Tag: long covid symptoms

Symptomatology and microbiology of the gastrointestinal tract in post-COVID conditions

Abstract:

Post-COVID conditions, also known as post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC), refer to the persistence of symptoms in COVID-19 long-haulers. Various manifestations of post-COVID conditions are general symptoms and/or manifestations of damage in multiple organs. Besides, SARS-CoV-2 can involve the gastrointestinal tract, resulting in sequelae such as diarrhea, abdominal pain, nausea, anorexia, vomiting, constipation, abdominal distension, acid reflux, and/or gastrointestinal bleeding.
Previous investigations point to SARS-CoV-2 entry into enterocytes enhances by the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors. Interestingly, ACE2 receptors are abundantly expressed in the gut, implying infection with SARS-CoV-2 might occur through this route as well as in the respiratory tract. According to mounting evidence, SARS-CoV-2 RNA has been identified in fecal specimens of patients with COVID-19 during and beyond the acute phase.
In addition, studies have shown gut microbiome composition is altered in patients with PASC, hence, another putative mechanism linked to gastrointestinal symptoms is gut dysbiosis. The presence of the gut-lung axis in COVID-19 might have major implications for disease pathogenesis and treatment.
This review discussed the prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms and pathophysiology underlying possible infection of the gut in patients with PASC. Also, SARS-COV-2 induced NLRP3 inflammasome-dependent inflammatory pathways are briefly addressed.
Source: Norouzi Masir M, Shirvaliloo M. Symptomatology and microbiology of the gastrointestinal tract in post-COVID conditions. JGH Open : an Open Access Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2022 Aug. DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.12811. PMID: 36247234; PMCID: PMC9538198. https://europepmc.org/article/pmc/pmc9538198 (Full text)

Endothelial dysfunction in COVID-19: an overview of evidence, biomarkers, mechanisms and potential therapies

Abstract:

The fight against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection is still raging. However, the pathophysiology of acute and post-acute manifestations of COVID-19 (long COVID-19) is understudied. Endothelial cells are sentinels lining the innermost layer of blood vessel that gatekeep micro- and macro-vascular health by sensing pathogen/danger signals and secreting vasoactive molecules. SARS-CoV-2 infection primarily affects the pulmonary system, but accumulating evidence suggests that it also affects the pan-vasculature in the extrapulmonary systems by directly (via virus infection) or indirectly (via cytokine storm), causing endothelial dysfunction (endotheliitis, endothelialitis and endotheliopathy) and multi-organ injury.

Mounting evidence suggests that SARS-CoV-2 infection leads to multiple instances of endothelial dysfunction, including reduced nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability, oxidative stress, endothelial injury, glycocalyx/barrier disruption, hyperpermeability, inflammation/leukocyte adhesion, senescence, endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EndoMT), hypercoagulability, thrombosis and many others. Thus, COVID-19 is deemed as a (micro)vascular and endothelial disease. Of translational relevance, several candidate drugs which are endothelial protective have been shown to improve clinical manifestations of COVID-19 patients.

The purpose of this review is to provide a latest summary of biomarkers associated with endothelial cell activation in COVID-19 and offer mechanistic insights into the molecular basis of endothelial activation/dysfunction in macro- and micro-vasculature of COVID-19 patients. We envisage further development of cellular models and suitable animal models mimicking endothelial dysfunction aspect of COVID-19 being able to accelerate the discovery of new drugs targeting endothelial dysfunction in pan-vasculature from COVID-19 patients.

Source: Xu, Sw., Ilyas, I. & Weng, Jp. Endothelial dysfunction in COVID-19: an overview of evidence, biomarkers, mechanisms and potential therapies. Acta Pharmacol Sin (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41401-022-00998-0 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41401-022-00998-0 (Full text)

New‑onset neuropsychiatric sequelae and ‘long‑COVID’ syndrome (Review)

Abstract:

The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‑19) pandemic has had a widespread impact on individuals’ mental health through indirect psychological and social mechanisms, related to factors such as fear of infection or death, social isolation, lack of social support and financial instability.
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‑CoV‑2) infection has also been associated with the development or recurrence of neuropsychiatric symptoms, both during the acute phase, as well as during the post‑acute ‘long‑COVID’ phase. In addition to the COVID‑19 survivors with a mental health history that are at a high risk of experiencing a range of neuropsychiatric symptoms following resolution of acute COVID‑19, there is accumulating evidence that a diagnosis of COVID‑19 may also be associated with new‑onset neuropsychiatric morbidity among survivors without pre‑existing mental health disorders.
In particular, studies investigating the incidence of post‑acute neuropsychiatric sequelae, based mostly on retrospective cohort study designs and data from national health registries, have reported the development of new‑onset manifestations, including depression, anxiety, psychotic symptoms, sleep disturbances and fatigue. Nevertheless, when COVID‑19 survivors were compared with SARS‑CoV‑2‑negative controls and especially survivors of other disorders (such as influenza), the findings regarding the risk of incident neuropsychiatric manifestations varied among studies.
While there is evidence of an association between SARS‑CoV‑2 infection and the subsequent occurrence of new‑onset neuropsychiatric symptoms, especially among patients with increased disease severity, further research using methodological approaches less susceptible to confounding bias is required to establish causal relationships.
Source: Efstathiou, V., Stefanou, M., Demetriou, M., Siafakas, N., Katsantoni, E., Makris, M., Tsivgoulis, G., Zoumpourlis, V., Kympouropoulos, S. P., Tsoporis, J. N., Spandidos, D. A., Ferentinos, P., Smyrnis, N., Rizos, E.”New‑onset neuropsychiatric sequelae and ‘long‑COVID’ syndrome (Review)”. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 24.5 (2022): 705. https://www.spandidos-publications.com/10.3892/etm.2022.11641 (Full text available as PDF file)

New symptoms and prevalence of postacute COVID-19 syndrome among nonhospitalized COVID-19 survivors

Abstract:

The aim of this study was to assess postacute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) syndrome (PACS) symptoms according to the onset of the infection while evaluating the effect of COVID-19 vaccination on the symptoms of PACS. We conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study in which nonhospitalized COVID-19 survivors and healthy controls were compared for the occurrence of PACS.

The total number of patients in this study was 472. At 6–12 and > 12 months after the infection, COVID-19 survivors had a significantly higher incidence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and anxiety than the non-COVID-19 cohort. Furthermore, depression, cognitive deficit, tics, impaired quality of life and general health impairment were significantly more prevalent among COVID-19 survivors at < 6 months, 6–12 months and > 12 months than in the non-COVID-19 cohort. However, respiratory symptoms were significantly more prevalent among COVID-19 survivors only in the first 6 months after infection.

In addition, cognitive deficit (OR = 0.15; 95% CI 0.03–0.87) and impaired quality of life (B = − 2.11; 95% CI − 4.21 to − 0.20) were significantly less prevalent among vaccinated COVID-19 survivors than among nonvaccinated survivors.

Longitudinal studies are needed to establish the time that should elapse after COVID-19 infection for the symptoms of PACS to appear. Randomized clinical trials are needed to assess the possibility that COVID-19 vaccines might relieve PACS symptoms.

Source: Albtoosh, A.S., Toubasi, A.A., Al Oweidat, K. et al. New symptoms and prevalence of postacute COVID-19 syndrome among nonhospitalized COVID-19 survivors. Sci Rep 12, 16921 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21289-y  (Full text)

Post-Acute Effect of SARS-CoV-2 Infection on the Cardiac Autonomic Function

Abstract:

Background: Recent studies reported a long-lasting effect of COVID-19 infection that extends beyond the active disease and disrupts various body systems besides the respiratory system. The current study aims to investigate the post-acute effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection on cardiovascular autonomic activity, reactivity and sensitivity in patients who had the infection at least 3 months before.

Methods: This was a comparative cross-sectional observational study. Fifty-nine subjects were allocated into two groups, controls (n=31), who had no history of positive COVID-19 infection, and the post-COVID patients (n=28) who were recruited 3 to 8 months after testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Baseline cardiovascular autonomic activity was evaluated through recording of baseline heart rate variability (HRV), autonomic reactivity was determined through standard cardiovascular autonomic reflex tests (CART), and cardiac autonomic sensitivity was assessed through cardiac baroreceptor sensitivity (cBRS).

