Category: Psychiatry/Psychology

Does depression mediate the relation between fatigue severity and disability in chronic fatigue syndrome sufferers?

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is often associated with significant levels of disability. Although fatigue and depression have been found to be independently related to severity of disability, it is not clear how these three factors are mutually related. The present study sought to address this issue by specifically testing a model of mediation whereby depression was hypothesized to influence relations between fatigue and disability.

METHODS: Participants included 90 individuals seeking treatment for CFS at a tertiary care facility. Each provided demographic information and completed standardized measures of depression and fatigue severity, as well as a measure of disability, which assessed difficulties in physical, psychosocial, and independence domains.

RESULTS: Analyses indicated that depression and fatigue were positively correlated with one another, as well as all three disability domains. Analyses of mediation indicated that depression completely mediated the relation between fatigue and psychosocial disability and partially mediated the relation between fatigue and the other two disability domains. Indirect effects tests indicated that the inclusion of depression in the statistical models was statistically meaningful.

CONCLUSIONS: These results replicate previous findings that fatigue and depression are independently related to disability in those with CFS. A more complex statistical model, however, suggested that depression severity substantially influenced the strength of the relation between fatigue and disability levels across a range of domains, including complete mediation in areas involving psychosocial functioning. These results may aid in clarifying contemporary conceptualizations of CFS and provide guidance in the identification of appropriate treatment targets.

 

Source: Hadlandsmyth K, Vowles KE. Does depression mediate the relation between fatigue severity and disability in chronic fatigue syndrome sufferers? J Psychosom Res. 2009 Jan;66(1):31-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.08.002. Epub 2008 Nov 22. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19073290

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome and DSM-IV personality disorders

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: Personality is an important factor in the research of the chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Although some studies report a high rate of personality disorders–around the 40% level–in samples of patients with CFS, the generalizability of these findings can be questioned. The present study evaluates the prevalence of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) personality disorders in a sample of female CFS patients and in two control groups.

METHOD: The ADP-IV questionnaire (Assessment of DSM Personality Disorders IV) was used to assess the DSM-IV-TR personality disorders at a dimensional and categorical level in a sample of 50 female CFS patients and in two matched control samples of Flemish civilians (n=50) and psychiatric patients (n=50).

RESULTS: The results indicate a striking lack of statistical significant differences between the CFS sample and the Flemish control group at the level of dimensional Trait scores, number of criteria, and prevalence rates of personality disorder diagnoses. Unsurprisingly, higher scores at these levels were obtained within the psychiatric sample. The prevalence of an Axis II disorder was 12% in the Flemish and CFS samples, whereas the psychiatric sample obtained a prevalence of 54%.

CONCLUSION: The prominent absence of any significant difference in personality disorder characteristics between the female Flemish general population and the CFS samples seems to suggest only a minor etiological role for personality pathology, as defined by the DSM-IV Axis II, within CFS.

 

Source: Courjaret J, Schotte CK, Wijnants H, Moorkens G, Cosyns P. Chronic fatigue syndrome and DSM-IV personality disorders. J Psychosom Res. 2009 Jan;66(1):13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.07.001. Epub 2008 Nov 22. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19073288

 

Symptoms, impairment and illness intrusiveness–their relationship with depression in women with CFS/ME

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) is an illness in which physiological and psychological factors are believed to interact to cause and maintain CFS/ME in an individual predisposed to it. The various symptoms and impairments associated with CFS/ME have a large impact on quality of life. The purpose of the present study was to identify the extent to which the core symptoms and impairments associated with CFS/ME relate to depression in women with CFS/ME, and to discover whether these relationships were mediated by illness intrusiveness. CFS/ME was found to be a highly intrusive illness, intruding into more life domains and to a greater degree than other illnesses. The effects of both symptoms and impairment on depression were, in part, mediated by illness intrusiveness. Although symptoms severity and impairment had both direct and indirect effects on depression, illness intrusiveness was the strongest predictor of depression.

