Tag: antidepressants

Randomized, double blind, controlled placebo-phase in trial of low dose phenelzine in the chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Because of the striking similarity of the clinical manifestations produced by use of the drug reserpine and seen in patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), we theorized that CFS was a disorder of reduced central sympathetic drive. Because of the pharmacology of control of this central sympathetic system, we further postulated that CFS symptoms would respond quickly to low dose treatment with a monamine oxidase inhibitor. To test these hypotheses, we designed a randomized, double blind placebo controlled study using phenelzine.

No patient in the trial had a diagnosis of lifetime or current psychiatric disorder and none had depressed mood in the range of clinically depressed patients on a paper and pencil test of depression. Patients in the placebo group received placebo for 6 weeks while those in the drug treatment group were treated in three 2-week segments-placebo, 15 mg phenelzine every other day, and then 15 mg daily. This treatment regimen produced a significant pattern of improvement compared to worsening in 20 self report vehicles of CFS symptoms, illness severity, mood or functional status.

Thus the data support our hypothesis of reduced sympathetic drive, although an alternative hypothesis of pain alleviation is also possible. The study design also allowed us to evaluate patients for a placebo effect: no evidence for this was found, suggesting that CFS is not an illness due to patients’ being overly suggestible.

 

Source: Natelson BH, Cheu J, Pareja J, Ellis SP, Policastro T, Findley TW. Randomized, double blind, controlled placebo-phase in trial of low dose phenelzine in the chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1996 Apr;124(3):226-30. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8740043

 

Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of fluoxetine in chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: No somatic treatment has been found to be effective for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Antidepressant therapy is commonly used. Fluoxetine is recommended in preference to tricyclic agents because it has fewer sedative and autonomic nervous system effects. However, there have been no randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies showing the effectiveness of antidepressant therapy in CFS. We have carried out such a study to assess the effect of fluoxetine in depressed and non-depressed CFS patients.

METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind study, we recruited 44 patients to the depressed CFS group, and 52 to the non-depressed CFS group. In each group participants were randomly assigned to receive either fluoxetine (20 mg once daily) or placebo for 8 weeks. The effect of fluoxetine was assessed by questionnaires, self-observation lists, standard neuropsychological tests, and a motion-sensing device (Actometer), which were applied on the day treatment started and on the last day.

FINDINGS: The two groups were well matched in terms of age, sex distribution, employment and marital status, and duration of CFS. There were no significant differences between the placebo and fluoxetine-treated groups in the change during the 8-week treatment period for any dimension of CFS. There was no change in subjective assessments of fatigue, severity of depression, functional impairment, sleep disturbances, neuropsychological function, cognitions, or physical activity in the depressed or the non-depressed subgroup.

INTERPRETATION: Fluoxetine in a 20 mg daily dose does not have a beneficial effect on any characteristic of CFS. The lack of effect of fluoxetine on depressive symptoms in CFS suggests that processes underlying the presentation of depressive symptoms in CFS may differ from those in patients with major depressive disorder.

 

Source: Vercoulen JH, Swanink CM, Zitman FG, Vreden SG, Hoofs MP, Fennis JF, Galama JM, van der Meer JW, Bleijenberg G. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of fluoxetine in chronic fatigue syndrome. Lancet. 1996 Mar 30;347(9005):858-61. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8622391

 

Fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, and myofascial pain syndrome

Abstract:

Two important studies in which nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy was used convincingly demonstrated that muscle is not the primary pathologic factor in fibromyalgia. There were further studies reporting that fibromyalgia-chronic fatigue syndrome may follow well treated Lyme disease or mimic Lyme disease. The longest therapeutic trial to date in fibromyalgia demonstrated an initial modest effect of tricyclic medications, but at 6 months that efficacy was no longer evident. Investigation in both fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome now focuses on the central nervous system. The use of new technology, eg, neurohormonal assays and imaging such as single-photon emission computed tomography scan, may be important in understanding these elusive conditions.

 

Source: Goldenberg DL. Fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, and myofascial pain syndrome. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 1995 Mar;7(2):127-35. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7766493

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome. Clinical, social psychological problems and management

Abstract:

Fatigue chronic syndrome (SFC) is the heir-at-law of neurasthenia. Both are seen like physical diseases and share certain therapeutic measures, such as sleep; they have the same symbolic function and enable patients as well as doctors reluctant to psychological dimensions of pathology, to get and express sympathy and attention. A strong controversy developed these last years concerning the SFC physiopathology particularly concerning the responsibility of viral infectious agents or psychiatric troubles.

