Tag: viral onset

Mitochondrial DNA Missense Mutations ChrMT: 8981A > G and ChrMT: 6268C > T Identified in a Caucasian Female with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) Triggered by the Epstein–Barr Virus

Abstract:

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a multisystem disabling disease with unclear etiology and pathophysiology, whose typical symptoms include prolonged debilitating recovery from fatigue or postexertional malaise (PEM). Disrupted production of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), the intracellular energy that fuels cellular activity, is a cause for fatigue.

Here, we present a long-term case of ME/CFS: a 75-year-old Caucasian female patient, whose symptoms of ME/CFS were clearly triggered by an acute infection of the Epstein–Barr virus 24 years ago (mononucleosis). Before then, the patient was a healthy professional woman.

A recent DNA sequence analysis identified missense variants of mitochondrial respiratory chain enzymes, including ATP6 (ChrMT: 8981A > G; Q152R) and Cox1 (ChrMT: 6268C > T; A122V). Protein subunits ATP6 and Cox1 are encoded by mitochondrial DNA outside of the nucleus: the Cox1 gene encodes subunit 1 of complex IV (CIV: cytochrome c oxidase) and the ATP6 gene encodes subunit A of complex V (CV: ATP synthase). CIV and CV are the last two of five essential enzymes that perform the mitochondrial electron transport respiratory chain reaction to generate ATP.

Further analysis of the blood sample using transmission electron microscopy demonstrated abnormal, circulating, extracellular mitochondria. These results indicate that the patient had dysfunctional mitochondria, which may contribute directly to her major symptoms, including PEM and neurological and cognitive changes. Furthermore, the identified variants of ATP6 (ChrMT: 8981A > G; Q152R) and Cox1 (ChrMT: 6268C > T; A122V), functioning at a later stage of mitochondrial ATP production, may play a role in the abnormality of the patient’s mitochondria and the development of her ME/CFS symptoms.

Source: Gaoyan G. Tang-Siegel, David W. Maughan, Milah B. Frownfelter, Alan R. Light, “Mitochondrial DNA Missense Mutations ChrMT: 8981A > G and ChrMT: 6268C > T Identified in a Caucasian Female with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) Triggered by the Epstein–Barr Virus”, Case Reports in Genetics, vol. 2024, Article ID 6475425, 10 pages, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6475425 https://www.hindawi.com/journals/crig/2024/6475425/ (Full text)

A neuroinflammatory paradigm can explain Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/ Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Post-COVID-19 Fatigue Syndrome

Abstract

This thesis illustrates the development of a neuroinflammatory paradigm for Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS), applicable to Long-COVID related “Post-COVID-19 Fatigue Syndrome” (PCFS).

The brain being devoid of nociceptors, in combination with neuroimaging technology lacking sufficient sensitivity, helps to explain why the chronic but low-level neuroinflammation purported to be present in the brains of ME/CFS (and PCFS) sufferers has gone unreported by patients, and has been largely undetected by scientists, until more recently. Over-activation of microglia and astrocytes is increasingly being proposed to be at the heart of ME/CFS (and PCFS) pathophysiology.

A key Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging (PET/MRI) study (2014) provided evidence of glial-cell over-activity, implicating neuroinflammation within the brain’s limbic system, of ME/CFS patients. Other cerebral spinal fluid and neuroimaging studies, including a more recent Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS)/MRI Thermometry study (2019), have added support to this concept.

Resultant dysfunction of the limbic system and its closely-connected hypothalamus, which in turn leads to a disturbed autonomic nervous system (ANS) and dysfunctional hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal-axis (HPA-axis) could then account for the diverse range of symptoms reported in ME/CFS (and PCFS). These symptoms include chronic fatigue, flu-like malaise, mood, memory and cognitive problems (limbic system), sleep, taste, visual and thermostatic-control problems (hypothalamus), gastro-intestinal disturbance, cardiovascular problems and hypotension (ANS), as well as increased frequency of urination and lower blood cortisol levels (HPA-axis).

