Mistaken Identity: Many Diagnoses are Frequently Misattributed to Lyme Disease

Abstract:

Background: Prior studies have demonstrated that Lyme disease is frequently over-diagnosed. However, few studies describe which conditions are misdiagnosed as Lyme disease.

Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study evaluated patients referred for Lyme disease to a Mid-Atlantic academic center between 2000-2013 who lacked evidence for Borrelia burgdorferi infection. The primary outcome is clinically described diagnoses contributing to symptoms. Secondary outcomes included symptom duration and determination whether diagnoses were new or attributed to existing medical conditions.

Results: Of 1261 referred patients, 1061 (84%) had no findings of active Lyme disease, with 690 (65%) receiving other diagnoses resulting in 405 (59%) having newly diagnosed medical conditions, 134 (19%) attributed to pre-existing medical issues, and 151 (22%) had both new and pre-existing conditions. Among the 690 patients, the median symptom duration was 796 days, and a total of 139 discrete diagnoses were made. Infectious disease diagnoses comprised only 3.2%. Leading diagnoses were anxiety/depression 222 (21%), fibromyalgia 120 (11%), chronic fatigue syndrome 77 (7%), migraine disorder 74 (7%), osteoarthritis 62 (6%) and sleep disorder/apnea 48 (5%). Examples of less frequent but non-syndromic diseases newly diagnosed included multiple sclerosis (11), malignancy (8), Parkinson’s disease (8), sarcoidosis (4) or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (4).

Conclusions: Most patients with long-term symptoms have either new or pre-existing disorders accounting for their symptoms other than Lyme disease, suggesting overdiagnosis in this population. Patients referred for consideration of Lyme disease for chronic symptoms deserve careful assessment for diagnoses other than Borrelia burgdorferi infection.

Source: Kobayashi T, Higgins Y, Melia MT, Auwaerter PG. Mistaken Identity: Many Diagnoses are Frequently Misattributed to Lyme Disease. Am J Med. 2021 Nov 30:S0002-9343(21)00792-0. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2021.10.040. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34861197. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002934321007920  (Full text)

Persistent Exertional Intolerance After COVID-19

Abstract:

Background: Some patients with COVID-19 who have recovered from the acute infection after experiencing only mild symptoms continue to exhibit persistent exertional limitation that often is unexplained by conventional investigative studies.

Research question: What is the pathophysiologic mechanism of exercise intolerance that underlies the post-COVID-19 long-haul syndrome after COVID-19 in patients without cardiopulmonary disease?

Study design and methods: This study examined the systemic and pulmonary hemodynamics, ventilation, and gas exchange in 10 patients who recovered from COVID-19 and were without cardiopulmonary disease during invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing (iCPET) and compared the results with those from 10 age- and sex-matched control participants. These data then were used to define potential reasons for exertional limitation in the cohort of patients who had recovered from COVID-19.

Results: The patients who had recovered from COVID-19 exhibited markedly reduced peak exercise aerobic capacity (oxygen consumption [VO2]) compared with control participants (70 ± 11% predicted vs 131 ± 45% predicted; P < .0001). This reduction in peak VO2 was associated with impaired systemic oxygen extraction (ie, narrow arterial-mixed venous oxygen content difference to arterial oxygen content ratio) compared with control participants (0.49 ± 0.1 vs 0.78 ± 0.1; P < .0001), despite a preserved peak cardiac index (7.8 ± 3.1 L/min vs 8.4±2.3 L/min; P > .05). Additionally, patients who had recovered from COVID-19 demonstrated greater ventilatory inefficiency (ie, abnormal ventilatory efficiency [VE/VCO2] slope: 35 ± 5 vs 27 ± 5; P = .01) compared with control participants without an increase in dead space ventilation.

Interpretation: Patients who have recovered from COVID-19 without cardiopulmonary disease demonstrate a marked reduction in peak VO2 from a peripheral rather than a central cardiac limit, along with an exaggerated hyperventilatory response during exercise.