 

Source: Dancey CP, Friend J. Symptoms, impairment and illness intrusiveness–their relationship with depression in women with CFS/ME. Psychol Health. 2008;23(8):983-99. doi: 10.1080/08870440701619957. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25160923

 

Salivary cortisol output before and after cognitive behavioural therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: There is evidence that patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) have mild hypocortisolism. One theory about the aetiology of this hypocortisolism is that it occurs late in the course of CFS via factors such as inactivity, sleep disturbance, chronic stress and deconditioning. We aimed to determine whether therapy aimed at reversing these factors–cognitive behavioural therapy for CFS–could increase cortisol output in CFS.

METHODS: We measured diurnal salivary cortisol output between 0800 and 2000 h before and after 15 sessions (or 6 months) of CBT in 41 patients with CDC-defined CFS attending a specialist, tertiary outpatient clinic.

RESULTS: There was a significant clinical response to CBT, and a significant rise in salivary cortisol output after CBT.

LIMITATIONS: We were unable to control for the passage of time using a non-treated CFS group.

CONCLUSIONS: Hypocortisolism in CFS is potentially reversible by CBT. Given previous suggestions that lowered cortisol may be a maintaining factor in CFS, CBT offers a potential way to address this.

 

Source: Roberts AD, Papadopoulos AS, Wessely S, Chalder T, Cleare AJ. Salivary cortisol output before and after cognitive behavioural therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome. J Affect Disord. 2009 May;115(1-2):280-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.09.013. Epub 2008 Oct 19. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18937978

 

Factors associated with depression among individuals with chronic fatigue syndrome: findings from a nationally representative survey

Abstract:

OBJECTIVES: Most previous research regarding chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and depression has relied on clinical samples. The current research determined the prevalence and correlates of depression among individuals with CFS in a community sample.

METHODS: The nationally representative Canadian Community Health Survey, conducted in 2000/2001, included an unweighted sample size of 1045 individuals who reported a diagnosis of CFS and had complete data on depression. Respondents with CFS who were depressed (n = 369) were compared to those who were not depressed (n = 676). Chi-square analyses, t-tests and a logistic regression were conducted.

RESULTS: Thirty-six per cent of individuals with CFS were depressed. Among individuals with CFS, depression was associated with lower levels of mastery and self-esteem. In the logistic regression analyses, the odds of depression among individuals with CFS were higher for females, younger respondents, those with lower incomes and food insecurity and those whose activities were limited by pain. Two in five depressed individuals had not consulted with any mental health professional in the preceding year. Twenty-two per cent of depressed respondents had seriously considered suicide in the past year. Individuals with CFS who were depressed were particularly heavy users of family physicians, with an average of 11.1 visits annually (95% confidence interval = 10.7, 11.6).

CONCLUSION: It is important for clinicians to assess depression and suicidal ideation among their patients with CFS, particularly among females, those reporting moderate to severe pain, low incomes and inadequate social support.

 

Source: Fuller-Thomson E, Nimigon J. Factors associated with depression among individuals with chronic fatigue syndrome: findings from a nationally representative survey. Fam Pract. 2008 Dec;25(6):414-22. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmn064. Epub 2008 Oct 3. http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/content/25/6/414.long (Full article)

 

Guided self-instructions for people with chronic fatigue syndrome: randomised controlled trial

Abstract:

A minimal intervention, based on cognitive-behavioural therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome and consisting of self-instructions combined with email contact, was tested in a randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN27293439). A total of 171 patients participated in the trial: 85 were allocated to the intervention condition and 86 to the waiting-list condition. All patients met the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome. An intention-to-treat analysis showed a significant decrease in fatigue and disability after self-instruction. The level of disability was negatively correlated with treatment outcome. Guided self-instructions are an effective treatment for patients with relatively less severe chronic fatigue syndrome.

 

Source: Knoop H, van der Meer JW, Bleijenberg G. Guided self-instructions for people with chronic fatigue syndrome: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2008 Oct;193(4):340-1. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.051292. http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/193/4/340.long (Full article)

 

Functional incapacity and physical and psychological symptoms: how they interconnect in chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: It has been argued that perceived functional incapacity might be a primary characteristic of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and could be explained by physical symptoms. If so, it could be expected to be closely associated with physical, but not psychological symptoms. The study tests this hypothesis.

