Cognitive behavior therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: a case study

Abstract:

The case of a 26-year old woman with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) is presented. Multidimensional assessment showing severe debilitating fatigue and considerable psychological, social and occupational impairment confirmed the diagnosis. Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) was based on a tested causal model of CFS and individual behavioral analyses. Key elements in CBT were process variables from the CFS model, like sense of control, causal attributions, physical activity and focusing on bodily functions. Goals were recovery from fatigue, returning to work and relapse prevention. The course of therapy is described in detail to illustrate difficulties in treating CFS. Assessments were made five times, at baseline and at 8, 14, 21 and 33 months. Comparison of the pretest, post-test and follow-up scores of the outcome variables, fatigue and functional impairment and of the process variables showed clinically significant improvement from the range of CFS patients to the range of healthy controls.

 

Source: Prins JB, Bleijenberg G. Cognitive behavior therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: a case study. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1999 Dec;30(4):325-39. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10759328

 

An evaluation of multidisciplinary intervention for chronic fatigue syndrome with long-term follow-up, and a comparison with untreated controls

Abstract:

Individuals meeting the Fukuda et al definition for chronic fatigue syndrome completed a multidisciplinary assessment that included medical, psychiatric, behavioral, and psychological evaluations. Patients were then offered a comprehensive multidisciplinary intervention that included (1) bringing the patient under optimal medical management; (2) treating any ongoing affective or anxiety disorder pharmacologically; and (3) implementing a comprehensive cognitive-behavioral treatment program. Fifty-one patients proceeded to treatment.

The cognitive-behavioral component was carried out through the use of a therapist working with the patients in their own environments. The program was individually tailored to patients, but included (1) structured physical exercise and activation; (2) sleep management strategies; (3) careful activity management; (4) regulation of stimulant intake and reductions in use of symptomatic medications; (5) cognitive intervention designed to deal with patients’ beliefs concerning the nature of their disorder; (6) participation of patients’ family; and (7) efforts to establish specific vocational and avocational goals. Third parties were encouraged to collaborate cooperatively.

Employers were urged to provide employment opportunities and facilitate a graduated but time-targeted return to work. Disability carriers were encouraged to provide interim financial support in the form of disability benefits, support therapeutic intervention, but also to establish a clear time-frame to access to benefits.

Of 51 treated patients, 31 returned to gainful employment, 14 were functioning at a level equivalent to employment, and 6 remained significantly disabled. Twenty of the original 71 patients were contacted an average of 33 months later. Patients who had been treated showed good maintenance of gains. Untreated patients showed improvement in only a minority of cases.

 

Source: Marlin RG, Anchel H, Gibson JC, Goldberg WM, Swinton M. An evaluation of multidisciplinary intervention for chronic fatigue syndrome with long-term follow-up, and a comparison with untreated controls. Am J Med. 1998 Sep 28;105(3A):110S-114S. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9790492

 

Cognitive behavior therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: efficacy and implications

Abstract:

Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) is a form of non-pharmacologic treatment. It is based on a model of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) that hypothesizes that certain cognitions and behavior may perpetuate symptoms and disability–that is, act as obstacles to recovery. Treatment emphasizes self-help and aims to help the patient to recover by changing these unhelpful cognitions and behavior.

There is now good evidence from 2 independent randomized clinical trials to support the efficacy of CBT in patients with CFS. The treatment effect is substantial, although few patients are cured. The urgent clinical need is to make this form of treatment available to patients with CFS. One approach is to incorporate the principles of CBT into routine clinical practice. The preliminary evaluation of these simpler forms of CBT are promising, although the results of controlled trials are awaited. At present, intensive individual CBT administered by a skilled therapist remains the treatment of choice for patients with CFS.

 

Source: Sharpe M. Cognitive behavior therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: efficacy and implications. Am J Med. 1998 Sep 28;105(3A):104S-109S. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9790491

 

Illness beliefs and treatment outcome in chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Longitudinal studies have shown that physical illness attributions are associated with poor prognosis in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Speculation exists over whether such attributions influence treatment outcome. This study reports the effect of illness beliefs on outcome in a randomized controlled trial of cognitive-behavior therapy versus relaxation.

