Tag: questionnaire

Sustained illness burden over time among Australians with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Background: Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) is a disabling chronic illness. Many people with ME/CFS (pwME/CFS) are unable to continue employment and require support to complete activities of daily living. Despite this, ME/CFS remains unrecognised as a disability in Australia. The present study aimed to highlight the profound burdens experienced by pwME/CFS over time to provide evidence of permanency and necessitate reforms to Australian healthcare policies.

Methods: Data were collected for this longitudinal investigation between 1st October 2021 and 3rd October 2024. All participants were Australian residents aged between 18 and 65 years fulfilling the Canadian or International Consensus Criteria. Sociodemographic information, medical history, illness presentation and patient-reported outcomes were collected using three self-administered questionnaires distributed at approximately six-month intervals. Illness presentation and patient-reported outcomes were investigated over 12 months with Cochran’s Q, Friedman and one-way repeated measures ANOVA tests using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 29.0. Quality of life data were compared with Australian population norms using one-sample Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.

Results: Thirty-two pwME/CFS (n = 22/32, 68.8% female) participated at all three time points. At baseline, the mean age was 44.03 years and median illness duration was 12.50 years. Participants reported a median of 30 symptoms at each time point – the most common of which were also the most severe in presentation. Importantly, there were no significant changes in any symptom or patient-reported outcome over the 12-month study period. Overall health status, physical health and the ability to participate in daily and work life activities were the most substantially impacted. Quality of life was significantly reduced among pwME/CFS when compared with population norms at all time points.

Conclusions: PwME/CFS face substantial and sustained illness burdens. These consistent, profound impairments emphasise the need for improved access to disability and social support services for pwME/CFS in Australia through policy reform.

Source: Weigel B, Eaton-Fitch N, Thapaliya K, Marshall-Gradisnik S. Sustained illness burden over time among Australians with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. PLoS One. 2025 Dec 29;20(12):e0338433. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0338433. PMID: 41460857; PMCID: PMC12747376. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12747376/ (Full text)

Defining a High-Quality Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome cohort in UK Biobank

Abstract:

Background: Progress in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) research is being slowed by the relatively small-scale studies being performed whose results are often not replicated. Progress could be accelerated by analyses of large population-scale projects, such as UK Biobank (UKB), which provide extensive phenotype and genotype data linked to both ME/CFS cases and controls.

Methods: Here, we analysed the overlap and discordance among four UKB-defined ME/CFS cohorts, and additional questionnaire data when available.

Results: A total of 5,354 UKB individuals were linked to at least one piece of evidence of MECFS, a higher proportion (1.1%) than most prevalence estimates. Only a third (36%; n=1,922) had 2 or more pieces of evidence for MECFS, in part due to data missingness. For the same UKB participant, ME/CFS status defined by ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision) code G93.3 (Post-viral fatigue syndrome) was most likely to be supported by another data type (72%); ME/CFS status defined by Pain Questionnaire responses is least likely to be supported (43%), in part due to data missingness.

Conclusions: We conclude that ME/CFS status in UKB, and potentially other biobanks, is best supported by multiple, and not single, lines of evidence. Finally, we raise the estimated ME/CFS prevalence in the UK to 410,000 using the most consistent evidence for ME/CFS status, and accounting for those who had no opportunity to participate in UKB due to being bed- or house-bound.

Source: Samms GL, Ponting CP. Defining a High-Quality Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome cohort in UK Biobank. NIHR Open Res. 2025 Apr 28;5:39. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13956.1. PMID: 40443420; PMCID: PMC12120426. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12120426/ (Full text)

Awareness and Perception of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Among Pain Specialists: A Questionnaire-Based Study

Abstract:

Background: This study aims to explore the perceptions and clinical approaches of pain management specialists toward myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), a condition characterized by persistent fatigue, widespread pain, unrefreshing sleep, and autonomic dysfunction. Given the challenges in diagnosis and management, pain specialists may play a pivotal role in symptom relief. By identifying variations in evaluation and treatment practices, this study seeks to enhance the recognition of ME/CFS and improve its clinical management within pain medicine.

Material and methods: The questionnaire was distributed in printed form to 250 pain specialists in Turkey. Given the limited number of pain physicians in the country, the study aimed to encompass all actively practicing specialists. The survey included four demographic questions, eight true-false questions, 12 multiple-choice questions, and four rating-scale questions. Data were collected anonymously. Data were analyzed using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS, version 27.0; IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY), with descriptive statistics and chi-square (χ²) tests applied to examine the relationships between awareness levels and attitudinal variables.

