Category: Management

Chronic fatigue syndrome. A practical guide to assessment and management

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) have become increasingly recognized as a common clinical problem, yet one that physicians often find difficult to manage. In this review we suggest a practical, pragmatic, evidence-based approach to the assessment and initial management of the patient whose presentation suggests this diagnosis. The basic principles are simple and for each aspect of management we point out both potential pitfalls and strategies to overcome them.

The first, and most important task is to develop mutual trust and collaboration. The second is to complete an adequate assessment, the aim of which is either to make a diagnosis of CFS or to identify an alternative cause for the patient’s symptoms. The history is most important and should include a detailed account of the symptoms, the associated disability, the choice of coping strategies, and importantly, the patient’s own understanding of his/her illness. The assessment of possible comorbid psychiatric disorders such as depression or anxiety is mandatory.

When the physician is satisfied that no alternative physical or psychiatric disorder can be found to explain symptoms, we suggest that a firm and positive diagnosis of CFS be made.

The treatment of CFS requires that the patient is given a positive explanation of the cause of his symptoms, emphasizing the distinction among factors that may have predisposed them to develop the illness (lifestyle, work stress, personality), triggered the illness (viral infection, life events) and perpetuated the illness (cerebral dysfunction, sleep disorder, depression, inconsistent activity, and misunderstanding of the illness and fear of making it worse).

Interventions are then aimed to overcoming these illness-perpetuating factors. The role of antidepressants remains uncertain but may be tried on a pragmatic basis. Other medications should be avoided. The only treatment strategies of proven efficacy are cognitive behavioral ones. The most important starting point is to promote a consistent pattern of activity, rest, and sleep, followed by a gradual return to normal activity; ongoing review of any ‘catastrophic’ misinterpretation of symptoms and the problem solving of current life difficulties.

We regard chronic fatigue syndrome as important not only because it represents potentially treatable disability and suffering but also because it provides an example for the positive management of medically unexplained illness in general.

 

Source: Sharpe M, Chalder T, Palmer I, Wessely S. Chronic fatigue syndrome. A practical guide to assessment and management. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1997 May;19(3):185-99. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9218987

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome

“Biopsychosocial approach” may be difficult in practice

This week a joint working group of the Royal Colleges of Physicians, Psychiatrists, and General Practitioners in Britain issued a report on chronic fatigue syndrome.’ The report constitutes, arguably, the finest contemporary position statement in the field, and physicians and patients are well advised to read it, but it is sure to engender disagreement on both sides of the Atlantic.

The term chronic fatigue syndrome is relatively new. It first appeared in the 1988 proposal by the United States Centers for Disease Control to formalise a working case definition for symptoms that had been variously named and attributed to numerous causes for over two centuries. Through field testing, the case definition was revised and simplified in 1994. In essence, it classifies a constellation of prolonged and debilitat ing symptoms as worthy of medical attention and study (see box). Related case criteria were developed by consensus at Oxford in 199 .4 Neither the American nor the Oxford criteria assume the syndrome to be a single nosological entity. As the royal colleges’ report concludes, the term chronic fatigue syndrome is appropriate because it carries none of the inaccurate aetiological implications of the alternative acronyms-myalgic encephalomyelitis, chronic fatigue syndrome, and immune dysfunction syndrome.

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2359057/pdf/bmj00562-0007.pdf

 

Source: Straus SE. Chronic fatigue syndrome. BMJ. 1996 Oct 5;313(7061):831-2. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2359057/

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a medically unexplained illness characterized by chronic, disabling fatigue, impaired concentration, muscle pain, and other somatic symptoms. The conceptual difficulties associated with all medically unexplained illnesses contribute to the controversy surrounding CFS, which has centered around whether it is best regarded as a medical or as a psychiatric condition. Clinically, such an approach is not helpful, and current research suggests that both pathophysiologic changes and psychosocial factors are important. Pragmatic management based on a detailed assessment of the individual is outlined.

 

Source: Sharpe M. Chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1996 Sep;19(3):549-73. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8856816

 

Management of chronic fatigue syndrome: case study

Abstract:

1. Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a complex disorder marked by incapacitating fatigue of uncertain etiology which has resulted in a least a 50% reduction in activity and is of at least 6 months’ duration. 2. Definitive diagnosis can be very challenging. Because no markers objectively identify the presence of CFS, diagnosis depends heavily on the presence of subjective complaints. 3. The current philosophy of CFS management is to use a multidisciplinary approach incorporating these rehabilitation goals: restore a sense of self efficacy and control; gradually increase physical activity; and decrease the restrictions imposed by CFS.

 

Source: Dyck D, Allen S, Barron J, Marchi J, Price BA, Spavor L, Tateishi S. Management of chronic fatigue syndrome: case study. AAOHN J. 1996 Feb;44(2):85-92. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8694980

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome: current perspectives on evaluation and management

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To describe clinical and laboratory guidelines for assessment and management of patients presenting with chronic fatigue syndrome(CFS).

DATA SOURCES: Relevant international consensus diagnostic criteria and research literature on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, concurrent medical and psychological disturbance and clinical management of CFS.

CONCLUSIONS: Medical and psychiatric morbidity should be carefully assessed and actively treated, while unnecessary laboratory investigations and extravagant treatment regimens should be avoided. No single infective agent has been demonstrated as the cause of CFS, and immunopathological hypotheses remain speculative. The aetiological role of psychological factors is debated, but they do predict prolonged illness. The rate of spontaneous recovery appears to be high. Effective clinical management requires a multidisciplinary approach, with consideration of the medical, psychological and social factors influencing recovery.

