Chronic fatigue syndrome criteria. A critique of the requirement for multiple physical complaints

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that the patients with chronic fatigue who have the highest number of medically unexplained physical symptoms over their lifetime would also have the highest prevalence of current and lifetime affective and anxiety disorders, lifetime affective symptoms, and the most functional disability. A further goal was to use this information to modify the current case definition to better identify a subgroup of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome who are less likely to have psychiatric illness.

DESIGN: Two hundred eighty-five consecutive patients with chronic fatigue were interviewed with the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule and completed four self-rating questionnaires measuring psychologic distress, functional disability, and the tendency to amplify symptoms. Based on previously published data, patients were divided into four groups with a progressively higher number of lifetime medically unexplained physical symptoms. The prevalence of current and lifetime psychiatric disorders, lifetime psychologic symptoms, and extent of functional impairment was then compared in these four groups of patients.

MAIN RESULTS: The prevalence of current and lifetime psychiatric diagnosis and lifetime depressive symptoms increased linearly with the number of lifetime physical symptoms that the patient experienced. The extent of impairment in activities of daily living and the tendency to amplify symptoms also increased linearly with the number of medically unexplained physical symptoms.

CONCLUSION: The patients with the highest numbers of medically unexplained physical symptoms had extraordinarily high rates of current and lifetime psychiatric disorders. These data suggest that the current case definition for chronic fatigue syndrome inadvertently selects for patients with the highest prevalence of lifetime psychiatric diagnoses. A recommendation based on these results is to modify the case criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome to include patients with fatigue and few physical symptoms and to identify and consider excluding patients with high numbers of physical complaints.

Comment in: Defining the chronic fatigue syndrome. [Arch Intern Med. 1992]

 

Source: Katon W, Russo J. Chronic fatigue syndrome criteria. A critique of the requirement for multiple physical complaints. Arch Intern Med. 1992 Aug;152(8):1604-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1497394

 

The chronic fatigue syndrome

Introduction

Waging war requires ….. energy, which in the end, depletes the operator and concerns the relationship between energy and stress. When the operators are human beings, it may happen that a stage is reached such that the demands being made exceed their resources to cope ….. the symptoms of such resultant stress have been given a variety of labels – shellshock, lack of moral fibre, twitch, war neurosis, battle fatigue and now post-traumatic stress disorder ……’. This is a paraphrased account of Norman Dixon’s penetrating assessment of post-Gulf War battle stress in The Times Saturday Review of the 26 January 1991. It would apply equally to the chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), which also has a variety of labels including the post-viral fatigue syndrome, myalgic encephalomyelitis, Royal Free disease, fibromyalgia, epidemic neuromyaesthenia, yuppy ‘flu disease, chronic Epstein-Barr virus syndrome and Iceland disease. The major clinical feature is of incapacitating fatigue, often accompanied by widespread myalgia and low-spiritedness.

You can read the rest if this article here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2399560/pdf/postmedj00068-0012.pdf

 

Source: James DG1, Brook MG, Bannister BA. The chronic fatigue syndrome. Postgrad Med J. 1992 Aug;68(802):611-4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1448399

 

Clinical, epidemiologic, and virologic studies in four clusters of the chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to provide a case definition of chronic fatigue syndrome in an outbreak occurring in the Nevada-California region to evaluate candidate etiologic agents and observe the natural history of the illness.

METHODS: Patients diagnosed as having chronic fatigue syndrome were studied by repeated interviews, questionnaires, and blood collection over a 3-year period. Serum samples were tested for antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus, human herpesvirus-6, and human T-lymphotropic viruses I and II. Leukocytes from typical cases were also assayed for human T-lymphotropic viruses I and II.

RESULTS: Cases were defined as persons who had: (1) severe persistent fatigue following an acute illness appearing in an individual with no previous physical or psychological symptoms; (2) presenting signs and symptoms of an acute infection; (3) severe and persistent headache and/or myalgias; and (4) abrupt change in cognitive function or the appearance of a new mood disorder. After 3 years of follow-up, almost all study subjects were able to return to pre-illness activity. None of the viruses evaluated–human T-lymphotropic viruses I and II, Epstein-Barr virus, or human herpesvirus-6–could be etiologically linked to these outbreaks.

CONCLUSION: Clinical features of outbreaks of chronic fatigue syndrome differ sufficiently to suggest different etiologic agents. Giardiasis appears to have precipitated one of the four clusters in this study but the cause(s) of the other three outbreaks is as yet uncertain. The overall prognosis ofchronic fatigue syndrome is usually favorable.

Comment in: Human herpesvirus type 6 and chronic fatigue syndrome. [Arch Intern Med. 1993]

 

Source: Levine PH, Jacobson S, Pocinki AG, Cheney P, Peterson D, Connelly RR, Weil R, Robinson SM, Ablashi DV, Salahuddin SZ, et al. Clinical, epidemiologic, and virologic studies in four clusters of the chronic fatigue syndrome. Arch Intern Med. 1992 Aug;152(8):1611-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1323246

 

Follow up of patients presenting with fatigue to an infectious diseases clinic

Abstract:

OBJECTIVES: To determine the symptomatic and functional status during follow up of patients referred to hospital with unexplained fatigue and to identify patient variables associated with persistent functional impairment.

