Category: Medical Care

A patient perspective on enduring symptoms – the unmet need

Abstract:

This short paper illustrates the lived experience of individuals with severe enduring symptoms: chronic, often debilitating conditions for which no clear medical explanation currently exists. Drawing on qualitative interviews, the paper highlights the profound suffering, isolation, and lack of medical support experienced by this underserved population. It examines the systemic barriers to care, including stigma, the absence of follow-up services, and the traumatising nature of some healthcare encounters, which can lead to healthcare avoidance even in the face of potentially life-threatening symptoms. It concludes with a call for improved training for clinicians, increased capacity within NHS services, and ring-fenced funding for biomedical research.
Source: Katharine Cheston. A patient perspective on enduring symptoms – the unmet need. Future Healthcare Journal: Volume 12, Issue 4, 2025, 100465. ISSN 2514-6645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fhj.2025.100465. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2514664525002462 (Full text)

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS): diagnosis and management

Abstract:

Background: Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) has garnered substantial scientific and clinical interest, due to its rising global prevalence and significant pathophysiological overlap with post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS). This review systematically elucidates the prevailing diagnostic criteria, summarizes recent advances in understanding the potential pathophysiological mechanisms, and evaluates pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, and symptom-based assessment and management strategies.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for articles published from inception to August 2025.

Results: Current diagnostic frameworks for ME/CFS rely primarily on clinical symptomatology and lack definitive biomarkers. Immune dysregulation, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and neuroinflammation are central to its pathology. Pharmacological management includes immunomodulatory treatments, antioxidant therapies, mitochondrial support, and neuroinflammation intervention. Non-pharmacological strategies such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), graded exercise therapy (GET), activity pacing, and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) complement biomedical approaches by alleviating symptom severity and promoting energy conservation.

Conclusion: Among these approaches, CBT serves as an adjunctive therapy for symptom management rather than a curative one, whereas GET is contraindicated due to its potential for harm. Comprehensive clinical assessment and management of ME/CFS requires being symptom oriented and the recognition of individual differences. Recommended directions for future research include developing biomarker-based diagnostic tools, optimizing combination therapies that target multiple pathophysiological pathways simultaneously, and integrating real-world data and digital health technologies for precise monitoring and management of ME/CFS.

Source: Fan J, Jiao J, Chang HQ, Zhong DL, Liu XB, Li J, Chen LM, Jin RJ, Wu X. Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS): diagnosis and management. J Transl Med. 2025 Dec 9. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-07506-y. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 41366804. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12967-025-07506-y

Contested and neglected: Social and medical marginalization in severe Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Highlights:

  • Severe ME/CFS patients face deep social, medical, and structural exclusion.
  • Delegitimation of illness leads to isolation, distress, and denied support.
  • Gendered stigma shapes how women’s pain is dismissed in health care.
  • Twitter (now X) offers access to the voices of an otherwise unreachable patient group.
  • This study urges reforms in care, disability access, and illness recognition.

Abstract:

This study addresses the persistent invisibility of people with severe Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) in research by centering their voices and examining how social and institutional forces shape their lives. As a medically contested illness, ME/CFS—especially in its severe form—renders patients both physically incapacitated and socially invisible.
Drawing on qualitative content analysis of 342 tweets under the hashtag #severeME, we identify how contested legitimacy, gendered stigma, and systemic marginalization structure the daily realities of 161 individuals with severe ME/CFS or their caregivers. Our findings highlight profound functional debilitation, emotional isolation, and exclusion from care and disability systems. We argue for the urgent need to legitimize contested illnesses, reform models of care, and extend disability protections to restore dignity and support to this neglected population.
Source: Bita Nezamdoust, Erin Ruel. Contested and neglected: Social and medical marginalization in severe Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Social Science & Medicine, Volume 388, 2026, 118766. ISSN 0277-9536. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625010974 (Full text)

Telehealth as a care solution for homebound people: systematic review and meta-analysis of healthcare utilization, quality of life, and well-being outcomes

Abstract:

Homebound individuals residing in community settings with severe health conditions and disabilities could arguably benefit from telehealth interventions. However, the effectiveness of telehealth compared to in-person care remains underexplored, considering the diversity of these groups. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of telehealth in reducing healthcare utilization and improving health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and well-being in homebound populations.

