Treatment – Page 13 – American ME and CFS Society

Chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

INTRODUCTION: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) affects between 0.006% and 3% of the population depending on the criteria of definition used, with women being at higher risk than men.

METHODS AND OUTCOMES: We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of treatments for chronic fatigue syndrome? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to March 2010 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).

RESULTS: We found 46 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.

CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: antidepressants, cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), corticosteroids, dietary supplements, evening primrose oil, galantamine, graded exercise therapy, homeopathy, immunotherapy, intramuscular magnesium, oral nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, and prolonged rest.

Source: Reid S, Chalder T, Cleare A, Hotopf M, Wessely S. Chronic fatigue syndrome. BMJ Clin Evid. 2011 May 26;2011. pii: 1101. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3275316/ (Full article)

Amitriptyline and prochlorperazine inhibit proinflammatory mediator release from human mast cells: possible relevance to chronic fatigue syndrome

CFS a complex disorder characterized by unexplained severe fatigue for over 6 months with a broad range of additional symptoms involving the nervous, endocrine and immune systems, and an estimated prevalence of 1%1. Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) are prescribed off label for a number of painful diseases that are often comorbid, such as chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), fibromyalgia, interstitial cystitis, and irritable bowel syndrome, the symptoms of which are worsened by stress2. However, there is no known mechanism to explain the apparent beneficial action of TCAs3.

Mast cells and their mediators have been implicated in inflammatory diseases4, including CFS5. Mast cells are located perivascularly in close proximity to neurons in the thalamus and hypothalamus, especially the median eminence6, where they are juxtaposed to corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH)-positive nerve processes7. CRH activates mast cells to release vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)8, which could participate in neurogenic inflammation and contribute to the pathogenesis of CFS. Such mediators may be released locally in the brain or may cross the blood-brain-barrier (BBB), which can be disrupted by stress, subsequent to mast cell activation9. Given the above, we hypothesized that TCAs may be helpful through inhibition of mast cell release of pro-inflammatory mediators.

You can read the rest of this letter here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3498825/

Source: Clemons A, Vasiadi M, Kempuraj D, Kourelis T, Vandoros G, Theoharides TC. Amitriptyline and prochlorperazine inhibit proinflammatory mediator release from human mast cells: possible relevance to chronic fatigue syndrome. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2011 Jun;31(3):385-7. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e3182196e50. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3498825/ (Full article)

The role of changes in activity as a function of perceived available and expended energy in nonpharmacological treatment outcomes for ME/CFS

Abstract:

Nonpharmacological interventions for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) often emphasize gradual increases in activity to promote improvement in physical functioning and fatigue. The energy envelope theory may provide a framework for understanding the relationship between changes in activity level and outcomes for patients with ME/CFS. This study examined the relationship between energy envelope and changes in activity after nonpharmacological interventions in a sample of 44 adults with ME/CFS.

Results showed that those who were within their energy envelope before treatment showed more improvement in physical functioning and fatigue compared with those outside of their energy envelope. These findings suggest that an assessment of perceived available and expended energy could help guide the development of individualized nonpharmacological interventions for people with ME/CFS.

Source: Brown M, Khorana N, Jason LA. The role of changes in activity as a function of perceived available and expended energy in nonpharmacological treatment outcomes for ME/CFS. J Clin Psychol. 2011 Mar;67(3):253-60. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20744. Epub 2010 Oct 25. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3164291/ (Full article)

Classifying medication use in clinical research

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Medication use data are usually collected in clinical research. Yet no standardized method for categorizing these exists, either for sample description or for the study of medication use as a variable.

OBJECTIVE: The present investigation was designed to develop a simple, empirically based classification scheme for medication use categorization.

METHOD: The authors used factor analysis to reduce the number of possible medication groupings. This permitted a pattern of medication usage to emerge that appeared to characterize specific clinical constellations. To illustrate the technique’s potential, the authors applied this classification system to samples where sleep disorders are prominent: chronic fatigue syndrome and sleep apnea.

RESULTS: The authors’ classification approach resulted in 5 factors that appear to cohere in a logical fashion. These were labeled Cardiovascular or Metabolic Syndrome Medication, Symptom Relief Medication, Psychotropic Medication, Preventative Medication, and Hormonal Medication.

