A machine learning approach identifies distinct early-symptom cluster phenotypes which correlate with hospitalization, failure to return to activities, and prolonged COVID-19 symptoms

Abstract:

Background: Accurate COVID-19 prognosis is a critical aspect of acute and long-term clinical management. We identified discrete clusters of early stage-symptoms which may delineate groups with distinct disease severity phenotypes, including risk of developing long-term symptoms and associated inflammatory profiles.

Methods: 1,273 SARS-CoV-2 positive U.S. Military Health System beneficiaries with quantitative symptom scores (FLU-PRO Plus) were included in this analysis. We employed machine-learning approaches to identify symptom clusters and compared risk of hospitalization, long-term symptoms, as well as peak CRP and IL-6 concentrations.

Results: We identified three distinct clusters of participants based on their FLU-PRO Plus symptoms: cluster 1 (“Nasal cluster”) is highly correlated with reporting runny/stuffy nose and sneezing, cluster 2 (“Sensory cluster”) is highly correlated with loss of smell or taste, and cluster 3 (“Respiratory/Systemic cluster”) is highly correlated with the respiratory (cough, trouble breathing, among others) and systemic (body aches, chills, among others) domain symptoms. Participants in the Respiratory/Systemic cluster were twice as likely as those in the Nasal cluster to have been hospitalized, and 1.5 times as likely to report that they had not returned-to-activities, which remained significant after controlling for confounding covariates (P < 0.01). Respiratory/Systemic and Sensory clusters were more likely to have symptoms at six-months post-symptom-onset (P = 0.03). We observed higher peak CRP and IL-6 in the Respiratory/Systemic cluster (P < 0.01).

Conclusions: We identified early symptom profiles potentially associated with hospitalization, return-to-activities, long-term symptoms, and inflammatory profiles. These findings may assist in patient prognosis, including prediction of long COVID risk.

Source: Epsi NJ, Powers JH, Lindholm DA, Mende K, Malloy A, Ganesan A, Huprikar N, Lalani T, Smith A, Mody RM, Jones MU, Bazan SE, Colombo RE, Colombo CJ, Ewers EC, Larson DT, Berjohn CM, Maldonado CJ, Blair PW, Chenoweth J, Saunders DL, Livezey J, Maves RC, Sanchez Edwards M, Rozman JS, Simons MP, Tribble DR, Agan BK, Burgess TH, Pollett SD; EPICC COVID-19 Cohort Study Group. A machine learning approach identifies distinct early-symptom cluster phenotypes which correlate with hospitalization, failure to return to activities, and prolonged COVID-19 symptoms. PLoS One. 2023 Feb 9;18(2):e0281272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281272. PMID: 36757946; PMCID: PMC9910657. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9910657/ (Full text)

Symptom patterns and life with post-acute COVID-19 in children aged 8-17: a mixed methods studyprotocol

Abstract:

Background: While there is a substantial body of knowledge about acute COVID-19, less is known about long-COVID, where symptoms continue beyond four weeks.

Aim: This study aims to describe longer-term effects of COVID-19 infection in children and young people (CYP) and identify their needs in relation to long-COVID.

Design & setting: This study comprises an observational prospective cohort study and a linked qualitative study, identifying participants aged 8-17 years in the West Midlands of England.

Method: CYP will be invited to complete online questionnaires to monitor incidences and symptoms of Covid-19 over a 12-month period. CYP who have experienced long-term effects of COVID will be invited to interview, and those currently experiencing symptoms will be asked to document their experiences in a diary. Professionals who work with CYP will be invited to explore the impact of long-COVID on the wider experiences of CYP, in a focus group. Descriptive statistics will be used to describe the incidence and rates of resolution of symptoms, and comparisons made between exposed and non-exposed groups. Logistic regression models will be used to estimate associations between candidate predictors and the development of long-COVID, and linear regression will be used to estimate associations between candidate predictors. Qualitative data will be analysed thematically using the constant comparison method.

Conclusion: This study will describe features and symptoms of long-COVID and explore the impact of long-COVID within the lives of CYP and their families, to provide better understanding of long-COVID and inform clinical practice.