Source: Singh I, Joseph P, Heerdt PM, Cullinan M, Lutchmansingh DD, Gulati M, Possick JD, Systrom DM, Waxman AB. Persistent Exertional Intolerance After COVID-19: Insights From Invasive Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing. Chest. 2021 Aug 11:S0012-3692(21)03635-7. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.08.010. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34389297; PMCID: PMC8354807. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8354807/  (Full text)

Use of Cardiopulmonary Stress Testing for Patients With Unexplained Dyspnea Post-Coronavirus Disease

Abstract:

Objectives: The authors used cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to define unexplained dyspnea in patients with post-acute sequelae of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (PASC). We assessed participants for criteria to diagnose myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS).

Background: Approximately 20% of patients who recover from coronavirus disease (COVID) remain symptomatic. This syndrome is named PASC. Its etiology is unclear. Dyspnea is a frequent symptom.

Methods: The authors performed CPET and symptom assessment for ME/CFS in 41 patients with PASC 8.9 ± 3.3 months after COVID. All patients had normal pulmonary function tests, chest X-ray, and chest computed tomography scans. Peak oxygen consumption (peak VO2), slope of minute ventilation to CO2 production (VE/VCO2 slope), and end tidal pressure of CO2 (PetCO2) were measured. Ventilatory patterns were reviewed with dysfunctional breathing defined as rapid erratic breathing.

Results: Eighteen men and 23 women (average age: 45 ± 13 years) were studied. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 59% ± 9%. Peak VO2 averaged 20.3 ± 7 mL/kg/min (77% ± 21% predicted VO2). VE/VCO2 slope was 30 ± 7. PetCO2 at rest was 33.5 ± 4.5 mm Hg. Twenty-four patients (58.5%) had a peak VO2 <80% predicted. All patients with peak VO2 <80% had a circulatory limitation to exercise. Fifteen of 17 patients with normal peak VO2 had ventilatory abnormalities including peak respiratory rate >55 (n = 3) or dysfunctional breathing (n = 12). For the whole cohort, 88% of patients (n = 36) had ventilatory abnormalities with dysfunctional breathing (n = 26), increased VE/VCO2 (n = 17), and/or hypocapnia PetCO2 <35 (n = 25). Nineteen patients (46%) met criteria for ME/CFS.

Conclusions: Circulatory impairment, abnormal ventilatory pattern, and ME/CFS are common in patients with PASC. The dysfunctional breathing, resting hypocapnia, and ME/CFS may contribute to symptoms. CPET is a valuable tool to assess these patients.

Source: Mancini DM, Brunjes DL, Lala A, Trivieri MG, Contreras JP, Natelson BH. Use of Cardiopulmonary Stress Testing for Patients With Unexplained Dyspnea Post-Coronavirus Disease. JACC Heart Fail. 2021 Dec;9(12):927-937. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2021.10.002. PMID: 34857177.  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34857177/

Skeletal muscle alterations in patients with acute Covid-19 and post-acute sequelae of Covid-19

Abstract:

Background and methods: Skeletal muscle-related symptoms are common in both acute Covid-19 and Post-Acute Sequelae of Covid-19 (PASC). In this narrative review, we discuss cellular and molecular pathways that are affected, and consider these in regard to skeletal muscle involvement in other conditions, such as acute respiratory distress syndrome, critical illness myopathy and post-viral fatigue syndrome.
Results: Patients with severe Covid-19 and PASC suffer from skeletal muscle weakness and exercise intolerance. Histological sections present muscle fiber atrophy, metabolic alterations, and immune cell infiltration. Contributing factors to weakness and fatigue in patients with severe Covid-19 include systemic inflammation, disuse, hypoxemia, and malnutrition. These factors also contribute to post-ICU syndrome and ICU-acquired weakness, and likely explain a substantial part of Covid-19-acquired weakness. The skeletal muscle weakness and exercise intolerance associated with PASC are more obscure and different factors likely contribute. Direct SARS-CoV-2 viral infiltration into skeletal muscle or an aberrant immune system likely contribute. Similarities between skeletal muscle alterations in PASC and chronic fatigue syndrome deserve further study.
Conclusion: Both SARS-CoV-2 specific factors and generic consequences of acute disease likely underlie the observed skeletal muscle alterations in both acute Covid 19 and PASC.
Source: Soares, M., Eggelbusch, M., Naddaf, E., Gerrits, K., van der Schaaf, M., van den Borst, B., Wiersinga, W. J., et al. Skeletal muscle alterations in patients with acute Covid-19 and post-acute sequelae of Covid-19. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.78509 https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/331064

