1993 – Page 6 – American ME and CFS Society

Immunologic and psychologic therapy for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Abstract:

PURPOSE: To evaluate the potential benefit of immunologic therapy with dialyzable leukocyte extract and psychologic treatment in the form of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Immunologic and psychologic treatments were administered to 90 adult patients who fulfilled diagnostic criteria for CFS in a double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled study. A four-cell trial design allowed the assessment of benefit from immunologic and psychologic treatment individually or in combination. Outcome was evaluated by measurement of global well-being (visual analogue scales), physical capacity (standardized diaries of daily activities), functional status (Karnofsky performance scale), and psychologic morbidity (Profile of Mood States questionnaire), and cell-mediated immunity was evaluated by peripheral blood T-cell subset analysis and delayed-type hypersensitivity skin testing.

RESULTS: Neither dialyzable leukocyte extract nor CBT (alone or in combination) provided greater benefit than the nonspecific treatment regimens.

CONCLUSIONS: In this study, patients with CFS did not demonstrate a specific response to immunologic and/or psychologic therapy. The improvement recorded in the group as a whole may reflect both nonspecific treatment effects and a propensity to remission in the natural history of this disorder.

Comment in:

Treatment for chronic fatigue syndrome. [Am J Med. 1994]

Cognitive behavior therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome. [Am J Med. 1995]

Source: Lloyd AR, Hickie I, Brockman A, Hickie C, Wilson A, Dwyer J, Wakefield D. Immunologic and psychologic therapy for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Med. 1993 Feb;94(2):197-203. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8430715

Unproven diet therapies in the treatment of the chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

This report is a review of the unproven diet therapies recommended for individuals with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Diet therapies promoted for the relief of CFS symptoms by the authors of five CSF self-help books were evaluated on the basis of nutritional adequacy and scientific rationale.

Unproven diet therapies for patients with CFS include megavitamin/mineral supplements; royal jelly and other dietary supplements; and elimination, avoidance, and rotation diets. Claims that these therapies relieve CFS symptoms and promote recovery are anecdotal and have not been substantiated by clinical research.

The yeast-avoidance and sugar-free diets, both promoted to combat Candida albicans overgrowth, are of questionable value in treating patients with CFS. The rotation diet is not balanced and does not meet the current recommended dietary intake levels. Diet strategies that call for the avoidance of food additives, preservatives, sweeteners, and other ingredients are not supported by available evidence and are not practical for patients with CFS.

A diet plan for patients with CFS should be based on sound nutritional principles and common sense. Until the results of studies demonstrating the benefits of particular diet therapies in the management of CFS are available, patients with CFS are advised to eat a varied diet selected from among and within the basic food groups to ensure an adequate nutrient intake and to reach and maintain a reasonable body weight.

Source: Morris DH, Stare FJ. Unproven diet therapies in the treatment of the chronic fatigue syndrome. Arch Fam Med. 1993 Feb;2(2):181-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8275187

A comparison of neuropsychiatric characteristics in chronic fatigue syndrome, multiple sclerosis, and major depression

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), a controversial clinical entity characterized by severe fatigue and constitutional symptoms, has been associated with a variety of psychiatric disorders. To further understand the psychiatric profile of CFS, the authors compared patients with CFS, multiple sclerosis (MS), and major depression by using diagnostic interviews and self-report measures of Axis I disorders and personality disorders. CFS patients differed from patients with major depression, with significantly less depression and fewer personality disorders. Compared with MS patients, CFS patients did not differ with regard to personality disorders. However, they did have significantly more frequent current depression than MS patients, particularly following onset of their illness.

Source: Pepper CM, Krupp LB, Friedberg F, Doscher C, Coyle PK. A comparison of neuropsychiatric characteristics in chronic fatigue syndrome, multiple sclerosis, and major depression. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1993 Spring;5(2):200-5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8508039

Society, mind and body in chronic fatigue syndrome: an anthropological view

Abstract:

An anthropological view of chronic fatigue syndrome places the study of illness in social context. Data from an interview study of 50 chronically fatigued patients demonstrate the relation of local social worlds–families, workplaces, communities–to the meaning and experience of illness.

