Chronic fatigue report delayed as row breaks out over content

The government’s long awaited report on the treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome could be in jeopardy after four key members resigned from the working group.

The move throws doubt on the validity of the report, which was due to be published in the first week of January. As the BMJ went to press, the chief medical officer, Liam Donaldson, had postponed its launch on 4 January 2002.

A total of 10 people from the original working group have resigned for various reasons since it was set up in 1998. The most recent resignations were highlighted in a written question by the Countess of Mar to health minister Lord Hunt on 17 December.

Two psychiatrists, a public health doctor, and a nurse therapist have resigned, saying that the report plays down the psychological and social aspects of the condition and concentrates on a medical model. Two patients are understood to have also resigned recently.

The group was set up to consider how best the NHS could care for people with the syndrome, also known as myalgic encephalomyelitis or “ME.”

But with so little still known about what causes the syndrome, how to diagnose it, and how best to treat it, it is understood that the report fails to provide the straightforward answers doctors may have hoped for.

You can read the rest of this article here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1121974/

 

Source: Eaton L. Chronic fatigue report delayed as row breaks out over content. BMJ. 2002 Jan 5;324(7328):7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1121974/ (Full article)

 

Report of the working group on the possible relationship between hepatitis B vaccination and the chronic fatigue syndrome

Introduction:

On 2 June, 1992, the Laboratory Centre for Disease Control (LCDC), Health Protection Branch, Department of National Health and Welfare, asked Dr. Gilles Delage to set up an independent working group to evaluate the evidence linking hepatitis B vaccination with the chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Dr. Delage agreed to act as the chairman of the group, and experts were recruited in the following fields: clinical investigation of patients with CFS, clinical studies of hepatitis B vaccination in health care workers, epidemiology and study design, public health programs pertaining to hepatitis B vaccination, and immunology of vaccine response. The working group held a 1-day meeting on 2 November, 1992. It reviewed in detail the data collected by LCDC on 30 self-reported cases of CFS (meeting a standard case definition) alleged to be secondary to hepatitis B vaccination. The working group then reviewed data made available by some of its members. After a lengthy discussion, all members of the working group agreed that there is no evidence of a cause-effect relationship between hepatitis B vaccination and CFS. This report outlines the reasons why the group arrived at this conclusion.

You can read the rest of this article here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1485526/pdf/cmaj00271-0068.pdf

 

Source: Report of the working group on the possible relationship between hepatitis B vaccination and the chronic fatigue syndrome. CMAJ. 1993 Aug 1;149(3):314-9. [Article in English, French] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1485526/