DESIGN: Follow up by postal questionnaire six weeks to four years (median 1 year) after initial clinical assessment of patients referred to hospital during 1984-8.

SETTING: Infectious diseases outpatient clinic in a teaching hospital.

PATIENTS: 200 consecutive patients with fatigue of uncertain cause for at least six weeks; 177 fulfilled the inclusion criteria.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Findings at initial assessment; current symptoms, beliefs about the cause of illness, coping behaviours emotional disorder, social variables including membership of self help organizations, and degrees of recovery and functional impairment from questionnaire responses.

RESULTS: 144 (81%) patients returned completed questionnaires. Initial assessment did not indicate the cause of fatigue, other than preceding infection. The proportion of patients with functional impairment was significantly smaller with longer follow up (33% (11/33) at two to four years, 73% (29/40) at six weeks to six months; chi 2 for trend = 12.5, df = 1; p less than 0.05). Functional impairment was significantly associated with belief in a viral cause of the illness (odds ratio = 3.9; 95% confidence interval 1.5 to 9.9), limiting exercise (3.2; 1.5 to 6.6), avoiding alcohol (4.5; 1.8 to 11.3), changing or leaving employment (3.1; 1.4 to 6.9), belonging to a self help organization (7.8; 2.5 to 23.9), and current emotional disorder (4.4; 2.0 to 9.3).

CONCLUSIONS: Short term prognosis for recovery of function was poor but improved with time. Most patients had made a functional recovery by two years after initial clinic attendance. Impaired functioning was more likely with certain patient characteristics. Prospective studies are required to clarify whether these associations are the consequences of a more disabling illness or indicate factors contributing to impaired function.

Comment in

Outcome in the chronic fatigue syndrome. [BMJ. 1992]

Outcome in the chronic fatigue syndrome. [BMJ. 1992]

Outcome in the chronic fatigue syndrome. [BMJ. 1992]

 

Source: Sharpe M, Hawton K, Seagroatt V, Pasvol G. Follow up of patients presenting with fatigue to an infectious diseases clinic. BMJ. 1992 Jul 18;305(6846):147-52. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1515828

Note: You can read the full article herehttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1883193/

 

Postviral fatigue syndrome

Comment on: Possible upregulation of hypothalamic 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors in patients with postviral fatigue syndrome. [BMJ. 1992]

 

EDITOR, -A M 0 Bakheit and colleagues recently reported’ a possible upregulation of hypothalamic 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors in patients with the postviral fatigue syndrome, giving some evidence for hypothalamic functional abnormalities in these patients, which are different from others with depression. There is a growing body of evidence which claims that this clinical condition is organic and cannot be simply perceived as a somatisation disorder in patients with predisposition to psychiatric disease.”

We reviewed and quantitatively analysed with Ceretec and single photon emission tomography the brain perfusion of 14 patients fulfilling the Oxford criteria for diagnosis of myalgic encephalomyelitis. They had all had disease for more than six months (more than half the time) manifested with generalised malaise and myalgia, as well as significant physical and intellectual disability. None had any medical condition known to produce fatigue or had recently or in the past had psychiatric disease. When compared with a group of 24 nondepressed age and sex matched controls (normal volunteers) there was significant reduction of the perfusion to several areas of the brain cortex but particularly the brain stem (table).

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1882397/pdf/bmj00077-0053b.pdf

 

Source: Costa DC, Brostoff J, Douli V, Ell PJ. Postviral fatigue syndrome. BMJ. 1992 Jun 13;304(6841):1567. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1882397/

 

Postviral fatigue syndrome

Comment on: Possible upregulation of hypothalamic 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors in patients with postviral fatigue syndrome. [BMJ. 1992]

 

EDITOR,-A M 0 Bakheit and colleagues report enhanced release of prolactin after administration of buspirone in patients with the postviral fatigue syndrome compared with controls and patients with depression. Their report would have been improved if they had described more fully the differences between the two groups of patients. As they point out, depression can be difficult to distinguish clinically from the postviral fatigue syndrome.

The authors used the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition, Revised to define depressive illness, but to qualify for this diagnosis a patient need complain of only four symptoms such as fatigue, hypersomnia, retardation, and loss of concentration in addition to depressed mood. The criteria they used for the postviral fatigue syndrome included depression, fatigue, reversed sleep pattern, and constipation alternating with diarrhoea. It would be surprising if there was not a substantial overlap between the two groups and if one of the main factors affecting diagnosis was not whether the patient presented first to a psychiatrist or a neurologist.