A dysfunctional hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN), a potentially vulnerable site, within the brains of genetically susceptible people, which functions normally as a stress-control integrator, is proposed to be at the core of ME/CFS (and PCFS) aetiology and pathophysiology.

It is proposed that all triggers of ME/CFS, be they viral (Epstein-Barr Virus is the most common trigger), or non-viral; including other infectious diseases, multiple vaccinations, emotional trauma or chemical toxin shock, share a common triggering mechanism. They are each proposed to manifest themselves as severe physiological stressors, which by a combination of humoral and neural routes, target, the hypothalamic PVN, of genetically susceptible individuals. By exceeding an intrinsic stress-threshold pertaining to the complex neurological circuitry, within the hypothalamic PVN, the triggering stressor is proposed to overload it into a (permanently) iii dysfunctional state.

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), in common with the triggering stressors of ME/CFS, also manifests itself as a severe physiological stressor, due to a cytokine surge at the site of the primary infection (the lungs). This particular stressor is, also, proposed to target the hypothalamic PVN, in genetically susceptible people, thus triggering PCFS. Life’s ongoing physiological stressors, such as physical, mental overexercise, chemical toxin exposure, emotional and financial stress, all of which are known to exacerbate and perpetuate ME/CFS (as well as PCFS) could do so by then targeting a now “compromised” (possibly inflamed) stress-sensitive hypothalamic PVN, by similar routes.

Then if an alternative, but variable (according to fluctuating neuroinflammation of the hypothalamic PVN, itself) stress threshold was exceeded, commonly reported post-exertional malaise (PEM) episodes, more problematic flare-ups, and even more severe prolonged and characteristic relapses could ensue.

It is proposed that a dysfunctional hypothalamic PVN, thereby, acts as an epicentre to a radiating neuroinflammatory response within the brains of ME/CFS (and PCFS) sufferers. A neuroinflammatory pathway, as proposed to be shared by the early-onset stages of several progressive neuroinflammatory (neurodegenerative) diseases could also be shared by ME/CFS, and PCFS. Indeed, this pathway could be shared by other potentially nonprogressive neuroinflammatory disorders, such as the closely-related fibromyalgia, mental health disorders, epilepsy, and migraines.

Might then the “drivers” of the inflammatory process, which sustain glial-cell activation (and neuroinflammation), in ME/CFS (and PCFS), be the perpetuating stressors, themselves, acting in combination with a now “compromised” and stress-sensitive hypothalamic PVN? If so, what then might be the mechanistic detail linking a stressor-targeted hypothalamic PVN and microglial activation in ME/CFS (and PCFS)?

One attractive scenario requiring further investigation involves the release of corticotrophin releasing hormone (CRH), which is released naturally by the hypothalamic PVN due to stress. The chronic release of CRH from a stress-sensitive, dysfunctional hypothalamic PVN might induce microglia activation, leading to chronic neuroinflammation, via the stimulation of mast-cells.

Two papers were published in relation to this neuroinflammatory paradigm for ME/CFS (2018, 2019), followed by another paper (2021), in which a paradigm was presented to explain the more recently emergent, but equally perplexing, Long-COVID related “PostCOVID-19 Fatigue Syndrome” (PCFS).

The neuroinflammatory model presented is both iv coherent and unifying for all triggering stressors and perpetuating stressors of ME/CFS (& PCFS), without the need for subtypes (as many other models require), but it does require validation. To this effect, it is hoped that this neuroinflammatory model will be both thought-provoking, as well as providing a framework for scientific researchers to test, critique, modify, and develop, into the future.

More brain-focussed research, using increasingly sophisticated neuroimaging technology (especially enhanced PET/MRI) is recommended. Then, a brain-signature for both ME/CFS (and PCFS) might even become attainable, within the next decade, perhaps.

Long-COVID related PCFS, affecting millions of people worldwide, presents a golden opportunity for in-depth longitudinal neuroimaging studies (following patients through relapse-recovery cycles) to develop a better understanding of PCFS (and ME/CFS) pathophysiology.