Causal attributions and beliefs about exercise, activity, and rest were recorded before and after treatment in 60 CFS patients recruited to the trial. Physical illness attributions were widespread, did not change with treatment, and were not associated with poor outcome in either the cognitive-behavior therapy group or the control group.

Beliefs about avoidance of exercise and activity changed in the cognitive behavior therapy group, but not in the control group. This change was associated with improved outcome. These findings suggest that physical illness attributions are less important in determining outcome (at least in treatment studies) than has been previously thought. In this study, good outcome is associated with change in avoidance behavior, and related beliefs, rather than causal attributions.

 

Source: Deale A, Chalder T, Wessely S. Illness beliefs and treatment outcome in chronic fatigue syndrome. J Psychosom Res. 1998 Jul;45(1):77-83. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9720857

 

Cognitive behavior therapy for functional somatic complaints. The example of chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Somatic complaints such as pain and fatigue that are unexplained by conventional disease are common in medical practice and are referred to as functional, somatoform, or somatization symptoms. Despite frequent chronicity, disability, and high associated medical costs, patients with these complaints are rarely offered either constructive explanations or effective treatment. In this perspective, a cognitive-behavioral approach to the problem is described, using chronic fatigue syndrome as an example. It is concluded that the utility of the cognitive-behavioral theory and the proven effectiveness cognitive behavior therapy provide the basis for a new evidence-based approach to psychosomatics.

 

Source: Sharpe M. Cognitive behavior therapy for functional somatic complaints. The example of chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychosomatics. 1997 Jul-Aug;38(4):356-62. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9217406

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome and occupational health

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a controversial condition that many occupational physicians find difficult to advise on. In this article we review the nature and definition of CFS, the principal aetiologic hypotheses and the evidence concerning prognosis. We also outline a practical approach to patient assessment, diagnosis and management. The conclusions of this review are then applied to the disability discrimination field. The implications of the new UK occupational health legislation are also examined. Despite continuing controversy about the status, aetiology and optimum management of CFS, we argue that much can be done to improve the outcome for patients with this condition. The most urgent needs are for improved education and rehabilitation, especially in regard to employment. Occupational physicians are well placed to play an important and unique role in meeting these needs.

 

Source: Mounstephen A, Sharpe M. Chronic fatigue syndrome and occupational health. Occup Med (Lond). 1997 May;47(4):217-27. http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/content/47/4/217.long (Full article)

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome. A practical guide to assessment and management

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) have become increasingly recognized as a common clinical problem, yet one that physicians often find difficult to manage. In this review we suggest a practical, pragmatic, evidence-based approach to the assessment and initial management of the patient whose presentation suggests this diagnosis. The basic principles are simple and for each aspect of management we point out both potential pitfalls and strategies to overcome them.

The first, and most important task is to develop mutual trust and collaboration. The second is to complete an adequate assessment, the aim of which is either to make a diagnosis of CFS or to identify an alternative cause for the patient’s symptoms. The history is most important and should include a detailed account of the symptoms, the associated disability, the choice of coping strategies, and importantly, the patient’s own understanding of his/her illness. The assessment of possible comorbid psychiatric disorders such as depression or anxiety is mandatory.

When the physician is satisfied that no alternative physical or psychiatric disorder can be found to explain symptoms, we suggest that a firm and positive diagnosis of CFS be made.

The treatment of CFS requires that the patient is given a positive explanation of the cause of his symptoms, emphasizing the distinction among factors that may have predisposed them to develop the illness (lifestyle, work stress, personality), triggered the illness (viral infection, life events) and perpetuated the illness (cerebral dysfunction, sleep disorder, depression, inconsistent activity, and misunderstanding of the illness and fear of making it worse).

