Physical and Mental Fatigue in Subjects Recovered from COVID-19 Infection: A Case–Control Study

Abstract:

Purpose: Much effort has been directed toward studying COVID-19 symptoms; however, the post–COVID-19 phase remains mysterious. The aim of this work was to conduct a clinical and neurophysiological evaluation of physical and mental fatigue in COVID-19 long-haulers and to study whether markers of COVID-19 severity are able to predict the likelihood of developing postinfectious fatigue syndrome (PIFS) in such patients.

Patients and Methods: This case–control study was conducted on 46 COVID-19 long-haulers who met the criteria for PIFS and 46 recovered COVID-19 subjects without any residuals. Clinical assessment of fatigue was done using a fatigue questionnaire. Repetitive nerve stimulation and single-fiber electromyography were done after excluding neuropathy and myopathy.

Results: The median value for physical fatigue was 4 (IQR 2– 7), while that for mental fatigue was 2 (IQR 0– 3). Each day’s increase in the period of COVID-19 illness increased the odds of PIFS in COVID-19 long-haulers 1.104-fold, and each unit increase in ferritin increased the odds of PIFS 1.006-fold. A significant decrement in at least one muscle was observed in 50% of patients. Patients with PIFS had significantly higher mean consecutive difference (MCD) in the extensor digitorum communis than the control group. There were statistically significant positive correlations between MCD values and physical, mental, and total fatigue scores.

Conclusion: Higher ferritin levels and prolonged COVID-19 infection were independent predictors of PIFS in COVID-19 long-haulers. There was electrophysiological evidence of abnormalities in the peripheral portion of the motor unit in COVID-19 long-haulers with PIFS.

Source: Elanwar R, Hussein M, Magdy R, Eid RA, Yassien A, Abdelsattar AS, Alsharaway LA, Fathy W, Hassan A, Kamal YS. Physical and Mental Fatigue in Subjects Recovered from COVID-19 Infection: A Case–Control Study. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2021;17:2063-2071 https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S317027 https://www.dovepress.com/physical-and-mental-fatigue-in-subjects-recovered-from-covid-19-infect-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-NDT (Full text)

Migraine Is More Than Just Headache: Is the Link to Chronic Fatigue and Mood Disorders Simply Due to Shared Biological Systems?

Abstract:

Migraine is a symptomatically heterogeneous condition, of which headache is just one manifestation. Migraine is a disorder of altered sensory thresholding, with hypersensitivity among sufferers to sensory input. Advances in functional neuroimaging have highlighted that several brain areas are involved even prior to pain onset. Clinically, patients can experience symptoms hours to days prior to migraine pain, which can warn of impending headache. These symptoms can include mood and cognitive change, fatigue, and neck discomfort. Some epidemiological studies have suggested that migraine is associated in a bidirectional fashion with other disorders, such as mood disorders and chronic fatigue, as well as with other pain conditions such as fibromyalgia. This review will focus on the literature surrounding alterations in fatigue, mood, and cognition in particular, in association with migraine, and the suggested links to disorders such as chronic fatigue syndrome and depression.

We hypothesize that migraine should be considered a neural disorder of brain function, in which alterations in aminergic networks integrating the limbic system with the sensory and homeostatic systems occur early and persist after headache resolution and perhaps interictally. The associations with some of these other disorders may allude to the inherent sensory sensitivity of the migraine brain and shared neurobiology and neurotransmitter systems rather than true co-morbidity.

Source: Karsan N, Goadsby PJ. Migraine Is More Than Just Headache: Is the Link to Chronic Fatigue and Mood Disorders Simply Due to Shared Biological Systems? Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Jun 3;15:646692. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.646692. PMID: 34149377; PMCID: PMC8209296. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8209296/ (Full text)

Chronic post-COVID-19 syndrome and chronic fatigue syndrome: Is there a role for extracorporeal apheresis?

Abstract:

As millions of patients have been infected by SARS-CoV-2 virus a vast number of individuals complain about continuing breathlessness and fatigue even months after the onset of the disease. This overwhelming phenomenon has not been well defined and has been called “post-COVID syndrome” or “long-COVID” [1]. There are striking similarities to myalgic encephalomyelitis also called chronic fatigue syndrome linked to a viral and autoimmune pathogenesis. In both disorders neurotransmitter receptor antibodies against ß-adrenergic and muscarinic receptors may play a key role. We found similar elevation of these autoantibodies in both patient groups.

