Comment on: Postviral fatigue syndrome. [BMJ. 1991]
SIR, In his letter Dr Anthony Knudsen comments (1) on the recent paper by Dr J W Gow and colleagues on the postviral fatigue syndrome.(2) Dr Knudsen refers to the fact that the aetiology of the syndrome has not been established and to the dearth of definitive pathological findings. Though he does not directly express an opinion, he mentions “the view held by some that the condition is stress related and of psychological origin.”
The body of opinion that holds that the postviral fatigue syndrome has a physical, organic origin seems often to be criticised because it cannot produce “the evidence.” Yet these critics seem quite sanguine about putting forward the hypothesis that the syndrome is of psychological or psychiatric origin without a hint of an opinion regarding the basis of this hypothesis, far less evidence to support it.
You can read the rest of this comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1669836/pdf/bmj00125-0065d.pdf
Source: M L Sweeney. Postviral fatigue syndrome. BMJ. 1991 May 11; 302(6785): 1153–1154. PMCID: PMC1669836 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1669836/