Tag: 1995

The impact of catastrophic beliefs on functioning in chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

This study investigated the association between catastrophic beliefs and disability in the context of Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). A sample of 282 CFS sufferers were asked about the consequences of pushing themselves beyond their present physical state. Responses were coded into catastrophic or non-catastrophic categories. While not differing on the length of illness or psychological adjustment, subjects demonstrating catastrophic responses evidenced significantly higher levels of fatigue and were more disabled in terms of their ability to work both in their normal occupation and around the house. Catastrophizers also showed greater disability in terms of their sleep and rest, social communication, and recreational activities. The role of catastrophic beliefs and personal perceptions of CFS in maintaining the illness is discussed.

 

Source: Petrie K, Moss-Morris R, Weinman J. The impact of catastrophic beliefs on functioning in chronic fatigue syndrome. J Psychosom Res. 1995 Jan;39(1):31-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7760301

 

Correlates of somatic causal attributions in primary care patients with fatigue

Abstract:

Researchers in the field of chronic fatigue in tertiary care found that patients’ somatic (e.g. viral) explanations for their condition may lead to chronicity of symptoms. We studied the influence of a somatic attributional bias on outcome and reported symptoms in primary care patients with fatigue.

We compared fatigue scores on a specific scale, and number of presented symptoms, in two groups of primary care patients with ‘functional’ fatigue: 75 with a high score on the somatic subscale of the Fatigue Attribution Scale (S-FAS), and 95 with a low score on the S-FAS. At the index visit, patients with low and high scores on the S-FAS were not different for age, sex, fatigue scores, and levels of depressive symptoms.

Patients with high scores on the S-FAS presented significantly more somatic and psychological symptoms-a total of 36 symptoms for 24 patients (25.3%) in the low-score group, and a total of 52 symptoms for 31 patients (41.3%) in the high-score group.

Forty-two days later, at the follow-up visit, the fatigue scores were similar in both groups. In primary care patients with fatigue not due to somatic illness or major depression, the tendency to attribute fatigue to somatic causes is not associated with a worse outcome, but with a higher number of reported symptoms.

 

Source: Cathébras P, Jacquin L, le Gal M, Fayol C, Bouchou K, Rousset H. Correlates of somatic causal attributions in primary care patients with fatigue. Psychother Psychosom. 1995;63(3-4):174-80. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7624463

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome. 1: Etiology and pathogenesis

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a disorder of unknown etiology characterized by debilitating fatigue and other somatic and neuropsychiatric symptoms. A range of heterogeneous clinical and laboratory findings have been reported in patients with CFS. Various theories have been proposed to explain the underlying pathophysiologic processes but none has been proved.

Research findings of immunologic dysfunction and neuroendocrine changes suggest the possible dysregulation of interactions between the nervous system and the immune system. Without a clear understanding of its etiopathogenesis, CFS has no definitive treatment.

Management approaches have been necessarily speculative, and they have evolved separately in a number of medical and nonmedical disciplines. The results of several controlled treatment studies have been inconclusive. An accurate case definition identifying homogeneous subtypes of CFS is needed. The integration of medical and psychologic treatment modalities and the use of both biologic and psychologic markers to evaluate treatment response will enhance future treatment strategies.

 

Source: Farrar DJ, Locke SE, Kantrowitz FG. Chronic fatigue syndrome. 1: Etiology and pathogenesis. Behav Med. 1995 Spring;21(1):5-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7579775

 

Post-hepatitis syndrome revisited

Abstract:

To examine the role of acute hepatitis A and B infection in the aetiology of chronic fatigue syndrome and psychiatric morbidity we studied 40 patients with acute viral hepatitis A or B consecutively admitted to an infectious diseases unit and studied at least 6 months after recovery.

Liver function tests (LFT) had returned to normal in each case. Forty-seven patients with other infectious diseases, of which 12 were presumed viral, admitted immediately after each hepatitis patient during the same period acted as controls. The main outcome measures were scores on a fatigue and muscle pain questionnaire, general health questionnaire (GHQ-12) and supplementary questions.

The hepatitis cases scored significantly higher fatigue scores, GHQ-12 scores and muscle pain scores. Length of time since recovery from illness, age and sex were not confounding factors. Hepatitis cases were also less energetic, had greater weight change, had altered alcohol tolerance, had less exercise tolerance and felt less fit than the control group and compared with their premorbid state.

Hence fatigue is more common after recovery in patients hospitalized for hepatitis A and B up to 30 months post-infection compared with matched controls hospitalized for other infectious diseases. Hepatitis A and B infection is a risk factor for post-infection fatigue, intermittent fatigue, as well as for psychiatric morbidity.

 

Source: Berelowitz GJ, Burgess AP, Thanabalasingham T, Murray-Lyon IM, Wright DJ. Post-hepatitis syndrome revisited. J Viral Hepat. 1995;2(3):133-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7493307