Post-COVID-19 syndrome: persistent neuroimaging changes and symptoms 9 months after initial infection

Abstract:

A previously healthy and active middle-aged woman acquired COVID-19 as an occupational exposure with subsequent persistent post-COVID-19 symptoms including headache, dyspnoea on exertion, chest pressure, tachycardia, anosmia, parosmia, persistent myalgia, vertigo, cognitive decline and fatigue. She presented to a tertiary medical centre for further evaluation after 9 months of persistent symptoms and had a largely unremarkable workup with the exception of a persistently elevated monocyte chemoattractant protein 1, blunted cardiovagal response and non-specific scattered areas of low-level hypometabolism at the bilateral frontal, left precuneus, occipital and parietal regions on PET scan.

Source: Grach SL, Ganesh R, Messina SA, Hurt RT. Post-COVID-19 syndrome: persistent neuroimaging changes and symptoms 9 months after initial infection. BMJ Case Rep. 2022 Apr 8;15(4):e248448. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2021-248448. PMID: 35396239. https://casereports.bmj.com/content/15/4/e248448.long (Full text)

The use of amantadine in the prevention of progression and treatment of COVID-19 symptoms in patients infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus (COV-PREVENT): Study rationale and design

Abstract:

Background: COVID-19, a disease caused by infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, is asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic in most cases. Some patients, usually burdened with risk factors develop acute respiratory failure and other organ dysfunction. In such cases, the mortality rate is very high despite the use of intensive therapy. Amantadine has complex activity including antiviral, antiinflammatory and dopaminergic effects. This clinical trial will assess the efficacy and safety of amantadine in the prevention of COVID-19 progression toward acute respiratory failure and neurological complications.

Methods and results: The trial will enroll 200 patients who are positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection and have one or more risk factors for worsening the disease. These patients will be included as hospitalized or ambulatory subjects for early treatment of illness. The recruitment will take place in 8 centers covering different regions of Poland. For 14 days they will be given either 200 mg of amantadine a day or placebo. Our hypothesis is a considerable reduction in the number of patients with progression toward respiratory insufficiency or neurological complications thanks to the treatment of amantadine.

Conclusions: Demonstrating the efficacy and safety of amantadine treatment in improving the clinical condition of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 is of great importance in combating the effects of the pandemic. It has potential to influence on the severity and course of neurological complications, which are very common and persist long after the infection as long-COVID syndrome.

Clinical trial registration: www.

Clinicaltrials: gov identification no. NCT04854759; Eudra CT number: 2021-001144-98 (dated 27 February 2021).

Source: Rejdak K, Fiedor P, Bonek R, Goch A, Gala-Błądzińska A, Chełstowski W, Łukasiak J, Kiciak S, Dąbrowski P, Dec M, Król ZJ, Papuć E, Zasybska A, Segiet A, Grieb P. The use of amantadine in the prevention of progression and treatment of COVID-19 symptoms in patients infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus (COV-PREVENT): Study rationale and design. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Apr 4;116:106755. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106755. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35390511; PMCID: PMC8978450. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8978450/ (Full text)

Small fiber neuropathy underlying dysautonomia in COVID-19 and in post-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and long-COVID syndromes

Letter:

We eagerly read the excellent editorial by Gemignani and the corresponding original article by Abrams et al. about the suspected involvement of small fibers (small fiber neuropathy [SFN]) in acute severe, acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections and in long-coronavirus disease (COVID) syndrome.12 It was speculated that at least some of the clinical manifestations of long-COVID syndrome could be attributed to involvement of small nerve fibers by the viral infection. The authors believe that studies are needed that investigate the role of autonomic dysfunction in long-COVID syndrome and the prevalence of SFN by means of the 13-item SFN symptom inventory questionnaire. The papers are appealing but raise some concerns that require discussion.