Interventions are then aimed to overcoming these illness-perpetuating factors. The role of antidepressants remains uncertain but may be tried on a pragmatic basis. Other medications should be avoided. The only treatment strategies of proven efficacy are cognitive behavioral ones. The most important starting point is to promote a consistent pattern of activity, rest, and sleep, followed by a gradual return to normal activity; ongoing review of any ‘catastrophic’ misinterpretation of symptoms and the problem solving of current life difficulties.

We regard chronic fatigue syndrome as important not only because it represents potentially treatable disability and suffering but also because it provides an example for the positive management of medically unexplained illness in general.

 

Source: Sharpe M, Chalder T, Palmer I, Wessely S. Chronic fatigue syndrome. A practical guide to assessment and management. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1997 May;19(3):185-99. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9218987

 

Cognitive behavior therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: Cognitive behavior therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome was compared with relaxation in a randomized controlled trial.

METHODS: Sixty patients with chronic fatigue syndrome were randomly assigned to 13 sessions of either cognitive behavior therapy (graded activity and cognitive restructuring) or relaxation. Outcome was evaluated by using measures of functional impairment, fatigue, mood, and global improvement.

RESULTS: Treatment was completed by 53 patients. Functional impairment and fatigue improved more in the group that received cognitive behavior therapy. At final follow-up, 70% of the completers in the cognitive behavior therapy group achieved good outcomes (substantial improvement in physical functioning) compared with 19% of those in the relaxation group who completed treatment.

CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive behavior therapy was more effective than a relaxation control in the management of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Improvements were sustained over 6 months of follow-up.

Comment in: Cognitive behavior therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome. [Am J Psychiatry. 1998]

 

Source: Deale A, Chalder T, Marks I, Wessely S. Cognitive behavior therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry. 1997 Mar;154(3):408-14. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9054791

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome. Definition, diagnostic measures and therapeutic possibilities

Abstract:

This article reviews the chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), a disorder whose etiology is unknown. The diagnostic criteria proposed in 1994 by the CDC and the International Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Study Group are introduced.

In contrast to widespread belief, there are no laboratory tests available to underpin the diagnosis of CFS; the diagnosis is made solely on the basis of clinical criteria. In the differential diagnosis, the exclusion of other conditions that can cause chronic fatigue, such as neuropsychiatric or sleep disorders, is of critical importance.

In this context, the question as to whether CFS is a clinical entity that can be differentiated from psychiatric diagnoses, such as depression, somatoform disorder, or neurasthenia, is discussed. At the moment, there is no specific therapy for CFS. Therefore, therapeutic approaches are limited to symptomatic management of the concomitant sleep disturbances, pain, or psychiatric symptoms, such as depression.

Patients may benefit from cognitive behavioral therapy, as this may help then to identify and exclude factors contributing to and maintaining chronic fatigue. An integrated medical and psychological approach should be adopted, with the aim of preventing significant secondary negative results of the illness, such as interpersonal conflicts or chronic disability.

Comment in: “Chronic fatigue syndrome“. Nervenarzt. 1997

 

Source: Lieb K, Dammann G, Berger M, Bauer J. Chronic fatigue syndrome. Definition, diagnostic measures and therapeutic possibilities. Nervenarzt. 1996 Sep;67(9):711-20. [Article in German] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8992368

 

Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome. Patients’ beliefs about their illness were probably not a major factor

Comment onCognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. [BMJ. 1996]

 

EDITOR,-Michael Sharpe and colleagues’ study confirms that the best medical advice for patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome is not “nothing can be done” or that “the disease will burn itself out.”‘ The study produced improvement in 73% of the patients, which is comparable to the 80% improvement produced by my management techniques.2 3 Interestingly, my approach seems to be fundamentally different from that of Sharpe and colleagues.

You can read the full comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2350897/pdf/bmj00539-0053d.pdf

 

Source: Ho-Yen DO. Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome. Patients’ beliefs about their illness were probably not a major factor. BMJ. 1996 Apr 27;312(7038):1097-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8616430