SAMPLING AND METHODS: The sample consisted of 73 patients, with a diagnosis of CFS according to the Oxford criteria, randomly selected from clinics in the Departments of Immunology and Psychiatry at St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London. The degree of fatigue experienced by patients was assessed using the Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire and a visual analogue scale. Self-rated instruments were used to measure physical and social functioning, quality of life, and physical and psychological symptoms.

RESULTS: Principal-component analysis of all scale scores revealed 2 distinct components, explaining 53% of the total variance. One component was characterized by psychological symptoms and generic quality of life indicators, whilst the other component was made up of physical symptoms, social and physical functioning and indicators of fatigue.

CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that perceived functional incapacity is a primary characteristic of CFS, which is manifested and/or explained by physical symptoms.

(c) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.

 

Source: Priebe S, Fakhoury WK, Henningsen P. Functional incapacity and physical and psychological symptoms: how they interconnect in chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychopathology. 2008;41(6):339-45. doi: 10.1159/000152375. Epub 2008 Sep 3. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18765959

 

Can CBT substantially change grey matter volume in chronic fatigue syndrome?

Sir, I wish to comment on the paper ‘Increase in prefrontal cortical volume following cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS)’ (De Lange et al., 2008). The authors compared the grey matter volume (GMV) of 22 patients with CFS before and after treatment with CBT, and with 22 healthy controls who were assessed at a similar time interval but received no treatment. The patient sample at baseline had a 5% smaller GMV as compared to healthy controls. In patients, GMV at baseline was correlated with slow information processing speed and physical activity. At follow-up, in the patient group, mean GMV increased with 0.7% from 669.4 to 674.1 ml. This increase in GMV was correlated with changes in cognitive speed. On the basis of this result, the authors conclude ‘that the cerebral atrophy associated with CFS is partially reversed after effective CBT’. In the Netherlands, a press release of the author’s institution even states ‘CBT brings about structural changes in brains of patients’ (Radboud University, 2008). The question arises whether the study results indeed support such far reaching conclusions.

Two critical points need to be taken into consideration. First, the authors did not include a control group of patients receiving no treatment or a different treatment. Therefore, the increase in GMV cannot be attributed to the CBT treatment given. It is possible that the natural course of and fluctuations in the illness are responsible for this result. In addition, it might be possible that other treatments than CBT would have resulted in the same, or even better, results. Second, even if the results were indeed to be attributed to changes in lifestyle brought about by CBT, several questions still remain. To name a few, first, the increase in volume of <1% is very modest. Therefore, the question is whether, although statistically significant, this small increase is also of clinical significance. Second, if CBT brings about changes in lifestyle, and these changes are responsible for small improvements in the patients’ brain and activity levels, are these changes structural and related to the primary disease process? An alternative interpretation is that changing the lifestyle of patients, influences their quality of life, activity patterns and GMV, while the underlying disease process is not influenced.

Another critical remark relates to the fact that the authors in their paper do not mention the proportion of absolute increase in GMV of 0.7%, but rather report that the initial between-group difference between patients and healthy controls decreases with 12%. For readers, it is important to realize that the measure of change reported by the authors is influenced by the absolute size of the between-group difference: the smaller, and therefore less relevant, this difference is, the larger the reported proportion becomes, thereby making less relevant results looking more impressive.

The above considerations lead to the conclusion, that the author’s results, although interesting, do not support the far reaching conclusions regarding the power of CBT.

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/content/132/6/e110.long

Comment in: Change in grey matter volume cannot be assumed to be due to cognitive behavioural therapy. [Brain. 2009]

Comment on: Increase in prefrontal cortical volume following cognitive behavioural therapy in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. [Brain. 2008]

 

Source: Bramsen I. Can CBT substantially change grey matter volume in chronic fatigue syndrome? Brain. 2009 Jun;132(Pt 6):e110; author reply e111. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn207. Epub 2008 Aug 29. http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/content/132/6/e110.long (Full article)

 

Implementing cognitive behavior therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome in mental health care: a costs and outcomes analysis

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the costs and outcomes of implementing cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in a mental health center (MHC). CBT is an evidence-based treatment for CFS that was scarcely available until now. To investigate the possibilities for wider implementation, a pilot implementation project was set up.