Intestinal flora and neurological disorders

Abstract:

The human intestinal flora is a highly diverse ecosystem composed of trillions of bacteria. The imbalance of the flora is related to a variety of diseases. The intestinal flora interacts with the nervous system bidirectionally in many ways through the gut-brain axis. It causes neuroimmune inflammatory response, dysfunction of gut mucosa and blood-brain barrier, direct stimulation of the vagus nerve, spinal nerve of the enteric nervous system, and the neuroendocrine hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis, causing neurological disorders. The metabolites of the intestinal microbial community also play a role.

This article summarizes the characteristics of the altered intestinal flora and intervention measures in autism spectrum disorder, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, epilepsy, Guillain-Barré syndrome, Alzheimer’s disease, neuromyelitis optica, hepatic encephalopathy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, schizophrenia, depression, chronic fatigue syndrome, Huntington’s disease and stroke. The current research on intestinal flora is still in its infancy, and very few studies were carried out on causality and the underlying mechanisms, which prevents the development of precise flora-based clinical intervention measures. It is expected the research on intestinal flora would lead to novel approaches for treatment of some neurological disorders.

Source: Tang Q, Cao L. [Intestinal flora and neurological disorders]. Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao. 2021 Nov 25;37(11):3757-3780. Chinese. doi: 10.13345/j.cjb.210253. PMID: 34841782. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34841782/

Post COVID-19 Syndrome in Patients with Asymptomatic/Mild Form

Abstract:

Post COVID-19 Syndrome (PCS) is a complex of various symptoms developing a month or more after the acute phase of the disease. The cases of PCS development among patients with asymptomatic/mild forms are frequently reported; however, the pathogenesis of PCS in this group of patients is still not completely clear. The publications about COVID-19 which were published in online databases from December 2019 to September 2021 are analyzed in this review. According to the analysis, PCS develops on average in 30-60% of patients, mainly among women. Fatigue, shortness of breath, cough, and anosmia were reported as the most common symptoms. The possible association between the described PCS symptoms and brain damage was revealed.

We assume the possibility of an alternative course of COVID-19, which develops in genetically predisposed individuals with a stronger immune response, in which it predominantly affects the cells of the nervous system, possibly with the presence of an autoimmune component, which might have similarity with chronic fatigue syndrome or autoimmune disautonomia. Thus, the gender (female) and the presence of anosmia during an asymptomatic or mild course of the disease can be predictive factors for the development of PCS, which can be caused by autoimmune damage to neurons, glia, and cerebral vessels.

Source: Malkova A, Kudryavtsev I, Starshinova A, Kudlay D, Zinchenko Y, Glushkova A, Yablonskiy P, Shoenfeld Y. Post COVID-19 Syndrome in Patients with Asymptomatic/Mild Form. Pathogens. 2021 Oct 30;10(11):1408. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10111408. PMID: 34832564. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34832564/

Addressing the Long COVID Crisis: Integrative Health and Long COVID

Abstract:

While COVID-19 has killed millions of people globally, its lasting effects on the health and well-being of entire populations are just becoming clear. As many as 30% of those diagnosed with COVID-19 report continuing health-related problems, regardless of the severity of the initial infection. Given the infection rate in the world, that translates to between 5.4 and 17.9 million globally; about 700 000 in the US. The syndrome goes by many names; here we call it “long COVID.” Patients experience a wide range of symptoms, including serious organ system effects such as pulmonary fibrosis, myocarditis, new diabetes diagnoses, stroke, and other cerebrovascular events. They also experience ongoing pain, fatigue, and cognitive dysfunction. We suggest here that these patients require an integrative health approach, one that combines traditional medical management, non-pharmacological approaches, and behavior and lifestyle changes. Such an approach has been shown to be beneficial in other chronic illnesses such as fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, and post-Lyme disease.