I do not agree with the notion that long-COVID syndrome is the same as post-COVID syndrome.1 Acute COVID-19 usually lasts one to 4 wk. Subacute COVID-19 lasts 5 to 12 wk. When clinical manifestations of COVID-19 persist beyond 12 wk, the condition is termed post-COVID syndrome. Both subacute COVID-19 and post-COVID syndrome are included under the overarching term long-COVID-syndrome. Differentiating long-COVID syndrome from post-COVID-syndrome is crucial for their management and for assessing long-term outcomes.

An issue not addressed in the paper is Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) due to an infection with SARS-CoV-2.3 There is ample evidence that the immune response to the virus can trigger autoimmune reactions, including those that are involved in the development of GBS. There is evidence accumulating that mRNA- and vector-based anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines can trigger the development of GBS.4 GBS can affect not only motor and sensory fibers, but also peripheral autonomic fibers, particularly in the GBS subtype of acute motor and sensory axonal neuropathy (AMSAN). There is a subtype of GBS that may exclusively affect autonomic fibers and present with pure dysautonomia.5 Because GBS may be mild, it can go unrecognized; because patients often have a long recovery time, autonomic manifestations in long COVID syndrome could be explained by incomplete recovery from autonomic involvement in abortive GBS.

Not addressed in the articles is the involvement of the central autonomic nervous system (ANS). There are several reports demonstrating that a SARS-CoV-2 infection can be complicated by hypophysitis.6 Furthermore, patients with a pre-existing pituitary micro- or macro-adenoma have an increased risk of pituitary apoplexy during SARS-CoV-2 infection.7 Accordingly, the hypophysial-pituitary-adrenergic axis can be impaired,8 thus leading to autonomic dysfunction.

Autonomic dysfunction may not always be recognized by those involved in the management of COVID-19 patients. Thus, patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection are often not investigated sufficiently for their symptoms of autonomic dysfunction, such as insomnia, fatigue, cognitive impairment, hypersensitivity to light, blurred vision, dry eyes or mouth, drooling, palpitations, syncope, orthostatic dizziness, hot flashes, dysphagia, bowel or bladder dysfunction, sexual dysfunction, changes in skin, hair, and nails, or abnormalities of sweating. Studies that may be performed to assess ANS involvement are a contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pituitary gland, determination of releasing factors, pituitary stimulating hormones, and hormones of peripheral endocrine organs, and diagnostic testing for involvement of the peripheral ANS. Several of the latter tests are not widely available and their sensitivity and specificity may be low if portions of the peripheral ANS are tested that are not affected.

Not addressed was the role of anti-COVID-19 drugs in the development of SFN. There is increasing evidence that some of the compounds administered to infected patients are neurotoxic and can be responsible for polyneuropathy. Some of these compounds, such as lopinavir, ritonavir, daptomycin, and linezolid, may also damage autonomic fibers.

I agree that there is a need to investigate the involvement of the central and peripheral ANS in some patients with acute SARS-CoV-2 infections or long-COVID syndrome. Such patients should be investigated not only by use of questionnaires and the Quantitative Sudomotor Axon Reflex Test (QSART) but particularly by quantitative sensory testing (QST), micro-neurography of C-fibers of the superficial peroneal nerve, sensory stimulation tests, the deep breathing test, the Valsalva maneuver, tilt testing, cerebral blood flow velocity measurements, pain-related evoked potentials (PREP), laser speckle contact analysis (LASCA), laser Doppler flowmetry, laser Doppler imaging, contact heat-evoked potentials (CHEP), corneal confocal microscopy (CCM), and proximal or distal skin biopsy stained with protein gene product (PGP) 9.5. Furthermore, hormone levels should be determined and autopsy of COVID-19 patients should include histological investigations of central and peripheral autonomic pathways.

Source: Finsterer J. Small fiber neuropathy underlying dysautonomia in COVID-19 and in post-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and long-COVID syndromes. Muscle Nerve. 2022 Apr 6. doi: 10.1002/mus.27554. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35385125.  https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mus.27554 (Full text)

COVID-19 patients require multi-disciplinary rehabilitation approaches to address persisting symptom profiles and restore pre-COVID quality of life

Abstract:

Background: Long-COVID diagnosis is prominent, and our attention must support those experiencing debilitating and long-standing symptoms. To establish patient pathways, we must consider the societal and economic impacts of sustained COVID-19. Accordingly, we sought to determine the pertinent areas impacting quality of life (QoL) following a COVID-19 infection.

