Category: Medical Care

Patient-Generated Data as Interventions in Doctor-Patient Relationships? Negotiating (Un)Invited Participation in Medical Consultations

Abstract:

Health data generated by apps and devices are increasingly popular and expected to affect various aspects of doctor-patient relationships. No longer confined to medically authorised and certified health technologies, a range of biomedical data-from heart rate to blood pressure or oxygen saturation-are captured and processed by consumer health devices. This article outlines different responses of physicians to patients collecting data with popular consumer devices and considers how the data may challenge or reify medical authority.

Based on semi-structured interviews with doctors and chronically ill patients in Germany from 2021 to 2023, we compare cases from diabetes, sleep disorders, cardiovascular conditions, obesity and ME/CFS and explore when, how and for what reasons different medical specialists consider patient-generated data (PGD) from consumer devices in outpatient settings.

Their response registers vary: whereas some physicians reject PGD that seem to compete with their diagnostic activities, others tolerate the data (collection), whereas still others more readily include them into their diagnostic practices. This suggests nuanced strategies for navigating the demarcation between accepting or rejecting ‘uninvited’ participation through PGD from consumer apps and devices.

Source: Augst AK, Lämmerhirt D, Schubert C. Patient-Generated Data as Interventions in Doctor-Patient Relationships? Negotiating (Un)Invited Participation in Medical Consultations. Sociol Health Illn. 2024 Nov 14. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13864. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39540662. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9566.13864 (Full text)

Expanded autonomic testing helps to pinpoint cases of orthostatic intolerance

News:

Using expanded, state-of-the-art capabilities in autonomic testing, Peter Novak, MD, PhD, Chief of the Division of Autonomic Neurology in the Department of Neurology, is driving better understanding of hard-to-diagnose patients with orthostatic intolerance.

The debilitating condition is among the most common neurological conditions affecting women in the United States ages 35 or younger. While knowledge of orthostatic intolerance has become more nuanced in recent years, diagnosing some patients’ symptoms when changing from lying to standing (dizziness, weakness and shortness of breath, with or without rapid heartbeat) has remained elusive.

The identification of postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) in the early 1990s led to clearer diagnosis of many patients. But the syndrome, by definition, excludes those who do not experience tachycardia. To address their symptoms, these patients sometimes are prescribed antianxiety or antidepressant medications.

To better understand these patients, Dr. Novak turned to continuous monitoring of end tidal CO2 and CBFv (cerebral blood flow velocity). As the technologies became available for clinical use, Novak added them to routine testing. The results led him to identify two new syndromes relating to orthostatic dizziness.

“We can now diagnose people who were previously thought to have psychiatric illness or had no diagnosis at all,” says Dr. Novak, of the Department of Neurology, one of only a few departments in the United States that has a Division of Autonomic Neurology.

In addition to continuous monitoring of heart rate and blood pressure that is standard for Valsalva maneuver and tilt-table tests, Dr. Novak’s Autonomic Testing Lab, located at Brigham and Women’s Faulkner Hospital, also measures and interprets end tidal CO2 and CBFv during these tests. Through testing, he has characterized two new syndromes:

  • Hypocapnic cerebral hypoperfusion (HYCH) is a novel syndrome of low CBFv that Novak described in late 2018 in PLoS ONE, as a biomarker of orthostatic intolerance. HYCH can be detected during a tilt test, in patients without orthostatic tachycardia, hypotension, arrhythmia, vascular abnormalities or other causes of abnormal orthostatic CBFv. “This is POTS without the T,” explains Dr. Novak. “These people have normal BP and normal heart rate. But they have the same low blood flow as in POTS due to vasoconstrictive effect of hypocapnia (low end tidal CO2). This is the main reason to monitor blood flow. Otherwise you can miss what is going on with this the patient, and the patient could be misdiagnosed as having a psychiatric illness.” The Autonomic Testing Lab currently sees at last two patients each month who meet the criteria of HYCH. Treatment is similar to that of patients with POTS (combination of exercise, diet and medication for more severe cases), since HYCH and POTS are probably on a spectrum of the same disorder.
  • Orthostatic Cerebral Hypoperfusion Syndrome (OCHOS) is a syndrome of orthostatic intolerance associated with low CBFv that Dr. Novak first described in 2016. In this syndrome, the orthostatic cerebral blood flow is reduced while all other variables are normal. OCHOS can be disabling. Many patients respond to volume expansion or cerebral vasodilators, but the optimal therapy has yet to be found.