Source: Roth A, Chan PS, Jonas W. Addressing the Long COVID Crisis: Integrative Health and Long COVID. Glob Adv Health Med. 2021 Nov 16;10:21649561211056597. doi: 10.1177/21649561211056597. PMID: 34820152; PMCID: PMC8606968. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606968/  (Full text)

Missteps in Creating a Long Haul COVID Case Definition

Excerpt:

Millions of individuals who have not recovered from the COVID virus are now dealing with a host of symptoms that are challenging our health care system. Many are experiencing significant problems in being recognized by health care workers as a real disorder, as for many of them, there are no biological markers of persistent illness. Just as with ME/CFS, we need to be sure that long haul COVID patients are not victimized first by the pandemic and then by the health care skepticism of their significant symptoms. We have the conceptual and theoretical grounding to develop clinical and research case definitions for those with persisting COVID symptoms. Patients must be instrumentally involved in all such efforts as failure to do so will only further delegitimize their condition.

Read the rest of this article HERE.

Source: Leonard Jason, Ph.D. and Vernita Perkins, PhD. Missteps in Creating a Long Haul COVID Case Definition. Psychology Today. Posted November 22, 2021

Post-COVID syndrome: the aftershock of SARS-CoV-2

Introduction:

Significant time has passed since the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic outbreak, which led to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection in hundreds of millions of individuals all around the globe. Accumulation evidence along the pandemic raised an association between the SARS-CoV-2 and autoimmunity (1). SARS-CoV-2 infected patients have a high presence of various autoantibodies (1). Moreover, numerous cases of new-onset of autoimmune-related disorders had been documented following the infection, including both organ-specific and systemic autoimmune diseases (1).

Recent studies focused on analyzing recovered COVID-19 patients demonstrate a broad spectrum of persistent and systemic symptoms, which had got the novel terms of “post-COVID syndrome”, “long COVID” and “chronic COVID-19” (2). This new disorder had led to the understanding that the absence of SARS-CoV-2 following COVID-19 does not necessarily mean full recovery (2).

Studies conducted follow-ups on COVID-19 patients indicate that 50-80% of symptomatic COVID-19 patients who recovered report non-specific symptoms, most commonly fatigue, headache, dyspnea, anosmia, and memory complaint (3–5). An Italian study that examined patients after a mean of 60 days from the first COVID-19 symptom on-set had found only 12.6% of the patients completely recovered; 55% had three or more symptoms, and worsened quality of life was observed among 44% of patients (3). Intriguingly, a systematic review and meta-analysis reported more than 50 possible long-term effects of the SAR-CoV-2 infection (6). The chronic phase of COVID-19 is also presented in objective findings; for example, a study conducted in Germany had found that 78% of recently recovered symptomatic COVID-19 patients had at least one chronic symptom; the most common abnormality was myocardial inflammation (60%) (4).

In this issue of the journal, Bertin D et al. documented a case of post-COVID syndrome with a one-year follow-up. This case describes persistent anti-cardiolipin IgG autoantibodies and eosinopenia with ongoing neurologic symptoms, demonstrating the long-term disease course of COVID-19 in many patients. Anti-cardiolipin autoantibodies and eosinopenia were defined as independent factors associated with COVID-19 severity, indicating their active involvement in the progression of the disease (7,8). Additional studies that included follow-up on recovered COVID-19 patients describe similar findings: patients report respiratory, neurologic, and non-specific symptoms, accompanied by the presents of autoantibodies (6). Interestingly, in a one-year prospective cohort study, neurocognitive symptoms frequency were found significantly higher in patients with ANA titer of ≥1:160 in comparison to <1:160 at 12 months post–COVID-19 symptom onset (9). It should be emphasized that the development of autoantibodies, which appears to be common following symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, could act as the preclinical stage of many autoimmune diseases. Thus, the long-term autoimmune implications of SARS-CoV-2 could be severe.

