Tag: questionnaire

Assessing Functional Capacity in Myalgic Encephalopathy/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Patient-Informed Questionnaire

Abstract:

Background: Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is an acquired disease with significant morbidity that affects both children and adults. Post-exertional malaise is a cardinal symptom of ME/CFS and impacts a patient’s functional capacity (FC). The absence of effective tools to assess FC has significant consequences for timely diagnosis, clinical follow-up, assessments for patient disability benefits, and research studies. In interventional studies, the inability to assess FC can result in an incomplete assessment of the potential benefit of the intervention, leading to beneficial treatment outcomes being missed.
Methods: Using extensive, repeated patient feedback, we have developed a new questionnaire, FUNCAP, to accurately assess FC in ME/CFS patients. The questionnaire consists of eight domains divided by activity types: A. personal hygiene/basic functions, B. walking/movement, C. being upright, D. activities in the home, E. communication, F. activities outside the home, G. reactions to light and sound, and H. concentration.
Results: Through five rounds of anonymous web-based surveys and a further test–retest validation round, two versions of the questionnaire were developed: a longer version comprising 55 questions (FUNCAP55), developed for improved diagnostic and disability benefit/insurance FC assessments; and a shorter version (FUNCAP27) for clinical patient follow-up and potential use in research. Good reliability and validity and negligible floor and ceiling effects were found, with comparable findings in all aspects in both a large Norwegian (n = 1263) and a separate English-language international sample (n = 1387) demonstrating the validity and reliability of FUNCAP.
Conclusions: Our findings support the utility of FUNCAP as an effective, reliable and valid tool for assessing FC in ME/CFS patients.
Source: Sommerfelt K, Schei T, Seton KA, Carding SR. Assessing Functional Capacity in Myalgic Encephalopathy/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Patient-Informed Questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(12):3486. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13123486 https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/13/12/3486 (Full text)

Mismatch between subjective and objective dysautonomia

Abstract:

Autonomic symptom questionnaires are frequently used to assess dysautonomia. It is unknown whether subjective dysautonomia obtained from autonomic questionnaires correlates with objective dysautonomia measured by quantitative autonomic testing. The objective of our study was to determine correlations between subjective and objective measures of dysautonomia.

This was a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted at Brigham and Women’s Faulkner Hospital Autonomic Laboratory between 2017 and 2023 evaluating the patients who completed autonomic testing. Analyses included validated autonomic questionnaires [Survey of Autonomic Symptoms (SAS), Composite Autonomic Symptom Score 31 (Compass-31)] and standardized autonomic tests (Valsalva maneuver, deep breathing, sudomotor, and tilt test). The autonomic testing results were graded by a Quantitative scale for grading of cardiovascular reflexes, sudomotor tests and skin biopsies (QASAT), and Composite Autonomic Severity Score (CASS). Autonomic testing, QASAT, CASS, and SAS were obtained in 2627 patients, and Compass-31 in 564 patients.

The correlation was strong between subjective instruments (SAS vs. Compass-31, r = 0.74, p < 0.001) and between objective instruments (QASAT vs. CASS, r = 0.81, p < 0.001). There were no correlations between SAS and QASAT nor between Compass-31 and CASS. There continued to be no correlations between subjective and objective instruments for selected diagnoses (post-acute sequelae of COVID-19, n = 61; postural tachycardia syndrome, 211; peripheral autonomic neuropathy, 463; myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, 95; preload failure, 120; post-treatment Lyme disease syndrome, 163; hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, 213; neurogenic orthostatic hypotension, 86; diabetes type II, 71, mast cell activation syndrome, 172; hereditary alpha tryptasemia, 45).

The lack of correlation between subjective and objective instruments highlights the limitations of the commonly used questionnaires with some patients overestimating and some underestimating true autonomic deficit. The diagnosis-independent subjective–objective mismatch further signifies the unmet need for reliable screening surveys. Patients who overestimate the symptom burden may represent a population with idiosyncratic autonomic-like symptomatology, which needs further study. At this time, the use of autonomic questionnaires as a replacement of autonomic testing cannot be recommended.

Source: Novak, P., Systrom, D., Marciano, S.P. et al. Mismatch between subjective and objective dysautonomia. Sci Rep 14, 2513 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52368-x https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-52368-x (Full text)

What do infectious disease specialists think about managing long COVID?

