Tag: Ciba Foundation

Society, mind and body in chronic fatigue syndrome: an anthropological view

Abstract:

An anthropological view of chronic fatigue syndrome places the study of illness in social context. Data from an interview study of 50 chronically fatigued patients demonstrate the relation of local social worlds–families, workplaces, communities–to the meaning and experience of illness.

Negative life events and difficulties, multiple commitments, and a hectic pace are among prominent themes in the subjects’ local worlds. These themes are reflected in: (1) attributions of illness onset to social sources, (2) the symbolism of the core complaint of fatigue, and (3) an illness-induced, positively valued lifestyle transformation suggesting the rejection of culturally prescribed ‘busyness’.

Dichotomous definitions of the relation of mind and body are shown to be part of culture, not Nature, in the paper’s second section. The ‘mind-body dichotomy’ and the differing values attached to physical and psychological disorders by a naturalistic scientific paradigm explain the delegitimizing experiences of sufferers, who find their illness dismissed as psychosomatic and therefore ‘not real’.

A conceptualization of chronic fatigue syndrome which links local social worlds to psychological distress, felt bodily sensation and biological changes is proposed. Collaborative teams of social scientists and medical researchers might fruitfully pursue aspects of social context in relation to psychiatric, immunological and viral dimensions of the illness.

 

Source: Ware NC. Society, mind and body in chronic fatigue syndrome: an anthropological view. Ciba Found Symp. 1993;173:62-73; discussion 73-82. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8491108

 

Chronic fatigue in historical perspective

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue as a presenting complaint, in the absence of other evident organic illness, was seldom reported historically before the second half of the 19th century. Its first eruption was the so-called ‘bed cases’ or ‘sofa cases’ among middle-class females in the period from 1860 to about 1910. ‘Neurasthenia’ does not necessarily represent an early forerunner of chronic fatigue.

Many patients receiving that diagnosis did not complain of fatigue. Others with functional fatigue did not receive the diagnosis ‘neurasthenia’. Both medical-anecdotal and quantitative sources make it clear that by the time of the First World War, chronic fatigue was a common complaint in Europe and North America.

Medical concepts of chronic fatigue since the 1930s have run along four separate lines: (1) ‘postinfectious neuromyasthenia’, going back to an atypical ‘poliomyelitis’ epidemic in 1934; (2) ‘chronic Epstein-Barr virus’ infection, an illness attribution that increased in frequency after the discovery in 1968 that this virus caused mononucleosis; (3) ‘myalgic encephalomyelitis’, dating from an epidemic at the Royal Free Hospital in London in 1955; and (4) ‘fibrositis’, or ‘fibromyalgia’, used as a rheumatological description since the turn of the century. Recently, these four separate paths have tended to converge into the diagnosis of ‘chronic fatigue syndrome’.

 

Source: Shorter E. Chronic fatigue in historical perspective. Ciba Found Symp. 1993;173:6-16; discussion 16-22. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8491107

 

Clinical presentation of chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a chronic illness of uncertain aetiology characterized by at least six months of debilitating fatigue and associated symptoms. The symptoms of the syndrome are all non-specific and some (but not all) are also seen in psychiatric illness. The symptomatology suggesting an organic component to the illness includes its abrupt onset with an ‘infectious-like’ illness, intermittent unexplained fevers, arthralgias and ‘gelling’ (stiffness), sore throats, cough, photophobia, night sweats, and post-exertional malaise with systemic symptoms. The illness can last for years and is associated with marked impairment of functional health status.

 

Source: Komaroff AL. Clinical presentation of chronic fatigue syndrome. Ciba Found Symp. 1993;173:43-54; discussion 54-61. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8491106

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome and the treatment process

Abstract:

Fatigue is a common complaint in general practice and is often associated with psychiatric and psychosocial problems and demoralization. Although the Centers for Disease Control definition of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) excludes pre-existing psychiatric illness, common psychosocial problems short of a clinical disorder (such as irritability, difficulty in thinking, inability to concentrate, depression and sleep disturbance) overlap with the criteria for CFS.