Source: Faux-Nightingale A, Burton C, Twohig H, Blagojevic-Bucknall M, Carroll W, Chew-Graham CA, Dunn K, Gilchrist F, Helliwell T, Lawton O, Lawton S, Mallen C, Saunders B, van der Windt D, Welsh V. Symptom patterns and life with post-acute COVID-19 in children aged 8-17: a mixed methods studyprotocol. BJGP Open. 2023 Feb 9:BJGPO.2022.0149. doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0149. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36759021. https://bjgpopen.org/content/early/2023/02/08/BJGPO.2022.0149 (Full text available as PDF file)

A case of post-COVID-19 myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome characterized by post-exertional malaise and low serum acylcarnitine level

Abstract:

COVID-19 afflicts patients with acute symptoms and longer term sequelae. One of the sequelae is myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), which is often difficult to diagnose, having no established tests. In this article, we synthesize information from literature reviews on patients with ME/CSF that developed after recovery from COVID-19.

Source: Jinushi R, Nishiguchi S, Masuda S, Sasaki A, Koizumi K, Ryozawa S. A case of post-COVID-19 myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome characterized by post-exertional malaise and low serum acylcarnitine level. Clin Case Rep. 2023 Feb 10;11(2):e6930. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.6930. PMID: 36789311; PMCID: PMC9913186. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9913186/ (Full text)

As a doctor with long covid, I feel abandoned by the NHS

NHS workers with long covid should be given adequate sick pay and the support to work if they can

The covid-19 pandemic has thrown a spotlight on the treatment of NHS staff and their perceived value to their employers. As a recent episode of the BBC’s Panorama programme showed, many NHS staff now find themselves abandoned and in a precarious financial position after being infected with covid-19—most likely at work. The episode, “Forgotten Heroes of the Covid Front Line,” interviewed NHS staff struggling with the ongoing health effects of covid-19 infection, uncovering the stories of people who, despite being too sick to work, are facing reduced sick pay or losing their jobs. For some staff, this has already happened.

An estimated two million people in the UK have long covid,1 including many thousands of NHS workers, so why do we hear so little about it? As a doctor in the NHS who is one of those affected, I’m disappointed by the collective silence and the lack of protections and support mechanisms in place. NHS workers had to put their health and lives on the line when the virus broke out, with only a weekly clap to bolster them. Yet the public’s support hid underlying questions about the inadequacy of the personal protective equipment given to frontline workers in the UK and troubling attitudes to the risks we’d expose these people to.

UK guidance told healthcare workers that flimsy plastic aprons and masks we could see through were enough to protect us when clearly they weren’t. NHS staff had no choice but to continue working and caring for patients, so we carried on. I will never forget the fear in the eyes of those I cared for, and the dawning reality of the virus we were facing as cases continued to climb and more people were admitted to hospital.

I was relatively young, fit, and healthy when the pandemic began. I didn’t take any medications or have a pre-existing illness. I had nothing to worry about, I was told. But I was worried and wanted to protect my family. After coming home from a shift in the community covid hub, I’d strip off in the front porch, put my clothes straight in the washing machine, and shower. Of course, now that we understand more about the transmission of covid-19, I know why this wasn’t enough. Within a few weeks of working during the first wave of the pandemic, I was sick and stuck in bed, my oxygen levels dropping whenever I stood or walked.

Initially, I carried on working, struggling to manage a few hours here and there. One key feature of everyone I know with long covid is that we “pushed through” the initial stages of our illness, believing that we could get better by carrying on and ignoring our bodies. As a doctor, the system I worked in and the martyr complex instilled by medical culture enabled that view. In medicine, being ill, being human, and looking after ourselves is still too often seen as a kind of failure or weakness.

Being a doctor was how I defined my life, but eventually I was unable to carry on working. Now I’m in constant pain. I struggle to sit, walk, or play with my children. Like thousands of other people, I face the stark reality of being left behind—thrown away because I am now disabled.

The contrast in the way that healthcare workers have been treated is stark: from being lauded as heroes when needed by the system and government to being abandoned if they can now no longer work in the way they once did. Where is the leadership from the top, insisting that we care for those who were harmed by covid while working?

NHS workers—from doctors to porters, cleaners to nurses—have held the service together with their goodwill for years. But the personal costs of this are often too great. Even before the pandemic, I frequently neglected my needs or personal life for work. I miscarried at work, and continued with my clinic, not even giving myself time for a brief cry in the toilet. I missed a friend’s funeral because they were not a “first degree relative.” The covid-19 pandemic, and the swell of recognition it prompted for the value of healthcare workers, should have helped us reset these priorities and provide more support for staff. Yet this opportunity hasn’t been taken up by the government or NHS employers and is typified in the response to staff with long covid.

Like many people with long covid, I struggle living in a world where covid-19 has been declared “over” even though I still have not recovered my former health and more people are falling ill all the time. NHS staff, especially those with long covid or other covid-19 sequelae, should be protected from further infections and not have to fear for our lives going to work nearly three years on. Research has shown that FFP3 masks reduce the risk of covid-19 infection2: those who wish to wear them should be given them and supported.