Both OCHOS and HYCH are described among the 100 case studies in Dr. Novak’s recently published book Autonomic Testing, (Oxford University Press, April 2019), intended as a practical manual for performing and interpreting autonomic testing. Each case study includes the testing evaluation, results (with visual images to guide test interpretations) and recommendations for treatment and follow-up. Nearly all cases show results of the newer techniques of continuous CBFv and CO2 monitoring concurrent with traditional heart rate and blood pressure testing. “Together, they are more valuable than separately,” Dr. Novak explains.

The combination of classic autonomic tests (Valsalva maneuver, deep breathing and tilt test) enhanced by using of continuous CBFv and CO2 monitoring together make up “the Brigham Protocol.” In addition, the protocol includes non-invasive skin biopsies, now routinely performed in the lab to assess direct small fiber damage, which may indicate inflammation that is treatable. “We call it autonomic testing, but it is more than that at our institution,” says Dr. Novak.

Since 2015, the Autonomic Testing Lab has performed autonomic testing on approximately 1,300 people, about half of them for orthostatic symptoms, says Dr. Novak.

For questions about autonomic testing or if you have a patient who would benefit from autonomic testing, learn more here.

Virtual reality education on myalgic encephalomyelitis for medical students and healthcare professionals: a pilot study

Abstract:

Introduction: Myalgic encephalomyelitis/ chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a chronic condition which may be characterised by debilitating fatigue, post-exertional malaise, unrefreshing sleep, and cognitive difficulties. ME/CFS has significant negative impact on quality of life for those living with the condition. This may be exacerbated by a lack of knowledge within healthcare regarding the condition. Previous research has found that immersive virtual reality (VR) educational experiences within healthcare education can increase knowledge and empathy.

Methods: The present study employed a quasi-experimental pre-test-post-test design to investigate the impact of a short immersive VR educational experience on knowledge of ME/CFS and empathy for those living with the condition. The VR experience placed participants into a virtual scene which told real life stories of the experience of people living with ME/CFS and their families. 43 participants completed in this pilot study: 28 medical students and 15 primary care health professionals. Participants completed measures of knowledge of ME/CFS and empathy before and after engagement with the experience.

Results: A statistically significant increase was found for levels of knowledge (p < .001, d = 0.74) and empathy (p < .001, d = 1.56) from pre-VR experience levels to post-VR experience levels with a medium and large effect size, respectively. Further analysis revealed no statistically significant difference between baseline levels of knowledge of ME/CFS between healthcare professionals and medical students.

Discussion: The present study is the first to explore the use of this short immersive VR experience as an education tool within healthcare to increase knowledge of ME/CFS, and empathy for those living with the condition. Findings allude to the previously established lack of knowledge of ME/CFS within healthcare although promisingly the increases in knowledge and empathy found suggest that this immersive VR experience has potential to address this. Such changes found in this small-scale pilot study suggest that future research into the use of VR as an educational tool within this setting may be beneficial. Use of a control group, and larger sample size as well as investigation of retention of these changes may also enhance future research.

