Cognitive behavioural therapy and psycho-education for chronic fatigue syndrome in young people: reflections from the families’ perspective

Abstract:

OBJECTIVES: Recent trials have produced optimistic results for family-focussed cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in young people. This study sought to examine the under-researched question of the views and experiences of patients and families who take part.

DESIGN: Semi-structured interviews and qualitative analysis were chosen in order to address clients’ perspectives in depth.

METHODS: Sixteen young people and sixteen parents who participated in a trial of CBT versus psycho-education (PE) for CFS were interviewed. Key themes were discerned using inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS: Most families had low expectations of a cure but hope for improvement. Generally speaking, participants found both CBT and PE acceptable and helpful. Behavioural aspects of CBT (e.g. goal-setting, graded activity) were found helpful. The opportunity to gain support, recognition and validation was important. Cognitive elements of therapy were sometimes deemed inappropriate and some felt emotional aspects of CFS were not adequately addressed. Participants were ambivalent towards the extent of family involvement. Negative experiences related to the therapy setting and feeling inappropriately labeled. Most participants felt therapy was a stepping-stone towards normal life, although many felt recovery was incomplete. Very few differences were found between themes from CBT and PE participants. A notable exception was that every young person who experienced CBT described therapy as helpful, whereas the participants who strongly opposed the therapy approach had all experienced PE.

CONCLUSIONS: The detailed insights regarding families’ therapy experiences suggest areas of improvement for service delivery and topics for further investigation.

 

Source: Dennison L, Stanbrook R, Moss-Morris R, Yardley L, Chalder T. Cognitive behavioural therapy and psycho-education for chronic fatigue syndrome in young people: reflections from the families’ perspective. Br J Health Psychol. 2010 Feb;15(Pt 1):167-83. doi: 10.1348/135910709X440034. Epub 2009 May 6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19422732

 

Cognitive-behavior therapy in chronic fatigue syndrome: is improvement related to increased physical activity?

Abstract:

This multiple case study of cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) compared self-report and behavioral outcomes. Eleven relatively high-functioning participants with CFS received 6-32 sessions of outpatient graded-activity oriented CBT.

Self-report outcomes included measures of fatigue impact, physical function, depression, anxiety, and global change. Behavioral outcomes included actigraphy and the 6-minute walking test. Global change ratings were very much improved (n=2), much improved (n=2), improved (n=5), and no change (n=2).

Of those reporting improvement, clinically significant actigraphy increases (n=3) and decreases (n=4) were found, as well as no significant change (n=2). The nature of clinical improvement in CBT trials for high-functioning CFS patients may be more ambiguous than that postulated by the cognitive-behavioral model.

 

Source: Friedberg F, Sohl S. Cognitive-behavior therapy in chronic fatigue syndrome: is improvement related to increased physical activity? J Clin Psychol. 2009 Apr;65(4):423-42. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20551. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19213007

 

Customizing treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia: the role of perpetuating factors

Erratum in: Psychosomatics. 2009 Mar-Apr;50(2):176.

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Syndromes characterized by chronic, medically unexplained fatigue, effort- and stress-intolerance, and widespread pain are highly prevalent in medicine.

RESULTS: In chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and fibromyalgia (FM), various perpetuating factors may impair patients’ quality of life and functioning and impede recovery. Although cognitive-behavioral and graded-exercise therapy are evidence-based treatments, the effectiveness and acceptability of therapeutic interventions in CFS/FM may largely depend on a customized approach taking the heterogeneity of perpetuating factors into account.

CONCLUSION: Further research should clarify the aim and outcome of different treatment strategies in CFS/FM, as well as the underlying mechanisms of change, including those facilitating neurobiological recovery.

 

Source: Van Houdenhove B, Luyten P. Customizing treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia: the role of perpetuating factors. Psychosomatics. 2008 Nov-Dec;49(6):470-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.49.6.470. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19122123

 

Salivary cortisol output before and after cognitive behavioural therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: There is evidence that patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) have mild hypocortisolism. One theory about the aetiology of this hypocortisolism is that it occurs late in the course of CFS via factors such as inactivity, sleep disturbance, chronic stress and deconditioning. We aimed to determine whether therapy aimed at reversing these factors–cognitive behavioural therapy for CFS–could increase cortisol output in CFS.