Extracorporeal apheresis using a special filter seems to be effective in reducing these antibodies in a significant way clearly improving the debilitating symptoms of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Therefore, such a form of neuropheresis may provide a promising therapeutic option for patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome. This method will also be effective when other hitherto unknown antibodies and inflammatory mediators are involved.

Source: Bornstein SR, Voit-Bak K, Donate T, Rodionov RN, Gainetdinov RR, Tselmin S, Kanczkowski W, Müller GM, Achleitner M, Wang J, Licinio J, Bauer M, Young AH, Thuret S, Bechmann N, Straube R. Chronic post-COVID-19 syndrome and chronic fatigue syndrome: Is there a role for extracorporeal apheresis? Mol Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 17. doi: 10.1038/s41380-021-01148-4. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34140635. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34140635/

Central Sensitivity and Fibromyalgia

Abstract:

Fibromyalgia presents with symptoms of widespread pain, fatigue, sleeping and cognitive disturbances as well as other somatic symptoms. It often overlaps with other conditions termed ‘central sensitivity syndromes’ such as irritable bowel syndrome, chronic fatigue syndrome and temporomandibular disorder. Central sensitisation, mediated by amplified processing in the central nervous system, has been identified as the key pathogenic mechanism in these disorders. The term ‘central sensitivity’ can be used to collectively describe the clinical presentation of these disorders.

Fibromyalgia is highly prevalent in most rheumatic diseases as well as non-rheumatic chronic diseases and if unrecognised results in high morbidity. It is diagnosed clinically after excluding important differential diagnoses. Diagnostic criteria have been developed as tools to help identify and diagnose fibromyalgia. Such tools can fulfill an important need when managing patients with rheumatic disease and other chronic diseases as a way to identify fibromyalgia and improve patient outcomes. Treatment involves an integrated approach including education, exercise, stress reduction and pharmacological therapies targeting the central nervous system. This approach is suitable for all presentations of central sensitivity and some central sensitivity syndromes have additional treatment options specific to the clinical presentation.

Source: Mezhov V, Guymer E, Littlejohn G. Central Sensitivity and Fibromyalgia. Intern Med J. 2021 Jun 17. doi: 10.1111/imj.15430. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34139045. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34139045/

Chronic fatigue and post-exertional malaise in people living with long COVID

Abstract:

Purpose People living with long COVID describe a high symptom burden, and a more detailed assessment of chronic fatigue and post-exertional malaise (PEM) may inform the development of rehabilitation recommendations. The aims of this study were to use validated questionnaires to measure the severity of fatigue and compare this with normative data and thresholds for clinical relevance in other diseases; measure and describe the impact of PEM; and describe symptoms of dysfunctional breathing, self-reported physical activity/sitting time, and health-related quality of life.

Methods This was an observational study involving an online survey for adults living with long COVID (data collection from February-April, 2021) following a confirmed or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection. Questionnaires included the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) and DePaul Symptom Questionnaire-Post-Exertional Malaise.

Results After data cleaning, n=213 participants were included in the analysis. Participants primarily identified as women (85.5%), aged 40-59 (78.4%), who had been experiencing long COVID symptoms for ≥6 months (72.3%). The total FACIT-F score was 18±10 (where the score can range from 0-52, and a lower score indicates more severe fatigue), and 71.4% were experiencing chronic fatigue. Post-exertional symptom exacerbation affected most participants, and 58.7% met the scoring thresholds used in people living with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. PEM occurred alongside a reduced capacity to work, be physically active, and function both physically and socially.

Conclusion Long COVID is characterized by chronic fatigue that is clinically relevant and is at least as severe as fatigue in several other clinical conditions, including cancer. PEM appears to be a common and significant challenge for the majority of this patient group. Patients, researchers, and allied health professionals are seeking information on safe rehabilitation for people living with long COVID, particularly regarding exercise. Fatigue and post-exertional symptom exacerbation must be monitored and reported in studies involving interventions for people with long COVID.

Source: Rosie TwomeyJessica DeMarsKelli FranklinS. Nicole Culos-ReedJason WeatheraldJames G. Wrightson. Chronic fatigue and post-exertional malaise in people living with long COVID.

