Preferential Impairment of Auditory Working Memory in Long COVID: An Observational Study of Undergraduate Medical Students

Abstract:

Background: Long COVID is a multisystem condition with prolonged symptoms that develop after recovery from the COVID-19 infection, often following a mild infection. Few studies have been conducted on cognitive function among medical students after recovery from mild COVID-19. This study aimed to assess the attention span and working memory (WM) capacity of medical students after six months of recovery.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed on 17 young adult medical students who had suffered a mild COVID-19 infection at least six months prior. Eighteen age-matched healthy medical students served as the controls. Audio-visual WM tasks and attention spans were assessed using computerized software for both the cases and controls.

Results: The mean ages of the case and control were 19.67±1.6 and 20.0±1.2 years, respectively. The most common symptoms among cases were fatigue (33%), weight loss (26%), and nasal stuffiness (13%). The overall proportion of correct responses across all visual and auditory WM tasks (p=0.085) and reaction times (p=0.609) did not differ between the cases and controls. However, the overall target hit rate of the auditory WM task was significantly lower in cases than in controls (p=0.002). This difference was not observed in the visual WM task (p=0.374).

Conclusion: In the current study, the overall WM functions (visual and auditory combined) and attention span did not differ between cases and controls. However, auditory WM performance was significantly impaired in patients compared with controls, indicating selective impairment of auditory WM in patients with long COVID.

Source: Manna S, Ghosh Dastidar S, S R, et al. (January 01, 2024) Preferential Impairment of Auditory Working Memory in Long COVID: An Observational Study of Undergraduate Medical Students. Cureus 16(1): e51457. doi:10.7759/cureus.51457 https://www.cureus.com/articles/217296-preferential-impairment-of-auditory-working-memory-in-long-covid-an-observational-study-of-undergraduate-medical-students#!/ (Full text)

Case Study: COVID-19 Brain Fog or Auditory Processing Disorder?

A wide array of symptoms have been directly associated with COVID-19 following recovery, but they can also occur several weeks or months after the diagnosis. These include, but are not limited to, damage to the respiratory tract as well as decreased cognition and other brain functions. The nonmedical term used to describe these post-COVID-19 problems is “brain fog.”

The symptoms of brain fog are similar to mild cognitive impairment or, of interest to audiologists, an auditory processing disorder (APD). 2 COVID-19 has neurological consequences and affects specific areas of the brain, such as the cingulate cortex (i.e. emotions, memory, depression, and decision of action). 3 Brain fog is also associated with several symptoms related to hearing and communication, which can affect the accomplishment of routine daily tasks. Many of those can be mistaken for or coexist with APD symptoms. These include “difficulty attending or staying focused, difficulty concentrating, difficulty understanding or remembering instructions, language problems, short-term memory problems,” to mention a few. 2 However, what might appear as a brain fog case could be an undiagnosed or even a pre-existing APD issue. 2 Symptoms could include struggling to keep track of conversations, forgetfulness and memory issues, problems following directions, and several cognitive difficulties. 2

This report presents the case of a 31-year-old medical doctor who was diagnosed with COVID-19 in December 2020, and later identified with APD symptoms that are now commonly seen in post-COVID-19 brain fog patients. Auditory training following the Buffalo Model 4 resolved the patient’s chief complaints following 12 treatment sessions. This issue is one of many that could shed light on the great potential auditory training has in resolving brain fog complaints that overlap with what is commonly seen in APD patients, highlighting the concerns regarding COVID-19’s direct effects on auditory processing.

Source: Alexander, Angela Loucks AuD, MNZAS, CCC-A; DiSogra, Robert M. AuD; Abbas, Fatima BS; Braund, Stacey AuD, CCC-A; Spokes, Chelsea BSpHLSc, MClinAud. Case Study: COVID-19 Brain Fog or Auditory Processing Disorder?. The Hearing Journal 76(04):p 18,19,20,22,23,24, April 2023. | DOI: 10.1097/01.HJ.0000927332.17564.4e https://journals.lww.com/thehearingjournal/Fulltext/2023/04000/Case_Study__COVID_19_Brain_Fog_or_Auditory.2.aspx (Full text)

Objective evidence of cognitive complaints in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: a BOLD fMRI study of verbal working memory

Abstract:

Individuals with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) often have difficulties with complex auditory information processing. In a series of two Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) studies, we compared BOLD signal changes between Controls and individuals with CFS who had documented difficulties in complex auditory information processing (Study 1) and those who did not (Study 2) in response to performance on a simple auditory monitoring and a complex auditory information processing task (mPASAT).

We hypothesized that under conditions of cognitive challenge: (1) individuals with CFS who have auditory information processing difficulties will utilize frontal and parietal brain regions to a greater extent than Controls and (2) these differences will be maintained even when objective difficulties in this domain are controlled for.

Using blocked design fMRI paradigms in both studies, we first presented the auditory monitoring task followed by the mPASAT. Within and between regions of interest (ROI), group analyses were performed for both studies with statistical parametric mapping (SPM99).

Findings showed that individuals with CFS are able to process challenging auditory information as accurately as Controls but utilize more extensive regions of the network associated with the verbal WM system. Individuals with CFS appear to have to exert greater effort to process auditory information as effectively as demographically similar healthy adults. Our findings provide objective evidence for the subjective experience of cognitive difficulties in individuals with CFS.

 

Source: Lange G, Steffener J, Cook DB, Bly BM, Christodoulou C, Liu WC, Deluca J, Natelson BH. Objective evidence of cognitive complaints in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: a BOLD fMRI study of verbal working memory. Neuroimage. 2005 Jun;26(2):513-24. Epub 2005 Apr 7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15907308

 

Selective impairment of auditory processing in chronic fatigue syndrome: a comparison with multiple sclerosis and healthy controls

Abstract:

The most consistent deficit observed in individuals with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome has been in efficiency of information processing. To examine the possibility of a modality-specific impairment, the present study examined subjects with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, multiple sclerosis, and healthy controls on an auditory-versus visual-paced serial-addition test. 20 subjects with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, 20 subjects with clinically definite Multiple Sclerosis, and 20 sedentary healthy controls were compared.

One-half of the subjects in each group were administered the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test and the other half were administered the Paced Visual Serial Addition Test. The group with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome was differentially impaired on the auditory relative to the visual processing task. The group with Multiple Sclerosis was equally impaired on both versions of the task. The results are discussed within the framework of Baddeley’s model of working memory.

 

Source: Johnson SK, DeLuca J, Diamond BJ, Natelson BH. Selective impairment of auditory processing in chronic fatigue syndrome: a comparison with multiple sclerosis and healthy controls. Percept Mot Skills. 1996 Aug;83(1):51-62. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8873173