self-management – American ME and CFS Society

An exploration of the experiences and self-generated strategies used when navigating everyday life with Long Covid

Abstract:

Background: Around one in ten people who contract Covid-19 report ongoing symptoms or ‘Long Covid’. Without any known interventions to cure the condition, forms of self-management are routinely prescribed by healthcare professionals and described by people with the condition. However, there is limited research exploring what strategies are used to navigate everyday life with Long Covid, and experiences that initiate development of these strategies. Our study aimed to explore the range and influence of self-generated strategies used by people with Long Covid to navigate everyday life within the context of their own condition.

Methods: Forming part of the Long Covid Personalised Self-managemenT support co-design and EvaluatioN (LISTEN) project, we conducted a qualitative study using narrative interviews with adults who were not hospitalised with Covid-19. Participants aged over 18 years, who self-identified with Long Covid, were recruited from England and Wales. Data were analysed with patient contributors using a reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Eighteen participants (mean age = 44 years, SD = 13 years) took part in interviews held between December 2021 and February 2022. Themes were constructed which depicted 1) the landscape behind the Long Covid experience and 2) the everyday experience of participants’ Long Covid. The everyday experience comprised a combination of physical, emotional, and social factors, forming three sub-themes: centrality of physical symptoms, navigating ‘experts’ and the ‘true colour’ of personal communities, and a rollercoaster of psychological ambiguity). The third theme, personal strategies to manage everyday life was constructed from participants’ unique presentations and self-generated solutions to manage everyday life. This comprised five sub-themes: seeking reassurance and knowledge, developing greater self-awareness through monitoring, trial and error of ‘safe’ ideas, building in pleasure and comfort, and prioritising ‘me’.

Conclusions: Among this sample of adults with Long Covid, their experiences highlighted the unpredictable nature of the condition but also the use of creative and wide ranging self-generated strategies. The results offer people with Long Covid, and healthcare professionals supporting them, an overview of the collective evidence relating to individuals’ self-management which can enable ways to live ‘better’ and regain some sense of identity whilst facing the impact of a debilitating, episodic condition.

Trial registration: LISTEN ISRCTN36407216.

Source: Leggat FJ, Heaton-Shrestha C, Fish J, Siriwardena AN, Domeney A, Rowe C, Patel I, Parsons J, Blair J, Jones F. An exploration of the experiences and self-generated strategies used when navigating everyday life with Long Covid. BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 13;24(1):789. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18267-6. PMID: 38481230; PMCID: PMC10938753. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10938753/ (Full text)

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) in Adolescents: Practical Guidance and Management Challenges

Abstract:

This paper reviews the current understanding of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), and whether any treatment strategies have been effective. ME/CFS is a condition of as yet unknown etiology that commonly follows an infective process. It includes a new onset of fatigue (of more than 3-6 month duration and not relieved by rest), post-exertional malaise, cognitive difficulties and unrefreshing sleep, and frequently orthostatic intolerance, somatic symptoms and pain. Long COVID has renewed interest in the condition and stimulated research with findings suggestive of a multisystem neuroimmune disease. There are no definitively effective treatments. Despite earlier recommendations regarding graded exercise therapy and cognitive behavior therapy, the current recommendations are managing symptoms, with lifestyle management and supportive care.

This paper provides an outline of strategies that young people and their families have reported as helpful in managing a chronic illness that impacts their life socially, physically, emotionally, cognitively and educationally. As the illness frequently occurs at a time of rapid developmental changes, reducing these impacts is reported to be as important as managing the physical symptoms. Young people face a mean duration of 5 years illness (range 1-16 years) with a likely residual 20% having significant restrictions after 10 years.

Their feedback has suggested that symptom management, self-management strategies, advocacy and educational liaison have been the most helpful. They value professionals who will listen and take them seriously, and after excluding alternative diagnoses, they explain the diagnosis, are supportive and assist in monitoring their progress. Remaining engaged in education was the best predictor of later functioning. This allowed for social connections, as well as potential independence and fulfilling some aspirations. The need to consider the impact of this chronic illness on all aspects of adolescent development, as part of management, is highlighted.

Source: Rowe K. Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) in Adolescents: Practical Guidance and Management Challenges. Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2023 Jan 4;14:13-26. doi: 10.2147/AHMT.S317314. PMID: 36632532; PMCID: PMC9827635. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9827635/ (Full text)

Effectiveness of a group-based self-management program for people with chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a group-based self-management program for people with chronic fatigue syndrome.

DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial.

SETTING: Four mid-sized towns in southern Norway and two suburbs of Oslo.

SUBJECTS: A total of 137 adults with chronic fatigue syndrome.

INTERVENTION: A self-management program including eight biweekly meetings of 2.5 hours duration. The control group received usual care.