Adhering and expanding on a published protocol, we conducted comprehensive search across multiple databases: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, LILACS, and the Web of Science, with no restrictions on language or publication date, and experimental and quasiexperimental studies considered. Eleven independent reviewers were responsible for study selection, and three for data extraction. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using JBI checklists. A meta-analysis was then performed using Stata software, which reported standardized mean differences (SMDs) as the effect measure, with the quality of evidence evaluated using the GRADE approach. From an initial screening of 3289 articles, ten studies met our inclusion criteria, with eight suitable for meta-analysis. These studies encompassed data from 2245 participants.

Our findings revealed that telehealth interventions significantly reduced healthcare utilization (SMD: −0.49; 95% CI: −0.76 to −0.22; p < 0.01, GRADE: low certainty), significantly enhanced HRQOL (SMD: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.35; p = 0.04, GRADE: moderate certainty), and significantly improved well-being (SMD: −0.31; 95% CI: −0.47 to −0.15; p < 0.01, GRADE: moderate certainty) compared to in-person care. Thus, telehealth emerges as a viable alternative to conventional care, significantly reducing healthcare utilization and enhancing both HRQOL and well-being for homebound people.

These findings underscore the potential of telehealth to mitigate healthcare disparities and emphasize the need for accessible, equitable telehealth services codeveloped with end users and relevant stakeholders to save resources and maximize health outcomes for vulnerable populations in community settings.

Source: Pinero de Plaza, Maria Alejandra, Gulyani, Aarti, Bulto, Lemma N., Allande-Cussó, Regina, Pearson, Vincent, Lange, Belinda, Marin, Tania, Gebremichael, Lemlem, Brown, Shannon, Dafny, Hila, Sajeev, Shelda, Bulamu, Norma, Beleigoli, Alline, Nesbitt, Katie, McMillan, Penelope, Clark, Robyn, Tieu, Matthew, Kitson, Alison, Champion, Stephanie, Hines, Sonia, Hendriks, Jeroen M., Telehealth as a Care Solution for Homebound People: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Healthcare Utilization, Quality of Life, and Well-Being Outcomes, Health & Social Care in the Community, 2025, 7224151, 32 pages, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1155/hsc/7224151 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1155/hsc/7224151 (Full text)

Reframing Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS): Biological Basis of Disease and Recommendations for Supporting Patients

Abstract:

Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) is a worldwide challenge. There are an estimated 17-24 million patients worldwide, with an estimated 60 percent or more who have not been diagnosed. Without a known cure, no specific curative medication, disability lasting years to being life-long, and disagreement among healthcare providers as to how to most appropriately treat these patients, ME/CFS patients are in need of assistance. Appropriate healthcare provider education would increase the percentage of patients diagnosed and treated; however, in-school healthcare provider education is limited.

To address the latter issue, the New Jersey Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Association (NJME/CFSA) has developed an independent, incentive-driven, learning program for students of the health professions. NJME/CFSA offers a yearly scholarship program in which applicants write a scholarly paper on an ME/CFS-related topic. The efficacy of the program is demonstrated by the 2024-2025 first place scholarship winner’s essay, which addresses the biological basis of ME/CFS and how the healthcare provider can improve the quality of life of ME/CFS patients.

For the reader, the essay provides an update on what is known regarding the biological underpinnings of ME/CFS, as well as a medical student’s perspective as to how the clinician can provide care and support for ME/CFS patients. The original essay has been slightly modified to demonstrate that ME/CFS is a worldwide problem and for publication.

Source: Agarwal P, Friedman KJ. Reframing Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS): Biological Basis of Disease and Recommendations for Supporting Patients. Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 5;13(15):1917. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151917. PMID: 40805949. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/13/15/1917 (Full text)

Assessing the influence of lived-experience experts on healthcare providers in a virtual community of practice: a qualitative study

Abstract:

Long COVID, myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), and other poorly understood post-acute infection syndromes (PAIS) can present with unexplained symptoms or conditions that may be misunderstood by healthcare providers, causing delays in diagnosis and care. To address these issues, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funded the Long COVID and Fatiguing Illness Recovery Program (LC&FIRP), initiated as a pilot project to assess whether providing tele-mentoring and other online education for primary care providers could help them improve the quality of life and support the recovery of their patients with these conditions.

