Tag: post-infection syndrome

Does Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) Represent a Poly-Herpesvirus Post-Virus Infectious Disease?

Abstract:

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a debilitating multisystem illness with unknown etiology. An estimated 17-24 million people representing approximately 1% of the population are afflicted worldwide. In over half of cases, ME/CFS onset is associated with acute “flu-like” symptoms, suggesting a role for viruses. However, no single virus has been identified as the only etiological agent.

This may reflect the approach employed or more strongly the central dogma associated with herpesviruses replication, which states that a herpesvirus exists in two states, either lytic or latent. The purpose of this review is to address the role that abortive lytic replication may have in the pathogenesis of ME/CFS and other post-acute viral infections and also to raise awareness that these syndromes might be poly-herpesviruses mediated diseases.

Source: Ariza ME, Mena Palomo I, Williams MV. Does Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) Represent a Poly-Herpesvirus Post-Virus Infectious Disease? Viruses. 2025 Dec 16;17(12):1624. doi: 10.3390/v17121624. PMID: 41472292. https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/17/12/1624 (Full text)

The lingering shadow of epidemics: post-acute sequelae across history

Significance:
Long COVID, a chronic multisystemic health condition, impacts hundreds of millions around the world. Long COVID has brought light to other related post-acute infection syndromes (PAIS) that are triggered by a wide array of pathogens. This opinion article highlights historical accounts of PAIS through the centuries and emphasizes the need for integrated approaches to understanding and treating PAIS.
Highlights:

  • New or persistent symptoms following COVID-19, known as ‘long COVID’, occur in an estimated 4–20% of pediatric and 10–20% of adult patients after acute infection with SARS-CoV-2. Long COVID is associated with dysregulation of both innate and adaptive immunity.
  • While long COVID is a relatively new clinical entity, post-acute infection syndromes (PAIS) have been well documented for over a century.
  • A wide variety of pathogens are associated with PAIS, including divergent classes of viruses, bacteria, and parasites. While each PAIS has a unique trigger and pathology, similarities in symptom profiles and immunological findings suggest these conditions may share features or involve overlapping biological mechanisms.
  • Despite being well described in the literature, PAIS remain understudied relative to their high disease burden. Patients often face stigma and psychologization from medical professionals when disease biomarkers are not readily apparent, exemplified by the historic dismissal of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS).
Abstract:
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has drawn global attention to post-acute infection syndromes (PAIS), with millions affected by post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC, or Long COVID). While Long COVID is newly defined, PAIS have been described for over a century following epidemic infections. Multiple pathogens – including influenza, Epstein-Barr virus, and Borrelia burgdorferi, among others – can precipitate persistent, poorly understood symptoms. Chronic illnesses such as myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) have long been linked to infectious triggers. This recurring association highlights critical knowledge gaps and underscores the need for systematic investigation. Unlike prior pandemics, the current era offers advanced technologies and analytic tools to address these gaps. Defining the biology of Long COVID may yield broader insights into host–pathogen interactions and mechanisms of chronic illness.
Source: Miller CM, Moen JK, Iwasaki A. The lingering shadow of epidemics: post-acute sequelae across history. Trends Immunol. 2025 Dec 4:S1471-4906(25)00267-4. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2025.10.010. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 41350176. https://www.cell.com/trends/immunology/fulltext/S1471-4906(25)00267-4 (Full text)