Involvement of the autonomic nervous system dysfunction in post-COVID syndrome

Many viruses are well known to contribute to autoimmunity in genetically pre dispositioned individuals, such as those with human leukocyte antigen B27 (10). SARS-CoV-2 had been associated with numerous autoantibodies (1); some are believed to be the basis of the severe forms of COVID-19 (11). Furthermore, these autoantibodies, along with others, could lead to the multi-organ involvement of post-COVID syndrome, which manifests as broad and unspecific symptoms (6). Autoantibodies against the autonomic nervous system compounds are believed to be an incremental part of the post-COVID syndrome etiology. A study that included post-COVID syndrome patients had unidentified in all the subjects between 2 and 7 different functionally active autoantibodies that acted as receptor agonists, such as β2-adrenoceptor, α1-adrenoceptor, and angiotensin II receptor type 1 receptor (12). Functionally active autoantibodies such as those were present in several neurological and cardiac disorders, which might clarify the onset of neurological and cardiovascular symptoms of the post-COVID syndrome (12).

Post-COVID patients commonly have a clinical presentation similar to the encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS): severe fatigue, sleep disorders, cognition impairments, and different manifestations of autonomic dysfunction exacerbated in physical exercise (6,13–15). ME/CFS has an autoimmune etiology, which can be demonstrated by high titers of autoantibodies against autonomic receptors, such as beta-adrenergic and muscarinic receptors (16,17). These autoantibodies, similar to those found in patients with post-COVID symptoms, lead to unspecific symptoms due to autonomic nervous system dysregulation. In addition to ME/CFS, many features of the post-COVID syndrome are shared with fibromyalgia patients. It had been shown that 189/616 (30.7%) of COVID-19 recovered patients satisfied the American College of Rheumatology criteria for fibromyalgia, 43.4% of which were men (18).

Therapeutic options and vaccination

ME/CFS and fibromyalgia have solid evidence of dysregulated immune involvement (16,17,19). Moreover, current studies suggest that immunosuppression, such as monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody and cyclophosphamide, may benefit patients suffering from ME/CFS (20,21). Such immunosuppressive therapeutic options can assist in the depletion of B cells, thus reducing the functionally active autoantibodies linked to autonomic dysfunction. Beneficial effects had also been demonstrated by the use of anti-ß2 adrenergic receptor-binding immunoadsorption (22). It should be emphasized that such treatment can diminish other pathogenic antibodies that the medical community had not yet recognized. Due to the possible involvement of autoantibodies against the autonomic nervous system in the post-COVID syndrome, similar immunosuppressive options in these patients may be effective, thereby should be investigated.

Most individuals infected by SARS-CoV-2 are asymptomatic or experience mild symptoms (23,24). While the frequency of post-COVID syndrome in such individuals is still uncertain, it seems to be much lower than in symptomatic patients (9). Thus, avoiding COVID-19 with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination could prominently assist in preventing long-term symptoms of COVID-19, lower the prevalence of post-COVID syndrome and help overcome the pandemic. Nonetheless, even with the ongoing heist mass vaccination programs, the COVID-19 pandemic will leave its mark.

Conclusion

Due to the accumulating evidence of persistent post-infectious symptoms reported by numerous recovered patients, the focus of the medical and research communities might need to start shifting focus from the acute phase of COVID-19 to the chronic manifestations of the SARS-CoV-2 infection, referred to as by “post-COVID syndrome”. Post-COVID syndrome presents as non-specific symptoms, most commonly fatigue, headache, dyspnea, anosmia, and memory complaint, which is suspiciously similar to the infection-induced myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and fibromyalgia (15,18). As current studies suggest an involvement of immune-related dysfunction in the development of post-COVID syndrome, immunosuppressive therapeutic options could be beneficial in parallel to heist SARS-CoV-2 vaccination of the population (15,20,21).

