Tag: long covid symptoms

Analysis of post-COVID symptoms and predisposing factors for chronic post-COVID syndrome

Abstract:

Introduction: While there is sufficient information about acute COVID-19, which can cause a multisystemic and fatal disease, post-COVID syndrome and risk factors for this condition remain poorly known. We aimed to identify postCOVID symptoms and risk factors for chronic post-COVID syndrome through this study.

Materials and methods: This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 254 out of 384 COVID-19 patients admitted to our COVID-19 polyclinic between February and April 2021. The patients were questioned with a list of 37 symptoms at the fifth and twelfth weeks after disease onset via phone review, and their acute post-COVID (APC) and chronic post-COVID (CPC) symptoms were recorded. Data on risk factors were collected from the hospital’s medical records system. Associations between symptom count in the CPC phase and age, sex, hospitalization, RT-PCR result, specific radiological findings, comorbidities, and long-term medications were evaluated.

Result: Two hundred twenty-one patients had APC symptoms, and 138 patients had CPC symptoms. While the most common symptom was fatigue at week five, it was hair loss at week 12. Symptoms were observed significantly less in the CPC phase than in the APC phase (Z= -12.301, p= 0.00). Female sex and the presence of specific radiological findings were significantly associated with the occurrence of CPC symptoms (p= 0.03, p= 0.00, respectively). Long-term use of angiotensin-2 receptor blockers (ARBs) was correlated with a low symptom count in the CPC phase (p= 0.00).

Conclusions: Female sex and the presence of specific radiological findings were risk factors for developing CPC. Long-term use of ARBs was associated with a low chronic post-COVID symptom burden. A substantial cluster of multisystemic symptoms was observed in both phases, and this condition highlights the requirement for customized outpatient management that includes long-term follow-up and treatment of COVID-19 patients. Identifying the high-risk patients that will develop persistent symptoms can guide this management.

Source: Abalı H, Demir D, Gül Ş, Şimşek Veske N, Tural Onur S. Analysis of post-COVID symptoms and predisposing factors for chronic post-COVID syndrome. Tuberk Toraks. 2023 Dec;71(4):378-389. English. doi: 10.5578/tt.20239606. PMID: 38152008. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38152008/ (Full text available as PDF file)

Persistence of post-COVID symptoms in the general population two years after SARS-CoV-2 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract:

Objective: This meta-analysis investigated the prevalence of post-COVID symptoms two-years after SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Methods: Electronic literature searches on PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science databases, and on medRxiv/bioRxiv preprint servers were conducted up to October 1, 2023. Studies reporting data on post-COVID symptoms at two-years after infection were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Random-effects models were used for meta-analytical pooled prevalence of each symptom.

Results: From 742 studies identified, twelve met inclusion criteria. The sample included 7912 COVID-19 survivors (50.7% female; age: 59.5, SD: 16.3). Post-COVID symptoms were assessed at a follow-up of 722.9 (SD: 51.5) days after. The overall methodological quality of studies was moderate (mean: 6/10, SD: 1.2 points). The most prevalent post-COVID symptoms two-years after SARS-CoV-2 infection were fatigue (28.0%, 95%CI 12.0-47.0), cognitive impairments (27.6%, 95%CI 12.6-45.8), and pain (8.4%, 95%CI 4.9-12.8). Psychological disturbances such as anxiety (13.4%, 95%CI 6.3-22.5) and depressive (18.0%, 95%CI 4.8-36.7) levels as well as sleep problems (20.9%, 95%CI 5.25-43.25) were also prevalent. Pooled data showed high heterogeneity (I2 ≥ 75%).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis shows the presence of post-COVID symptoms in 30% of patients two-years after COVID-19. Fatigue, cognitive disorders, and pain were the most prevalent post-COVID symptoms. Psychological disturbances as well as sleep problems were still present two-years after COVID-19.

Source: Fernandez-de-Las-Peñas C, Notarte KI, Macasaet R, Velasco JV, Catahay JA, Ver AT, Chung W, Valera-Calero JA, Navarro-Santana M. Persistence of post-COVID symptoms in the general population two years after SARS-CoV-2 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect. 2023 Dec 13:S0163-4453(23)00590-X. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2023.12.004. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38101521. https://www.journalofinfection.com/article/S0163-4453(23)00590-X/fulltext (Full text)

Assessing symptoms of long/post COVID and chronic fatigue syndrome using the DePaul symptom questionnaire-2: a validation in a German-speaking population

Abstract:

Objective: A subset of Covid-19 survivors will develop persisting health sequelae (i.e. Long Covid/LC or Post Covid/PC) similar to Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS). In the absence of a reliable biomarker to diagnose LC/PC and ME/CFS, their classification based on symptoms becomes indispensable. Hence, we translated and validated the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire−2 (DSQ-2), to offer a screening tool for the German-speaking population.