The SFC fatigue is unlikely hysterical or neuromuscular but it probably depends on several associated factors; cerebral neurobiochemistry anomalies (possibly induced by an infection or immune reactions), effort perception trouble, affective trouble, lack of physical activity. The handicap seems to be worse on account of unsuitable care and inefficacious treatment. Especially sleep, which is often beneficial in a short term, is source of ulterior chronicisation. Antidepressants are the only justified pharmacological treatment for SFC at the moment. Referring to the existence and the nature of cognitive distortions, the author suggests a cognitive-behavioural therapy, whose aim is a progressive activity resumption.

 

Source: Wessely S. Chronic fatigue syndrome. Clinical, social psychological problems and management. Encephale. 1994 Nov;20 Spec No 3:581-95. [Article in French] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7843055

 

Therapeutic guidelines in chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

The treatment of CFS is not definitive up till now and it is limited both by ignorance of its causes and by different applicable operative case definitions. It has been etiopathologically related to infectious agents, neuromuscular illnesses, neuro-endocrinous-immunologic alterations and to different psychiatric disorders, particularly depressive disorders. Consequently, a great variety of therapeutic strategies have been tried, most of them with insufficient results. Among the medicamentous ones: immunity activator agents such as recombinant interleukin-2, nonspecific immunitary modulators such as seric gamma globulin, antivirus drugs such as acyclovir, muscular relaxants such as ciclobenzaprine, H2 receptor blockers and steroid and nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs such as ibuprofen, naproxen and fulbiprofen. Better results seem to have been obtained with antidepressants, and amfebutamone and serotonin-reuptake selective inhibitors are specially promising. Among the nonmedicamentous strategies, cognitive behavioural treatment can be effective and the so called “psychiatric management of the patient with CFS” has been proposed as a global, pragmatic, individualized, comprehensive approach which must be completed with other interdisciplinary interventions on the patient and his environment.

 

Source: Bertolín Guillén JM, Bedate Villar J. Therapeutic guidelines in chronic fatigue syndrome. Actas Luso Esp Neurol Psiquiatr Cienc Afines. 1994 May-Jun;22(3):127-30. [Article in Spanish] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7484295

 

Treatment of the chronic fatigue syndrome. A review and practical guide

Abstract:

The chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) was formally defined in 1988 to describe a syndrome of severe and disabling fatigue of uncertain aetiology associated with a variable number of somatic and/or psychological symptoms. CFS has been reported in most industrialised countries and is most prevalent in women aged between 20 and 50 years.

Despite occasional claims to the contrary, the aetiology of CFS remains elusive. Although abnormalities in tests of immune function and cerebral imaging have been described in variable numbers of CFS patients, such findings have been inconsistent and cannot be relied upon, either to establish or exclude the diagnosis. Thus, diagnosis rests on fulfillment of the Centers for Disease Control case definition which was revised in 1992. This case definition remains somewhat controversial, largely due to its subjectiveness.

The mainstay of treatment is establishing the diagnosis and educating the patient about the illness. An empathetic clinician can stop further consultations elsewhere (‘doctor shopping’) and subsequent excessive investigations, which frequently occur in such patients.

Most patients should undertake a trial of antidepressant therapy, even if major depression is not present. The choice of antidepressant drug should tailor the tolerability profile to relief of particular CFS symptoms, such as insomnia or hypersomnia. Failure to improve within 12 weeks warrants an alternative antidepressant agent of another class. Many other drugs have been reported anecdotally to be beneficial, but no therapy has been demonstrated to be reproducibly useful in double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials with an adequate duration of follow-up.

 

Source: Blondel-Hill E, Shafran SD. Treatment of the chronic fatigue syndrome. A review and practical guide. Drugs. 1993 Oct;46(4):639-51. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7506650

 

Pharmacological approaches to the therapy of chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Although a variety of pharmacological agents have been used to treat patients with chronic fatigue syndrome none has been shown to effect a complete resolution of symptoms.

Data obtained from a retrospective study and from an objective assessment of the aerobic work capacity of patients with this disorder suggest that the underlying pathophysiological abnormality is a disorder of sleep regulation. This results not only in profound fatigue and lethargy but also reduced sensory threshold for pain, disordered temperature regulation, cardiovascular abnormalities, disturbed higher cerebral function and mental depression.

Drugs which modulate sleep, such as tricyclic antidepressants, have a limited effect in improving the symptoms that CFS patients experience. We suggest that other agents which affect central nervous system neurotransmitters, particularly serotonin, may have potential in the management of this condition and need to be evaluated in large controlled clinical trials.