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1882437/pdf/bmj00077-0052e.pdf

 

Source: Curtis D, Bullock T. Postviral fatigue syndrome. BMJ. 1992 Jun 13;304(6841):1566-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1882437/

 

Postviral fatigue syndrome

Comment on: Possible upregulation of hypothalamic 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors in patients with postviral fatigue syndrome. [BMJ. 1992]

 

EDITOR,-A M 0 Bakheit and colleagues suggest that the buspirone challenge test may be useful in distinguishing between a “primary depressive illness” and the postviral fatigue syndrome. It is difficult to assess the truth of this from the data presented in their paper. To know the usefulness of this test the numbers of controls and patients scored above or below an appropriately chosen cut off point of serum prolactin concentration needs to be known. Unfortunately, the authors present the prolactin concentrations as mean values. If the aim of the test is to exclude major depression then a cut off which produces few false negative results should be chosen. Were the high mean values in the postviral fatigue group due to one or two extreme outliers? It is noteworthy that the standard deviations in the patients were much higher in the controls at baseline assessment. Why was this?

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1882426/pdf/bmj00077-0052c.pdf

 

Source: Hatcher S. Postviral fatigue syndrome. BMJ. 1992 Jun 13;304(6841):1566; author reply 1567. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1882426/

 

Postviral fatigue syndrome

Comment on: Possible upregulation of hypothalamic 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors in patients with postviral fatigue syndrome. [BMJ. 1992]

 

EDITOR,-A M 0 Bakheit and colleagues report an enhanced prolactin response to buspirone in patients with postviral fatigue syndrome and suggest this may be due to upregulation of hypothalamic 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors. They fail to mention the considerable evidence indicating that the drug is a moderately potent dopamine antagonist, a pharmacological action which suggests an alternative explanation for their data.

They administered a single 60 mg dose of buspirone-in excess of the daily maximum of 45 mg recommended by the British National Formulary-so antidopaminergic effects may well have been significant in their studies. The fact that the prolactin releasing effect of buspirone can be blocked by the drug metergoline does not prove 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor specificity. Indeed, metergoline is used commonly as an alternative dopamine agonist to bromocriptine in managing hyperprolactinaemia. Thus enhanced prolactin release after buspirone in postviral fatigue syndrome may reflect, at least in part, inhibition of increased hypothalamic dopaminergic tone on the  It would be interesting to study the same groups of patients using a specific D2 dopamine antagonist (such as domperidone) to see whether this is the case.

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1882431/pdf/bmj00077-0052d.pdf

 

Source: Bevan JS. Postviral fatigue syndrome. BMJ. 1992 Jun 13;304(6841):1566; author reply 1567. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1882431/

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

The chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a poorly understood condition with nonspecific signs and symptoms, especially debilitating fatigue. Most patients can pinpoint the onset of their illness and usually describe a flu-like state. The search for an etiologic agent has focused on a number of viruses such as Epstein-Barr, enteroviruses, retroviruses, and human herpesvirus-6.

Evidence supports persistent viral infection in a small percentage of CFS patients. Immunologic abnormalities do exist in CFS, which indicate the presence of immune activation in CFS patients.

Although abnormal muscle biopsies have been found in some patients with CFS, strength and endurance appear normal, but perception of exertion may be abnormal. Patients with chronic fatigue have a high incidence of premorbid and concurrent psychiatric disorders, and on physical examination many often have reproducible tender points similar to fibromyalgic patients. Clinical evaluation should rule out other potential causes of fatigue, but elaborate diagnostic tests are seldom required.

Presently, no specific treatment exists for CFS. A cognitive behavioral approach with or without the use of tricyclics has been advocated. Patients should be encouraged to maintain functional status and should not be discouraged from exercise. Several medications have been tried but with no definite clinical benefit.

 

Source: Winters EG, Quinet RJ. Chronic fatigue syndrome. J La State Med Soc. 1992 Jun;144(6):260-70. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1619343

 

Sleep, Epstein-Barr virus infection, musculoskeletal pain, and depressive symptoms in chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Sleep physiology, viral serology and symptoms of 14 patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) were compared with 12 healthy controls. All patients described unrefreshing sleep and showed a prominent alpha electroencephalographic nonrapid eye movement (7.5-11.0 Hz) sleep anomaly (p less than or equal to 0.001), but had no physiologic daytime sleepiness.

There were no group differences in Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) antibody titers. The patient group had more fibrositis tender points (p less than 0.0001), described more somatic complaints (p less than 0.0001), and more depressive symptoms (p less than 0.0001). Patients with CFS do not show evidence for a specific chronic EBV infection, but show altered sleep physiology, numerous tender points, diffuse pain, and depressive symptoms. These features are similar to those found in fibromyalgia syndrome.

 

Source: Whelton CL, Salit I, Moldofsky H. Sleep, Epstein-Barr virus infection, musculoskeletal pain, and depressive symptoms in chronic fatigue syndrome. J Rheumatol. 1992 Jun;19(6):939-43. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1328633