References

  • 1
    Dotan A, Muller S, Kanduc D, David P, Halpert G, Shoenfeld Y. The SARS-CoV-2 as an instrumental trigger of autoimmunity. Autoimmun Rev. 2021 Apr;20(4):102792.
  • 2
    Alwan NA. A negative COVID-19 test does not mean recovery. Nature. 2020 Aug 11;584(7820):170–170.
  • 3
    Carfì A, Bernabei R, Landi F, for the Gemelli Against COVID-19 Post-Acute Care Study Group. Persistent Symptoms in Patients After Acute COVID-19. JAMA. 2020 Aug 11;324(6):603–5.
  • 4
    Puntmann VO, Carerj ML, Wieters I, Fahim M, Arendt C, Hoffmann J, et al. Outcomes of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients Recently Recovered From Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Nov 1;5(11):1265–73.
  • 5
    Mahmud R, Rahman MM, Rassel MA, Monayem FB, Sayeed SKJB, Islam MS, et al. Post-COVID-19 syndrome among symptomatic COVID-19 patients: A prospective cohort study in a tertiary care center of Bangladesh. PLOS ONE. 2021 Apr 8;16(4):e0249644.
  • 6
    Lopez-Leon S, Wegman-Ostrosky T, Perelman C, Sepulveda R, Rebolledo PA, Cuapio A, et al. More than 50 long-term effects of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 9;11(1):16144.
  • 7
    Lindsley AW, Schwartz JT, Rothenberg ME. Eosinophil responses during COVID-19 infections and coronavirus vaccination. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2020 Jul 1;146(1):1-7.
  • 8
    Jizzini M, Shah M, Zhou K. SARS-CoV-2 and Anti-Cardiolipin Antibodies. Clinical Medicine Insights: Case Reports. 2020 Dec;13:1179547620980381.
  • 9
    Seeßle J, Waterboer T, Hippchen T, Simon J, Kirchner M, Lim A, Müller B, Merle U. Persistent Symptoms in Adult Patients 1 Year After Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Prospective Cohort Study. Clinical infectious diseases: an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2021.
  • 10
    Shoenfeld Y, Gilburd B, Abu-Shakra M, Amital H, Barzilai O, Berkun Y, et al. The mosaic of autoimmunity: genetic factors involved in autoimmune diseases–2008. Isr Med Assoc J IMAJ. 2008 Jan;10(1):3–7.
  • 11
    Khamsi R. Rogue antibodies could be driving severe COVID-19. Nature. 2021 Jan 19;590(7844):29–31.
  • 12
    Wallukat G, Hohberger B, Wenzel K, Fürst J, Schulze-Rothe S, Wallukat A, et al. Functional autoantibodies against G-protein coupled receptors in patients with persistent Long-COVID-19 symptoms. J Transl Autoimmun. 2021 Jan 1;4:100100.
  • 13
    Huang C, Huang L, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Gu X, et al. 6-month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from hospital: a cohort study. The Lancet. 2021 Jan 16;397(10270):220–32.
  • 14
    Wostyn P. COVID-19 and chronic fatigue syndrome: Is the worst yet to come? Med Hypotheses. 2021 Jan;146:110469.
  • 15
    Bornstein SR, Voit-Bak K, Donate T, Rodionov RN, Gainetdinov RR, Tselmin S, Kanczkowski W, Müller GM, Achleitner M, Wang J, Licinio J. Chronic post-COVID-19 syndrome and chronic fatigue syndrome: Is there a role for extracorporeal apheresis?. Molecular Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 17:1-4.
  • 16
    Rasa S, Nora-Krukle Z, Henning N, Eliassen E, Shikova E, Harrer T, et al. Chronic viral infections in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). J Transl Med. 2018 Oct 1;16(1):268.
  • 17
    Loebel M, Grabowski P, Heidecke H, Bauer S, Hanitsch LG, Wittke K, Meisel C, Reinke P, Volk HD, Fluge Ø, Mella O. Antibodies to β adrenergic and muscarinic cholinergic receptors in patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Brain, behavior, and immunity. 2016 Feb 1;52:32-9.
  • 18
    Ursini F, Ciaffi J, Mancarella L, Lisi L, Brusi V, Cavallari C, et al. Fibromyalgia: a new facet of the post-COVID-19 syndrome spectrum? Results from a web-based survey. RMD Open. 2021 Aug 1;7(3):e001735.
  • 19
    Rodriguez-Pintó I, Agmon-Levin N, Howard A, Shoenfeld Y. Fibromyalgia and cytokines. Immunol Lett. 2014 Oct;161(2):200–3.
  • 20
    Tölle M, Freitag H, Antelmann M, Hartwig J, Schuchardt M, van der Giet M, et al. Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Efficacy of Repeat Immunoadsorption. J Clin Med. 2020 Aug;9(8):2443.
  • 21
    Rekeland IG, Fosså A, Lande A, Ktoridou-Valen I, Sørland K, Holsen M, et al. Intravenous Cyclophosphamide in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. An Open-Label Phase II Study. Front Med. 2020;7:162.
  • 22
    Scheibenbogen C, Loebel M, Freitag H, Krueger A, Bauer S, Antelmann M, et al. Immunoadsorption to remove ß2 adrenergic receptor antibodies in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome CFS/ME. PloS One. 2018;13(3):e0193672.
  • 23
    Salzberger B, Buder F, Lampl B, Ehrenstein B, Hitzenbichler F, Holzmann T, et al. Epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2. Infection. 2021 Apr;49(2):233–9.
  • 24
    Gao Z, Xu Y, Sun C, Wang X, Guo Y, Qiu S, et al. A systematic review of asymptomatic infections with COVID-19. J Microbiol Immunol Infect Wei Mian Yu Gan Ran Za Zhi. 2021 Feb;54(1):12–6.