Results: In Turkey, 106 pain medicine physicians (42.4%) participated in the study. The average age was 40.6±8.52 years. Among the participants, 39.6% had previously heard of myalgic encephalomyelitis. Physicians were inclined to first ask the question, “Do you think you get enough sleep at night?” when evaluating these patients, with a rate of 63.2%. The majority of participants (65.9%) stated that they “occasionally” or “rarely” considered the relationship between fatigue and orthostatic intolerance. Additionally, 37.7% believed that this disease is a subtype of depression. The statement, “chronic fatigue decreases with intense aerobic exercise,” was agreed upon by 50.9% of participants. This controversial statement was particularly more common among those who were unaware of ME/CFS’s alternative name (p=0.009) and those who did not take dysautonomic disorders into account (p=0.048). When considering an ME/CFS diagnosis, physicians most frequently referred patients to the physical medicine and rehabilitation department (32.1%). Those who preferred not to refer patients to any department (12.3%) tended to find it appropriate for a patient to seek consultation at a pain medicine clinic due to widespread body pain and fatigue (χ2=11.405, p=0.044).

Conclusion: This study is the first questionnaire-based research assessing pain physicians’ awareness and attitudes toward ME/CFS. By highlighting their perspectives on its evaluation and management, our findings may improve recognition and clinical approaches to ME/CFS. Future research should focus on education and standardized guidelines to enhance patient care.

Source: Uygun GG, Gözükızıl ST, Bilen A. Awareness and Perception of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Among Pain Specialists: A Questionnaire-Based Study. Cureus. 2025 Mar 23;17(3):e81030. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81030. PMID: 40264626; PMCID: PMC12013460. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12013460/ (Full text)

Assessing Functional Capacity in Myalgic Encephalopathy/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Patient-Informed Questionnaire

Abstract:

Background: Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is an acquired disease with significant morbidity that affects both children and adults. Post-exertional malaise is a cardinal symptom of ME/CFS and impacts a patient’s functional capacity (FC). The absence of effective tools to assess FC has significant consequences for timely diagnosis, clinical follow-up, assessments for patient disability benefits, and research studies. In interventional studies, the inability to assess FC can result in an incomplete assessment of the potential benefit of the intervention, leading to beneficial treatment outcomes being missed.
Methods: Using extensive, repeated patient feedback, we have developed a new questionnaire, FUNCAP, to accurately assess FC in ME/CFS patients. The questionnaire consists of eight domains divided by activity types: A. personal hygiene/basic functions, B. walking/movement, C. being upright, D. activities in the home, E. communication, F. activities outside the home, G. reactions to light and sound, and H. concentration.
Results: Through five rounds of anonymous web-based surveys and a further test–retest validation round, two versions of the questionnaire were developed: a longer version comprising 55 questions (FUNCAP55), developed for improved diagnostic and disability benefit/insurance FC assessments; and a shorter version (FUNCAP27) for clinical patient follow-up and potential use in research. Good reliability and validity and negligible floor and ceiling effects were found, with comparable findings in all aspects in both a large Norwegian (n = 1263) and a separate English-language international sample (n = 1387) demonstrating the validity and reliability of FUNCAP.
Conclusions: Our findings support the utility of FUNCAP as an effective, reliable and valid tool for assessing FC in ME/CFS patients.
Source: Sommerfelt K, Schei T, Seton KA, Carding SR. Assessing Functional Capacity in Myalgic Encephalopathy/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Patient-Informed Questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(12):3486. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13123486 https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/13/12/3486 (Full text)

Mismatch between subjective and objective dysautonomia

Abstract:

Autonomic symptom questionnaires are frequently used to assess dysautonomia. It is unknown whether subjective dysautonomia obtained from autonomic questionnaires correlates with objective dysautonomia measured by quantitative autonomic testing. The objective of our study was to determine correlations between subjective and objective measures of dysautonomia.

This was a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted at Brigham and Women’s Faulkner Hospital Autonomic Laboratory between 2017 and 2023 evaluating the patients who completed autonomic testing. Analyses included validated autonomic questionnaires [Survey of Autonomic Symptoms (SAS), Composite Autonomic Symptom Score 31 (Compass-31)] and standardized autonomic tests (Valsalva maneuver, deep breathing, sudomotor, and tilt test). The autonomic testing results were graded by a Quantitative scale for grading of cardiovascular reflexes, sudomotor tests and skin biopsies (QASAT), and Composite Autonomic Severity Score (CASS). Autonomic testing, QASAT, CASS, and SAS were obtained in 2627 patients, and Compass-31 in 564 patients.