Research methods: Three hundred and eighty-one participants completed a web-based survey (83% female, 17% male) consisting of 70 questions across 7 sections (demographics, COVID-19 symptoms; QoL; sleep quality; breathlessness; physical activity and mental health). Mean age, height, body mass and body mass index (BMI) were 42 ± 12 years, 167.6 ± 10.4 cm, 81.2 ± 22.2 kg, and 29.1 ± 8.4 kg.m2, respectively.

Results: Participant health was reduced because of COVID-19 symptoms (‘Good health‘ to ‘Poor health‘ [< 0.001]). Survey respondents who work reported ongoing issues with performing moderate (83%) and vigorous (79%) work-related activities.

Conclusions: COVID-19 patients report reduced capacity to participate in activities associated with daily life, including employment activities. Bespoke COVID-19 support pathways must consider multi-disciplinary approaches that address the holistic needs of patients to restore pre-pandemic quality of life and address experienced health and wellbeing challenges.

Plain Language Summary: The long-term impact of long-COVID has a dramatic impact upon daily activities and lifestyle. The development of bespoke support pathways to support patients must address the physical and psychological considerations to adequately restore pre-COVID quality of life and address broader societal and economic implications, especially for those that are of working age.

Source: Faghy MA, Maden-Wilkinson T, Arena R, Copeland RJ, Owen R, Hodgkins H, Willmott A. COVID-19 patients require multi-disciplinary rehabilitation approaches to address persisting symptom profiles and restore pre-COVID quality of life. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2022 Apr 18:1-6. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2022.2063843. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35385677. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17476348.2022.2063843 (Full text)

Studying severe long COVID to understand post-infectious disorders beyond COVID-19

To the Editor — As the COVID Human Genetic Effort consortium (https://www.covidhge.com/), we have studied genetic and immunological determinants of life-threatening COVID-19 pneumonia1, multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C)2, resistance to SARS-CoV-2 infection3 and ‘COVID toes’4, and here we present our efforts to investigate post-acute COVID-19 syndrome, or ‘long COVID’.

Most people infected with SARS-CoV-2 experience a mild to moderate acute infection, while ~10% develop hypoxemic pneumonia and 3% develop critical illness, which are outcomes associated with older age and male sex. Inborn errors of type I interferon immunity involving the viral sensors TLR7 or TLR3 can explain critical disease in 1–5% of people less than 60 years of age, whereas neutralizing autoantibodies to the type I interferons IFN-α, IFN-β and IFN-ω are seen in 15–20% of people over 70 years of age1, which highlights the importance of type I interferon immunity for protective immunity against acute SARS-CoV-2 infection in the respiratory tract.

Although hypoxemic pneumonia typically occurs 2 weeks after infection, a small fraction of children and young adults develop MIS-C at about 4 weeks after infection. This disorder overlaps Kawasaki disease and superantigen-mediated toxic shock syndrome. Immunological analyses have revealed hyperinflammatory immune responses, distinct from those of acute COVID-19 and Kawasaki disease5, and activation of T cells, possibly by a SARS-CoV-2 superantigen6. There is massive expansion of T cells expressing the T cell receptor (TCR) β-chain variable region TRBV11-2 in combination with variable TCR α-chains and broadly reactive autoantibodies2. Intriguingly, the delayed presentation of MIS-C after infection is at odds with other superantigen-mediated disorders, which might be explained by viral persistence specifically in the intestine and repeated superantigen-mediated activation through a leaky gut. Viral persistence has been proposed to be associated with the degree of activation of the immune system during acute infection with SARS-CoV-27.