Comment in: Chronic fatigue syndrome: is total body potassium important? [Med J Aust. 1996]

 

Source: Hickie IB, Lloyd AR, Wakefield D. Chronic fatigue syndrome: current perspectives on evaluation and management. Med J Aust. 1995 Sep 18;163(6):314-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7565238

 

The chronically fatigued patient

Abstract:

This article illustrates that the diagnostic evaluation as well as the management of the patient presenting with chronic fatigue can be done in an orderly manner. If a medical illness is the cause of the patient’s fatigue, this is usually evident on initial presentation. A thorough history and complete physical examination, in conjunction with some screening laboratory tests, can rule out most medical causes of fatigue, and any remaining cases declare themselves over the next several visits. If a medical cause is not evident, a further “fishing expedition” is fruitless.

Psychiatric illness, such as depression or generalized anxiety disorder, accounts for another significant proportion of cases of chronic fatigue. As with medical illness, psychiatric illness should be suspected based on history and is not a diagnosis of exclusion. Some patients presenting with chronic fatigue have a history and symptom pattern consistent with the diagnosis of CFS. The cause of this syndrome is controversial and is still unknown. The clinician, however, can offer the patient care in an environment that is respectful of their physical and psychological discomfort and can provide significant symptomatic improvement to the patient.

Lastly, some patients with fatigue do not fit any diagnostic category, including CFS. As with many other common complaints, such as headaches or abdominal pain, although a diagnosis may not be given to the patient, the clinician can do a lot to reassure the patient and assist the patient in living with his or her symptoms. As Solberg eloquently wrote: “[E]valuation of the fatigued patient requires all of a physician’s best attributes–a broad view of disease, psychosocial sensitivity, and a good ongoing relationship with the patient.”

 

Source: Epstein KR. The chronically fatigued patient. Med Clin North Am. 1995 Mar;79(2):315-27. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7877393

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome. 1: Etiology and pathogenesis

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a disorder of unknown etiology characterized by debilitating fatigue and other somatic and neuropsychiatric symptoms. A range of heterogeneous clinical and laboratory findings have been reported in patients with CFS. Various theories have been proposed to explain the underlying pathophysiologic processes but none has been proved.

Research findings of immunologic dysfunction and neuroendocrine changes suggest the possible dysregulation of interactions between the nervous system and the immune system. Without a clear understanding of its etiopathogenesis, CFS has no definitive treatment.

Management approaches have been necessarily speculative, and they have evolved separately in a number of medical and nonmedical disciplines. The results of several controlled treatment studies have been inconclusive. An accurate case definition identifying homogeneous subtypes of CFS is needed. The integration of medical and psychologic treatment modalities and the use of both biologic and psychologic markers to evaluate treatment response will enhance future treatment strategies.

 

Source: Farrar DJ, Locke SE, Kantrowitz FG. Chronic fatigue syndrome. 1: Etiology and pathogenesis. Behav Med. 1995 Spring;21(1):5-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7579775

 

The treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome: science and speculation

Abstract:

The chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a heterogeneous disorder characterized by fatigue, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and various other somatic complaints. Treatment studies to date reflect both the diversity of medical disciplines involved in the management of patients with CFS and the multiple pathophysiologic mechanisms proposed.

There have been few attempts to study integrated treatment programs, and although several controlled studies have been reported, no treatment has been shown clearly to result in long-term benefit in the majority of patients. Good clinical care integrating medical and psychologic concepts, together with symptomatic management, may prevent significant secondary impairment in the majority of patients.

Future treatment studies should examine differential response rates for possible subtypes of the disorder (eg, documented viral onset, concurrent clinical depression), evaluate the extent of any synergistic effects between therapies (ie, medical and psychologic), and employ a wide range of biologic and psychologic parameters as markers of treatment response.

 

Source: Wilson A, Hickie I, Lloyd A, Wakefield D. The treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome: science and speculation. Am J Med. 1994 Jun;96(6):544-50. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8017453

 

Ways of coping with chronic fatigue syndrome: development of an illness management questionnaire

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a disorder of uncertain aetiology, and there is uncertainty also about the appropriate way in which patients should manage the illness. An illness management questionnaire (IMQ) was designed to assess coping in CFS. This was completed by 207 patients, in parallel with the COPE scales (a general measure of coping that can be applied situationally), and measures of functional impairment, anxiety and depression.

The IMQ yielded four factors: maintaining activity, accommodating to the illness, focusing on symptoms and information-seeking. Scales based upon these factors together predicted 26, 27 and 22% of the variance in functional impairment, anxiety and depression, respectively, and each scale had significant relationships with relevant scales of the COPE, supporting the interpretation of the factors. It is suggested that the IMQ may be employed to relate ways of coping to outcomes in CFS, and to assess coping as a mediator of change in cognitive-behavioural interventions.

 

Source: Ray C, Weir W, Stewart D, Miller P, Hyde G. Ways of coping with chronic fatigue syndrome: development of an illness management questionnaire. Soc Sci Med. 1993 Aug;37(3):385-91. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8356486

 

Service delivery for people with chronic fatigue syndrome: a pilot action research study

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a symptom complex which while mild in some cases is severely debilitating in others. Long-term ill health leads to greater use of resources but in the case of long-term CFS the anecdotal evidence suggested a low compliance with the available options and a high level of both patient and general practitioner dissatisfaction.

This pilot study sought through repeated action research cycles to start to identify culturally and contextually sensitive forms of language and models for service delivery suitable for people with CFS in a general practice setting. It worked through a number of action research cycles, to initiate the identification of conceptual models acceptable to both doctors and to patients suffering from CFS, self-management options which encouraged the body’s ability to heal itself and services and delivery mechanisms which met patient needs within health provider options.

 

Source: Denz-Penhey H, Murdoch JC. Service delivery for people with chronic fatigue syndrome: a pilot action research study. Fam Pract. 1993 Mar;10(1):14-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8477887