Methods: A sample of healthy adults, and adults with ME/CFS and LC/PC (N = 502) completed a reduced-item version of the DSQ-2 and SF-36 questionnaire online. We performed an exploratory factor analysis, assessed construct validity, diagnostic accuracy and compared the symptom profiles of individuals with ME/CFS versus LC/PC versus healthy adults.

Results: Exploratory factor analysis revealed a 10-factor solution with excellent internal consistencies. The sensitivity of the DSQ-2 was excellent. The specificity was moderate with moderate inter-rater reliability. Construct validity of the DSQ-2 was supported by strong negative correlations with physical health subscales of the SF-36. A visual comparison of the symptom profiles of individuals with ME/CFS versus LC/PC revealed a comparable pattern.

Conclusion: Despite lower symptom severity, individuals with LC/PC reported significantly stronger limitations in general health and physical functioning and were more likely to meet ME/CFS diagnostic criteria with ongoing sickness duration, suggesting that ME/CFS can be considered a long-term sequela of LC/PC. This study offers a translated and validated version of the reduced-item DSQ-2 that can guide medical evaluation and aid physicians in identifying a ME/CFS-like subtype of LC/PC.

Source: Nina Buntić, Leonard A. Jason, Jochen Schneider, Marc Schlesser & André Schulz (2023) Assessing symptoms of long/post COVID and chronic fatigue syndrome using the DePaul symptom questionnaire-2: a validation in a German-speaking population, Fatigue: Biomedicine, Health & Behavior, DOI: 10.1080/21641846.2023.2295419 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21641846.2023.2295419 (Full text)

Clinical features of Japanese patients with gastrointestinal long-COVID symptoms

Introduction:

Although the development of new therapeutic approaches and vaccines has decreased coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated mortality, prolonged systemic symptoms after COVID-19, termed long-COVID, have been a major concern, considering their potential impact on health-related quality of life (QOL). Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, including diarrhea and abdominal pain, have been reported in patients with long-COVID even months after the initial COVID-19 symptoms have resolved.

Although emerging evidence suggests that GI symptoms in long-COVID are affected by the dysregulation of the immune system or ongoing inflammation and damage to the GI tract caused by the initial COVID-19 infection, the clinical features of patients with GI long-COVID symptoms remain elusive. Our study aimed to clarify these features.

Source: Kazuma Yagi, Takanori Asakura, Hideki Terai, Keiko Ohgino, Katsunori Masaki, Ho Namkoong, Shotaro Chubachi, Jun Miyata, Ichiro Kawada, Nobuhiro Kodama, Satoshi Sakamoto, Akira Umeda, Takashi Ishiguro, Makoto Ishii, Koichi Fukunaga. JGH Open. First published: 06 December 2023 https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.13006 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jgh3.13006 (Full text)

Mechanisms of long COVID: An updated review

Abstract:

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been ongoing for more than 3 years, with an enormous impact on global health and economies. In some patients, symptoms and signs may remain after recovery from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, which cannot be explained by an alternate diagnosis; this condition has been defined as long COVID.

Long COVID may exist in patients with both mild and severe disease and is prevalent after infection with different SARS-CoV-2 variants. The most common symptoms include fatigue, dyspnea, and other symptoms involving multiple organs. Vaccination results in lower rates of long COVID. To date, the mechanisms of long COVID remain unclear. In this narrative review, we summarized the clinical presentations and current evidence regarding the pathogenesis of long COVID.

Source: Yan Liu, Xiaoying Gu, Haibo Li, Hui Zhang, Jiuyang Xu. Mechanisms of long COVID: An updated review. Chinese Medical Journal Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Volume 1, Issue 4, December 2023, Pages 231-240. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772558823000580 (Full text)

Large scale phenotyping of long COVID inflammation reveals mechanistic subtypes of disease after COVID-19 hospitalisation

Abstract:

One in ten SARS-CoV-2 infections result in prolonged symptoms termed long COVID, yet disease phenotypes and mechanisms are poorly understood. We studied the blood proteome of 719 previously hospitalised adults with long COVID grouped by symptoms. Elevated markers of myeloid inflammation and complement activation were associated with long COVID; elevated IL1R2, MATN2 and COLEC12 were associated with cardiorespiratory symptoms, fatigue, and anxiety/depression, while MATN2 and DPP10 were elevated in gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, and C1QA in cognitive impairment.
Proteins suggestive of neurodegeneration were elevated in cognitive impairment, whilst SCG3 (indicative of brain-gut axis disturbance) was specific to GI symptoms. Nasal inflammation was apparent after COVID-19 but did not associate with symptoms. Although SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG was elevated with some long COVID symptoms, virus was not detected from sputum. Thus, systemic inflammation is evident in long COVID and could be targeted in therapeutic trials tailored to pathophysiological differences between symptom groups.

Source: Peter Openshaw, Felicity Liew, Claudia Efstathiou et al. Large scale phenotyping of long COVID inflammation reveals mechanistic subtypes of disease after COVID-19 hospitalisation, 04 December 2023, PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square [https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3427282/v1] https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-3427282/v1 (Full text)

Differential Cardiopulmonary Hemodynamic Phenotypes in PASC Related Exercise Intolerance

Abstract:

Background Post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) affects a significant portion of patients who have previously contracted SARS-CoV-2, with exertional intolerance being a prominent symptom.