Abstract:

This survey of infectious disease providers on long COVID care revealed a lack of familiarity with existing resources, a sentiment of missing guidelines, and scarcity of dedicated care centers. The low response rate suggests that infectious disease specialists do not consider themselves as the primary providers of long COVID care.

Long COVID (or post-acute sequelae of COVID-19, PASC) complicates an estimated 10–30% of non-hospitalized cases and 50–70% of hospitalized cases of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection.(Reference Davis, McCorkell, Vogel and Topol1) The work-up often requires multiple disciplines to collaborate, both for diagnostic evaluation and for offering symptomatic treatment.(Reference Parker, Brigham and Connolly2) For this purpose, an infrastructure of so-called long COVID clinics has been developing,(Reference Vanichkachorn, Newcomb and Cowl3) oftentimes under the supervision of a single medical specialty. Given that long COVID is a complication of an infection, the medical subspecialty of infectious diseases (ID) has frequently been involved in devising and running such clinics. Here, we intended to survey ID providers in North America regarding their role in managing long COVID and their perspective on the availability of resources. For this purpose, we used the Emerging Infections Network (EIN), which is a provider-based sentinel network funded by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (http://ein.idsociety.org/). Our implicit hypothesis was that ID providers are insufficiently equipped to provide long COVID care because neither infection work-up nor antiviral treatment play a role in current management.

We designed a questionnaire, tested it among peers, and sent it out to all 2,978 EIN listserv subscribers on 3 occasions between February 7 and February 26, 2023. The survey contained 8 questions, 7 of which were structured questions. There was an option to make additional open-text field comments.

The response rate was very low, with 117 of 2,978 providers who filled out the survey (3.9%). Of these 117, 46 stated that they did not care for long COVID patients, and we analyzed the responses of the remaining 71 providers (2.4% of 2,978). Most of these would see long COVID patients once a month or less often (50/71). Thirteen indicated they were specifically seeing long COVID patients. Only 15 out of 71 (21%) felt “very comfortable” in making a diagnosis of long COVID, and most thought the resources available to clinicians involved in long COVID care were inadequate (55%) or were unaware of such resources (18%). The management consists mostly of a case-by-case-based approach without standardization (55%), followed by behavioral education for energy conservation (44%). Access to a long COVID clinic was considered easy by only 17%, while 48% stated there was no dedicated clinic located nearby, and 35% highlighted that locally available clinics were not easily accessible.

The open-text field answers were notable for showing that long COVID is a “complicated syndrome, currently without a specialty home” and that it is not easy to provide “holistic care to patients in our existing system.” Also, the absence of straightforward definitions, national guidelines, and dedicated research was pointed out. Lastly, one provider argued that “this is a primary care issue with collaboration with any needed specialists.”

The low response rate, the small percentage of ID providers heavily involved in long COVID care, and some free text statements can be seen as key findings of our survey. Our interpretation is that long COVID—although originating from an acute infection—is not perceived to be in the wheelhouse of the infectious diseases subspecialty. Infectious disease providers may not consider themselves as well-equipped as a generalist such as primary care providers.(Reference Berger, Altiery, Assoumou and Greenhalgh4) Long COVID patients, however, are likely to benefit from designated points of generalist care, with access to pertinent medical specialties and rehabilitative services (physical therapy, occupational health, and mental health), in order to receive comprehensive management for their signs and symptoms. In addition, widespread healthcare worker burnout in the wake of the pandemic may contribute to a subjective saturation with COVID-19-related topics and have reduced survey participation.

A minority of responders considered themselves very comfortable in diagnosing long COVID, the resources for appropriate clinical care were mostly felt to be inadequate, and management seems to happen on a case-by-case base (i.e., non-standardized). This points to the general unease about what constitutes best practice in long COVID care. We speculate that similar findings would be encountered in other medical specialties. Also, there is a considerable need for more research in the field, as evidenced by a recent award by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to study new models of delivery of long COVID care (https://www.ahrq.gov/coronavirus/long-covid-grant-awards.html).

In conclusion, our survey of infectious disease providers and their perspective on long COVID care suggested a lack of familiarity with existing resources, a sentiment of missing guidelines, and scarcity of dedicated care centers. In addition, the low response rate to this survey can be interpreted as ID providers not regarding their specialty as the primary point of contact for delivering long COVID care.