The correlation was strong between subjective instruments (SAS vs. Compass-31, r = 0.74, p < 0.001) and between objective instruments (QASAT vs. CASS, r = 0.81, p < 0.001). There were no correlations between SAS and QASAT nor between Compass-31 and CASS. There continued to be no correlations between subjective and objective instruments for selected diagnoses (post-acute sequelae of COVID-19, n = 61; postural tachycardia syndrome, 211; peripheral autonomic neuropathy, 463; myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, 95; preload failure, 120; post-treatment Lyme disease syndrome, 163; hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, 213; neurogenic orthostatic hypotension, 86; diabetes type II, 71, mast cell activation syndrome, 172; hereditary alpha tryptasemia, 45).

The lack of correlation between subjective and objective instruments highlights the limitations of the commonly used questionnaires with some patients overestimating and some underestimating true autonomic deficit. The diagnosis-independent subjective–objective mismatch further signifies the unmet need for reliable screening surveys. Patients who overestimate the symptom burden may represent a population with idiosyncratic autonomic-like symptomatology, which needs further study. At this time, the use of autonomic questionnaires as a replacement of autonomic testing cannot be recommended.

Source: Novak, P., Systrom, D., Marciano, S.P. et al. Mismatch between subjective and objective dysautonomia. Sci Rep 14, 2513 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52368-x https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-52368-x (Full text)

What do infectious disease specialists think about managing long COVID?

Abstract:

This survey of infectious disease providers on long COVID care revealed a lack of familiarity with existing resources, a sentiment of missing guidelines, and scarcity of dedicated care centers. The low response rate suggests that infectious disease specialists do not consider themselves as the primary providers of long COVID care.

Long COVID (or post-acute sequelae of COVID-19, PASC) complicates an estimated 10–30% of non-hospitalized cases and 50–70% of hospitalized cases of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection.(Reference Davis, McCorkell, Vogel and Topol1) The work-up often requires multiple disciplines to collaborate, both for diagnostic evaluation and for offering symptomatic treatment.(Reference Parker, Brigham and Connolly2) For this purpose, an infrastructure of so-called long COVID clinics has been developing,(Reference Vanichkachorn, Newcomb and Cowl3) oftentimes under the supervision of a single medical specialty. Given that long COVID is a complication of an infection, the medical subspecialty of infectious diseases (ID) has frequently been involved in devising and running such clinics. Here, we intended to survey ID providers in North America regarding their role in managing long COVID and their perspective on the availability of resources. For this purpose, we used the Emerging Infections Network (EIN), which is a provider-based sentinel network funded by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (http://ein.idsociety.org/). Our implicit hypothesis was that ID providers are insufficiently equipped to provide long COVID care because neither infection work-up nor antiviral treatment play a role in current management.

We designed a questionnaire, tested it among peers, and sent it out to all 2,978 EIN listserv subscribers on 3 occasions between February 7 and February 26, 2023. The survey contained 8 questions, 7 of which were structured questions. There was an option to make additional open-text field comments.

The response rate was very low, with 117 of 2,978 providers who filled out the survey (3.9%). Of these 117, 46 stated that they did not care for long COVID patients, and we analyzed the responses of the remaining 71 providers (2.4% of 2,978). Most of these would see long COVID patients once a month or less often (50/71). Thirteen indicated they were specifically seeing long COVID patients. Only 15 out of 71 (21%) felt “very comfortable” in making a diagnosis of long COVID, and most thought the resources available to clinicians involved in long COVID care were inadequate (55%) or were unaware of such resources (18%). The management consists mostly of a case-by-case-based approach without standardization (55%), followed by behavioral education for energy conservation (44%). Access to a long COVID clinic was considered easy by only 17%, while 48% stated there was no dedicated clinic located nearby, and 35% highlighted that locally available clinics were not easily accessible.

The open-text field answers were notable for showing that long COVID is a “complicated syndrome, currently without a specialty home” and that it is not easy to provide “holistic care to patients in our existing system.” Also, the absence of straightforward definitions, national guidelines, and dedicated research was pointed out. Lastly, one provider argued that “this is a primary care issue with collaboration with any needed specialists.”