Source: Mackay, A. A neuroinflammatory paradigm can explain Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/ Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Post-COVID-19 Fatigue Syndrome. PhD Thesis. University of Otago, New Zealand.  https://ourarchive.otago.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10523/15089/MackayAngus2021PhD.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (PDF file)

What Causes ME/CFS: The Role of the Dysfunctional Immune System and Viral Infections

Abstract:

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) remains an enigmatic highly disabling and complex long-term condition with a wide range of aetiologies and symptoms.

A viral onset is commonly mentioned by patients and several bodily systems are ultimately disturbed. The parallel with long-covid is clear.

However, immune dysregulation with impaired NK cell dysfunction and tendency to novel autoimmunity have been frequently reported. These may contribute to reactivation of previous acquired viruses/retroviruses accompanied by impaired endocrine regulation and mitochondrial energy generation.

The unpredictable nature of seemingly unconnected and diverse symptoms that are poorly responsive to several allopathic and alternative therapies then contributes to an escalation of the illness with secondary dysfunction of multiple other systems. Treatment of established ME/CFS is therefore difficult and requires multi-specialty input addressing each of the areas affected by the illness.

Source: Amolak S Bansal, Aletta D Kraneveld, Elisa Oltra and Simon Carding. What Causes ME/CFS: The Role of the Dysfunctional Immune System and Viral Infections. Journal of Immunology and Allergy 2022;3(2):1-15. https://maplespub.co.in/assets/images/files/doc_1663924267.pdf (Full text)

A Comparison of Immune Functionality in Viral versus Non-Viral CFS Subtypes

Abstract:

Participants with CFS were grouped into viral and non-viral onset fatigue categories and assessed for differential immunological marker expression. Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells were assessed for differential phenotypic expression of surface adherence glycoproteins on circulating lymphocytes. The flow cytometric analysis employed fluorescent monoclonal antibody labeling.

The viral in comparison to the non-viral group demonstrated significant elevations in several Th1 type subsets including: the percentage and number of CD4+ cells, the percentage and number of CD2+CD26+ cells, the percentage and number of CD2+CD4+CD26+ cells, the percentage and number of CD4+ CD26+ cells, and the percentage of Th2 naïve cells (CD4+ CD45RA+CD62L+).

Of the remaining significant findings, the non viral group demonstrated significant elevations in comparison to the viral group for the following Th1 type subsets: the percentage of CD8+ cells, the percentage of T-cytotoxic suppressor cells (CD3+8+), and the percentage and number of Th1 memory cells (CD8+CD45RA-CD62L-).

The viral group demonstrated a pattern of activation that differed from that of the group with a non-viral etiology, as evidenced by an elevated and out of range percentage and number of CD4+ cells, the percentage of CD2+CD26+, and the percentage of Th2 naïve cells (CD4+CD45RA+CD62L+). Both groups demonstrated reduced and out of range Natural Killer Cell Cytotoxicity and percentage of B-1 cells (CD5+CD19).

In addition, both groups demonstrated an elevated and out of range percentage of CD2+CD8+CD26+, percentage of the Th1 memory subset (CD4+CD45RA-CD62L-), the percentage of Th1 memory and naïve cells (CD8+CD45RA-CD62L-, CD8+CD45RA+CD62L-), the percentage and number of Th2 memory cells (CD4+CD45RA-CD62L+), and the percentage of Th2 memory and naïve cells (CD8+CD45RA-CD62L+, CD8+CD45RA+CD62L+).

These findings imply that the homeostatic mechanism responsible for the regulation of the Th1 (cell mediated) and Th2 (humoral) immune responses is disturbed in CFS. The implications of these findings are discussed.

 

Source: Porter N, Lerch A, Jason LA, Sorenson M, Fletcher MA, Herrington J. A Comparison of Immune Functionality in Viral versus Non-Viral CFS Subtypes. J Behav Neurosci Res. 2010 Jun 1;8(2):1-8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3951052/ (Full article)