METHOD: Costs and effects were evaluated in a non-controlled before- and after study with an eight months time-horizon. Both the costs of performing the treatments and the costs of implementing the treatment program were included in the analysis. The implementation interventions included: informing general practitioners (GPs) and CFS patients, training therapists, and instructing the MHC employees. Given the non-controlled design, cost outcome ratios (CORs) and their acceptability curves were analyzed. Analyses were done from a health care perspective and from a societal perspective. Bootstrap analyses were performed to estimate the uncertainty around the cost and outcome results.

RESULTS: 125 CFS patients were included in the study. After treatment 37% had recovered from CFS and the mean gained QALY was 0.03. Costs of patients’ health care and productivity losses had decreased significantly. From the societal perspective the implementation led to cost savings and to higher health states for patients, indicating dominancy. From the health care perspective the implementation revealed overall costs of 5.320 euros per recovered patient, with an acceptability curve showing a 100% probability for a positive COR at a willingness to pay threshold of 6.500 euros per recovered patient.

CONCLUSION: Implementing CBT for CFS in a MHC appeared to have a favorable cost outcome ratio (COR) from a societal perspective. From a health care perspective the COR depended on how much a recovered CFS patient is being valued. The strength of the evidence was limited by the non-controlled design. The outcomes of this study might facilitate health care providers when confronted with the decision whether or not to adopt CBT for CFS in their institution.

 

Source: Scheeres K, Wensing M, Bleijenberg G, Severens JL. Implementing cognitive behavior therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome in mental health care: a costs and outcomes analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Aug 13;8:175. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-175. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2536664/ (Full article)

 

Cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome in adults

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a common, debilitating and serious health problem. Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) may help to alleviate the symptoms of CFS.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effectiveness and acceptability of CBT for CFS, alone and in combination with other interventions, compared with usual care and other interventions.

SEARCH STRATEGY: CCDANCTR-Studies and CCDANCTR-References were searched on 28/3/2008. We conducted supplementary searches of other bibliographic databases. We searched reference lists of retrieved articles and contacted trial authors and experts in the field for information on ongoing/completed trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials involving adults with a primary diagnosis of CFS, assigned to a CBT condition compared with usual care or another intervention, alone or in combination.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data on patients, interventions and outcomes were extracted by two review authors independently, and risk of bias was assessed for each study. The primary outcome was reduction in fatigue severity, based on a continuous measure of symptom reduction, using the standardised mean difference (SMD), or a dichotomous measure of clinical response, using odds ratios (OR), with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS: Fifteen studies (1043 CFS participants) were included in the review. When comparing CBT with usual care (six studies, 373 participants), the difference in fatigue mean scores at post-treatment was highly significant in favour of CBT (SMD -0.39, 95% CI -0.60 to -0.19), with 40% of CBT participants (four studies, 371 participants) showing clinical response in contrast with 26% in usual care (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.76). Findings at follow-up were inconsistent. For CBT versus other psychological therapies, comprising relaxation, counselling and education/support (four studies, 313 participants), the difference in fatigue mean scores at post-treatment favoured CBT (SMD -0.43, 95% CI -0.65 to -0.20). Findings at follow-up were heterogeneous and inconsistent. Only two studies compared CBT against other interventions and one study compared CBT in combination with other interventions against usual care.

AUTHORS’ CONCLUSIONS: CBT is effective in reducing the symptoms of fatigue at post-treatment compared with usual care, and may be more effective in reducing fatigue symptoms compared with other psychological therapies. The evidence base at follow-up is limited to a small group of studies with inconsistent findings. There is a lack of evidence on the comparative effectiveness of CBT alone or in combination with other treatments, and further studies are required to inform the development of effective treatment programmes for people with CFS.

Comment in: Review: CBT reduces fatigue in adults with chronic fatigue syndrome but effects at follow-up unclear. [Evid Based Ment Health. 2009]

Update of:  Cognitive behaviour therapy for adults with chronic fatigue syndrome. [Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000]

 

Source: Price JR, Mitchell E, Tidy E, Hunot V. Cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;(3):CD001027. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001027.pub2.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18646067