Epistemic in/justice in patient participation. A discourse analysis of the Dutch ME/CFS Health Council advisory process

Abstract:

In healthcare settings, patient participation is increasingly adopted as a possible remedy to ill people suffering from ‘epistemic injustices’ – that is to their unfair harming as knowers. In exploring and interpreting patient participation discourses within the 2013-2018 Dutch Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME)/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) Health Council advisory process, this paper assesses the epistemological emancipatory value of this participatory practice. It reveals that in the analysed case, patient representatives predominantly offer biomedical knowledge about ME/CFS. They frame this condition as primarily somatic, and accordingly, perceive appropriate diagnostic criteria, research avenues and treatment options as quantifiable, objectifiable and explicitly non-psychogenic.

This paper argues that such a dominant biomedical patient participatory practice is ambiguous in terms of its ability to correct epistemic injustices towards ill people. Biomedicalized patient participation may enhance people’s credibility and their ability to make sense of their illness, but it may also undermine their valid position within participatory practices as well as lead to (sustaining) biased and reductive ideas about who ill people are and what kind of knowledge they hold. The final section of this paper offers a brief reflection on how to navigate such biomedicalized participatory practices in order to attain more emancipatory ones.

Source: de Boer ML. Epistemic in/justice in patient participation. A discourse analysis of the Dutch ME/CFS Health Council advisory process. Sociol Health Illn. 2021 Jun 17. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13301. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34137042. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34137042/

Performance Validity and Outcome of Cognitive Behavior Therapy in Patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Abstract:

Objective: There is limited research examining the impact of the validity of cognitive test performance on treatment outcome. All known studies to date have operationalized performance validity dichotomously, leading to the loss of predictive information. Using the range of scores on a performance validity test (PVT), we hypothesized that lower performance at baseline was related to a worse treatment outcome following cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) and to lower adherence to treatment.

Method: Archival data of 1081 outpatients treated with CBT for CFS were used in this study. At baseline, all patients were assessed with a PVT, the Amsterdam Short-Term Memory test (ASTM). Questionnaires assessing fatigue, physical disabilities, psychological distress, and level of functional impairment were administered before and after CBT.

Results: Our main hypothesis was not confirmed: the total ASTM score was not significantly associated with outcomes at follow-up. However, patients with a missing follow-up assessment had a lower ASTM performance at baseline, reported higher levels of physical limitations, and completed fewer therapy sessions.

Conclusions: CFS patients who scored low on the ASTM during baseline assessment are more likely to complete fewer therapy sessions and not to complete follow-up assessment, indicative of limited adherence to treatment. However, if these patients were retained in the intervention, their response to CBT for CFS was comparable with subjects who score high on the ASTM. This finding calls for more research to better understand the impact of performance validity on engagement with treatment and outcomes.

Source: Roor JJ, Dandachi-FitzGerald B, Peters MJV, Knoop H, Ponds RWHM. Performance Validity and Outcome of Cognitive Behavior Therapy in Patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2021 Jun 16:1-10. doi: 10.1017/S1355617721000643. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34130768. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34130768/

IN MEMORIAM: DR. PAUL CHENEY

I was deeply saddened to learn that Dr. Paul Cheney had passed away on June 10th. Along with Dr. Dan Peterson, Dr. Cheney  practiced in Incline Village, Nevada during the outbreak of what appeared to be a new disease. It had the hallmarks of a viral infection, but their patients were not recovering. That disease would later be called “Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.”

Dr. Cheney’s passing has personal significance for me, because he was the doctor who diagnosed me in 1993. I had heard about him through the leader of our support group in Austin, Texas, who generously allowed me to listen to a tape she had made of her consult with him. I was impressed with Dr. Cheney’s wealth of knowledge, which stemmed not just from his clinical practice, but from his research background in immunology. He not only had an MD, but held a PhD in physics and had been a research associate in the Division of Immunology at the CDC. He had also served as Chief of Medicine at the USAF Hospital in Mt. Home, Idaho for three years before going into private practice.

On the wall of Dr. Cheney’s office was a map with pushpins indicating where his patients came from. There were pushpins in every state and all over the world. Over the course of his practice he saw thousands of patients, whom he tested extensively for immune and metabolic dysfunctions, cardiac function, co-infections (including Lyme disease), indicators of viral reactivation, antigen sensitivity, and autoimmune activity, among others. I don’t think anyone understood ME/CFS as well as he did. Dr. Cheney was our “resident genius.”