MAIN MEASURES: Primary outcome measure: Medical Outcomes Study-Short Form-36 physical functioning subscale.

SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Fatigue severity scale, self-efficacy scale, physical and mental component summary of the Short Form-36, and the illness cognition questionnaire (acceptance subscale). Assessments were performed at baseline, and at six-month and one-year follow-ups.

RESULTS: At the six-month follow-up, a significant difference between the two groups was found concerning fatigue severity ( p = 0.039) in favor of the control group, and concerning self-efficacy in favor of the intervention group ( p = 0.039). These significant differences were not sustained at the one-year follow-up. No significant differences were found between the groups concerning physical functioning, acceptance, and health status at any of the measure points. The drop-out rate was 13.9% and the median number of sessions attended was seven (out of eight).

CONCLUSIONS: The evaluated self-management program did not have any sustained effect, as compared with receiving usual care.

Source: Pinxsterhuis I, Sandvik L, Strand EB, Bautz-Holter E, Sveen U. Effectiveness of a group-based self-management program for people with chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2017 Jan;31(1):93-103. doi: 10.1177/0269215515621362. Epub 2016 Jul 11. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26672998

Activity Pacing Self-Management in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of an activity pacing self-management (APSM) intervention in improving performance of daily life activities in women with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS).

METHOD: A total of 33 women with CFS (age 41.1±11.2 yr) were randomly allocated to APSM (experimental group; n=16) or relaxation (control group; n=17). Main outcome measures included the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM; primary) and Checklist Individual Strength (CIS).

RESULTS: COPM scores changed significantly over time in both groups (p=.03). The change in Satisfaction scores showed a significant difference in favor only of APSM (effect size=0.74 [0.11, 1.4]). CIS scores decreased significantly in the experimental group only (p<.01).

CONCLUSION: APSM was found to be feasible and effective in optimizing participation in desired daily life activities in women with CFS. Replication in a larger sample with long-term follow-up is required.

Source: Kos D, van Eupen I, Meirte J, Van Cauwenbergh D, Moorkens G, Meeus M, Nijs J. Activity Pacing Self-Management in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Occup Ther. 2015 Sep-Oct;69(5):6905290020. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2015.016287. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4564796/ (Full article)

Chronic fatigue self-management in primary care: a randomized trial

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of brief fatigue self-management (FSM) for medically unexplained chronic fatigue (UCF) and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in primary care.

METHODS: A randomized controlled design was used wherein 111 patients with UCF or CFS were randomly assigned to two sessions of FSM, two sessions of symptom monitoring support (attention control; AC), or a usual care control condition (UC). Participants were assessed at baseline and at 3 and 12 months after treatment. The primary outcome, the Fatigue Severity Scale, measured fatigue impact on functioning. Analysis was by intention to treat (multiple imputation) and also by per protocol.

RESULTS: A group × time interaction across the 15-month trial showed significantly greater reductions in fatigue impact in the FSM group in comparison with the AC group (p < .023) and the UC group (p < .013). Medium effect sizes for reduced fatigue impact in the FSM group were found in comparison with the AC group (d = 0.46) and the UC group (d = 0.40). The per-protocol analysis revealed large effect sizes for the same comparisons. Clinically significant decreases in fatigue impact were found for 53% of participants in the FSM condition, 14% in the AC condition, and 17% in the UC condition. Dropout rates at the 12-month follow-up were high (42%-53%), perhaps attributable to the burden of monthly telephone calls to assess health care use.

CONCLUSION: A brief self-management intervention for patients with UCF or CFS seemed to be clinically effective for reducing the impact of fatigue on functioning.

Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00997451.

Source: Friedberg F, Napoli A, Coronel J, Adamowicz J, Seva V, Caikauskaite I, Ngan MC, Chang J, Meng H. Chronic fatigue self-management in primary care: a randomized trial. Psychosom Med. 2013 Sep;75(7):650-7. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31829dbed4. Epub 2013 Aug 6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3785003/ (Full article)

Cost-effectiveness of supported self-management for CFS/ME patients in primary care

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Nurse led self-help treatments for people with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalitis (CFS/ME) have been shown to be effective in reducing fatigue but their cost-effectiveness is unknown.

METHODS: Cost-effectiveness analysis conducted alongside a single blind randomised controlled trial comparing pragmatic rehabilitation (PR) and supportive listening (SL) delivered by primary care nurses, and treatment as usual (TAU) delivered by the general practitioner (GP) in North West England. A within trial analysis was conducted comparing the costs and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) measured within the time frame of the trial. 296 patients aged 18 and over with CFS/ME diagnosed using the Oxford criteria were included in the cost-effectiveness analysis.