The low response rate, the small percentage of ID providers heavily involved in long COVID care, and some free text statements can be seen as key findings of our survey. Our interpretation is that long COVID—although originating from an acute infection—is not perceived to be in the wheelhouse of the infectious diseases subspecialty. Infectious disease providers may not consider themselves as well-equipped as a generalist such as primary care providers.(Reference Berger, Altiery, Assoumou and Greenhalgh4) Long COVID patients, however, are likely to benefit from designated points of generalist care, with access to pertinent medical specialties and rehabilitative services (physical therapy, occupational health, and mental health), in order to receive comprehensive management for their signs and symptoms. In addition, widespread healthcare worker burnout in the wake of the pandemic may contribute to a subjective saturation with COVID-19-related topics and have reduced survey participation.

A minority of responders considered themselves very comfortable in diagnosing long COVID, the resources for appropriate clinical care were mostly felt to be inadequate, and management seems to happen on a case-by-case base (i.e., non-standardized). This points to the general unease about what constitutes best practice in long COVID care. We speculate that similar findings would be encountered in other medical specialties. Also, there is a considerable need for more research in the field, as evidenced by a recent award by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to study new models of delivery of long COVID care (https://www.ahrq.gov/coronavirus/long-covid-grant-awards.html).

In conclusion, our survey of infectious disease providers and their perspective on long COVID care suggested a lack of familiarity with existing resources, a sentiment of missing guidelines, and scarcity of dedicated care centers. In addition, the low response rate to this survey can be interpreted as ID providers not regarding their specialty as the primary point of contact for delivering long COVID care.

Source: Lyons MD, Beekmann SE, Polgreen PM, Marschall J. What do infectious disease specialists think about managing long COVID? Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology. 2023;3(1):e236. doi:10.1017/ash.2023.519 https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/antimicrobial-stewardship-and-healthcare-epidemiology/article/what-do-infectious-disease-specialists-think-about-managing-long-covid/E89D7EA86E873D517D24FBB20D304A8D (Full text)

 

How Patient Input Helped Create Culturally Sensitive Multinational Instruments Assessing Post Viral Symptoms

Our study involves collaboration/participation in order to develop culturally sensitive multinational tools for assessing post viral symptoms.

We discuss the creation of questionnaires using patient participation, and the translation of these questionnaires using international collaboration.

Patient engagement in collaboration on the creation and use of these types of instruments is of particular importance for patients who historically have not been true partners in collaborative efforts to understand diseases.

This has occurred for those with the post-viral illness called Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS), which has generated considerable resentment and estrangement among the patient community.

Our article reviews:

1) why participation of diverse groups/patients is important in the development of instruments to measure key symptoms of ME/CFS,

2) why the ME/CFS group of patients needs to be included specifically (as an example),

and

3) why structured health questionnaires are important/useful.

Our article also has an overall aim of demonstrating collaborative efforts with patients and others on creating multinational scales.

We provide examples of participatory processes used in developing and translating patient-driven instruments so that they can be used in non-English speaking countries.

Our article illustrates how patients and international researchers can be involved in efforts to develop and translate international assessment instruments to validly capture domains of unexplained illness like ME/CFS.

With the onset of another post-viral illness, Long COVID, there is a world-wide need to create valid and culturally sensitive assessment instruments to measure critical symptoms, many of which are similar to ME/CFS.

Source: Leonard A. Jason and Joseph A. Dorri. How Patient Input Helped Create Culturally Sensitive Multinational Instruments Assessing Post Viral Symptoms. The Australian Community Psychologist., Volume 32 No 1  https://psychology.org.au/getmedia/c300a432-c7fd-4f97-9322-ce16429067e4/ac-vol-32(1)-2023-final-draft.pdf#page=63 (Full text)

Assessing symptoms of long/post COVID and chronic fatigue syndrome using the DePaul symptom questionnaire-2: a validation in a German-speaking population

Abstract:

Objective: A subset of Covid-19 survivors will develop persisting health sequelae (i.e. Long Covid/LC or Post Covid/PC) similar to Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS). In the absence of a reliable biomarker to diagnose LC/PC and ME/CFS, their classification based on symptoms becomes indispensable. Hence, we translated and validated the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire−2 (DSQ-2), to offer a screening tool for the German-speaking population.

Methods: A sample of healthy adults, and adults with ME/CFS and LC/PC (N = 502) completed a reduced-item version of the DSQ-2 and SF-36 questionnaire online. We performed an exploratory factor analysis, assessed construct validity, diagnostic accuracy and compared the symptom profiles of individuals with ME/CFS versus LC/PC versus healthy adults.

Results: Exploratory factor analysis revealed a 10-factor solution with excellent internal consistencies. The sensitivity of the DSQ-2 was excellent. The specificity was moderate with moderate inter-rater reliability. Construct validity of the DSQ-2 was supported by strong negative correlations with physical health subscales of the SF-36. A visual comparison of the symptom profiles of individuals with ME/CFS versus LC/PC revealed a comparable pattern.