Dr. Cheney spent four hours with me during our initial consult. He was not just thorough, he was kind. When he pronounced me “severely ill” there was genuine concern in his eyes. He gave me a piece of advice that I never forgot. “You are in a leaky boat,” he said. “How much can you throw overboard?” Throwing things overboard has saved me on many occasions.

The last time I saw Dr. Cheney was at the IACFS/ME Conference in San Francisco in 2014. I gave him a big hug and introduced myself as a former patient. “I remember you,” he said. It had been 21 years.

RIP Dr. Cheney. The world is poorer without you in it.

More information

Dr Cheney on heart function – from Dr. Myhill’s site: “Dr Paul Cheney has been working with the CFS patients clinically and experimentally for decades and this page is based on many of his ideas. This pulls together many clinical issues which hitherto were inexplicable to me and provides the basis for new therapies for CFS.”

Phoenix Rising Dr. Cheney page – Contains many links to protocols, treatment plans, etc. Some links are dead, but most are still active.

The Cheney Chronicles #2: His Protocol For Chronic Fatigue Syndrome – Cort Johnson’s blog, Health Rising, has two articles detailing one patient’s consult with Dr. Cheney.

ProHealth has a number of articles about Dr. Cheney’s treatment approach.

A Colossus in the ME/CFS Field Passes: Remembering Paul Cheney MD, Ph.D. – Cort Johnson talks about the treatments Dr. Cheney used, as well as his theories about the pathophysiology of ME/CFS.

 

The circuit of symbolic violence in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS)/myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) (I): A preliminary study

Abstract:

Objective: How can it be that a disease as serious as CFS affecting such a large number of people could be so unknown to the general population? The answer given to this question is based on Pierre Bourdieu’s analyzes of symbolic violence.

Method: The “letters to the editor” by CFS patients to three national Spanish newspapers were subjected to various qualitative and quantitative analyzes.

Results: Based on the qualitative analyzes and their theoretical interpretation, 13 mechanisms of symbolic violence were identified: non-recognition, institutionalized un-care, condescension, authorized imposition of illegitimate verdicts, delegitimization, disintegration, imposition of discourse, euphemization, silencing, invisibilization, isolation, uncommunication, and self-blaming. Multiple Correspondence Analysis made it possible to identify that the structural mechanisms (non-recognition, disintegration) were combined with the most symbolic ones, which came to the forefront producing the observed effects of symbolic violence. The 13 clusters obtained in the Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering confirmed this result.

Source: Gimeno Torrent X. The circuit of symbolic violence in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS)/myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) (I): A preliminary study. Health Care Women Int. 2021 Jun 14:1-36. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2021.1925900. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34125009. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34125009/

The Prevalence of Pediatric Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome in a Community‑Based Sample

Abstract:

Background: Most pediatric prevalence studies of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) have been based upon data from tertiary care centers, a process known for systematic biases such as excluding youth of lower socioeconomic status and those less likely to have access to health care. In addition, most pediatric ME/CFS epidemiologic studies have not included a thorough medical and psychiatric examination. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of pediatric ME/CFS from an ethnically and sociodemographically diverse community-based random sample.

Method: A sample of 10,119 youth aged 5-17 from 5622 households in the Chicagoland area were screened. Following evaluations, a team of physicians made final diagnoses. Youth were given a diagnosis of ME/CFS if they met criteria for three selected case definitions. A probabilistic, multi-stage formula was used for final prevalence calculations.

Results: The prevalence of pediatric ME/CFS was 0.75%, with a higher percentage being African American and Latinx than Caucasian. Of the youth diagnosed with ME/CFS, less than 5% had been previously diagnosed with the illness.

Conclusions: Many youth with the illness have not been previously diagnosed with ME/CFS. These findings point to the need for better ways to identify and diagnose youth with this illness.

Source: Jason LA, Katz BZ, Sunnquist M, Torres C, Cotler J, Bhatia S. The Prevalence of Pediatric Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome in a Community‑Based Sample. Child Youth Care Forum. 2020 Aug;49(4):563-579. doi: 10.1007/s10566-019-09543-3. Epub 2020 Jan 23. PMID: 34113066; PMCID: PMC8186295. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34113066/