Source: Lyons MD, Beekmann SE, Polgreen PM, Marschall J. What do infectious disease specialists think about managing long COVID? Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology. 2023;3(1):e236. doi:10.1017/ash.2023.519 https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/antimicrobial-stewardship-and-healthcare-epidemiology/article/what-do-infectious-disease-specialists-think-about-managing-long-covid/E89D7EA86E873D517D24FBB20D304A8D (Full text)

 

How Patient Input Helped Create Culturally Sensitive Multinational Instruments Assessing Post Viral Symptoms

Our study involves collaboration/participation in order to develop culturally sensitive multinational tools for assessing post viral symptoms.

We discuss the creation of questionnaires using patient participation, and the translation of these questionnaires using international collaboration.

Patient engagement in collaboration on the creation and use of these types of instruments is of particular importance for patients who historically have not been true partners in collaborative efforts to understand diseases.

This has occurred for those with the post-viral illness called Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS), which has generated considerable resentment and estrangement among the patient community.

Our article reviews:

1) why participation of diverse groups/patients is important in the development of instruments to measure key symptoms of ME/CFS,

2) why the ME/CFS group of patients needs to be included specifically (as an example),

and

3) why structured health questionnaires are important/useful.

Our article also has an overall aim of demonstrating collaborative efforts with patients and others on creating multinational scales.

We provide examples of participatory processes used in developing and translating patient-driven instruments so that they can be used in non-English speaking countries.

Our article illustrates how patients and international researchers can be involved in efforts to develop and translate international assessment instruments to validly capture domains of unexplained illness like ME/CFS.

With the onset of another post-viral illness, Long COVID, there is a world-wide need to create valid and culturally sensitive assessment instruments to measure critical symptoms, many of which are similar to ME/CFS.

Source: Leonard A. Jason and Joseph A. Dorri. How Patient Input Helped Create Culturally Sensitive Multinational Instruments Assessing Post Viral Symptoms. The Australian Community Psychologist., Volume 32 No 1  https://psychology.org.au/getmedia/c300a432-c7fd-4f97-9322-ce16429067e4/ac-vol-32(1)-2023-final-draft.pdf#page=63 (Full text)

Assessing symptoms of long/post COVID and chronic fatigue syndrome using the DePaul symptom questionnaire-2: a validation in a German-speaking population

Abstract:

Objective: A subset of Covid-19 survivors will develop persisting health sequelae (i.e. Long Covid/LC or Post Covid/PC) similar to Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS). In the absence of a reliable biomarker to diagnose LC/PC and ME/CFS, their classification based on symptoms becomes indispensable. Hence, we translated and validated the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire−2 (DSQ-2), to offer a screening tool for the German-speaking population.

Methods: A sample of healthy adults, and adults with ME/CFS and LC/PC (N = 502) completed a reduced-item version of the DSQ-2 and SF-36 questionnaire online. We performed an exploratory factor analysis, assessed construct validity, diagnostic accuracy and compared the symptom profiles of individuals with ME/CFS versus LC/PC versus healthy adults.

Results: Exploratory factor analysis revealed a 10-factor solution with excellent internal consistencies. The sensitivity of the DSQ-2 was excellent. The specificity was moderate with moderate inter-rater reliability. Construct validity of the DSQ-2 was supported by strong negative correlations with physical health subscales of the SF-36. A visual comparison of the symptom profiles of individuals with ME/CFS versus LC/PC revealed a comparable pattern.

Conclusion: Despite lower symptom severity, individuals with LC/PC reported significantly stronger limitations in general health and physical functioning and were more likely to meet ME/CFS diagnostic criteria with ongoing sickness duration, suggesting that ME/CFS can be considered a long-term sequela of LC/PC. This study offers a translated and validated version of the reduced-item DSQ-2 that can guide medical evaluation and aid physicians in identifying a ME/CFS-like subtype of LC/PC.

Source: Nina Buntić, Leonard A. Jason, Jochen Schneider, Marc Schlesser & André Schulz (2023) Assessing symptoms of long/post COVID and chronic fatigue syndrome using the DePaul symptom questionnaire-2: a validation in a German-speaking population, Fatigue: Biomedicine, Health & Behavior, DOI: 10.1080/21641846.2023.2295419 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21641846.2023.2295419 (Full text)

Implications of the quality of the doctor-patient relationship on health in adult ME/CFS patients. A qualitative public health study from a patient perspective

Abstract:

in English, German

Background: Most patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) are dissatisfied with medical care. They complain about e. g. the lack of medical recognition of ME/CFS as a neuroimmunological disease and the medical perception of those affected as “difficult patients”.