METHODS: We measured diurnal salivary cortisol output between 0800 and 2000 h before and after 15 sessions (or 6 months) of CBT in 41 patients with CDC-defined CFS attending a specialist, tertiary outpatient clinic.

RESULTS: There was a significant clinical response to CBT, and a significant rise in salivary cortisol output after CBT.

LIMITATIONS: We were unable to control for the passage of time using a non-treated CFS group.

CONCLUSIONS: Hypocortisolism in CFS is potentially reversible by CBT. Given previous suggestions that lowered cortisol may be a maintaining factor in CFS, CBT offers a potential way to address this.

 

Source: Roberts AD, Papadopoulos AS, Wessely S, Chalder T, Cleare AJ. Salivary cortisol output before and after cognitive behavioural therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome. J Affect Disord. 2009 May;115(1-2):280-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.09.013. Epub 2008 Oct 19. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18937978

 

Guided self-instructions for people with chronic fatigue syndrome: randomised controlled trial

Abstract:

A minimal intervention, based on cognitive-behavioural therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome and consisting of self-instructions combined with email contact, was tested in a randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN27293439). A total of 171 patients participated in the trial: 85 were allocated to the intervention condition and 86 to the waiting-list condition. All patients met the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome. An intention-to-treat analysis showed a significant decrease in fatigue and disability after self-instruction. The level of disability was negatively correlated with treatment outcome. Guided self-instructions are an effective treatment for patients with relatively less severe chronic fatigue syndrome.

 

Source: Knoop H, van der Meer JW, Bleijenberg G. Guided self-instructions for people with chronic fatigue syndrome: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2008 Oct;193(4):340-1. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.051292. http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/193/4/340.long (Full article)

 

Can CBT substantially change grey matter volume in chronic fatigue syndrome?

Sir, I wish to comment on the paper ‘Increase in prefrontal cortical volume following cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS)’ (De Lange et al., 2008). The authors compared the grey matter volume (GMV) of 22 patients with CFS before and after treatment with CBT, and with 22 healthy controls who were assessed at a similar time interval but received no treatment. The patient sample at baseline had a 5% smaller GMV as compared to healthy controls. In patients, GMV at baseline was correlated with slow information processing speed and physical activity. At follow-up, in the patient group, mean GMV increased with 0.7% from 669.4 to 674.1 ml. This increase in GMV was correlated with changes in cognitive speed. On the basis of this result, the authors conclude ‘that the cerebral atrophy associated with CFS is partially reversed after effective CBT’. In the Netherlands, a press release of the author’s institution even states ‘CBT brings about structural changes in brains of patients’ (Radboud University, 2008). The question arises whether the study results indeed support such far reaching conclusions.

Two critical points need to be taken into consideration. First, the authors did not include a control group of patients receiving no treatment or a different treatment. Therefore, the increase in GMV cannot be attributed to the CBT treatment given. It is possible that the natural course of and fluctuations in the illness are responsible for this result. In addition, it might be possible that other treatments than CBT would have resulted in the same, or even better, results. Second, even if the results were indeed to be attributed to changes in lifestyle brought about by CBT, several questions still remain. To name a few, first, the increase in volume of <1% is very modest. Therefore, the question is whether, although statistically significant, this small increase is also of clinical significance. Second, if CBT brings about changes in lifestyle, and these changes are responsible for small improvements in the patients’ brain and activity levels, are these changes structural and related to the primary disease process? An alternative interpretation is that changing the lifestyle of patients, influences their quality of life, activity patterns and GMV, while the underlying disease process is not influenced.