Growing recognition of post-acute infection syndromes

Commentary:
Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and long COVID affect large numbers of people, and constitute a substantial burden to the U.S. and global economies. The article by Eckey et al., in this issue of PNAS (1), adds to the growing evidence that the two illnesses have much in common. Moreover, the illnesses may represent just two examples of an even larger, recently recognized class of illness: post-acute infection syndromes (PAIS) (2).
ME/CFS
This illness first attracted attention in the 1980s. Typically, people suffering from ME/CFS previously have been healthy, and then develop a flu-like illness. While that illness appears initially not unlike previous transient illnesses, and while the respiratory symptoms and fever usually improve, people are left with a severe, persisting fatigue, cognitive problems, worsened symptoms following physical or mental exertion or upright posture, as well as unrefreshing sleep, an illness that can last for years (3, 4). The symptoms are not relieved by rest, and greatly impair a person’s ability to function at work and at home. Some individuals are homebound, some largely bedbound. People with ME/CFS often say, in so many words, “I am no longer the person I was.”
In the 1980s, some scientists suspected that a novel human pathogen was causing the illness. Such speculation seemed reasonable, since a novel virus recently had been discovered to cause the AIDS. However, no single, novel pathogen has emerged as the cause of ME/CFS.
Moreover, the standard laboratory tests that were performed in the 1980s generally came back “normal,” leading some to believe there were no underlying biological abnormalities to explain the symptoms. However, over the past 40 y, thousands of studies have identified many underlying abnormalities involving the brain, immune system, energy metabolism, redox imbalance, vascular injury, and gut microbiota (4–9). The symptoms of the illness are, indeed, accompanied by objective abnormalities.
Despite the fact that—in the United States, alone—the illness is estimated to affect up to 3.1 million people, and to generate direct and indirect expenses of approximately $36 to 51 billion annually (3, 10), relatively few investigators have sought to study the illness: the initial skepticism about whether the illness had a biological basis may have created a lingering stigma. That skepticism faded, to some degree, following publication in 2015 of a report from the U.S. National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine highlighting the importance of the problem (3).
Long COVID
Then, along came the COVID-19 pandemic. It was predicted that the pandemic would greatly increase the number of people with an ME/CFS-like illness (11), and that has proved to be the case. Many who have “recovered” from acute COVID-19, even from mild cases, have developed a persisting illness (called “long COVID”) with symptoms much like ME/CFS. The cumulative global incidence of long COVID may be as high as 400 million individuals (5, 8), and the costs to the U.S. and global economy (not including the direct costs of healthcare) may be several trillion dollars in the next 5 to 10 y (8, 12).
Comparing ME/CFS and Long COVID
The similarity of the symptoms seen in ME/CFS and long COVID is underscored by the report from Eckey et al. (1). The study involved a survey of nearly 4,000 people with these illnesses. Participants recorded the prevalence and severity of a large number of symptoms, comorbid illnesses, and responses to different treatments.
The authors recognize that such a survey has important limitations. The diagnoses of ME/CFS, long COVID, and comorbid illnesses were self-reported, and not determined by protocol-directed objective testing—although such testing often had been performed by their doctors. Likewise, the responses to different treatments were self-reported, not the results of randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Nevertheless, the large number of study subjects, and the consistency of their responses, suggests that their responses are valid.
Symptoms.
As seen in figure 1 of the report by Eckey et al. (1), the frequency of each of the symptoms is very similar in both illnesses. At the same time, there may be subgroups of people with both ME/CFS and long COVID in whom different symptoms are predominant: it is possible that these subgroups have different underlying pathophysiology, responses to treatments, and prognosis.
Underlying Pathophysiology.
Of course, the fact that the symptoms and symptom frequency are similar does not necessarily mean the two illnesses share an underlying pathophysiology. Nevertheless, it appears that they do. A detailed analysis of the underlying biological abnormalities seen in both illnesses reveals a striking similarity (6).
Comorbid Diseases.
The survey conducted by Eckey et al., addressed two other dimensions by which to compare the two illnesses. First, the survey found that people with the two illnesses frequently had the same comorbid conditions, particularly postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), migraine, dysautonomia, anxiety and depression, mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), Ehlers–Danlos syndrome (EDS)/joint hypermobility, and attention deficit disorder (ADD) (1).

Response to Therapies.

Patients with the two illnesses also responded similarly to specific treatments. Remarkably, even at the level of specific symptoms, responses were similar in people with the two illnesses, and the drugs most effective against particular symptoms would be expected to improve those symptoms, adding credibility to the self-reported improvement (1). Thus, the study is consistent with others in finding similar symptoms in people with the two illnesses and, additionally, finds similar comorbidities and responses to treatment.

PAIS

ME/CFS and long COVID are not the only two illnesses that share very similar symptoms. Over the past century, there have been many reports of an illness with very similar symptoms following multiple different acute bacterial, viral, fungal, and protozoal infections; hence, the proposal to call all of these illnesses PAIS (2). Long COVID surely is a PAIS (since the inciting infectious agent is known), and myalgic encephalomyelitis/ chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) likely often is (even though the inciting agents often have not been pursued by physicians).