Conclusion: Despite lower symptom severity, individuals with LC/PC reported significantly stronger limitations in general health and physical functioning and were more likely to meet ME/CFS diagnostic criteria with ongoing sickness duration, suggesting that ME/CFS can be considered a long-term sequela of LC/PC. This study offers a translated and validated version of the reduced-item DSQ-2 that can guide medical evaluation and aid physicians in identifying a ME/CFS-like subtype of LC/PC.

Source: Nina Buntić, Leonard A. Jason, Jochen Schneider, Marc Schlesser & André Schulz (2023) Assessing symptoms of long/post COVID and chronic fatigue syndrome using the DePaul symptom questionnaire-2: a validation in a German-speaking population, Fatigue: Biomedicine, Health & Behavior, DOI: 10.1080/21641846.2023.2295419 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21641846.2023.2295419 (Full text)

Implications of the quality of the doctor-patient relationship on health in adult ME/CFS patients. A qualitative public health study from a patient perspective

Abstract:

in English, German

Background: Most patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) are dissatisfied with medical care. They complain about e. g. the lack of medical recognition of ME/CFS as a neuroimmunological disease and the medical perception of those affected as “difficult patients”.

Method: As part of an exploratory qualitative survey, 544 medically diagnosed ME/CFS patients (> 20 years; 455 ♀, 89 ♂) were asked about their subjective experiences with regard to the doctor-patient relationships (DP relationship) to their treating physicians. The questionnaire was structured analogously to a focused, standardized guideline interview. The written answers were evaluated using a qualitative content analysis according to Mayring.

Results: The participants reported a significant deterioration in their health situation and their quality of life as a result of misdiagnoses and incorrect treatments, the strained DP relationship and the lack of support from the physicians. All of this leads to fear of visiting the doctor, a general loss of trust in physicians, a feeling of helplessness up to bitterness and resignation – with suicide as the last mental option for some patients to escape from this precarious situation. During medical consultations, other participants only addressed health problems that were not related to ME/CFS, or only went to the doctor in an emergency, or refrained from contacting doctors entirely.

Conclusions: The DP relationship described by the participants as problematic in their opinion has significant negative health consequences for them. It is therefore of great urgency to develop a patient-centred treatment concept that focuses on ME/CFS patients as experts on their own illness.

Source: Habermann-Horstmeier L, Horstmeier LM. Auswirkungen der Qualität der Arzt-Patient-Beziehung auf die Gesundheit von erwachsenen ME/CFS-Erkrankten : Eine qualitative Public-Health-Studie aus Patientensicht [Implications of the quality of the doctor-patient relationship on health in adult ME/CFS patients. A qualitative public health study from a patien perspective]. MMW Fortschr Med. 2023 Dec;165(Suppl 5):16-27. German. doi: 10.1007/s15006-023-2894-z. PMID: 38062324.

Treatment of 95 post-Covid patients with SSRIs

Abstract:

After Covid-19 infection, 12.5% develops post-Covid-syndrome (PCS). Symptoms indicate numerous affected organ systems. After a year, chronic fatigue, dysautonomia and neurological and neuropsychiatric complaints predominate. In this study, 95 PCS patients were treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). This study used an exploratory questionnaire and found that two-thirds of patients had a reasonably good to strong response on SSRIs, over a quarter of patients had moderate response, while 10% reported no response.

Overall, patients experienced substantial improved well-being. Brainfog and sensory overload decreased most, followed by chronic fatigue and dysautonomia. Outcomes were measured with three different measures that correlated strongly with each other. The response to SSRIs in PCS conditions was explained by seven possible neurobiological mechanisms based on recent literature on PCS integrated with already existing knowledge.

Important for understanding these mechanisms is the underlying biochemical interaction between various neurotransmitter systems and parts of the immune system, and their dysregulation in PCS. The main link appears to be with the metabolic kynurenine pathway (KP) which interacts extensively with the immune system. The KP uses the same precursor as serotonin: tryptophan. The KP is overactive in PCS which maintains inflammation and which causes a lack of tryptophan. Finally, potential avenues for future research to advance this line of clinical research are discussed.

Source: Rus CP, de Vries BEK, de Vries IEJ, Nutma I, Kooij JJS. Treatment of 95 post-Covid patients with SSRIs. Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 2;13(1):18599. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45072-9. PMID: 37919310; PMCID: PMC10622561. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10622561/ (Full text)