Signs and symptoms after SARS-CoV-2 infection have been reported to also persist even longer in some children and adults. The World Health Organization defines the ‘post COVID’ condition as one that “occurs in individuals with a history of probable or confirmed SARS CoV-2 infection, usually 3 months from the onset of COVID-19 with symptoms and that last for at least 2 months and cannot be explained by an alternative diagnosis” (https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-Post_COVID-19_condition-Clinical_case_definition-2021.1). Long COVID spans from very mild to severely debilitating disease with objective organ damage, but sometimes the distinction between recovery from post–intensive care unit syndrome and ongoing pathology is not clearly defined or reported in studies.

Interestingly, an acute multi-organ phenotype encompassing multiple neurological, neuropsychological–neurocognitive, cardiopulmonary, gastrointestinal and dermatological complaints during acute COVID-19 correlates with longer persistence of signs and symptoms8.

The World Health Organization’s definition of long COVID is vague, which leads to concerns that a variety of conditions, including psychosomatic complaints, become intermixed with more severe, post-infectious organ dysfunction. To maximize our chances of identifying the human genetic immunological determinants of disease, we will focus our efforts on the most severe cases of long COVID available through our international network of collaborators and clinics. We will include patients with over 3 months of persistent signs and symptoms after PCR-verified SARS-CoV-2 infection. We will also limit our studies to patients with severe organ damage or dysfunction that can be objectively verified by imaging and physiological or biochemical–molecular tests (Fig. 1a). Finally, to distinguish these patients with severe long COVID from patients with post–critical illness syndromes, we will include only patients whose persistent organ dysfunction cannot be explained by the severity of the preceding SARS-CoV-2 infection or by the treatments or medical interventions experienced.

Read the rest of this article HERE.

Source: Brodin P, Casari G, Townsend L, O’Farrelly C, Tancevski I, Löffler-Ragg J, Mogensen TH, Casanova JL; COVID Human Genetic Effort. Studying severe long COVID to understand post-infectious disorders beyond COVID-19. Nat Med. 2022 Apr 5. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01766-7. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35383311. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-022-01766-7 (Full article)

Long COVID and long chain fatty acids (LCFAs): Psychoneuroimmunity implication of omega-3 LCFAs in delayed consequences of COVID-19

Abstract:

The global spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has led to the lasting pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and the post-acute phase sequelae of heterogeneous negative impacts in multiple systems known as the “long COVID.” The mechanisms of neuropsychiatric complications of long COVID are multifactorial, including long-term tissue damages from direct CNS viral involvement, unresolved systemic inflammation and oxidative stress, maladaptation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and coagulation system, dysregulated immunity, the dysfunction of neurotransmitters and hypothalamus–pituitaryadrenal (HPA) axis, and the psychosocial stress imposed by societal changes in response to this pandemic. The strength of safety, well-acceptance, and accumulating scientific evidence has now afforded nutritional medicine a place in the mainstream of neuropsychiatric intervention and prophylaxis.

Long chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (omega-3 or n-3 PUFAs) might have favorable effects on immunity, inflammation, oxidative stress and psychoneuroimmunity at different stages of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Omega-3 PUFAs, particularly EPA, have shown effects in treating mood and neurocognitive disorders by reducing pro-inflammatory cytokines, altering the HPA axis, and modulating neurotransmission via lipid rafts. In addition, omega-3 PUFAs and their metabolites, including specialized pro-resolvin mediators, accelerate the process of cleansing chronic inflammation and restoring tissue homeostasis, and therefore offer a promising strategy for Long COVID. In this article, we explore in a systematic review the putative molecular mechanisms by which omega-3 PUFAs and their metabolites counteract the negative effects of long COVID on the brain, behavior, and immunity.

Source: Yang CP, Chang CM, Yang CC, Pariante CM, Su KP. Long COVID and long chain fatty acids (LCFAs): Psychoneuroimmunity implication of omega-3 LCFAs in delayed consequences of COVID-19. Brain Behav Immun. 2022 Apr 4;103:19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2022.04.001. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35390469; PMCID: PMC8977215. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8977215/ (Full text)

Reducing fatigue-related symptoms in Long COVID-19: a preliminary report of a lymphatic drainage intervention

Abstract:

In the early days of the first global wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, the potential for a postviral syndrome to manifest following COVID-19 infection was first recognized. Here, we present an analysis of a case series of the first 20 patients’ data collected in clinical practice to evaluate the potential of a possible alternative treatment for Long COVID.