Negative life events and difficulties, multiple commitments, and a hectic pace are among prominent themes in the subjects’ local worlds. These themes are reflected in: (1) attributions of illness onset to social sources, (2) the symbolism of the core complaint of fatigue, and (3) an illness-induced, positively valued lifestyle transformation suggesting the rejection of culturally prescribed ‘busyness’.

Dichotomous definitions of the relation of mind and body are shown to be part of culture, not Nature, in the paper’s second section. The ‘mind-body dichotomy’ and the differing values attached to physical and psychological disorders by a naturalistic scientific paradigm explain the delegitimizing experiences of sufferers, who find their illness dismissed as psychosomatic and therefore ‘not real’.

A conceptualization of chronic fatigue syndrome which links local social worlds to psychological distress, felt bodily sensation and biological changes is proposed. Collaborative teams of social scientists and medical researchers might fruitfully pursue aspects of social context in relation to psychiatric, immunological and viral dimensions of the illness.

Source: Ware NC. Society, mind and body in chronic fatigue syndrome: an anthropological view. Ciba Found Symp. 1993;173:62-73; discussion 73-82. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8491108

Chronic fatigue in historical perspective

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue as a presenting complaint, in the absence of other evident organic illness, was seldom reported historically before the second half of the 19th century. Its first eruption was the so-called ‘bed cases’ or ‘sofa cases’ among middle-class females in the period from 1860 to about 1910. ‘Neurasthenia’ does not necessarily represent an early forerunner of chronic fatigue.

Many patients receiving that diagnosis did not complain of fatigue. Others with functional fatigue did not receive the diagnosis ‘neurasthenia’. Both medical-anecdotal and quantitative sources make it clear that by the time of the First World War, chronic fatigue was a common complaint in Europe and North America.

Medical concepts of chronic fatigue since the 1930s have run along four separate lines: (1) ‘postinfectious neuromyasthenia’, going back to an atypical ‘poliomyelitis’ epidemic in 1934; (2) ‘chronic Epstein-Barr virus’ infection, an illness attribution that increased in frequency after the discovery in 1968 that this virus caused mononucleosis; (3) ‘myalgic encephalomyelitis’, dating from an epidemic at the Royal Free Hospital in London in 1955; and (4) ‘fibrositis’, or ‘fibromyalgia’, used as a rheumatological description since the turn of the century. Recently, these four separate paths have tended to converge into the diagnosis of ‘chronic fatigue syndrome’.

Source: Shorter E. Chronic fatigue in historical perspective. Ciba Found Symp. 1993;173:6-16; discussion 16-22. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8491107

Clinical presentation of chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a chronic illness of uncertain aetiology characterized by at least six months of debilitating fatigue and associated symptoms. The symptoms of the syndrome are all non-specific and some (but not all) are also seen in psychiatric illness. The symptomatology suggesting an organic component to the illness includes its abrupt onset with an ‘infectious-like’ illness, intermittent unexplained fevers, arthralgias and ‘gelling’ (stiffness), sore throats, cough, photophobia, night sweats, and post-exertional malaise with systemic symptoms. The illness can last for years and is associated with marked impairment of functional health status.

Source: Komaroff AL. Clinical presentation of chronic fatigue syndrome. Ciba Found Symp. 1993;173:43-54; discussion 54-61. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8491106

Chronic fatigue syndrome and the treatment process

Abstract:

Fatigue is a common complaint in general practice and is often associated with psychiatric and psychosocial problems and demoralization. Although the Centers for Disease Control definition of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) excludes pre-existing psychiatric illness, common psychosocial problems short of a clinical disorder (such as irritability, difficulty in thinking, inability to concentrate, depression and sleep disturbance) overlap with the criteria for CFS.

Psychological states can affect the course of CFS or become confused in the patient’s and doctor’s mind with the course of infection. The core dilemma in practice is how aggressively to pursue a possible basis for CFS when it persists in the absence of an identifiable external cause. Possibilities for exploration are numerous and potentially expensive. In practice, the persistence of doctors depends on the patient’s illness behaviour, on financial and organizational factors, and on the culture of medical care and practice styles.