Staff with long covid still have a lot to contribute to the NHS, which is beset by workforce shortages, but they need compassion and understanding. Many workers with long covid are desperately trying to return to work, but they must be met with flexibility and support. Instead of setting rigid time frames, NHS trusts should work with us to use our skills. This will mean making reasonable adjustments where they can, such as offering reduced duties, shorter hours, or the opportunity to work from home where possible.

The NHS has needed to challenge the organisational attitude of “work first, person second” for a long time. It can make a start by providing workers with long covid with adequate sick pay or compensation and the support to work if they are able to. Many of these people are ill because they were trying to save other people’s lives, without looking after their own. To neglect them now because they can no longer provide the same level of productivity is shameful.

Source: BMJ 2023;380:p337 https://www.bmj.com/content/380/bmj.p337 (Full text)

Potential molecular mechanisms of chronic fatigue in long haul COVID and other viral diseases

Abstract:

Historically, COVID-19 emerges as one of the most devastating diseases of humankind, which creates an unmanageable health crisis worldwide. Until now, this disease costs millions of lives and continues to paralyze human civilization’s economy and social growth, leaving an enduring damage that will take an exceptionally long time to repair.

While a majority of infected patients survive after mild to moderate reactions after two to six weeks, a growing population of patients suffers for months with severe and prolonged symptoms of fatigue, depression, and anxiety. These patients are no less than 10% of total COVID-19 infected individuals with distinctive chronic clinical symptomatology, collectively termed post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) or more commonly long-haul COVID. Interestingly, Long-haul COVID and many debilitating viral diseases display a similar range of clinical symptoms of muscle fatigue, dizziness, depression, and chronic inflammation.

In our current hypothesis-driven review article, we attempt to discuss the molecular mechanism of muscle fatigue in long-haul COVID, and other viral diseases as caused by HHV6, Powassan, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and HIV. We also discuss the pathological resemblance of virus-triggered muscle fatigue with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS).

Source: Gottschalk CG, Peterson D, Armstrong J, Knox K, Roy A. Potential molecular mechanisms of chronic fatigue in long haul COVID and other viral diseases. Infect Agent Cancer. 2023 Feb 7;18(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13027-023-00485-z. PMID: 36750846; PMCID: PMC9902840. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9902840/ (Full text)

Long COVID manifests with T cell dysregulation, inflammation, and an uncoordinated adaptive immune response to SARS-CoV-2

Abstract:

Long COVID (LC), a type of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), occurs after at least 10% of SARS-CoV-2 infections, yet its etiology remains poorly understood. Here, we used multiple “omics” assays (CyTOF, RNAseq, Olink) and serology to deeply characterize both global and SARS-CoV-2-specific immunity from blood of individuals with clear LC and non-LC clinical trajectories, 8 months following infection and prior to receipt of any SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Our analysis focused on deep phenotyping of T cells, which play important roles in immunity against SARS-CoV-2 yet may also contribute to COVID-19 pathogenesis.

Our findings demonstrate that individuals with LC exhibit systemic inflammation and immune dysregulation. This is evidenced by global differences in T cell subset distribution in ways that imply ongoing immune responses, as well as by sex-specific perturbations in cytolytic subsets. Individuals with LC harbored increased frequencies of CD4+ T cells poised to migrate to inflamed tissues, and exhausted SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T cells. They also harbored significantly higher levels of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, and in contrast to non-LC individuals, exhibited a mis-coordination between their SARS-CoV-2-specific T and B cell responses.

Collectively, our data suggest that proper crosstalk between the humoral and cellular arms of adaptive immunity has broken down in LC, and that this, perhaps in the context of persistent virus, leads to the immune dysregulation, inflammation, and clinical symptoms associated with this debilitating condition.

Source: Kailin Yin, Michael J. Peluso, Reuben Thomas, Min Gyoung Shin, Jason Neidleman, Xiaoyu Luo, Rebecca Hoh, Khamal Anglin, Beatrice Huang, Urania Argueta, Monica Lopez, Daisy Valdivieso, Kofi Asare, Rania Ibrahim, Ludger Ständker, Scott Lu, Sarah A. Goldberg, Sulggi A. Lee, Kara L. Lynch, J. Daniel Kelly, Jeffrey N. Martin, Jan Münch, Steven G. Deeks, Timothy J. Henrich, Nadia R. Roan. Long COVID manifests with T cell dysregulation, inflammation, and an uncoordinated adaptive immune response to SARS-CoV-2. bioRxiv 2023.02.09.527892; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.09.527892 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.02.09.527892v1.full (Full text)

