Tag: SNRI

Effect of Milnacipran Treatment on Ventricular Lactate in Fibromyalgia: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Abstract:

Milnacipran, a serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of fibromyalgia (FM). This report presents the results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of milnacipran conducted to test the hypotheses that a) similar to patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, patients with FM have increased ventricular lactate levels at baseline; b) 8 weeks of treatment with milnacipran will lower ventricular lactate levels compared with baseline levels and with ventricular lactate levels after placebo; and c) treatment with milnacipran will improve attention and executive function in the Attention Network Test compared with placebo. In addition, we examined the results for potential associations between ventricular lactate and pain. Baseline ventricular lactate measured by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging was found to be higher in patients with FM than in healthy controls (F1,37 = 22.11, P < .0001, partial η(2) = .37). Milnacipran reduced pain in patients with FM relative to placebo but had no effect on cognitive processing.

At the end of the study, ventricular lactate levels in the milnacipran-treated group had decreased significantly compared with baseline and after placebo (F1,18 = 8.18, P = .01, partial η(2) = .31). A significantly larger proportion of patients treated with milnacipran showed decreases in both ventricular lactate and pain than those treated with placebo (P = .03). These results suggest that proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging measurements of lactate may serve as a potential biomarker for a therapeutic response in FM and that milnacipran may act, at least in part, by targeting the brain response to glial activation and neuroinflammation.

PERSPECTIVE: Patients treated with milnacipran showed decreases in both pain and ventricular lactate levels compared with those treated with placebo, but, even after treatment, levels of ventricular lactate remained higher than in controls. The hypothesized mechanism for these decreases is via drug-induced reductions of a central inflammatory state.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01108731.

Copyright © 2015 American Pain Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

 

Source: Natelson BH, Vu D, Mao X, Weiduschat N, Togo F, Lange G, Blate M, Kang G, Coplan JD, Shungu DC. Effect of Milnacipran Treatment on Ventricular Lactate in Fibromyalgia: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. J Pain. 2015 Nov;16(11):1211-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Aug 31. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4630071/ (Full article)

 

A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial of duloxetine in the treatment of general fatigue in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of duloxetine in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome.

METHODS: A 12-week, randomized, double-blind study was designed to compare duloxetine 60-120 mg/d (n = 30) with placebo (n = 30) for efficacy and safety in the treatment of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. The primary outcome measure was the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory general fatigue subscale (range: 4-20, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue). Secondary measures were the remaining Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory subscales, Brief Pain Inventory, Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Symptom Inventory, Patient Global Impression of Improvement, and Clinical Global Impression of Severity. The primary analysis of efficacy for continuous variables was a longitudinal analysis of the intent-to-treat sample, with treatment-by-time interaction as the measure of effect.

RESULTS: The improvement in the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory general fatigue scores for the duloxetine group was not significantly greater than for the placebo group (P = 0.23; estimated difference between groups at week 12 = -1.0 [95% CI: -2.8, 0.7]). The duloxetine group was significantly superior to the placebo group on the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory mental fatigue score, Brief Pain Inventory average pain severity and interference scores, Short Form-36 bodily pain domain, and Clinical Global Impression of Severity score. Duloxetine was generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSION: The primary efficacy measure of general fatigue did not significantly improve with duloxetine when compared with placebo. Significant improvement in secondary measures of mental fatigue, pain, and global measure of severity suggests that duloxetine may be efficacious for some chronic fatigue syndrome symptom domains, but larger controlled trials are needed to confirm these results.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00375973.

Copyright © 2015 The Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

 

Source: Arnold LM, Blom TJ, Welge JA, Mariutto E, Heller A. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial of duloxetine in the treatment of general fatigue in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychosomatics. 2015 May-Jun;56(3):242-53. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2014.12.003. Epub 2014 Dec 16. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25660434