 

Source: McCluskey DR. Pharmacological approaches to the therapy of chronic fatigue syndrome. Ciba Found Symp. 1993;173:280-7; discussion 287-97. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8491103

 

Psychotropic treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome and related disorders

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and fibromyalgia frequently are associated with symptoms of major depression. For this reason, antidepressants have been used in treatment of these disorders; however, little direction has been provided into this application in psychopharmacology.

METHOD: First, nine studies were reviewed regarding the relationship of the symptoms of fatigue and depression. Next, 23 reports (12 double-blind studies, 7 open studies, and 4 case reports) were reviewed for the effectiveness of therapy as assessed by global response and improvement of both depression and pain. Studies were differentiated by type of controls, as well as by alleged mechanism of action of the pharmacologic agent.

RESULTS: Disturbances in brain neurochemistry shared by CFS and major depression may serve as a basis for the effectiveness of some antidepressants in CFS. Response to some antidepressants in patients with CFS or fibromyalgia may occur at doses lower than those used in major depression, e.g., amitriptyline 25-75 mg/day. We further found that the more serotonergic treatments (e.g., clomipramine) were more successful in alleviating pain than depression, whereas catecholaminergic agents (e.g., maprotiline, bupropion) seemed particularly effective for symptoms of associated depression.

CONCLUSION: To maximize response of the physiologic and psychological consequences of the disorder, more investigation is needed to replicate the apparent findings that relate the neurochemical impairment underlying CFS and fibromyalgia to the type of antidepressant mechanism.

 

Source: Goodnick PJ, Sandoval R. Psychotropic treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome and related disorders. J Clin Psychiatry. 1993 Jan;54(1):13-20. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8428892

 

A case of chronic fatigue syndrome who showed a beneficial effect by intravenous administration of magnesium sulphate

Abstract:

We have treated a case of chronic fatigue syndrome with atopic diathesis was had suffered general malaise, low grade fever, swelling of the lymph nodes, myalgias and arthralgias for a long time.

A 29-year-old female, who had been treated for atopic dermatitis for 5 years, complained of general malaise in May 1990. She was admitted to the nearest hospital in December 1990 because of low grade fever, swelling of the lymph nodes and an elevation of antinuclear antibody (2520x). She was transferred to our hospital in May 1991.

A diagnosis of collagen disease was not compatible with her condition. In addition to general malaise, fever and lymph node swelling, headache, myalgias, muscle weakness, arthralgias and insomnia were observed, and a diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome was made based on the working case definition proposed by Holmes et al.

Although eosinophilia, a high serum level of IgE, and elevation of RAST scores, low NK and ADCC activity, and a reduced level of NK cells in the peripheral blood were detected, serum antibodies to a number of viruses were in the normal range.

Treatments with non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs, minor tranquilizers and antidepressant drugs were not effective at all. An administration of magnesium sulphate was intravenously performed once a week in order to improve her condition, especially severe general malaise. After about 6-week’s administration of magnesium sulphate, she noticed reduced easy fatigability and an improvement in her impaired daily activities. Finally she was able to leave the hospital in January 1992.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

 

Source: Takahashi H, Imai K, Katanuma A, Sugaya T, Hisano K, Motoya S, Aoki S, Sugiyama T, Yachi. A case of chronic fatigue syndrome who showed a beneficial effect by intravenous administration of magnesium sulphate. Arerugi. 1992 Nov;41(11):1605-10. [Article in Japanese] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1492795

 

Bupropion treatment of fluoxetine-resistant chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) includes many symptoms of major depression. For this reason, many antidepressants have been used to treat the symptoms of this disorder. Among the more recently released antidepressants are fluoxetine and bupropion.

In this open study, nine CFS patients who either could not tolerate or did not respond to fluoxetine showed significant response when administered 300 mg/day of bupropion for an 8-week period in both rating of HDRS (t = 4.80, p < 0.01) and BDI (t = 2.48, p < 0.05). Furthermore, bupropion improvement in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale correlated significantly with change in plasma homovanillic acid (HVA) (r = 0.96, p < 0.01).

Plasma total methylhydroxyphenolglycol (MHPG) also increased significantly during bupropion treatment (t = 2.37, p = 0.05). Measures of T1 microsomal antibodies also decreased over treatment time; increases in natural killer cell numbers correlated inversely with change in plasma levels of free MHPG (r = -0.88, p < 0.05). Bupropion responders were more likely to have trough blood levels above 30 ng/ml (chi 2 = 3.6, p = 0.05).

 

Source: Goodnick PJ, Sandoval R, Brickman A, Klimas NG. Bupropion treatment of fluoxetine-resistant chronic fatigue syndrome. Biol Psychiatry. 1992 Nov 1;32(9):834-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1450297