Vascular Function, Systemic Inflammation, and Coagulation Activation 18 Months after COVID-19 Infection: An Observational Cohort Study

Abstract:

Introduction: Among its effect on virtually all other organs, COVID-19 affects the cardiovascular system, potentially jeopardizing the cardiovascular health of millions. Previous research has shown no indication of macrovascular dysfunction as reflected by carotid artery reactivity, but has shown sustained microvascular dysfunction, systemic inflammation, and coagulation activation at 3 months after acute COVID-19. The long-term effects of COVID-19 on vascular function remain unknown.
Materials and Methods: This cohort study involved 167 patients who participated in the COVAS trial. At 3 months and 18 months after acute COVID-19, macrovascular dysfunction was evaluated by measuring the carotid artery diameter in response to cold pressor testing. Additionally, plasma endothelin-1, von Willebrand factor, Interleukin(IL)-1ra, IL-6, IL-18, and coagulation factor complexes were measured using ELISA techniques.
Results: The prevalence of macrovascular dysfunction did not differ between 3 months (14.5%) and 18 months (11.7%) after COVID-19 infection (p = 0.585). However, there was a significant decrease in absolute carotid artery diameter change, 3.5% ± 4.7 vs. 2.7% ± 2.5, p—0.001, respectively. Additionally, levels of vWF:Ag were persistently high in 80% of COVID-19 survivors, reflecting endothelial cell damage and possibly attenuated endothelial function. Furthermore, while levels of the inflammatory cytokines interleukin(IL)-1RA and IL-18 were normalized and evidence of contact pathway activation was no longer present, the concentrations of IL-6 and thrombin:antithrombin complexes were further increased at 18 months versus 3 months (2.5 pg/mL ± 2.6 vs. 4.0 pg/mL ± 4.6, p = 0.006 and 4.9 μg/L ± 4.4 vs. 18.2 μg/L ± 11.4, p < 0.001, respectively).
Discussion: This study shows that 18 months after COVID-19 infection, the incidence of macrovascular dysfunction as defined by a constrictive response during carotid artery reactivity testing is not increased. Nonetheless, plasma biomarkers indicate sustained endothelial cell activation (vWF), systemic inflammation (IL-6), and extrinsic/common pathway coagulation activation (FVII:AT, TAT) 18 months after COVID-19 infection.
Source: Willems LH, Jacobs LMC, Groh LA, ten Cate H, Spronk HMH, Wilson-Storey B, Hannink G, van Kuijk SMJ, Ghossein-Doha C, Nagy M, Thijssen DHJ, van Petersen AS, Warlé MC. Vascular Function, Systemic Inflammation, and Coagulation Activation 18 Months after COVID-19 Infection: An Observational Cohort Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12(4):1413. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041413 https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/4/1413 (Full text)

Potential of Nano-Antioxidants and Nanomedicine for Recovery from Neurological Disorders Linked to Long COVID Syndrome

Abstract:

Long-term neurological complications, persisting in patients who cannot fully recover several months after severe SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus infection, are referred to as neurological sequelae of the long COVID syndrome. Among the numerous clinical post-acute COVID-19 symptoms, neurological and psychiatric manifestations comprise prolonged fatigue, “brain fog”, memory deficits, headache, ageusia, anosmia, myalgias, cognitive impairments, anxiety, and depression lasting several months.
Considering that neurons are highly vulnerable to inflammatory and oxidative stress damages following the overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS), neuroinflammation and oxidative stress have been suggested to dominate the pathophysiological mechanisms of the long COVID syndrome. It is emphasized that mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress damages are crucial for the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative disorders. Importantly, antioxidant therapies have the potential to slow down and prevent disease progression.
However, many antioxidant compounds display low bioavailability, instability, and transport to targeted tissues, limiting their clinical applications. Various nanocarrier types, e.g., liposomes, cubosomes, solid lipid nanoparticles, micelles, dendrimers, carbon-based nanostructures, nanoceria, and other inorganic nanoparticles, can be employed to enhance antioxidant bioavailability.
Here, we highlight the potential of phytochemical antioxidants and other neuroprotective agents (curcumin, quercetin, vitamins C, E and D, melatonin, rosmarinic acid, N-acetylcysteine, and Ginkgo Biloba derivatives) in therapeutic strategies for neuroregeneration. A particular focus is given to the beneficial role of nanoparticle-mediated drug-delivery systems in addressing the challenges of antioxidants for managing and preventing neurological disorders as factors of long COVID sequelae.
Source: Akanchise T, Angelova A. Potential of Nano-Antioxidants and Nanomedicine for Recovery from Neurological Disorders Linked to Long COVID Syndrome. Antioxidants. 2023; 12(2):393. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12020393 https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3921/12/2/393 (Full text)

