The low yield of physical examinations and laboratory investigations of patients with chronic fatigue

Abstract:

Fatigue is a common symptom but guidelines for its appropriate evaluation are lacking. The authors prospectively studied 100 adults with a chief complaint of fatigue lasting at least 1 month in order to determine the diagnostic contribution of physical examinations and laboratory investigations.

The evaluations were performed in the specialized clinic of a faculty practice. Physical examinations produced diagnostic information in 2% of patients, and laboratory investigations elucidated the cause of fatigue in 5% of patients. Structured follow-up evaluations after an average interval of 10 months failed to reveal any new organic causes for the fatigue symptom. Minor laboratory abnormalities were relatively common but did not contribute to the diagnostic process and did not seem to influence the clinical outcome.

The authors conclude that the traditional medical evaluation of patients complaining of chronic fatigue has a low yield in discovering treatable physical disorders.

 

Source:  Lane TJ, Matthews DA, Manu P. The low yield of physical examinations and laboratory investigations of patients with chronic fatigue. Am J Med Sci. 1990 May;299(5):313-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2337122

 

Usefulness of a standard battery of laboratory tests in investigating chronic fatigue in adults

Abstract:

Twenty-two adults with chronic fatigue were studied to determine the clinical usefulness of commonly applied laboratory tests. Subjects with the chief complaint of fatigue persisting for more than one year were followed for an average of seven months at a university family health centre.

During this time a group of commonly recommended tests were carried out and the patients had repeated physical examinations. Physical diseases and laboratory abnormalities were few, and patients with abnormal values and active problems were followed until their fatigue resolved or their abnormalities reverted to normal following therapy. The study demonstrated that the presence of an abnormal laboratory result in a fatigued individual does not necessarily indicate the cause of fatigue.

A psychiatric history was also performed and patients were tested with the symptom check list 90-R (SCL-90-R), a 90-item psychological symptom check list. Seven patients were receiving psychotherapy when they enrolled in the study. Two additional subjects entered therapy after the start of the study. Results on the symptom check list for the study group were largely abnormal, with a majority scoring in the highest quartile for depression, paranoid ideation and psychoticism.

It is concluded that the investigation of patients with fatigue which has lasted for longer than one year should focus on psychological causes. In this group of patients laboratory abnormalities are not useful in guiding evaluation or treatment for their fatigue.

 

Source: Valdini A, Steinhardt S, Feldman E. Usefulness of a standard battery of laboratory tests in investigating chronic fatigue in adults. Fam Pract. 1989 Dec;6(4):286-91. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2632306

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome

I was surprised that CMAJ published the letter from Drs. Gerald H. Ross and Jean A. Monro (Can Med Assoc J 1989; 140: 361) supporting such a vague, descriptive and unscientific term as “chronic fatigue syndrome”. As a practising psychiatrist I have attempted to emphasize that there are also primary psychologic causes of chronic fatigue such as depression and panic disorder (ibid: 361, 364); thus, it is more prudent to consider the relative causes of chronic fatigue than to create a “syndrome” that imposes a diagnostic life sentence of an incurable disease.

That a minuscule percentage of cases of chronic fatigue are due to chronic mononucleosis, other chronic infections and chemical sensitivity is not disputed. What is disputed is the number so diagnosed, particularly now that panic disorder – a primarily psychologic condition that causes chronic fatigue but is more amenable to treatment (antidepressant medication and dynamic insight-oriented psychotherapy) – appears to be reaching epidemic proportions. (1) Therefore, at the risk of considerable ideologic unpopularity, it would seem, I must repeat: “Primum non nocere.”

The statement by Ross and Monro that magnesium deficiency is associated with chemical sensitivity means just that and only that.

Ross and Monro’s six references are not definitive enough, the possible exception being the article of Tosato and colleagues (2) if – and only if – the chronic infectious mononucleosis referred to in the title was confirmed by serologic evidence of an acute attack. (3)

Ross and Monro display psychologic “sympathy” with “empathy” and quote me as referring to the term “psychosomatic” when I used the term “psychologic”.

“Syndromes” like “chronic fatigue syndrome” lessen the burden of introspection. In reverence to the “father” of nosology, Thomas Sydenham, and the “father” of psychiatry, Sigmund Freud, I must state, as a traditionally oriented psychiatrist, that it is nontherapeutic to condone self-defeating behaviour.

~Ray Holland, MD, FRCPC Box 458 Port Colborne, Ont.

References

1. Introduction. In Summary Proceedings of “Panic Disorder – Relative Merits of Pharmacotherapy and Psychotherapy” (satellite symposium of 1988 American Psychiatric Association annual meeting), Medical Group, Mississauga, Ont, 1988
2. Tosato G, Straus SE, Werner H et al: Characteristic T cell dysfunction in patients with chronic active EpsteinBarr virus infection (chronic infectious mononucleosis). J Immunol 1985; 134:3082-3088
3. Evans AS: A virus for all seasons.Buffalo Phys Biomed Sci 1988; 22 (2):14-15

 

Source: R Holland. Chronic fatigue syndrome. CMAJ. 1989 May 1; 140(9): 1016. PMCID: PMC1268972
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1268972/pdf/cmaj00190-0022b.pdf