Source: Anderson T, Duffy G, Corry D. Virtual reality education on myalgic encephalomyelitis for medical students and healthcare professionals: a pilot study. BMC Med Educ. 2024 Sep 17;24(1):1018. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05990-2. PMID: 39289650; PMCID: PMC11409778. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11409778/ (Full text)

ANZMES Releases Essential Resource for Healthcare Professionals to Manage Hospital Stays of Severe ME/CFS and long COVID Patients

Press Release:

 by 

ANZMES (the National Advisory on ME/CFS and a RNZCGP registered provider of continuing education) has released a short reference guide for secondary care. The resource acts as a guide for healthcare professionals in managing hospital stays for patients suffering from severe-very severe Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) and long COVID (lC). It aims to improve patient care by addressing the unique needs and symptoms of patients with severe ME/CFS and lC during their hospital admissions.

“ME/CFS is a complex condition and its severity is often misunderstood by healthcare professionals. Severe patients are housebound. Very severe patients are bedbound, with very high needs requiring 24/7 care. Hospitalisation often occurs due to undernutrition, infections, and dysautonomic issues. Therefore, it is crucial that healthcare professionals have the knowledge to effectively manage patients during hospital admissions so as not to exacerbate their severe and debilitating symptoms,” says ANZMES president, Fiona Charlton.

“Our aim with this new resource is to provide a clear and concise reference guide for healthcare professionals to enhance patient care. While the assessment and evaluation of long COVID may differ from ME/CFS, the management of long COVID closely mirrors it, so we have leveraged our medical team’s expertise to develop a guide to support the effective care of these patients in a hospital setting.” She says.

The resource outlines essential strategies for managing severe symptoms, including intense muscle and joint pain, extreme sensitivity to light, sound, touch, and chemicals, impaired mobility often necessitating a wheelchair, severe gastrointestinal issues, and increased susceptibility to infections due to immune dysfunction.

“For very severe patients, a light touch of the arm can be interpreted by the body as pain. Bright light can cause post-exertional malaise. People with very severe ME/CFS and long COVID spend the majority of their lives in darkened rooms, wearing noise cancelling headphones and eye masks. They are unable to eat properly, or bathe and toilet themselves without full time carers, and it is often a family member who assumes this role.” The impact of this on everyone cannot be underestimated.

An overview of key recommendations include:

  • Sensory Adjustments: Dim lighting, minimise noise, and provide private rooms to reduce sensory stress.
  • Medication and Nutrition: Avoid histamine-releasing anaesthetics and muscle relaxants. Use medications like propofol, midazolam, and fentanyl with caution. Monitor hydration and consider IV saline for orthostatic intolerance.[1]
  • Activity and Rest: Recognise that even minimal interactions, such as being spoken to or exposure to light, can trigger PEM. Prioritise rest and avoid any unnecessary activity.
  • Communication and Cognitive Support: Involve family and caregivers as representatives, especially when the patient cannot communicate; or simplify communication by providing written instructions and allowing extra time for patients to process information.
  • Care and Support: Recognise the psychological impact, validate the severity of conditions, and provide access to counselling and mental health support. Include family members or caregivers in discussions and allow them to stay with the patient if requested.

ANZMES emphasises the importance of personalised care plans, the involvement of patient’s family members and their regular health team to understand the severity of their condition. The guide also encourages connections with local support groups and resources for additional advocacy and support for not only patients, but also their carers to avoid burnout. Remote consultations and home visits are recommended to avoid unnecessary hospital admissions.

ANZMES president, Fiona Charlton concludes “We believe that education is key to improving outcomes for patients with severe-very severe ME/CFS and long COVID. By providing this resource, we aim to enhance the knowledge and confidence of healthcare professionals so they are equipped when these patients are admitted under their care.”