Another critical remark relates to the fact that the authors in their paper do not mention the proportion of absolute increase in GMV of 0.7%, but rather report that the initial between-group difference between patients and healthy controls decreases with 12%. For readers, it is important to realize that the measure of change reported by the authors is influenced by the absolute size of the between-group difference: the smaller, and therefore less relevant, this difference is, the larger the reported proportion becomes, thereby making less relevant results looking more impressive.

The above considerations lead to the conclusion, that the author’s results, although interesting, do not support the far reaching conclusions regarding the power of CBT.

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/content/132/6/e110.long

Comment in: Change in grey matter volume cannot be assumed to be due to cognitive behavioural therapy. [Brain. 2009]

Comment on: Increase in prefrontal cortical volume following cognitive behavioural therapy in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. [Brain. 2008]

 

Source: Bramsen I. Can CBT substantially change grey matter volume in chronic fatigue syndrome? Brain. 2009 Jun;132(Pt 6):e110; author reply e111. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn207. Epub 2008 Aug 29. http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/content/132/6/e110.long (Full article)

 

Implementing cognitive behavior therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome in mental health care: a costs and outcomes analysis

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the costs and outcomes of implementing cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in a mental health center (MHC). CBT is an evidence-based treatment for CFS that was scarcely available until now. To investigate the possibilities for wider implementation, a pilot implementation project was set up.

METHOD: Costs and effects were evaluated in a non-controlled before- and after study with an eight months time-horizon. Both the costs of performing the treatments and the costs of implementing the treatment program were included in the analysis. The implementation interventions included: informing general practitioners (GPs) and CFS patients, training therapists, and instructing the MHC employees. Given the non-controlled design, cost outcome ratios (CORs) and their acceptability curves were analyzed. Analyses were done from a health care perspective and from a societal perspective. Bootstrap analyses were performed to estimate the uncertainty around the cost and outcome results.

RESULTS: 125 CFS patients were included in the study. After treatment 37% had recovered from CFS and the mean gained QALY was 0.03. Costs of patients’ health care and productivity losses had decreased significantly. From the societal perspective the implementation led to cost savings and to higher health states for patients, indicating dominancy. From the health care perspective the implementation revealed overall costs of 5.320 euros per recovered patient, with an acceptability curve showing a 100% probability for a positive COR at a willingness to pay threshold of 6.500 euros per recovered patient.

CONCLUSION: Implementing CBT for CFS in a MHC appeared to have a favorable cost outcome ratio (COR) from a societal perspective. From a health care perspective the COR depended on how much a recovered CFS patient is being valued. The strength of the evidence was limited by the non-controlled design. The outcomes of this study might facilitate health care providers when confronted with the decision whether or not to adopt CBT for CFS in their institution.

 

Source: Scheeres K, Wensing M, Bleijenberg G, Severens JL. Implementing cognitive behavior therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome in mental health care: a costs and outcomes analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Aug 13;8:175. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-175. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2536664/ (Full article)

 

Cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome in adults

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a common, debilitating and serious health problem. Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) may help to alleviate the symptoms of CFS.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effectiveness and acceptability of CBT for CFS, alone and in combination with other interventions, compared with usual care and other interventions.

SEARCH STRATEGY: CCDANCTR-Studies and CCDANCTR-References were searched on 28/3/2008. We conducted supplementary searches of other bibliographic databases. We searched reference lists of retrieved articles and contacted trial authors and experts in the field for information on ongoing/completed trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials involving adults with a primary diagnosis of CFS, assigned to a CBT condition compared with usual care or another intervention, alone or in combination.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data on patients, interventions and outcomes were extracted by two review authors independently, and risk of bias was assessed for each study. The primary outcome was reduction in fatigue severity, based on a continuous measure of symptom reduction, using the standardised mean difference (SMD), or a dichotomous measure of clinical response, using odds ratios (OR), with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS: Fifteen studies (1043 CFS participants) were included in the review. When comparing CBT with usual care (six studies, 373 participants), the difference in fatigue mean scores at post-treatment was highly significant in favour of CBT (SMD -0.39, 95% CI -0.60 to -0.19), with 40% of CBT participants (four studies, 371 participants) showing clinical response in contrast with 26% in usual care (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.76). Findings at follow-up were inconsistent. For CBT versus other psychological therapies, comprising relaxation, counselling and education/support (four studies, 313 participants), the difference in fatigue mean scores at post-treatment favoured CBT (SMD -0.43, 95% CI -0.65 to -0.20). Findings at follow-up were heterogeneous and inconsistent. Only two studies compared CBT against other interventions and one study compared CBT in combination with other interventions against usual care.