IACIs
PAIS, in turn, are one example of an even larger umbrella category, a group of disorders called IACIs (9, 13). As shown in Fig. 1, we distinguish three categories of IACIs: new organ injury from an infectious agent, such as the development of multiple sclerosis following primary infection with Epstein–Barr virus or duodenal ulcers caused by Helicobacter pylori; accelerated incidence of disease processes that had not yet become apparent before the time of an acute infection (including accelerated atherosclerosis and neurodegeneration post-COVID) (8, 14); and PAIS. Some observers use the term long COVID to include all three categories of illness following acute infection with SARS-CoV-2. We restrict the use of the term long COVID to just the PAIS that can follow SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Read the rest of this article here: https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2513877122
Source: A.L. Komaroff, Growing recognition of post-acute infection syndromes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 122 (29) e2513877122, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2513877122 (2025). https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2513877122 (Full text)

Assessing the influence of lived-experience experts on healthcare providers in a virtual community of practice: a qualitative study

Abstract:

Long COVID, myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), and other poorly understood post-acute infection syndromes (PAIS) can present with unexplained symptoms or conditions that may be misunderstood by healthcare providers, causing delays in diagnosis and care. To address these issues, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funded the Long COVID and Fatiguing Illness Recovery Program (LC&FIRP), initiated as a pilot project to assess whether providing tele-mentoring and other online education for primary care providers could help them improve the quality of life and support the recovery of their patients with these conditions.

The LC&FIRP multi-disciplinary team-based care approach is built on the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) learning model, which is an evidence-based virtual learning framework developed by the University of New Mexico and designed to disseminate and implement best practices, especially in under-resourced areas. A distinctive feature of LC&FIRP was the inclusion of lived-experience experts. To explore the influence of lived-experience experts on the care patients received, we collected the educational recommendations provided by the lived-experience experts during webinar sessions (January 2022-March 2024) and grouped these by themes.

The major themes that emerged included validation of patients’ illness experience; attitudes and beliefs about Long COVID, ME/CFS, and PAIS; understanding patients’ challenges and communicating with empathy; navigating referrals; recognizing and supporting disability; and supporting self-care. Investigators also interviewed patients of the Family Health Centers of San Diego (FHCSD) about their experiences receiving care from participating primary care providers and employed content analysis methods to code interview transcripts to identify themes among patients’ perspectives. Positive comments from the patients about topics emphasized by the lived-experience experts provided evidence of providers’ uptake and application of the experts’ recommendations and support the value of involving lived-experience experts in medical education to improve health services.

Source: Weaver SS, Carry M, Bertolli J, Godino J, Struminger B, Taren D, Scott JD, Sharp SP, Samaniego J, Bean DR, Issa A, Lin JS, Unger ER, Ramers CB. Assessing the influence of lived-experience experts on healthcare providers in a virtual community of practice: a qualitative study. Front Health Serv. 2025 Jun 27;5:1562651. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1562651. PMID: 40656206; PMCID: PMC12245761. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12245761/ (Full text)

A Mechanical Basis: Brainstem Dysfunction as a Potential Etiology of ME/CFS and Long COVID

Abstract:
The underlying pathologies driving post-acute infectious syndromes (e.g. myalgic encephalomyelitis / chronic fatigue syndrome, long COVID, etc) remain poorly understood. Given the extreme burden these illnesses impose on suffers, and the dramatic increase in cases following the COVID-19 pandemic, it is important to establish a deeper understanding of these pathologies.
We propose a model of how ME/CFS (and related illnesses), might emerge following a viral insult. Central to this hypothesis is the recognition that the core diagnostic features of ME/CFS involve bodily systems known to be governed by the brainstem. This is consistent with the growing literature suggesting that spinal and craniocervical pathologies are over-represented in people with ME/CFS and other post-infectious disorders.
We hypothesize that a non-trivial number of cases of ME/CFS and Long Covid (LC) may have a “mechanical basis.” We propose that an infectious insult may trigger an initial loss of connective tissue integrity in susceptible individuals (e.g. those with pre-existing hypermobility spectrum disorders), which in turn leads to instability at the craniocervical junction, and ultimately mechanical deformation of the brainstem. This ultimately causes widespread autonomic nervous system and immune system dysfunction due to aberrant signaling from the deformed nuclei.
This causal chain may also lead to a vicious cycle: if the dysregulation produced by the initial brainstem deformation leads to a deranged immune response or state of chronic hyper-inflammation, further expression of connective tissue degrading and remodeling factors such as MMPs and mast cells may be triggered. This could further degrade the connective tissues of the craniocervical junction and, in turn, increase mechanical deformation of the brainstem, leading to symptom exacerbation over time and leading to the chronic, lifelong presentation typical of ME/CFS.
Source: Wood, J., Varley, T., Hartman, J., Melia, N., Kaufman, D., & Falor, T. (2025). A Mechanical Basis: Brainstem Dysfunction as a Potential Etiology of ME/CFS and Long COVID. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202506.0874.v1 https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202506.0874/v1 (Full text)

Core features and inherent diversity of post-acute infection syndromes

Abstract:

Post-acute infection syndromes (PAIS), i.e., long-lasting pathologies subsequent to infections that do not properly resolve, have both a common core and a broad diversity of manifestations. PAIS include a group of core symptoms (pathological fatigue, cognitive problems, sleep disorders and pain) accompanied by a large set of diverse symptoms. Core and diverse additional symptoms, which can persist for years, exhibiting periods of relapses and remissions, usually start suddenly after an apparently common infection.