Psychological states can affect the course of CFS or become confused in the patient’s and doctor’s mind with the course of infection. The core dilemma in practice is how aggressively to pursue a possible basis for CFS when it persists in the absence of an identifiable external cause. Possibilities for exploration are numerous and potentially expensive. In practice, the persistence of doctors depends on the patient’s illness behaviour, on financial and organizational factors, and on the culture of medical care and practice styles.

It is essential to differentiate the appropriate management of CFS from scientific study where intensive investigation may be warranted. In practice doctors should proceed in a manner that conveys concern, supports function, and avoids dysfunctional illness behaviour and inadvertent legitimization and reinforcement of disability.

 

Source: Mechanic D. Chronic fatigue syndrome and the treatment process. Ciba Found Symp. 1993;173:318-27; discussion 327-41. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8491105

 

Non-pharmacological approaches to treatment

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) as currently defined overlaps with other syndromes including chronic pain, fibromyalgia, anxiety and depression. It also resembles historical descriptions of neurasthenia. The role of psychological (cognitive) and behavioural therapies in CFS is examined.

There are both pragmatic and theoretical arguments for their application to CFS. It is pragmatic to target obvious and treatable factors including inactivity and depression. A theoretical model in which psychological, physiological and social factors interact offers a plausible rationale for such treatment but is not yet empirically proven. While there is evidence for the efficacy of this type of therapy in related syndromes, the evidence in CFS is inconclusive.

A randomized controlled trial of combined cognitive and behavioural therapy currently in progress is described. Initial results suggest that most patients receiving cognitive behaviour therapy improve, especially in terms of functional impairment. It remains to be seen whether this therapy will prove to be more effective than standard general practitioner care. In the meantime cognitive behaviour therapy offers a pragmatic and rational therapy for patients with CFS.

 

Source: Sharpe M. Non-pharmacological approaches to treatment. Ciba Found Symp. 1993;173:298-308; discussion 308-17. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8491104

 

Pharmacological approaches to the therapy of chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Although a variety of pharmacological agents have been used to treat patients with chronic fatigue syndrome none has been shown to effect a complete resolution of symptoms.

Data obtained from a retrospective study and from an objective assessment of the aerobic work capacity of patients with this disorder suggest that the underlying pathophysiological abnormality is a disorder of sleep regulation. This results not only in profound fatigue and lethargy but also reduced sensory threshold for pain, disordered temperature regulation, cardiovascular abnormalities, disturbed higher cerebral function and mental depression.

Drugs which modulate sleep, such as tricyclic antidepressants, have a limited effect in improving the symptoms that CFS patients experience. We suggest that other agents which affect central nervous system neurotransmitters, particularly serotonin, may have potential in the management of this condition and need to be evaluated in large controlled clinical trials.

 

Source: McCluskey DR. Pharmacological approaches to the therapy of chronic fatigue syndrome. Ciba Found Symp. 1993;173:280-7; discussion 287-97. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8491103

 

Fibromyalgia, sleep disorder and chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Various research studies show that the amalgam of disordered sleep physiology, chronic fatigue, diffuse myalgia, and cognitive and behavioural symptoms constitutes a non-restorative sleep syndrome that may follow a febrile illness, as in the chronic fatigue syndrome. Where rheumatic complaints are prominent such a constellation of disturbed sleep physiology and symptoms also characterizes the fibromyalgia disorder.

In contrast to the chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia is associated with a variety of initiating or perpetuating factors such as psychologically distressing events, primary sleep disorders (e.g. sleep apnoea, periodic limb movement disorder) and inflammatory rheumatic disease, as well as an acute febrile illness.

The chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia have similar disordered sleep physiology, namely an alpha rhythm disturbance (7.5-11 Hz) in the electroencephalogram (EEG) within non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep that accompanies increased nocturnal vigilance and light, unrefreshing sleep. Aspects of cytokine and cellular immune functions are shown to be related to the sleep-wake system.

The evidence suggests a reciprocal relationship of the immune and sleep-wake systems. Interference either with the immune system (e.g. by a viral agent or by cytokines such as alpha-interferon or interleukin 2) or with the sleeping-waking brain system (e.g. by sleep deprivation) has effects on the other system and will be accompanied by the symptoms of the chronic fatigue syndrome.

