Tag: classification

Ethical classification of ME/CFS in the United Kingdom

Abstract:

Few conditions have sparked as much controversy as myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). Professional consensus has long suggested that the condition should be classified as psychiatric, while patients and advocacy groups have insisted it is a serious biological disease that requires medical care and research to develop it. This longstanding debate shifted in 2015, when U.S. governmental health authorities fully embraced medical classification and management. Given that some globally respected health authorities now insist that ME/CFS is a serious biological disease, this paper asks whether it can be ethical for the U.K. practice guideline now in development to characterize the condition as a mental health disorder.

Following a brief history of ME/CFS controversy, I offer three arguments to show that it would be unethical for the U.K. to now characterize ME/CFS as a mental health condition, considering the relevance of that conclusion for ME/CFS guidelines elsewhere and for other contested conditions.

© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Source: O’Leary D. Ethical classification of ME/CFS in the United Kingdom. Bioethics. 2019 Feb 8. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12559. [Epub ahead of print] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30734339

Clinical typology of chronic fatigue syndrome: classificatory hypothesis

Note: Full article also available as PDF download.

Primary (or pure) chronic fatigue syndrome (pCFS) is a complex and severe chronic and disabling disease of unknown causes, excluding secondary chronic fatigue syndrome (sCFS) related to some other medical condition. It is characterized by intense fatigue in addition to cognitive, autonomic, neuroendocrine, immunoallergic and musculoskeletal symptoms, which are of recent appearance and that cannot be explained by other clinical reasons, lasting for at least 6 months, is non-remitting significantly with rest and which worsens with physical or mental activity, with very slow recovery and a reduction of >50% of activities of daily living previously performed by the patient.1–4 It is diagnosed according to the 1994 Fukuda criteria,1 the Canadian consensus document published in 20032 or, more recently, the international consensus criteria of 2011; with the name of myalgic encephalomyelitis that offers a review on its physiopathology, symptoms and treatment.3 Prevalence is estimated to be between 0.5% and 2.5% of the general population.1–3,5 In spite of it being recognized as a disease by the WHO since 1989, and classified with the code G93.3 in the ICD-10,5,6 and that evidence accumulated from different fields during the past 2 decades, it is possible that pCFS is still largely unknown by most health professionals.

You can read the rest of this article here: http://www.reumatologiaclinica.org/en/clinical-typology-chronic-fatigue-syndrome/articulo/S2173574313001329/ 

Comment in

 

Source: Qanneta R, Fontova R, Poveda MJ, Castro S. Clinical typology of chronic fatigue syndrome: classificatory hypothesis. Reumatol Clin. 2014 Mar-Apr;10(2):132-3. doi: 10.1016/j.reuma.2013.04.004. Epub 2013 Jul 9.[Article in English, Spanish] http://www.reumatologiaclinica.org/es/linkresolver/tipologia-clinica-del-sindrome-fatiga/S1699258X13000971/ (Full article)