Results: Higher incidence of orthostatic hypotension was observed in post-COVID patients compared to controls (39.3% and 3.2%, respectively, p <0.001). Additionally, significantly reduced handgrip test, and heart rate response to head-up tilt was illustrated in the post-COVID group (p <0.001). About 85.7% of post-COVID participants had at least one abnormal cardiovascular reflex test (CART) compared to the control group (p <0.001). Although HRV parameters (TP, LF, HF, SDRR, RMSSD, pRR50), and the cBRS were numerically lower in the post-COVID-19 group, this did not reach the level of significance.

Conclusion: The results of the present study are suggestive of altered cardiovascular reactivity in post-acute COVID patients and demand further investigation and longer term follow up.

Post-Viral Fatigue in COVID-19: A Review of Symptom Assessment Methods, Mental, Cognitive, and Physical Impairment

Abstract:

Coronavirus 2 is responsible for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), and the main sequela is persistent fatigue. Post-viral fatigue is common and affects patients with mild, asymptomatic coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). However, the exact mechanisms involved in developing post-COVID-19 fatigue remain unclear. Furthermore, physical and cognitive impairments in these individuals have been widely described. Therefore, this review aims to summarize and propose tools from a multifaceted perspective to assess COVID-19 infection.

Herein, we point out the instruments that can be used to assess fatigue in long-term COVID-19: fatigue in a subjective manner or fatigability in an objective manner. For physical and mental fatigue, structured questionnaires were used to assess perceived symptoms, and physical and cognitive performance assessment tests were used to measure fatigability using reduced performance.

Source: Campos MC, Nery T, Starke AC, de Bem Alves AC, Speck AE, Junior ASA. Post-Viral Fatigue in COVID-19: A Review of Symptom Assessment Methods, Mental, Cognitive, and Physical Impairment. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022 Oct 3:104902. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104902. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36202253; PMCID: PMC9528075. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763422003918 (Full text)

Long-COVID Syndrome and the Cardiovascular System: A Review of Neurocardiologic Effects on Multiple Systems

Abstract:

Purpose of review: Long-COVID syndrome is a multi-organ disorder that persists beyond 12 weeks post-acute SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19). Here, we provide a definition for this syndrome and discuss neuro-cardiology involvement due to the effects of (1) angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptors (the entry points for the virus), (2) inflammation, and (3) oxidative stress (the resultant effects of the virus).

Recent findings: These effects may produce a spectrum of cardio-neuro effects (e.g., myocardial injury, primary arrhythmia, and cardiac symptoms due to autonomic dysfunction) which may affect all systems of the body. We discuss the symptoms and suggest therapies that target the underlying autonomic dysfunction to relieve the symptoms rather than merely treating symptoms. In addition to treating the autonomic dysfunction, the therapy also treats chronic inflammation and oxidative stress. Together with a full noninvasive cardiac workup, a full assessment of the autonomic nervous system, specifying parasympathetic and sympathetic (P&S) activity, both at rest and in response to challenges, is recommended. Cardiac symptoms must be treated directly. Cardiac treatment is often facilitated by treating the P&S dysfunction. Cardiac symptoms of dyspnea, chest pain, and palpitations, for example, need to be assessed objectively to differentiate cardiac from neural (autonomic) etiology. Long-term myocardial injury commonly involves P&S dysfunction. P&S assessment usually connects symptoms of Long-COVID to the documented autonomic dysfunction(s).

Source: DePace NL, Colombo J. Long-COVID Syndrome and the Cardiovascular System: A Review of Neurocardiologic Effects on Multiple Systems. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022 Sep 30:1–16. doi: 10.1007/s11886-022-01786-2. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36178611; PMCID: PMC9524329.  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9524329/ (Full text)

The Neurobiology of Long COVID

Abstract:

Persistent neurological and neuropsychiatric symptoms affect a substantial fraction of people after COVID-19 and represent a major component of the post-acute COVID syndrome, also known as long COVID. Here, we review what is understood about the pathobiology of post-acute COVID-19 impacts on the CNS and discuss possible neurobiological underpinnings of the cognitive symptoms affecting COVID-19 survivors. We propose the chief mechanisms that may contribute to this emerging neurological health crisis.
Source: Michelle Monje, Akiko Iwasaki. The Neurobiology of Long COVID. Published:October 06, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2022.10.006 https://www.cell.com/neuron/pdf/S0896-6273(22)00910-2.pdf (Full text available as PDF file)

Network autonomic analysis of post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 and postural tachycardia syndrome

Abstract:

Background: The autonomic nervous system (ANS) is a complex network where sympathetic and parasympathetic domains interact inside and outside of the network. Correlation-based network analysis (NA) is a novel approach enabling the quantification of these interactions. The aim of this study is to assess the applicability of NA to assess relationships between autonomic, sensory, respiratory, cerebrovascular, and inflammatory markers on post-acute sequela of COVID-19 (PASC) and postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS).