CONCLUSIONS: The findings show that medication profile varies according to clinical sample. The medication profile for participants with sleep apnea reflects known comorbid conditions; the medication profile associated with chronic fatigue syndrome appears to reflect the common perception of this condition as a psychogenic disorder.

Source: Rizzo D, Creti L, Bailes S, Baltzan M, Grad R, Amsel R, Fichten CS, Libman E. Classifying medication use in clinical research. J Prim Care Community Health. 2011 Jan 1;2(1):26-32. doi: 10.1177/2150131910385843. Epub 2010 Oct 27. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23804659

Amisulpride vs. fluoxetine treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome: a pilot study

Abstract:

Different pharmacologic agents have been evaluated in the treatment of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS), albeit with moderate efficacy. Among the compounds thought to present with potential to be efficacious in CFS patients stands out low-dose amisulpride, a substituted benzamide that has been shown to be an useful treatment for conditions which exhibit some overlap with CFS such as dysthymia and somatoform disorders.

We thus recruited forty non-depressed CFS patients that were randomized to receive either amisulpride 25mg bid, or fluoxetine 20mg uid; all subjects were un-blinded to the treatment regimen. At the time of enrollment in the study and after twelve weeks of treatment, enrolled subjects completed the Krupp Fatigue Severity Scale, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and a visual analog scale focused on pain and bodily discomfort. Moreover, all subjects were evaluated by a clinician, blinded to the treatment regimen, using the Clinical Global Impression Severity Scale.

Our data revealed a significant improvement both in self-report, and observer-based measures for the amisulpride-treated, but not for the fluoxetine-treated patients. Amisulpride-treated subjects also presented with a significant reduction of somatic complaints, while the amisulpride effect on anxiety and mood levels was not significant. Both drugs were equally well tolerated.

Summing up, we showed a positive symptomatic effect of amisulpride, compared to SSRI treatment, in a group of non-depressed CSF patients on self-report and on observer-based measures of fatigue and somatic complaints. If confirmed by larger, blinded studies, amisulpride thus could represent an effective approach to this difficult-to-treat condition.

Source: Pardini M, Guida S, Primavera A, Krueger F, Cocito L, Gialloreti LE. Amisulpride vs. fluoxetine treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome: a pilot study. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011 Mar;21(3):282-6. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2010.10.008. Epub 2010 Nov 26. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21112746

TLR3 agonists as immunotherapeutic agents

The interaction of innate and adaptive immune responses is extremely complex and just beginning to be understood in detail. The tendency for biomedical research to establish reproducible models, cell systems and receptor pathways, and then to focus on these systems can sometimes result in opportunity that is not appreciated. The Toll-like receptor (TLR)3 pathway as a therapeutic target falls into this category. There is an immense body of data that has been developed for more than 40 years; all of which is highly relevant to the TLR3 story and yet most of which predates the elucidation of the TLR pathways. A new recognition of TLR3, its unique properties that distinguish it from other TLR pathways, the specificity of relevant and long-available TLR agonists, and new studies of this biology utilizing modern assay methodology suggest that this target may be especially valuable as an adjunct to multiple immunotherapy strategies currently in use or in development.

You can read the rest of this article here: http://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/full/10.2217/imt.10.8 (Full article)

Source: Christopher F Nicodemus and Jonathan S Berek. TLR3 agonists as immunotherapeutic agents. Immunotherapy, March 2010 ,Vol. 2, No. 2, Pages 137-140 , DOI 10.2217/imt.10.8 (doi:10.2217/imt.10.8) http://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/full/10.2217/imt.10.8 (Full article)

Treatment of the narcoleptiform sleep disorder in chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia with sodium oxybate

Abstract:

This study investigates the response of the underlying sleep disorder associated with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) and fibromyalgia (FM) to treatment. We retrospectively reviewed 118 cases clinically consistent with CFS or FM, treated in a neurology practice. Abnormal findings on sleep studies and associated human leukocyte antigen markers, and a clinical pattern suggestive of narcolepsy, are present in a high proportion of patients. When considered appropriate based on the clinical picture and test results, treatment with sodium oxybate was offered to these patients. Sixty percent of patients treated with oxybate experienced significant relief of pain, while 75% experienced significant relief of fatigue. We postulate that the response to oxybate in CFS and FM suggests a disturbance of sleep similar to narcolepsy. These findings support this novel approach to intervention and further research. The inability to distinguish CFS and FM by testing and response to treatment suggests that they may represent variations of the same disorder or may be closely related disorders.