Understanding ME/CFS and long COVID:

Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) is a long-term, multi-systemic illness affecting the nervous, endocrine, autonomic, and immune systems. Patients experience severe fatigue, post-exertional malaise (PEM), unrefreshing sleep, cognitive impairment, and orthostatic intolerance. With over 100-200+ potential symptoms, the condition’s impact can vary greatly, making diagnosis and management highly individualised. Roughly 25% of all ME/CFS cases are categorised as mild, 50% as moderate-severe and 25% as very severe.[2] [3]

Long COVID is characterised by persistent, unexplained symptoms following infection with COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) lasting more than 12 weeks and not explained by an alternative diagnosis. Both conditions share symptoms such as extreme fatigue, cognitive dysfunction, and post-exertional symptom exacerbation (PESE), with up to 50% of long COVID cases fitting the diagnostic criteria for ME/CFS.

Post-Exertional Malaise (PEM)

Post-Exertional Malaise (PEM), also referred to as post-exertional symptom exacerbation (PESE) in the context of long COVID, is a debilitating response to normal, every-day activities in people with ME/CFS. For individuals with severe-very severe ME/CFS or lC, this can be triggered by sensory overload, such as exposure to light or even simple conversations. Repeated episodes of PEM can exacerbate these already severe symptoms, and even minimal exertion can lead to significant setbacks for the patient’s health and wellbeing.

About ANZMES

ANZMES, the Associated New Zealand ME Society, is the National Advisory on ME/CFS. Established in 1980, ANZMES has been at the forefront of research, representation, and education for ME/CFS in Aotearoa/New Zealand. The organisation is a registered provider of continuing medical education with the Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners (RNZCGP) and is dedicated to improving the lives of those affected by ME/CFS and long COVID. ANZMES is a founding member of the World ME Alliance.

 

The most severely ill patients with ME/CFS in Denmark

Abstract:

A subset of patients suffering from ME/CFS (Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome) are severely ill, bedridden, and dependent on personal care. This study aims to describe the medical and social conditions of the most severely ill patients with ME/CFS in Denmark and the situation of their caregivers.

Qualitative data were collected during 19 home visits to severely ill patients in Denmark. The patients interviewed were characterised by extremely low physical and mental functioning and longstanding illness. Relative to their dire condition, the participants received very little help from medical professionals and health services such as institutions and hospitals. There was an overall negative interaction with psychiatric interventions, and the relations between patients and the health system were generally characterised by mutual distrust. Social services were often dismissed, and obtaining the services was often described as more of a burden than a benefit.

In conclusion, the most severely ill patients with ME/CFS and their caregivers must be characterised as a systematically neglected patient group not comparable to any other similarly ill group.

Source: la Cour, P. (2024). The most severely ill patients with ME/CFS in Denmark. Cogent Public Health, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/27707571.2024.2359958 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/27707571.2024.2359958 (Full text)

Learning points about myalgic encephalitis/chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

This essay examines the complex landscape of myalgic encephalitis, commonly known as chronic fatigue syndrome, highlighting its chronic and multisystemic nature with elusive causative factors. It discusses clinical challenges in diagnosis and management, emphasising the importance of increased education and awareness among healthcare professionals. The role of empathic, person-centred care in improving patient outcomes is underscored, urging for a paradigm shift towards understanding and addressing the profound impact of myalgic encephalitis/chronic fatigue syndrome on patients’ lives.

Source: Wahi-Singh B. Learning points about myalgic encephalitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: Bridging the gap between research, clinical practice and awareness. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2024 May 27:14782715241257968. doi: 10.1177/14782715241257968. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38798182. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14782715241257968 (Full text)

Medical students highlight the importance of medical education, kindness, compassion and belief when learning about patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