The LC&FIRP multi-disciplinary team-based care approach is built on the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) learning model, which is an evidence-based virtual learning framework developed by the University of New Mexico and designed to disseminate and implement best practices, especially in under-resourced areas. A distinctive feature of LC&FIRP was the inclusion of lived-experience experts. To explore the influence of lived-experience experts on the care patients received, we collected the educational recommendations provided by the lived-experience experts during webinar sessions (January 2022-March 2024) and grouped these by themes.

The major themes that emerged included validation of patients’ illness experience; attitudes and beliefs about Long COVID, ME/CFS, and PAIS; understanding patients’ challenges and communicating with empathy; navigating referrals; recognizing and supporting disability; and supporting self-care. Investigators also interviewed patients of the Family Health Centers of San Diego (FHCSD) about their experiences receiving care from participating primary care providers and employed content analysis methods to code interview transcripts to identify themes among patients’ perspectives. Positive comments from the patients about topics emphasized by the lived-experience experts provided evidence of providers’ uptake and application of the experts’ recommendations and support the value of involving lived-experience experts in medical education to improve health services.

Source: Weaver SS, Carry M, Bertolli J, Godino J, Struminger B, Taren D, Scott JD, Sharp SP, Samaniego J, Bean DR, Issa A, Lin JS, Unger ER, Ramers CB. Assessing the influence of lived-experience experts on healthcare providers in a virtual community of practice: a qualitative study. Front Health Serv. 2025 Jun 27;5:1562651. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1562651. PMID: 40656206; PMCID: PMC12245761. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12245761/ (Full text)

Patient experiences of remote consulting with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis and fibromyalgia: a qualitative study

Abstract:

Background: Remote and digital consulting in primary care has rapidly expanded since March 2020. It is important to understand patient experiences, particularly for those living with complex long-term conditions, to identify how care can best be delivered, including within the remote space.

Aim: To explore the experiences of people living with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) and fibromyalgia when consulting remotely in primary care.

Design & setting: Semi-structured interviews with patients living with CFS/ME and fibromyalgia in general practice in England.

Method: Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 13 participants. The interviews were transcribed and analysed thematically according to a Foucauldian theoretical framework.

Results: All participants highlighted needing to feel believed by clinicians. Many reported difficulties with telephone and online consulting owing to the lack of physical communication. Positive outcomes were reported when there was a good relationship with a clinician. Continuity in care and recognising the complexity of these conditions were also considered important.

Conclusion: This study allowed people living with CFS/ME and fibromyalgia to describe their experiences when consulting remotely. Participants highlighted needing to feel listened to and felt they benefited from an ongoing relationship with a clinician although this was difficult to achieve when consulting remotely. Some advantages of remote consulting were reported, particularly when symptoms were troublesome. Flexible access systems, with a range of consultation modalities or preferred clinician(s) availability, could improve healthcare encounters, particularly given the increased use of remote consulting in primary care.

Source: Leach H, Eccles A, Chew-Graham CA, Atherton H. Patient experiences of remote consulting with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis and fibromyalgia: a qualitative study. BJGP Open. 2025 Apr 24;9(1):BJGPO.2024.0079. doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0079. PMID: 39191480; PMCID: PMC12137999. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12137999/ (Full text)

Reframing beliefs about their illness does not lead to recovery of tube-fed patients with very severe ME/CFS. Analysis of the BMJ article by Miller et al

Abstract:

The narrative which is presented by Miller et al. as new, has dominated the field of ME/CFS for the last 35 years. It has been tested by numerous studies and has been found to be ineffective and harmful, as concluded by for example NICE in 2021. Additionally, it does not lead to objective improvement and it has a negative instead of a positive effect on work and disability status.

What has happened over the last 35 years is that severely ill patients have been ridiculed, gaslit and ignored by the medical profession. These patients have lost hope in the part of the medical profession which has been instrumental in doing and promoting that. They have not lost hope to recover and they are all hoping to get effective pharmacological treatments sooner rather than later as changing their mindset does not lead to recovery. And if it does, then the diagnosis of ME/CFS was simply wrong.