It is essential to differentiate the appropriate management of CFS from scientific study where intensive investigation may be warranted. In practice doctors should proceed in a manner that conveys concern, supports function, and avoids dysfunctional illness behaviour and inadvertent legitimization and reinforcement of disability.

Source: Mechanic D. Chronic fatigue syndrome and the treatment process. Ciba Found Symp. 1993;173:318-27; discussion 327-41. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8491105

Non-pharmacological approaches to treatment

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) as currently defined overlaps with other syndromes including chronic pain, fibromyalgia, anxiety and depression. It also resembles historical descriptions of neurasthenia. The role of psychological (cognitive) and behavioural therapies in CFS is examined.

There are both pragmatic and theoretical arguments for their application to CFS. It is pragmatic to target obvious and treatable factors including inactivity and depression. A theoretical model in which psychological, physiological and social factors interact offers a plausible rationale for such treatment but is not yet empirically proven. While there is evidence for the efficacy of this type of therapy in related syndromes, the evidence in CFS is inconclusive.

A randomized controlled trial of combined cognitive and behavioural therapy currently in progress is described. Initial results suggest that most patients receiving cognitive behaviour therapy improve, especially in terms of functional impairment. It remains to be seen whether this therapy will prove to be more effective than standard general practitioner care. In the meantime cognitive behaviour therapy offers a pragmatic and rational therapy for patients with CFS.

Source: Sharpe M. Non-pharmacological approaches to treatment. Ciba Found Symp. 1993;173:298-308; discussion 308-17. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8491104

Pharmacological approaches to the therapy of chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Although a variety of pharmacological agents have been used to treat patients with chronic fatigue syndrome none has been shown to effect a complete resolution of symptoms.

Data obtained from a retrospective study and from an objective assessment of the aerobic work capacity of patients with this disorder suggest that the underlying pathophysiological abnormality is a disorder of sleep regulation. This results not only in profound fatigue and lethargy but also reduced sensory threshold for pain, disordered temperature regulation, cardiovascular abnormalities, disturbed higher cerebral function and mental depression.

Drugs which modulate sleep, such as tricyclic antidepressants, have a limited effect in improving the symptoms that CFS patients experience. We suggest that other agents which affect central nervous system neurotransmitters, particularly serotonin, may have potential in the management of this condition and need to be evaluated in large controlled clinical trials.

Source: McCluskey DR. Pharmacological approaches to the therapy of chronic fatigue syndrome. Ciba Found Symp. 1993;173:280-7; discussion 287-97. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8491103

Fibromyalgia, sleep disorder and chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Various research studies show that the amalgam of disordered sleep physiology, chronic fatigue, diffuse myalgia, and cognitive and behavioural symptoms constitutes a non-restorative sleep syndrome that may follow a febrile illness, as in the chronic fatigue syndrome. Where rheumatic complaints are prominent such a constellation of disturbed sleep physiology and symptoms also characterizes the fibromyalgia disorder.

In contrast to the chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia is associated with a variety of initiating or perpetuating factors such as psychologically distressing events, primary sleep disorders (e.g. sleep apnoea, periodic limb movement disorder) and inflammatory rheumatic disease, as well as an acute febrile illness.

The chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia have similar disordered sleep physiology, namely an alpha rhythm disturbance (7.5-11 Hz) in the electroencephalogram (EEG) within non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep that accompanies increased nocturnal vigilance and light, unrefreshing sleep. Aspects of cytokine and cellular immune functions are shown to be related to the sleep-wake system.

The evidence suggests a reciprocal relationship of the immune and sleep-wake systems. Interference either with the immune system (e.g. by a viral agent or by cytokines such as alpha-interferon or interleukin 2) or with the sleeping-waking brain system (e.g. by sleep deprivation) has effects on the other system and will be accompanied by the symptoms of the chronic fatigue syndrome.

Source: Moldofsky H. Fibromyalgia, sleep disorder and chronic fatigue syndrome. Ciba Found Symp. 1993;173:262-71; discussion 272-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8491102