Methods: In this retrospective study, datasets from PASC (n = 15), POTS (n = 15), and matched controls (n = 11) were analyzed. Networks were constructed from surveys (autonomic and sensory), autonomic tests (deep breathing, Valsalva maneuver, tilt, and sudomotor test) results using heart rate, blood pressure, cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFv), capnography, skin biopsies for assessment of small fiber neuropathy (SFN), and various inflammatory markers. Networks were characterized by clusters and centrality metrics.

Results: Standard analysis showed widespread abnormalities including reduced orthostatic CBFv in 100%/88% (PASC/POTS), SFN 77%/88%, mild-to-moderate dysautonomia 100%/100%, hypocapnia 87%/100%, and elevated inflammatory markers. NA showed different signatures for both disorders with centrality metrics of vascular and inflammatory variables playing prominent roles in differentiating PASC from POTS.

Conclusions: NA is suitable for a relationship analysis between autonomic and nonautonomic components. Our preliminary analyses indicate that NA can expand the value of autonomic testing and provide new insight into the functioning of the ANS and related systems in complex disease processes such as PASC and POTS.

Source: Novak P, Giannetti MP, Weller E, Hamilton MJ, Mukerji SS, Alabsi HS, Systrom D, Marciano SP, Felsenstein D, Mullally WJ, Pilgrim DM, Castells M. Network autonomic analysis of post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 and postural tachycardia syndrome. Neurol Sci. 2022 Sep 28:1–12. doi: 10.1007/s10072-022-06423-y. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36169757; PMCID: PMC9517969. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9517969/ (Full text)

The significance of oxidative stress in the pathophysiology of Long COVID and Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS)

Abstract:

Long COVID is now well accepted as an ongoing post-viral syndrome resulting from infection of a single virus, the pandemic SARS-CoV-2. It mirrors the post-viral fatigue syndrome, Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/ Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, a global debilitating illness arising mainly from sporadic geographically-specific viral outbreaks, and from community endemic infections, but also from other stressors. Core symptoms of both syndromes are post-exertional malaise (a worsening of symptoms following mental or physical activity), pervasive fatigue, cognitive dysfunction (brain fog), and sleep disturbance. Long COVID patients frequently also suffer from shortness of breath, relating to the lung involvement of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

There is no universally accepted pathophysiology, or recognized biomarkers yet for Long COVID or indeed for Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Clinical case definitions with very similar characteristics for each have been defined. Chronic inflammation, immune dysfunction, and disrupted energy production in the peripheral system has been confirmed in Long COVID and has been well documented in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.

Neuroinflammation occurs in the brain in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/ Chronic Fatigue Syndrome as shown from a small number of positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance spectroscopy studies, and has now been demonstrated for Long COVID. Oxidative stress, an increase in reactive oxygen and reactive nitrogen species, and free radicals, has long been suggested as a potential cause for many of the symptoms seen in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, resulting from both activation of the brain’s immune system and dysregulation of mitochondrial function throughout the body. The brain as a high producer of energy may be particularly susceptible to oxidative stress. It has been shown in peripheral immune cells that the balanced production of proteins involved in regulation of the reactive oxygen species in mitochondria is disturbed in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Fluctuations in the chronic low level neuroinflammation during the ongoing course of Long COVID as well as Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome have been proposed to cause the characteristic severe relapses in patients.

This review explores oxidative stress as a likely significant contributor to the pathophysiology of Long COVID and Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, and the mechanisms by which oxidative stress could cause the symptoms seen in both syndromes. Treatments that could mitigate oxidative stress and thereby lessen the debilitating symptoms to improve the life of patients are discussed.

Source: WALKER, Max Oliver Mackay et al. The significance of oxidative stress in the pathophysiology of Long COVID and Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS). Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 9, sep. 2022. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/3050>. Date accessed: 09 oct. 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v10i9.3050.