerebral thrombotic and inflammatory endothelial damage, and disruption of the blood-brain barrier (leading to parenchymal translocation of pro-inflammatory molecules, cytokines, and cytotoxic T lymphocytes) are involved, leading to microglial activation and astrogliosis. As an evolving topic, evidence derived from prospective studies will expand our understanding of post-COVID-19 these long-term outcomes.

Source: García-Grimshaw M, Sankowski R, Valdés-Ferrer SI. Neurocognitive and psychiatric post-coronavirus disease 2019 conditions: pathogenic insights of brain dysfunction following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. Curr Opin Neurol. 2022 Mar 11. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000001046. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35283463. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35283463/