The impact of COVID-19 stress on pain and fatigue in people with and without a central sensitivity syndrome

Abstract:

Objectives: Stress may augment somatic symptoms in central sensitivity syndromes (CSS) such as fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, and irritable bowel syndrome. To test this hypothesis, we examined whether the association between COVID-19 stress and somatic symptom severity would be stronger in people with than without CSS and whether psychological flexibility would buffer the impact of this stress on symptom severity.

Methods: In a 2-sample, repeated cross-sectional design, we analysed questionnaire data from Dutch people with and without CSS, collected in two independent surveys: before the COVID-19 pandemic (2018; CSS: n = 194, non-CSS: n = 337) and at the peak of the pandemic (2020; CSS: n = 428, non-CSS: n = 1101). Somatic symptom severity, worry and stress due to the pandemic, and psychological flexibility were examined in regression analyses. Two stress operationalisations were analysed: stress levels during the peak of the pandemic, and a comparison of measurements in 2020 and 2018 (assuming higher stress levels in 2020).

Results: Higher worry and stress during the pandemic (standardized β = 0.14), the presence of a CSS (β = 0.40), and lower psychological flexibility (β = -0.33) were all (p < .0001) associated with more severe somatic symptoms, but the associations of each stress operationalisation with somatic symptoms was not particularly strong in people with CSS (β = -0.026, p = .27; β = -0.037, p = .22), and psychological flexibility (β = -0.025, p = .18; β = 0.076, p = .35) did not buffer this association.

Conclusions: Findings do not support the hypotheses that COVID-19 stress augments somatic symptoms, particularly in CSS, or that psychological flexibility buffers this impact. Rather, COVID-19-related stress appears to have an uncertain impact on somatic symptoms.

Source: Koppert TY, Jacobs JWG, Lumley MA, Geenen R. The impact of COVID-19 stress on pain and fatigue in people with and without a central sensitivity syndrome. J Psychosom Res. 2021 Oct 29;151:110655. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110655. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34739944. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34739944/