counseling – American ME and CFS Society

Cost-effectiveness of counselling, graded-exercise and usual care for chronic fatigue: evidence from a randomised trial in primary care

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Fatigue is common and has been shown to result in high economic costs to society. The aim of this study is to compare the cost-effectiveness of two active therapies, graded-exercise (GET) and counselling (COUN) with usual care plus a self-help booklet (BUC) for people presenting with chronic fatigue.

METHODS: A randomised controlled trial was conducted with participants consulting for fatigue of over three months’ duration recruited from 31 general practices in South East England and allocated to one of three arms. Outcomes and use of services were assessed at 6-month follow-up. The main outcome measure used in the economic evaluation was clinically significant improvements in fatigue, measured using the Chalder fatigue scale. Cost-effectiveness was assessed using the net-benefit approach and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves.

RESULTS: Full economic and outcome data at six months were available for 163 participants; GET = 51, COUN = 58 and BUC = 54. Those receiving the active therapies (GET and COUN) had more contacts with care professionals and therefore higher costs, these differences being statistically significant. COUN was more expensive and less effective than the other two therapies. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of GET compared to BUC was equal to £987 per unit of clinically significant improvement. However, there was much uncertainty around this result.

CONCLUSION: This study does not provide a clear recommendation about which therapeutic option to adopt, based on efficiency, for patients with chronic fatigue. It suggests that COUN is not cost-effective, but it is unclear whether GET represents value for money compared to BUC.

Clinical Trial Registration number at ISRCTN register: 72136156.

Source: Sabes-Figuera R, McCrone P, Hurley M, King M, Donaldson AN, Ridsdale L. Cost-effectiveness of counselling, graded-exercise and usual care for chronic fatigue: evidence from a randomised trial in primary care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug 20;12:264. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-264. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3480915/ (Full article)

Chronic fatigue in general practice: is counselling as good as cognitive behaviour therapy? A UK randomised trial

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Fatigue is a common symptom for which patients consult their doctors in primary care. With usual medical management the majority of patients report that their symptoms persist and become chronic. There is little evidence for the effectiveness of any fatigue management in primary care.

AIM: To compare the effectiveness of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) with counselling for patients with chronic fatigue and to describe satisfaction with care.

DESIGN OF STUDY: Randomised trial with parallel group design.

SETTING: Ten general practices located in London and the South Thames region of the United Kingdom recruited patients to the trial between 1996 and 1998. Patients came from a wide range of socioeconomic backgrounds and lived in urban, suburban, and rural areas.

METHOD: Data were collected before randomisation, after treatment, and six months later. Patients were offered six sessions of up to one hour each of either CBT or counselling. Outcomes include: self-report of fatigue symptoms six months later, anxiety and depression, symptom attributions, social adjustment and patients’ satisfaction with care.

RESULTS: One hundred and sixty patients with chronic fatigue entered the trial, 45 (28%) met research criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome; 129 completed follow-up. All patients met Chalder et al’s standard criteria for fatigue. Mean fatigue scores were 23 on entry (at baseline) and 15 at six months’ follow-up. Sixty-one (47%) patients no longer met standard criteria for fatigue after six months. There was no significant difference in effect between the two therapies on fatigue (1.04 [95% CI = -1.7 to 3.7]), anxiety and depression or social adjustment outcomes for all patients and for the subgroup with chronic fatigue syndrome. Use of antidepressants and consultations with the doctor decreased after therapy but there were no differences between groups.

CONCLUSION: Counselling and CBT were equivalent in effect for patients with chronic fatigue in primary care. The choice between therapies can therefore depend on other considerations, such as cost and accessibility.

Comment in:

Chronic fatigue in general practice. [Br J Gen Pract. 2001]

Cognitive behaviour therapy and chronic fatigue syndrome. [Br J Gen Pract. 2001]

Source: Ridsdale L, Godfrey E, Chalder T, Seed P, King M, Wallace P, Wessely S; Fatigue Trialists’ Group. Chronic fatigue in general practice: is counselling as good as cognitive behaviour therapy? A UK randomised trial. Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Jan;51(462):19-24. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1313894/ (Full article)

Chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia: clinical assessment and treatment

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and fibromyalgia (FM) are closely related illnesses of uncertain etiology. This article reviews the research literature on these biobehavioral conditions, with an emphasis on explanatory models, clinical evaluation of comorbid psychiatric disorders, assessment of stress factors, pharmacologic and alternative therapies, and cognitive-behavioral treatment studies. Furthermore, clinical protocols suitable for professional practice are presented based on an integration of the authors’ clinical observations with published data. The article concludes with the recognition that mental health professionals can offer substantial help to these patients.

Source: Friedberg F, Jason LA. Chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia: clinical assessment and treatment. Clin Psychol. 2001 Apr;57(4):433-55. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11255201

Chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is defined by symptoms and diagnosed without any objective diagnostic tests. Risk factors for developing CFS may include infection, psychiatric disorders, and allergies. Modest dysfunction of multiple organ systems, including the immune, central nervous, endocrine, and muscular systems, have been identified in cases of CFS. Symptoms of various organic, psychiatric, and poorly understood disorders overlap those of CFS. There is no known cure for CFS; however, exercise, counseling, and medications may provide symptomatic relief.

Source: Klonoff DC. Chronic fatigue syndrome. Clin Infect Dis. 1992 Nov;15(5):812-23. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1445980