Method: As part of an exploratory qualitative survey, 544 medically diagnosed ME/CFS patients (> 20 years; 455 ♀, 89 ♂) were asked about their subjective experiences with regard to the doctor-patient relationships (DP relationship) to their treating physicians. The questionnaire was structured analogously to a focused, standardized guideline interview. The written answers were evaluated using a qualitative content analysis according to Mayring.

Results: The participants reported a significant deterioration in their health situation and their quality of life as a result of misdiagnoses and incorrect treatments, the strained DP relationship and the lack of support from the physicians. All of this leads to fear of visiting the doctor, a general loss of trust in physicians, a feeling of helplessness up to bitterness and resignation – with suicide as the last mental option for some patients to escape from this precarious situation. During medical consultations, other participants only addressed health problems that were not related to ME/CFS, or only went to the doctor in an emergency, or refrained from contacting doctors entirely.

Conclusions: The DP relationship described by the participants as problematic in their opinion has significant negative health consequences for them. It is therefore of great urgency to develop a patient-centred treatment concept that focuses on ME/CFS patients as experts on their own illness.

Source: Habermann-Horstmeier L, Horstmeier LM. Auswirkungen der Qualität der Arzt-Patient-Beziehung auf die Gesundheit von erwachsenen ME/CFS-Erkrankten : Eine qualitative Public-Health-Studie aus Patientensicht [Implications of the quality of the doctor-patient relationship on health in adult ME/CFS patients. A qualitative public health study from a patien perspective]. MMW Fortschr Med. 2023 Dec;165(Suppl 5):16-27. German. doi: 10.1007/s15006-023-2894-z. PMID: 38062324.

Treatment of 95 post-Covid patients with SSRIs

Abstract:

After Covid-19 infection, 12.5% develops post-Covid-syndrome (PCS). Symptoms indicate numerous affected organ systems. After a year, chronic fatigue, dysautonomia and neurological and neuropsychiatric complaints predominate. In this study, 95 PCS patients were treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). This study used an exploratory questionnaire and found that two-thirds of patients had a reasonably good to strong response on SSRIs, over a quarter of patients had moderate response, while 10% reported no response.

Overall, patients experienced substantial improved well-being. Brainfog and sensory overload decreased most, followed by chronic fatigue and dysautonomia. Outcomes were measured with three different measures that correlated strongly with each other. The response to SSRIs in PCS conditions was explained by seven possible neurobiological mechanisms based on recent literature on PCS integrated with already existing knowledge.

Important for understanding these mechanisms is the underlying biochemical interaction between various neurotransmitter systems and parts of the immune system, and their dysregulation in PCS. The main link appears to be with the metabolic kynurenine pathway (KP) which interacts extensively with the immune system. The KP uses the same precursor as serotonin: tryptophan. The KP is overactive in PCS which maintains inflammation and which causes a lack of tryptophan. Finally, potential avenues for future research to advance this line of clinical research are discussed.

Source: Rus CP, de Vries BEK, de Vries IEJ, Nutma I, Kooij JJS. Treatment of 95 post-Covid patients with SSRIs. Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 2;13(1):18599. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45072-9. PMID: 37919310; PMCID: PMC10622561. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10622561/ (Full text)

Assessing Functional Capacity in ME/CFS: A Patient Informed Questionnaire

Abstract:

Myalgic Encephalomyelitis / Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) is an acquired disease with significant morbidity that affects both children and adults. Effective tools to assess functional capacity (FC) are severely lacking which has significant consequences for timely diagnosis, assessments for patient disability benefits and assessing the impact and effectiveness of interventions.

In interventional research the inability to assess FC can result in an incomplete assessment of the potential effect of the intervention. Specifically of concern is that if an intervention is effective in reducing symptom load, patients may increase their activity level to reach a pre-intervention symptom load. Thus, if FC is not accurately assessed, beneficial treatment outcomes may be missed.

To address this issue, using extensive, repeated patient feedback we have developed a new questionnaire, FUNCAP, to achieve optimal FC assessment in ME/CFS patients.

The questionnaire covers eight domains and activity types: A. Personal hygiene / basic functions, B. Walking / movement, C. Being upright, D. Activities in the home, E. Communication, F. Activities outside the home, G. Reactions to light and sound, and H. Concentration.

Through five rounds of anonymous web-based surveys and a further test – retest validation round, two versions of the questionnaire were developed; a longer version comprising 55 questions (FUNCAP55) to improve diagnostic and disability benefit/ insurance FC assessments and a shorter version (FUNCAP27) for interventional research and less extensive FC assessments. FUNCAP may also be useful in other conditions where fatigue and PEM is present, such as Long Covid.