RESULTS: Treatment as usual is less expensive and leads to better patient outcomes compared with Supportive Listening. Treatment as usual is also less expensive than Pragmatic Rehabilitation. PR was effective at reducing fatigue in the short term, but the impact of the intervention on QALYs was uncertain. However, based on the results of this trial, PR is unlikely to be cost-effective in this patient population.

CONCLUSIONS: This analysis does not support the introduction of SL. Any benefits generated by PR are unlikely to be of sufficient magnitude to warrant recommending PR for this patient group on cost-effectiveness grounds alone. However, dissatisfaction with current treatment options means simply continuing with ‘treatment as usual’ in primary care is unlikely to be acceptable to patients and practitioners.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial registration number is IRCTN74156610.

Source: Richardson G, Epstein D, Chew-Graham C, Dowrick C, Bentall RP, Morriss RK, Peters S, Riste L, Lovell K, Dunn G, Wearden AJ; FINE Trial Writing group on behalf of the FINE Trial group. Collaborators (23). Cost-effectiveness of supported self-management for CFS/ME patients in primary care. BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Jan 18;14:12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3556109/ (Full article)

Finding the right balance of physical activity: a focus group study about experiences among patients with chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To explore contexts of experiences of physical activity perceived as beneficial or harmful for CFS patients.

METHODS: A qualitative study with empirical data from two focus groups with purposive sampling. Mean age was 50, two of ten participants were male, and social demographics varied. Participants were invited to share stories of good as well as bad experiences concerning physical activity. Data were analysed with systematic text condensation.

RESULTS: Participants were not averse to physical activity, but specific preconditions would determine how the activity was perceived. Physical activity was experienced as helpful and enjoyable, especially related to leisure activities where flexible and individual adaptation was feasible. Non-customized activity may precipitate set-backs giving patients the impression of losing control and being betrayed by their bodies. Strategies to review energy usage in daily life could adjust expectations, diminish stress load and assist in approaching a more appropriate priority and balance.

CONCLUSION: Self-management, body awareness and physical activity of choice combined with facilitation and advice from health care professionals is essential to achieve a positive outcome.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Exercise programmes should be adapted, paced, and self-managed in accordance with personal preferences and activity levels to be beneficial and empowering for CFS patients.

Source: Larun L, Malterud K. Finding the right balance of physical activity: a focus group study about experiences among patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Patient Educ Couns. 2011 May;83(2):222-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.05.027. Epub 2010 Jun 26. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20580520

Can pacing self-management alter physical behavior and symptom severity in chronic fatigue syndrome? A case series

Abstract:

Given the lack of evidence in support of pacing self-management for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), we examined whether physical behavior and health status of patients with CFS would improve in response to a pacing self-management program.

We performed an observational study of pacing self-management in seven CFS patients using a single-case study design. Stages A1 and A2 (7-day assessment periods) of the A1-B-A2 design corresponded to the baseline and posttreatment measurements of physical behavior (real-time activity monitoring) and health status (self-reported measures), respectively. Stage B (3 weeks of treatment) consisted of three individual treatment sessions of pacing self-management.

When comparing pre- versus posttreatment data, we found that the patients’ ability to perform daily activities and the severity of their symptom complexes were improved (p = 0.043). Concentration difficulties, mood swings, muscle weakness, and intolerance to bright light improved as well. A statistically significant decrease in the mean time spent doing light activity (<3 metabolic equivalents) was observed, but a change in the way physical activity was spread throughout the day was not.

We found that 3 weeks of pacing self-management was accompanied by a modest improvement in symptom severity and daily functioning. The outcome of the present study calls for a randomized controlled clinical trial to examine the effectiveness of pacing self-management for people with CFS.

Source: Nijs J, van Eupen I, Vandecauter J, Augustinus E, Bleyen G, Moorkens G, Meeus M. Can pacing self-management alter physical behavior and symptom severity in chronic fatigue syndrome? A case series. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;46(7):985-96. http://www.rehab.research.va.gov/jour/09/46/7/Nijs.html (Full article)

Service delivery for people with chronic fatigue syndrome: a pilot action research study

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a symptom complex which while mild in some cases is severely debilitating in others. Long-term ill health leads to greater use of resources but in the case of long-term CFS the anecdotal evidence suggested a low compliance with the available options and a high level of both patient and general practitioner dissatisfaction.

This pilot study sought through repeated action research cycles to start to identify culturally and contextually sensitive forms of language and models for service delivery suitable for people with CFS in a general practice setting. It worked through a number of action research cycles, to initiate the identification of conceptual models acceptable to both doctors and to patients suffering from CFS, self-management options which encouraged the body’s ability to heal itself and services and delivery mechanisms which met patient needs within health provider options.

Source: Denz-Penhey H, Murdoch JC. Service delivery for people with chronic fatigue syndrome: a pilot action research study. Fam Pract. 1993 Mar;10(1):14-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8477887