PAIS display highly variable clinical features depending on the nature of the initial pathogen, and to an even larger extent, on the diversity of preexisting individual terrains in which PAIS are rooted. In a first part, I discuss biological issues related to the persistence of microbial antigens, dysregulated immune responses, reactivation of latent viruses, different potential self-sustained inflammatory loops, mitochondrial dysfunction, metabolic disorders in the tryptophan- kynurenin pathway (TKP) with impact on serotonin, and consequences of a dysfunctional bidirectional microbiota-gut-brain axis.

The second part deals with the nervous system dependence of PAIS. I rely on the concept of interoception, the process by which the brain senses, integrates and interprets signals originating from within the body, and sends feebacks aimed at maintaining homeostasis. Interoception is central for understanding the origin of fatigue, dysautonomia, dysfunctioning of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, and its relation with stress, inflammation or depression.

I propose that all individual predispositions leading to self-sustained vicious circles constitute building blocks that can self-assemble in many possible ways, to give rise to both core and diverse features of PAIS. A useful discrimination between different PAIS subtypes should be obtained with a composite profiling including biomarkers, questionnaires and functional tests so as to take into account PAIS multidimensionality.

Source: Trautmann A. Core features and inherent diversity of post-acute infection syndromes. Front Immunol. 2025 Jun 3;16:1509131. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1509131. PMID: 40529374; PMCID: PMC12170329. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12170329/ (Full text)

Cerebrospinal fluid immune phenotyping reveals distinct immunotypes of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a complex heterogeneous multiorgan disease that can have severe impact on individuals’ quality of life. Diagnosis of ME/CFS is based on symptom presentation, and a significant goal for the field is to establish meaningful subtypes. The heterogeneity in the literature suggests that individuals living with ME/CFS may suffer from overlapping but different underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.

We enrolled 40 participants with ME/CFS and 41 matched healthy control subjects at the Bragée Clinic in Sweden. We assessed plasma samples from both ME/CFS cases and control groups and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from individuals with ME/CFS.

We investigated dysregulated pathways and disease profiles through clinical questionnaires; multiplex analyses of cytokines, hormones, and matrix metalloproteinases; pathogen seroreactivity through peptide display bacteria libraries; and high-throughput microarray for autoantibodies. All samples used were from humans.

We show altered interaction patterns between circulating biological factors in plasma of ME/CFS participants. Our analysis of CSF from individuals with ME/CFS revealed different immunotypes of disease. We found 2 patient clusters based on matrix metalloproteinases profiles. The subgroups had similar clinical presentation but distinct pathogen exposure and CSF inflammatory profiles.

Our findings shed light on ME/CFS immune phenotypes and generate hypotheses for future research in disease pathogenesis and treatment development by exploring disease subgroups.

Source: Bastos VC, Greene KA, Tabachnikova A, Bhattacharjee B, Sjögren P, Bertilson B, Reifert J, Zhang M, Kamath K, Shon J, Gehlhausen JR, Guan L, VanElzakker M, Proal A, Bragée B, Iwasaki A. Cerebrospinal fluid immune phenotyping reveals distinct immunotypes of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. J Immunol. 2025 May 15:vkaf087. doi: 10.1093/jimmun/vkaf087. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 40373264. https://academic.oup.com/jimmunol/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jimmun/vkaf087/8133211 (Full text)

Predisposing and Precipitating Factors in Epstein–Barr Virus-Caused Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Abstract:

Long COVID following SARS-CoV-2 and Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) following infectious mononucleosis (IM) are two examples of post-viral syndromes. The identification of risk factors predisposing patients to developing and maintaining post-infectious syndromes may help uncover their underlying mechanisms.
The majority of patients with ME/CFS report infectious illnesses before the onset of ME/CFS, with 30% of cases of ME/CFS due to IM caused by the Epstein–Barr virus. After developing IM, one study found 11% of adults had ME/CFS at 6 months and 9% had ME/CFS at 1 year. Another study of adolescents found 13% and 7% with ME/CFS at 6 and 12 months following IM, respectively. However, it is unclear which variables are potential risk factors contributing to the development and maintenance of ME/CFS following IM, because few prospective studies have collected baseline data before the onset of the triggering illness.
The current article provides an overview of a study that included pre-illness predictors of ME/CFS development following IM in a diverse group of college students who were enrolled before the onset of IM. Our data set included an ethnically and sociodemographically diverse group of young adult students, and we were able to longitudinally follow these youths over time to better understand the risk factors associated with the pathophysiology of ME/CFS.
General screens of health and psychological well-being, as well as blood samples, were obtained at three stages of the study (Stage 1—Baseline—when the students were well, at least 6 weeks before the student developed IM; Stage 2—within 6 weeks following the diagnosis of IM, and Stage 3—six months after IM, when they had either developed ME/CFS or recovered). We focused on the risk factors for new cases of ME/CFS following IM and found factors both at baseline (Stage 1) and at the time of IM (Stage 2) that predicted nonrecovery. We are now collecting seven-year follow-up data on this sample, as well as including cases of long COVID. The lessons learned in this prospective study are reviewed.
Source: Jason LA, Katz BZ. Predisposing and Precipitating Factors in Epstein–Barr Virus-Caused Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Microorganisms. 2025; 13(4):702. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13040702 https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/13/4/702 (Full text)

The persistence of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) after SARS-CoV-2 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Highlights:

  • SARS-CoV-2 can trigger Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.
  • 51% of Long COVID-19 patients have Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.
  • Long COVID-19 is a new name for an old disease.

Abstract:

Objectives: Long COVID-19 (LC) patients experience a number of chronic idiopathic symptoms that are highly similar to those of post-viral Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS). We have therefore performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the proportion of LC patients that satisfy ME/CFS diagnostic criteria.

Methods: Clinical studies published between January 2020 to May 2023 were identified using the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and CINAHL databases. Publication inclusion/exclusion criteria were formulated using the global CoCoPop framework. Data were pooled using a random-effects model with a restricted maximum-likelihood estimator. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical assessment tool.

Results: We identified 13 eligible studies that reported a total of 1,973 LC patients. Our meta-analysis indicated that 51% (95% CI, 42%-60%) of LC patients satisfied ME/CFS diagnostic criteria with fatigue, sleep disruption, and muscle/joint pain being the most common symptoms. Importantly, LC patients also experienced the ME/CFS hallmark symptom, post-exertional malaise.

Conclusions: Our study not only demonstrates that LC patients exhibit similar symptom clusters to ME/CFS, but that approximately half of LC patients satisfy a diagnosis of ME/CFS. Our findings suggest that current ME/CFS criteria could be adapted to the identification of a subset of LC patients that may facilitate the standardized diagnosis, management and the recruitment for clinical studies in the future.

Source: Ankush Dehlia, Mark A. Guthridge. The persistence of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) after SARS-CoV-2 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Infection, 2024, 106297, ISSN 0163-4453, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106297.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163445324002317 (Full text)

A multimodal approach for treating post-acute infectious syndrome

Abstract:

Long-term complications, such as extensive fatigue and cognitive issues, are known from various infections, including SARS-CoV-2, influenza
virus, or Borrelia burgdorferi. The pathology is mostly unknown and differs between patients. Unfortunately, there is currently no common and
effective treatment. In this perspective, we imply that post-acute infectious syndromes are due to a variety of factors, including among others
diminished tissue perfusion, tissue infiltration by viruses, inflammation, and oxidative stress, and that not one specific biomarker can be used
to measure these syndromes. Thus, we suggest that a score based on a number of criteria/factors should be used to assess post-acute infectious
syndromes.

Consequently, probably not one single treatment can be used to treat this group of patients, and we suggest a multimodal
treatment regimen comprising a combination of pharmacotherapy, such as metformin and naltrexone with anti-inflammatory effects,
alongside physical therapies such as extracorporeal apheresis and transcutaneous neurotherapy. This combined approach aims to reduce
biomarker levels and enhance cognitive functions. This implies that a reset of the systems can be achieved by a multimodal approach based on a
score for post-acute infectious syndromes.

Source:  Charlotte Steenblock, Nicole Toepfner, Yannick P. Kok, Philip Mavberg, Horst Bruckmoser, Alfons Breu, Johannes Korth, Harald Heidecke, Milo A. Puhan, and Stefan R. Bornstein. A multimodal approach for treating post-acute infectious syndrome. Brain Medicine (2024) 1, 1–7; doi: https://doi.org/10.61373/bm024p.0064; Published online: 30 August 2024. https://bm.genomicpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/BM0064-Steenblock-2024.pdf (Full text)