Tag: central fatigue

The role of clinical neurophysiology in the definition and assessment of fatigue and fatigability

Highlights:

  • Though a common symptom, fatigue is difficult to define and investigate, and occurs in a wide variety of disorders, with differing pathological causes.
  • This review aims to guide clinicians in how to approach fatigue and to suggest that neurophysiological tests may allow an understanding of its origin and severity.
  • The effectiveness of neurophysiological tests as cost-effective objective biomarkers for the assessment of fatigue has been summarised.

Abstract

Though a common symptom, fatigue is difficult to define and investigate, occurs in a wide variety of neurological and systemic disorders, with differing pathological causes. It is also often accompanied by a psychological component. As a symptom of long-term COVID-19 it has gained more attention.

In this review, we begin by differentiating fatigue, a perception, from fatigability, quantifiable through biomarkers. Central and peripheral nervous system and muscle disorders associated with these are summarised. We provide a comprehensive and objective framework to help identify potential causes of fatigue and fatigability in a given disease condition. It also considers the effectiveness of neurophysiological tests as objective biomarkers for its assessment. Among these, twitch interpolation, motor cortex stimulation, electroencephalography and magnetencephalography, and readiness potentials will be described for the assessment of central fatigability, and surface and needle electromyography (EMG), single fibre EMG and nerve conduction studies for the assessment of peripheral fatigability.

The purpose of this review is to guide clinicians in how to approach fatigue, and fatigability, and to suggest that neurophysiological tests may allow an understanding of their origin and interactions. In this way, their differing types and origins, and hence their possible differing treatments, may also be defined more clearly.

Source: Tankisi H, Versace V, Kuppuswamy A, Cole J. The role of clinical neurophysiology in the definition and assessment of fatigue and fatigability. Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2023 Dec 18;9:39-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cnp.2023.12.004. PMID: 38274859; PMCID: PMC10808861. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467981X23000367 (Full text)

Reliability of physiological, psychological, and cognitive variables in chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of specific physiological, psychological, and cognitive variables in 31 chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) subjects and 31 matched control subjects. All variables were assessed weekly over a 4-week period and reliability was determined using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results ranged from moderately to highly reliable for all variables assessed, except for mental and physical fatigue, which were of questionable reliability in both groups (ICC = 0.61 and 0.65, respectively, for the CFS group; 0.62 and 0.52 for the control group).

A Pearson product-moment correlation analysis that compared exercise performance with all psychological variables assessed, demonstrated a significant relationship between exercise performance and depression (r = .41, P = .02) in week 3 only, suggesting minimal association between objective performance and psychological responses. These correlation results support a central, as opposed to a peripheral, basis to the sensation of fatigue in CFS.

 

Source: Wallman KE, Morton AR, Goodman C, Grove R. Reliability of physiological, psychological, and cognitive variables in chronic fatigue syndrome. Res Sports Med. 2005 Jul-Sep;13(3):231-41. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16392538