Source: Spitzer AR, Broadman M. Treatment of the narcoleptiform sleep disorder in chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia with sodium oxybate. Pain Pract. 2010 Jan-Feb;10(1):54-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2009.00334.x. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20629967

Chronic fatigue syndrome: is there a role for non-antidepressant pharmacotherapy?

Abstract:

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a prevalent but poorly understood condition mainly characterized by debilitating, persistent or recurrent fatigue; increased physical and mental fatigability; cognitive impairment and widespread musculoskeletal pain. Despite intensive treatment research, the role of pharmacotherapy in the illness remains uncertain.

: An updated review is given of pharmacotherapy in CFS, with a focus on non-antidepressant, controlled drug trials performed between 1988 and August 2009.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN: Antiviral, immunological and antibiotic therapies, although sometimes associated with symptom amelioration, can be more harmful than beneficial in CFS. Stimulants seem to benefit some CFS patients but their long-term effects is uncertain. Although antidepressants are not curative for the illness, they might be useful for some symptomatic aspects and co-morbid anxiety and depression. There is little or no evidence that CFS patients benefit from other pharmacological agents (e.g., steroids) or from dietary supplements and complementary medicine products. Future research into treatment should take specific subgroups into account and should target immunological aspects of the illness as well as the complex relationships between CFS, stress and depression.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Pharmacotherapy can currently not be considered first-line treatment in CFS and should always be used in a context of self-management and rehabilitation.

Source: Van Houdenhove B, Pae CU, Luyten P. Chronic fatigue syndrome: is there a role for non-antidepressant pharmacotherapy? Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2010 Feb;11(2):215-23. Doi: 10.1517/14656560903487744. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20088743

Treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome: findings, principles and strategies

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a debilitating condition characterized by serious medically unexplained mental and physical fatigue. The high prevalence and both direct and indirect health costs of CFS patients represent a huge problem for contemporary health care. Moreover, the prognosis of CFS, even when treated, is often poor. In this paper, we first critically review current evidence based treatments of CFS. Second, we discuss the growing insights into the etiopathogenesis of CFS, and the need to translate and integrate these insights into future treatments. In particular, we formulate a pragmatic and empirically testable treatment approach, tailored to the individual needs of patients, which aims at restoring the mental and physical equilibrium of CFS patients by trying to bring about sustained life style changes.

Source: Luyten P, Van Houdenhove B, Pae CU, Kempke S, Van Wambeke P. Treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome: findings, principles and strategies. Psychiatry Investig. 2008 Dec;5(4):209-12. doi: 10.4306/pi.2008.5.4.209. Epub 2008 Dec 31. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2796012/ (Full article)

Chronic fatigue syndrome: la bête noire of the Belgian health care system

Abstract:

The World Health Organization acknowledges Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME)/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) to be a medical illness. ME/CFS is characterized by disorders in the inflammatory and oxidative and nitrosative stress (IO&NS) pathways. In 2002, the Belgian government started with the development of CFS “Reference Centers”, which implement a “psychosocial” model. The medical practices of these CFS Centers are defined by the Superior Health Council, e.g. treatment should be based upon Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Graded Exercise Therapy (GET); and biological assessments and treatments of ME/CFS should not be employed.

Recently, the Belgian government has evaluated the outcome of the treatments at the CFS Centers. They concluded that a “rehabilitation therapy” with CBT/GET yielded no significant efficacy in the treatment of ME/CFS and that CBT/GET cannot be considered to be curative therapies.

In case reports, we have shown that patients who were “treated” at those CFS centers with CBT/GET in fact suffered from IO&NS disorders, including intracellular inflammation, an increased translocation of gram-negative enterobacteria (leaky gut), autoimmune reactions and damage by O&NS.

Considering the fact that these findings are exemplary for ME/CFS patients and that GET may even be harmful, it means that many patients are maltreated by the Belgian CFS Centers. Notwithstanding the above, the government and the CFS Centers not only continue this unethical and immoral policy, but also reinforce their use of CBT/GET in patients with ME/CFS treated at those Centers.

Source: Maes M, Twisk FN. Chronic fatigue syndrome: la bête noire of the Belgian health care system. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2009;30(3):300-11. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19855351