Methods: Face-to-face treatment sessions with Perrin technique practitioners occurred weekly involving effleurage/other manual articulatory techniques. The individuals being treated also undertook daily self-massage along with gentle mobility exercises. Patients recorded symptom severity using the self-report 54-item profile of fatigue-related states (PFRS) before and after treatment.

Results: The mean age of male patients was 41.8 years (range, 29-53 years), and for female patients, 39.3 years (range, 28-50 years). None of the participants had a prior diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome, and all were new attendees to the clinics at the time of initial assessment. The average number of treatment sessions was 9.7 in men and 9.4 in women. The reduction in PFRS scores was 45% in men and 52% in women. The highest subscale scores on average were for fatigue, with the lowest for somatic symptoms. All subscale scores showed, on average, a similar reduction of approximately 50% postintervention, with the reduction in score relating to a decrease in the severity of symptoms.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that a specific manual lymphatic drainage intervention may help to reduce fatigue symptoms related to Long COVID. Perhaps preventing acute symptoms through early intervention.

Source: H Heald A, Perrin R, Walther A, Stedman M, Hann M, Mukherjee A, Riste L. Reducing fatigue-related symptoms in Long COVID-19: a preliminary report of a lymphatic drainage intervention. Cardiovasc Endocrinol Metab. 2022 Apr 12;11(2):e0261. doi: 10.1097/XCE.0000000000000261. PMID: 35441129; PMCID: PMC9010124. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9010124/ (Full text)

COVCOG 2: Cognitive and Memory Deficits in Long COVID: A Second Publication From the COVID and Cognition Study

Abstract:

COVID-19, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has been often characterized as a respiratory disease. However, it is increasingly being understood as an infection that impacts multiple systems, and many patients report neurological symptoms. Indeed, there is accumulating evidence for neural damage in some individuals, with recent studies suggesting loss of gray matter in multiple regions, particularly in the left hemisphere. There are several mechanisms by which the COVID-19 infection may lead to neurological symptoms and structural and functional changes in the brain, and cognitive problems are one of the most commonly reported symptoms in those experiencing Long COVID – the chronic illness following the COVID-19 infection that affects between 10 and 25% of patients. However, there is yet little research testing cognition in Long COVID.

The COVID and Cognition Study is a cross-sectional/longitudinal study aiming to understand cognitive problems in Long COVID. The first paper from the study explored the characteristics of our sample of 181 individuals who had experienced the COVID-19 infection, and 185 who had not, and the factors that predicted ongoing symptoms and self-reported cognitive deficits.

In this second paper from the study, we assess this sample on tests of memory, language, and executive function. We hypothesize that performance on “objective” cognitive tests will reflect self-reported cognitive symptoms. We further hypothesize that some symptom profiles may be more predictive of cognitive performance than others, perhaps giving some information about the mechanism. We found a consistent pattern of memory deficits in those that had experienced the COVID-19 infection, with deficits increasing with the severity of self-reported ongoing symptoms. Fatigue/Mixed symptoms during the initial illness and ongoing neurological symptoms were predictive of cognitive performance.

Source: Guo P, Benito Ballesteros A, Yeung SP, Liu R, Saha A, Curtis L, Kaser M, Haggard MP, Cheke LG. COVCOG 2: Cognitive and Memory Deficits in Long COVID: A Second Publication From the COVID and Cognition Study. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Mar 17;14:804937. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.804937. PMID: 35370620; PMCID: PMC8967943. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8967943/ (Full study)

COVCOG 1: Factors Predicting Physical, Neurological and Cognitive Symptoms in Long COVID in a Community Sample. A First Publication From the COVID and Cognition Study

Abstract:

Since its first emergence in December 2019, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has evolved into a global pandemic. Whilst often considered a respiratory disease, a large proportion of COVID-19 patients report neurological symptoms, and there is accumulating evidence for neural damage in some individuals, with recent studies suggesting loss of gray matter in multiple regions, particularly in the left hemisphere.