‘Imagine my surprise to discover ME/CFS is definitely not rare, but inexplicably and infuriatingly unacknowledged’. Fifth year medical student, Scotland.
Earlier this year, medical students at Scottish medical schools were invited to take part in an essay competition, 500 words on the topic of ‘What is your most important learning point about myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS)?’ This edition proudly features the first prize winning essay of the competition which was funded by the Scottish Government’s education project; Learn About ME.1
ME/CFS affects at least 280,000 people in the UK, including approximately 23,000 in Scotland. It is a neurological disease with multisystem symptoms, often triggered by a virus. People with ME/CFS may be left bedbound or housebound with a significantly reduced quality of life.2 Yet many healthcare professionals do not know how to diagnose or manage this devastating disease, nor do they know how, or what, to teach our next generation of doctors.3
People with ME/CFS, and a subset of those with long COVID, experience symptoms including post-exertional malaise (PEM), unrefreshing sleep, profound fatigue, brain fog and orthostatic intolerance.4
Patients can also present with sore throats, muscle aches, disrupted sleep, changes in bowel habit, joint and bone pain, problems with multitasking and short-term memory, word-finding difficulties, headaches, changes in smell and taste, tinnitus, disrupted menses, breathlessness, dizziness, skin rashes and hair loss.4
Research into underlying mechanisms has revealed key defects: an abnormal response to repeat exercise, gait and strength abnormalities, immune system dysfunction, neuroinflammation, altered blood cell morphology and clotting, problems with cellular-energy delivery, microbial gut dysbiosis and changes in metabolomics.5
The lack of medical education on this topic and resulting weak clinical knowledge of ME/CFS has resulted in delays to diagnosis, multiple clinic referrals and a huge cost to every taxpayer. ME/CFS costs the UK an estimated £3.3 billion a year6 and long COVID clinics cost millions, with funding being extended for this chronic condition. Yet Scottish services are struggling to find healthcare practitioners to deliver this care or worse, offering potentially harmful patient support workshops that are directly in conflict with the NICE (NG206) 2021 ME/CFS guidelines such as the highly criticised ‘Lightning Process’.7 Medical education on ME/CFS and post-acute infectious disease is urgently needed for earlier recognition and better management.
One student described the experience and delay in diagnosis for two of their family members: ‘. . .these young women were discarded as victims of teenage laziness or anxiety. They had to fight to gain support from their GP (General Practitioner) and their diagnosis took several second opinions and ultimately years’.
Outdated treatment using graded exercise, shown to harm ME/CFS patients, has been rebranded as ‘activity management’ in some services and offered to both ME/CFS and long COVID patients. Another medical student displayed incredible insight in recognising the deficiency of the current system, which relies largely on patient self-help: ‘the burden being placed on the patient to improve their condition through mental work’.
The key feature of ME/CFS is PEM. The most important thing to learn about PEM is that even trivial activity (whether physical, mental or emotional) can exacerbate symptoms, and that this exacerbation or flare can be delayed. A person with ME/CFS who can sit upright for five minutes on a given day could be too ill to sit up at all the next day due to PEM.8
A traditional rehabilitation programme led by a physiotherapist might include graded activity or exercise. For a non-ME/CFS person following a sports injury, orthopaedic surgery or intensive care, gently increasing activity for just a few minutes, or a few steps at a time is ideal. However, for ME/CFS patients, this approach could be incredibly harmful. People with ME/CFS need to conserve their energy and pace themselves to avoid a flare in symptoms.4
People who are only mildly affected still experience a major negative impact on their ability to work. They have very little energy for socialising, hobbies and housework. For those moderately affected, basic activities of normal daily living such as preparing food, washing and dressing can cause symptom exacerbation. Very severely affected individuals, who are often bedbound, can experience PEM from simply turning in bed, speaking and digesting food.9
ME/CFS also has a major impact on family members’ quality of life.2 Nearly a third of medical students responding commented on the impact on quality of life as being one of the most important things to learn about this disease.
Several students wrote about a family member, or friend, whom they knew with ME/CFS. Sadly, it was a recurring theme that the medical students explained they had not been taught about ME/CFS at medical school. One commented: ‘Alas, the only time in the last four years I have encountered the term ME/CFS at medical school was as a differential diagnosis for fibromyalgia’.
It is vital that this topic features more prominently in the medical curriculum, and in our medical textbooks, to avoid patient harm due to delayed or mis-diagnosis and mismanagement. There is a lot we can offer ME/CFS patients: an early and accurate diagnosis, medication for symptom control, practical support with disability applications and mobility aids, but above all, these medical students have reminded us that ME/CFS patients should be treated with kindness, compassion and belief.10
Source: Muirhead NL. Medical students highlight the importance of medical education, kindness, compassion and belief when learning about patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2024 May 27:14782715241255977. doi: 10.1177/14782715241255977. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38798174. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14782715241255977 (Full text)