Stuttering-Like Dysfluencies as a Consequence of Long COVID-19

Abstract:

Purpose: We present two patients who developed neurogenic stuttering after long COVID-19 related to SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Methods and results: Both patients experienced both physical (e.g., fatigue) and cognitive difficulties, which led to impaired function of attention, lexical retrieval, and memory consolidation. Both patients had new-onset stuttering-like speech dysfluencies: Blocks and repetitions were especially evident at the initial part of words and sentences, sometimes accompanied by effortful and associated movements (e.g., facial grimaces and oro-facial movements). Neuropsychological evaluations confirmed the presence of difficulties in cognitive tasks, while neurophysiological evaluations (i.e., electroencephalography) suggested the presence of “slowed” patterns of brain activity. Neurogenic stuttering and cognitive difficulties were evident for 4-5 months after negativization of SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal swab, with gradual improvement and near-to-complete recovery.

Conclusions: It is now evident that SARS-CoV-2 infection may significantly involve the central nervous system, also resulting in severe and long-term consequences, even if the precise mechanisms are still unknown. In the present report, long COVID-19 resulted in neurogenic stuttering, as the likely consequence of a “slowed” metabolism of (pre)frontal and sensorimotor brain regions (as suggested by the present and previous clinical evidence). As a consequence, the pathophysiological mechanisms related to the appearance of neurogenic stuttering have been hypothesized, which help to better understand the broader and possible neurological consequences of COVID-19.

Source: Furlanis G, Busan P, Formaggio E, Menichelli A, Lunardelli A, Ajcevic M, Pesavento V, Manganotti P. Stuttering-Like Dysfluencies as a Consequence of Long COVID-19. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Feb 7:1-16. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00381. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36749838. https://pubs.asha.org/doi/10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00381 (Full text)

Long COVID in cancer patients: preponderance of symptoms in majority of patients over long time period

Abstract:

Background: An increasing number of observational studies have reported the persistence of symptoms following recovery from acute COVID-19 disease in non-cancer patients. The long-term consequences of COVID-19 are not fully understood particularly in the cancer patient population. The purpose of this study is to assess post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) in cancer patients following acute COVID-19 recovery.

Methods: We identified cancer patients at MD Anderson Cancer Center who were diagnosed with COVID-19 disease between March 1, 2020 and Sept 1, 2020 and followed them till May 2021. To assess PASC, we collected patients reported outcomes through questionnaires that were sent to patients daily for 14 days after COVID-19 diagnosis then weekly for 3 months, and then monthly thereafter. We also reviewed patients’ electronic medical records to capture the persistence or emergence of new COVID19-related symptoms reported during any clinic or hospital encounter beyond 30 days of the acute illness and up to 14 months.

Results: We included 312 cancer patients with a median age of 57 years (18-86). The majority of patients had solid tumors (75%). Of the 312 patients, 188 (60%) reported long COVID-19 symptoms with a median duration of 7 months and up to 14 months after COVID-19 diagnosis. The most common symptoms reported included fatigue (82%), sleep disturbances (78%), myalgias (67%) and gastrointestinal symptoms (61%), followed by headache, altered smell or taste, dyspnea (47%) and cough (46%). A higher number of females reported a persistence of symptoms compared to males (63% vs 37%; p=0.036). Cancer type, neutropenia, lymphocytopenia, and hospital admission during acute COVID-19 disease were comparable in both groups. Among the 188 patients with PASC, only 16 (8.5%) were readmitted for COVID-related reasons.

Conclusions: More than one out of two cancer patients, and more likely females, report PASC that may persist beyond 6 months and even one year. The most common symptoms are non-respiratory and consist of fatigue, sleep disturbance, myalgia and gastro-intestinal symptoms. Most of the cancer patients with PASC were managed on outpatient basis with only 8,5% requiring a COVID-19 related re-admission.

Source: Dagher H, Chaftari AM, Subbiah IM, Malek AE, Jiang Y, Lamie P, Granwehr B, John T, Yepez E, Borjan J, Reyes-Gibby C, Flores M, Khawaja F, Pande M, Ali N, Rojo R, Karp DD, Chaftari P, Hachem R, Raad II. Long COVID in cancer patients: preponderance of symptoms in majority of patients over long time period. Elife. 2023 Feb 7;12:e81182. doi: 10.7554/eLife.81182. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36748905. https://elifesciences.org/articles/81182 (Full text)