Source: Sommerfelt, K.; Schei, T.; Seton, K.A.; Carding, S.R. Assessing Functional Capacity in ME/CFS: A Patient Informed Questionnaire. Preprints 2023, 2023092091 https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202309.2091/v1 (Full text available as PDF file) Final version https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/13/12/3486 (Full text)

A synthetic data generation system for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome questionnaires

Abstract:

Artificial intelligence or machine-learning-based models have proven useful for better understanding various diseases in all areas of health science. Myalgic Encephalomyelitis or chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) lacks objective diagnostic tests. Some validated questionnaires are used for diagnosis and assessment of disease progression.

The availability of a sufficiently large database of these questionnaires facilitates research into new models that can predict profiles that help to understand the etiology of the disease. A synthetic data generator provides the scientific community with databases that preserve the statistical properties of the original, free of legal restrictions, for use in research and education.

The initial databases came from the Vall Hebron Hospital Specialized Unit in Barcelona, Spain. 2522 patients diagnosed with ME/CFS were analyzed. Their answers to questionnaires related to the symptoms of this complex disease were used as training datasets. They have been fed for deep learning algorithms that provide models with high accuracy [0.69-0.81]. The final model requires SF-36 responses and returns responses from HAD, SCL-90R, FIS8, FIS40, and PSQI questionnaires. A highly reliable and easy-to-use synthetic data generator is offered for research and educational use in this disease, for which there is currently no approved treatment.

Source: Lacasa M, Prados F, Alegre J, Casas-Roma J. A synthetic data generation system for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome questionnaires. Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 31;13(1):14256. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40364-6. PMID: 37652910; PMCID: PMC10471690. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10471690/ (Full text)

Pediatric and Adult Patients with ME/CFS following COVID-19: A Structured Approach to Diagnosis Using the Munich Berlin Symptom Questionnaire (MBSQ)

Abstract:

Purpose A subset of patients with post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) fulfill the clinical criteria of myalgic encephalomyelitis / chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). To establish the diagnosis of ME/CFS for clinical and research purposes, comprehensive scores have to be evaluated.

Methods We developed the Munich Berlin Symptom Questionnaires (MBSQs) and supplementary scoring sheets (SSSs) to allow for a rapid evaluation of common ME/CFS case definitions. The MBSQs were applied to young patients with chronic fatigue and post-exertional malaise (PEM) who presented to the MRI Chronic Fatigue Center for Young People (MCFC). Trials were retrospectively registered (NCT05778006, NCT05638724).

Results Using the MBSQs and SSSs, we report on ten patients aged 11 to 25 years diagnosed with ME/CFS after asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection or mild to moderate COVID-19. Results from their MBSQs and from well-established patient-reported outcome measures indicated severe impairments of daily activities and health-related quality of life.

Conclusions ME/CFS can follow SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients younger than 18 years, rendering structured diagnostic approaches most relevant for pediatric PCC clinics. The MBSQs and SSSs represent novel diagnostic tools that can facilitate the diagnosis of ME/CFS in children, adolescents, and adults with PCC and other post-viral syndromes.

What is known ME/CFS is a frequent debilitating illness. For diagnosis, an extensive differential diagnostic workup is required and the evaluation of clinical ME/CFS criteria. ME/CFS following COVID-19 has been reported in adults but not in pediatric patients younger than 19 years of age.

What is new We present novel questionnairs (MBSQs), as tools to assess common ME/CFS case definitions in pediatric and adult patients with post-COVID-19 condition and beyond. We report on ten patients aged 11 to 25 years diagnosed with ME/CFS following asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection or mild to moderate COVID-19.

Source: Laura C. Peo, Katharina Wiehler, Johannes Paulick, Katrin Gerrer, Ariane Leone, Anja Viereck, Matthias Haegele, Silvia Stojanov, Cordula Warlitz, Silvia Augustin, Martin Alberer, Daniel B. R. Hattesohl, Laura Froehlich, Carmen Scheibenbogen, Lorenz Mihatsch, Rafael Pricoco, Uta Behrends. Pediatric and Adult Patients with ME/CFS following COVID-19: A Structured Approach to Diagnosis Using the Munich Berlin Symptom Questionnaire (MBSQ). medRxiv 2023.08.23.23293081; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.23.23293081 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.08.23.23293081v1.full-text (Full text)