There are a number of mechanisms by which COVID-19 infection may lead to neurological symptoms and structural and functional changes in the brain, and it is reasonable to expect that many of these may translate into cognitive problems. Indeed, cognitive problems are one of the most commonly reported symptoms in those experiencing “Long COVID”-the chronic illness following COVID-19 infection that affects between 10 and 25% of patients. The COVID and Cognition Study is a part cross-sectional, part longitudinal, study documenting and aiming to understand the cognitive problems in Long COVID. In this first paper from the study, we document the characteristics of our sample of 181 individuals who had experienced COVID-19 infection, and 185 who had not.

We explore which factors may be predictive of ongoing symptoms and their severity, as well as conducting an in-depth analysis of symptom profiles. Finally, we explore which factors predict the presence and severity of cognitive symptoms, both throughout the ongoing illness and at the time of testing. The main finding from this first analysis is that that severity of initial illness is a significant predictor of the presence and severity of ongoing symptoms, and that some symptoms during the initial illness-particularly limb weakness-may be more common in those that have more severe ongoing symptoms. Symptom profiles can be well described in terms of 5 or 6 factors, reflecting the variety of this highly heterogenous condition experienced by the individual. Specifically, we found that neurological/psychiatric and fatigue/mixed symptoms during the initial illness, and that neurological, gastrointestinal, and cardiopulmonary/fatigue symptoms during the ongoing illness, predicted experience of cognitive symptoms.

Source: Guo P, Benito Ballesteros A, Yeung SP, Liu R, Saha A, Curtis L, Kaser M, Haggard MP, Cheke LG. COVCOG 1: Factors Predicting Physical, Neurological and Cognitive Symptoms in Long COVID in a Community Sample. A First Publication From the COVID and Cognition Study. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Mar 17;14:804922. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.804922. PMID: 35370617; PMCID: PMC8968323. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8968323/ (Full text)

Obesity and lipid metabolism disorders determine the risk for development of long COVID syndrome: a cross-sectional study from 50,402 COVID-19 patients

Abstract:

Purpose: Metabolic disorders have been identified as major risk factors for severe acute courses of COVID-19. With decreasing numbers of infections in many countries, the long COVID syndrome (LCS) represents the next major challenge in pandemic management, warranting the precise definition of risk factors for LCS development.

Methods: We identified 50,402 COVID-19 patients in the Disease Analyzer database (IQVIA) featuring data from 1056 general practices in Germany. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for the development of LCS.

Results: Of the 50,402 COVID-19 patients included into this analysis, 1,708 (3.4%) were diagnosed with LCS. In a multivariate regression analysis, we identified lipid metabolism disorders (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.28-1.65, p < 0.001) and obesity (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.08-1.44, p = 0.003) as strong risk factors for the development of LCS. Besides these metabolic factors, patients’ age between 46 and 60 years (compared to age ≤ 30, (OR 1.81 95% CI 1.54-2.13, p < 0.001), female sex (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.20-1.47, p < 0.001) as well as pre-existing asthma (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.39-2.00, p < 0.001) and depression (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.09-1.47, p = < 0.002) in women, and cancer (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.09-1.95, p = < 0.012) in men were associated with an increased likelihood of developing LCS.

Conclusion: Lipid metabolism disorders and obesity represent age-independent risk factors for the development of LCS, suggesting that metabolic alterations determine the risk for unfavorable disease courses along all phases of COVID-19.

Source: Loosen SH, Jensen BO, Tanislav C, Luedde T, Roderburg C, Kostev K. Obesity and lipid metabolism disorders determine the risk for development of long COVID syndrome: a cross-sectional study from 50,402 COVID-19 patients. Infection. 2022 Mar 30:1–6. doi: 10.1007/s15010-022-01784-0. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35355237; PMCID: PMC8966865. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8966865/ (Full text)