Source: Vink, Mark and Vink-Niese, Friso, Reframing beliefs about their illness does not lead to recovery of tube-fed patients with very severe ME/CFS. Analysis of the BMJ article by Miller et al. (June 06, 2025). No., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5284667 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5284667 (Full text available as PDF file)

Ignored, dismissed, and minimized: Understanding the harmful consequences of invalidation in health care-A systematic meta-synthesis of qualitative research

Abstract:

The upsurge in the prevalence of contested, ambiguous, and difficult-to-diagnose illnesses presents challenges for clinicians who too often respond by invalidating patients’ symptoms. Although numerous qualitative studies have reported the effects of invalidation on patients’ psychological and behavioral outcomes, this body of research has not been systematically reviewed. Informed by Linehan’s (1993) conceptualization of invalidation, this systematic review elucidated the negative consequences, of symptom invalidation, or the dismissal or minimization of a person’s experiences with illness.

We reviewed 151 qualitative reports representing 11,307 individuals with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, endometriosis, fibromyalgia syndrome, Gulf War syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome, long COVID, multiple chemical sensitivity, myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, and vulvodynia.

Consistent with Linehan’s theorizing, thematic analysis identified four broad classes of consequences: induced emotional states and beliefs (e.g., shame, suicidality), induced health care emotional states and beliefs (e.g., health care-related anxiety and trauma), induced health care behavior (e.g., health care system avoidance), and diagnostic delay.

Informed by these findings, we developed a novel conceptual model explaining how symptom invalidation leads to these consequences and thereby undermines health outcomes. Future work should explore the proposed conceptual model and identify theoretically informed interventions and policies aimed at preventing symptom invalidation to improve psychological, behavioral, and health outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

Source: Bontempo AC, Bontempo JM, Duberstein PR. Ignored, dismissed, and minimized: Understanding the harmful consequences of invalidation in health care-A systematic meta-synthesis of qualitative research. Psychol Bull. 2025 Apr;151(4):399-427. doi: 10.1037/bul0000473. PMID: 40310228. https://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/2026-10154-001.html (Full text)

Awareness and Perception of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Among Pain Specialists: A Questionnaire-Based Study

Abstract:

Background: This study aims to explore the perceptions and clinical approaches of pain management specialists toward myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), a condition characterized by persistent fatigue, widespread pain, unrefreshing sleep, and autonomic dysfunction. Given the challenges in diagnosis and management, pain specialists may play a pivotal role in symptom relief. By identifying variations in evaluation and treatment practices, this study seeks to enhance the recognition of ME/CFS and improve its clinical management within pain medicine.

Material and methods: The questionnaire was distributed in printed form to 250 pain specialists in Turkey. Given the limited number of pain physicians in the country, the study aimed to encompass all actively practicing specialists. The survey included four demographic questions, eight true-false questions, 12 multiple-choice questions, and four rating-scale questions. Data were collected anonymously. Data were analyzed using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS, version 27.0; IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY), with descriptive statistics and chi-square (χ²) tests applied to examine the relationships between awareness levels and attitudinal variables.

Results: In Turkey, 106 pain medicine physicians (42.4%) participated in the study. The average age was 40.6±8.52 years. Among the participants, 39.6% had previously heard of myalgic encephalomyelitis. Physicians were inclined to first ask the question, “Do you think you get enough sleep at night?” when evaluating these patients, with a rate of 63.2%. The majority of participants (65.9%) stated that they “occasionally” or “rarely” considered the relationship between fatigue and orthostatic intolerance. Additionally, 37.7% believed that this disease is a subtype of depression. The statement, “chronic fatigue decreases with intense aerobic exercise,” was agreed upon by 50.9% of participants. This controversial statement was particularly more common among those who were unaware of ME/CFS’s alternative name (p=0.009) and those who did not take dysautonomic disorders into account (p=0.048). When considering an ME/CFS diagnosis, physicians most frequently referred patients to the physical medicine and rehabilitation department (32.1%). Those who preferred not to refer patients to any department (12.3%) tended to find it appropriate for a patient to seek consultation at a pain medicine clinic due to widespread body pain and fatigue (χ2=11.405, p=0.044).

Conclusion: This study is the first questionnaire-based research assessing pain physicians’ awareness and attitudes toward ME/CFS. By highlighting their perspectives on its evaluation and management, our findings may improve recognition and clinical approaches to ME/CFS. Future research should focus on education and standardized guidelines to enhance patient care.

Source: Uygun GG, Gözükızıl ST, Bilen A. Awareness and Perception of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Among Pain Specialists: A Questionnaire-Based Study. Cureus. 2025 Mar 23;17(3):e81030. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81030. PMID: 40264626; PMCID: PMC12013460. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12013460/ (Full text)