 

Source: Moldofsky H. Fibromyalgia, sleep disorder and chronic fatigue syndrome. Ciba Found Symp. 1993;173:262-71; discussion 272-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8491102

 

Somatization, illness attribution and the sociocultural psychiatry of chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

In addition to epidemiological and neurobiological perspectives on the relationship between chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and psychiatric disorders there has been increasing interest in the role of cognitive-behavioural, psychological, psychodynamic and social factors in the psychiatric aspects of this syndrome. These factors may be important in the initiation and/or maintenance of CFS and play important roles in the misdiagnosis of primary psychopathology as CFS. They may be important targets for intervention and treatment.

This paper examines the relevance of the following issues for better understanding the relationship between CFS and the results of psychiatric studies: (1) the concepts of somatization and abnormal illness behaviour; (2) the role of patients’ illness attributions; (3) psychological and psychodynamic constructs such as depressive vulnerability occurring in individuals dependent upon achievement for the maintenance of self-esteem and euthymic mood, perfectionism, and helplessness; (4) the role of personality characteristics and styles; (5) the potential iatrogenic role of the health care system in producing disability in individuals with a diagnosis of CFS; (6) the role of the media and other sociocultural forces in the patient’s choice of the CFS label; and (7) the impact of the CFS label on the patient. The importance of differentiating between initiating and maintaining or perpetuating factors is emphasized.

 

Source: Abbey SE. Somatization, illness attribution and the sociocultural psychiatry of chronic fatigue syndrome. Ciba Found Symp. 1993;173:238-52; discussion 252-61. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8491101

 

Chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome: clinical epidemiology and aetiological classification

Abstract:

To determine the medical and psychiatric diagnoses that have an aetiological role in chronic fatigue we conducted a prospective study of 405 (65% women) patients who presented for evaluation with this chief complaint to an academic medical centre.

The average age was 38.1 years and the average duration of fatigue at entry in the study was 6.9 years. All patients were given comprehensive physical and laboratory evaluations and were administered a highly structured psychiatric interview. Psychiatric diagnoses explaining the chronic fatigue were identified in 74% of patients and physical disorders were diagnosed in 7% of patients.

The most common psychiatric conditions in this series were major depression, diagnosed in 58% of patients, panic disorder, diagnosed in 14% of patients, and somatization disorder, diagnosed in 10% of patients. Primary sleep disorders, diagnosed in 2% patients, and chronic infections, confirmed in 1.6% patients, explained the majority of cases whose chronic fatigue was attributed to a physical disorder.

Thirty per cent of patients met the criteria used to define the chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Compared with age- and gender-matched control subjects with chronic fatigue, CFS patients had a similarly high prevalence of current psychiatric disorders (78% versus 82%), but were significantly more likely to have somatization disorder (28% versus 5%) and to attribute their illness to a viral infection (70% versus 33%).

We conclude that most patients with a chief complaint of chronic fatigue, including those exhibiting the features of CFS, suffer from standard mood, anxiety and/or somatoform disorders. Careful research is still needed to determine whether CFS is a distinct entity or a variant of these psychiatric illness.

 

Source: Manu P, Lane TJ, Matthews DA. Chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome: clinical epidemiology and aetiological classification. Ciba Found Symp. 1993;173:23-31; discussion 31-42. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8491100

 

The neuropsychiatry of chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

This paper explores the relationship between chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and psychiatric disorder, with special reference to neuropsychiatry, Topics reviewed include (1) epidemiological evidence of central disorder in CFS; (2) evidence from longitudinal studies of an interaction between vulnerability to CFS and psychiatric disorder; and (3) evidence from neuroimaging, neuropsychology, neurophysiology and neuroendocrinology of disordered CNS function in CFS. The most impressive evidence of CNS disturbance comes from neuroendocrinological studies, which suggest a role of hypothalamic disorder as a final common pathway for CFS. It is concluded that the equal and opposite tendencies of psychiatry to be ‘brainless’ and neurology to be ‘mindless’ have led to needless controversy over the nature of CFS. Now that the contributions of psychiatric disorder to CFS, and of neurobiological dysfunction to psychiatric disorder, are both established, it will be possible to make real advances in understanding the nature of CFS.

 

Source: Wessely S. The neuropsychiatry of chronic fatigue syndrome. Ciba Found Symp. 1993;173:212-29; discussion 229-37. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8491099