AUTHORS’ CONCLUSIONS: CBT is effective in reducing the symptoms of fatigue at post-treatment compared with usual care, and may be more effective in reducing fatigue symptoms compared with other psychological therapies. The evidence base at follow-up is limited to a small group of studies with inconsistent findings. There is a lack of evidence on the comparative effectiveness of CBT alone or in combination with other treatments, and further studies are required to inform the development of effective treatment programmes for people with CFS.

Comment inReview: CBT reduces fatigue in adults with chronic fatigue syndrome but effects at follow-up unclear. [Evid Based Ment Health. 2009]

Update of:  Cognitive behaviour therapy for adults with chronic fatigue syndrome. [Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000]

 

Source: Price JR, Mitchell E, Tidy E, Hunot V. Cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;(3):CD001027. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001027.pub2.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18646067

 

Increase in prefrontal cortical volume following cognitive behavioural therapy in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a disabling disorder, characterized by persistent or relapsing fatigue. Recent studies have detected a decrease in cortical grey matter volume in patients with CFS, but it is unclear whether this cerebral atrophy constitutes a cause or a consequence of the disease. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is an effective behavioural intervention for CFS, which combines a rehabilitative approach of a graded increase in physical activity with a psychological approach that addresses thoughts and beliefs about CFS which may impair recovery.

Here, we test the hypothesis that cerebral atrophy may be a reversible state that can ameliorate with successful CBT. We have quantified cerebral structural changes in 22 CFS patients that underwent CBT and 22 healthy control participants. At baseline, CFS patients had significantly lower grey matter volume than healthy control participants. CBT intervention led to a significant improvement in health status, physical activity and cognitive performance. Crucially, CFS patients showed a significant increase in grey matter volume, localized in the lateral prefrontal cortex. This change in cerebral volume was related to improvements in cognitive speed in the CFS patients.

Our findings indicate that the cerebral atrophy associated with CFS is partially reversed after effective CBT. This result provides an example of macroscopic cortical plasticity in the adult human brain, demonstrating a surprisingly dynamic relation between behavioural state and cerebral anatomy. Furthermore, our results reveal a possible neurobiological substrate of psychotherapeutic treatment.

Comment in: Can CBT substantially change grey matter volume in chronic fatigue syndrome? [Brain. 2009]

 

Source: de Lange FP1, Koers A, Kalkman JS, Bleijenberg G, Hagoort P, van der Meer JW, Toni I. Increase in prefrontal cortical volume following cognitive behavioural therapy in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Brain. 2008 Aug;131(Pt 8):2172-80. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn140. Epub 2008 Jun 28. http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/content/131/8/2172.long (Full article)

 

Attentional bias towards health-threat information in chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether individuals with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) show an attentional bias towards health-threat information.

METHODS: Attentional bias (AB) was assessed in individuals with CFS and healthy controls using a visual probe task which presented health-threat and neutral words and pictures for 500 ms. Self-report questionnaires were used to assess CFS symptoms, depression, anxiety, and social desirability.

RESULTS: Compared to a healthy control group, the CFS group showed an enhanced AB towards heath-threat stimuli relative to neutral stimuli. The AB was not influenced by the type of stimulus (pictures vs. words).

CONCLUSION: The finding of an AB towards health-threat information in individuals with CFS is supportive of models of CFS which underlie cognitive behavior therapy.

 

Source: Hou R, Moss-Morris R, Bradley BP, Peveler R, Mogg K. Attentional bias towards health-threat information in chronic fatigue syndrome. J Psychosom Res. 2008 Jul;65(1):47-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.03.008. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18582611