Exploring the Experience of Healthcare-Related Epistemic Injustice among People with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis / Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Abstract:

Myalgic encephalomyelitis / chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a chronic, disabling yet clinically “contested” condition, previously theorised through a lens of epistemic injustice. Phenomena conceptually close to epistemic injustice, including stigma, are known to have deleterious consequences on a person’s health and life-world. Yet, no known primary studies have explored how people with ME/CFS experience healthcare through a lens of epistemic injustice, whilst a dearth of research explicitly exploring healthcare-related injustice from a patient perspective has been noted. This qualitative study seeks to address this gap.

Semi-structured interviews and interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) were used to explore the experiences of five people with ME/CFS in the UK, vis-à-vis healthcare-related epistemic injustice. One superordinate theme is presented, “Being de-centred in patient-centred care,” alongside two sub-themes: “Struggling for epistemic-existential validation” and “Negotiating socio-epistemic hierarchies, politics and ‘power’.”

Findings suggest that healthcare-related epistemic injustice may differentially impact according to the patient’s social positionality (here, notably gender), and that a potential pathway of existential harm operates through threats to identity and personhood. Findings also indicate that cultural and political factors may further epistemic injustice in healthcare. Finally, epistemic injustice impacting as a chronic stressor cannot be ruled out and is worthy of further research.

The experience of healthcare-related epistemic injustice can carry far-reaching yet varied consequences for patients. Future research should consider drawing upon more socio-demographically diverse samples and an intersectional approach is recommended. Further exploration of structural drivers of epistemic injustice may highlight a need for politically and socio-culturally cognisant clinical approaches.

Source: Hunt, J., Runacres, J., Herron, D., & Sheffield, D. (2024). Exploring the Experience of Healthcare-Related Epistemic Injustice among People with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis / Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. The Qualitative Report, 29(4), 1125-1148. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6519 https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol29/iss4/15/ (Full text available as PDF file)

‘You don’t want to get better’: the outdated treatment of ME/CFS patients is a national scandal

By George Monbiot

It’s the greatest medical scandal of the 21st century. For decades, patients with ME/CFS (myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome) have been told they can make themselves better by changing their attitudes. This devastating condition, which afflicts about 250,000 people in the UK, was psychologised by many doctors and scientists, adding to the burden of a terrible physiological illness.

Long after this approach was debunked in scientific literature, clinicians who championed it have refused to let go. They continue to influence healthcare systems, governments and health insurers. And patients still suffer as a result.

Read the full article in The Guardian HERE.

NICE guideline on ME/CFS: robust advice based on a thorough review of the evidence

Abstract:

In 2021, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence produced an evidence-based guideline on the diagnosis and management of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), a disabling long-term condition of unknown cause. The guideline provides clear support for people living with ME/CFS, their families and carers, and for clinicians. A recent opinion piece published in the journal suggested that there were anomalies in the processing and interpretation of the evidence when developing the guideline and proposed eight areas where these anomalies were thought to have occurred. We outline how these opinions are based on a misreading or misunderstanding of the guideline process or the guideline, which provides a balanced and reasoned approach to the diagnosis and management of this challenging condition.

Source: Barry PW, Kelley K, Tan T, et al. NICE guideline on ME/CFS: robust advice based on a thorough review of the evidence. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry Published Online First: 28 February 2024. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2023-332731 https://jnnp.bmj.com/content/early/2024/02/28/jnnp-2023-332731 (Full text)