Study Objective This study aimed to characterize the invasive hemodynamic abnormalities of PASC-related exertional intolerance using a larger data set from invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing (iCPET).

Study Design & Intervention Fifty-five patients were recruited from the Yale Post-COVID-19-Recovery-Program, with most experiencing mild acute illness. Supine right heart catheterization (RHC) and iCPET were performed on all participants.

Main results The majority (75%) of PASC patients exhibited impaired peak systemic oxygen extraction (pEO2) during iCPET in conjunction with supranormal cardiac output (CO) (i.e., PASC alone group), On average, the PASC alone group exhibited a “normal” peak exercise capacity, VO2 (89±18% predicted). Approximately 25% of patients had evidence of central cardiopulmonary pathology (i.e., 12 with resting and exercise HFpEF and 2 with exercise PH). PASC patient with HFpEF (i.e., PASC HFpEF group) exhibited similarly impaired pEO2 with well compensated PH (i.e., peak VO2 and cardiac output >80% respectively) despite aberrant central cardiopulmonary exercise hemodynamics. PASC patients with HFpEF also exhibited increased body mass index of 39±7 kg·m−2. To examine the relative contribution of obesity to exertional impairment in PASC HFpEF, a control group compromising of obese non-PASC group (n=61) derived from historical iCPET cohort was used. The non-PASC obese patients with preserved peak VO2 (>80% predicted) exhibited a normal peak pulmonary artery wedge pressure (17±14 versus 25±6 mmHg; p=0.03) with similar maximal voluntary ventilation (90±12 versus 86±10%predicted; p=0.53) compared to PASC HFpEF patients. Impaired pEO2 was not significantly different between PASC patients who underwent supervised rehabilitation and those who did not (p=0.19).

Conclusions This study highlights the importance of considering impaired pEO2 in PASC patients with persistent exertional intolerance unexplained by conventional investigative testing. Results of current study also highlights the prevalence of a distinct high output failure HFpEF phenotype in PASC with a primary peripheral limitation to exercise.

Source: Peter A. Kahn, Phillip Joseph, Paul M. Heerdt, Inderjit Singh. Differential Cardiopulmonary Hemodynamic Phenotypes in PASC Related Exercise Intolerance. ERJ Open Research Jan 2023, 00714-2023; DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00714-2023 https://openres.ersjournals.com/content/early/2023/12/07/23120541.00714-2023 (Full text available as PDF file)

A synbiotic preparation (SIM01) for post-acute COVID-19 syndrome in Hong Kong (RECOVERY): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Abstract:

Background: Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS) affects over 65 million individuals worldwide but treatment options are scarce. We aimed to assess a synbiotic preparation (SIM01) for the alleviation of PACS symptoms.

Methods: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at a tertiary referral centre in Hong Kong, patients with PACS according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria were randomly assigned (1:1) by random permuted blocks to receive SIM01 (10 billion colony-forming units in sachets twice daily) or placebo orally for 6 months. Inclusion criterion was the presence of at least one of 14 PACS symptoms for 4 weeks or more after confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, including fatigue, memory loss, difficulty in concentration, insomnia, mood disturbance, hair loss, shortness of breath, coughing, inability to exercise, chest pain, muscle pain, joint pain, gastrointestinal upset, or general unwellness. Individuals were excluded if they were immunocompromised, were pregnant or breastfeeding, were unable to receive oral fluids, or if they had received gastrointestinal surgery in the 30 days before randomisation. Participants, care providers, and investigators were masked to group assignment. The primary outcome was alleviation of PACS symptoms by 6 months, assessed by an interviewer-administered 14-item questionnaire in the intention-to-treat population. Forward stepwise multivariable logistical regression was performed to identify predictors of symptom alleviation. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04950803.

Findings: Between June 25, 2021, and Aug 12, 2022, 463 patients were randomly assigned to receive SIM01 (n=232) or placebo (n=231). At 6 months, significantly higher proportions of the SIM01 group had alleviation of fatigue (OR 2·273, 95% CI 1·520-3·397, p=0·0001), memory loss (1·967, 1·271-3·044, p=0·0024), difficulty in concentration (2·644, 1·687-4·143, p<0·0001), gastrointestinal upset (1·995, 1·304-3·051, p=0·0014), and general unwellness (2·360, 1·428-3·900, p=0·0008) compared with the placebo group. Adverse event rates were similar between groups during treatment (SIM01 22 [10%] of 232 vs placebo 25 [11%] of 231; p=0·63). Treatment with SIM01, infection with omicron variants, vaccination before COVID-19, and mild acute COVID-19, were predictors of symptom alleviation (p<0·0036).

Interpretation: Treatment with SIM01 alleviates multiple symptoms of PACS. Our findings have implications on the management of PACS through gut microbiome modulation. Further studies are warranted to explore the beneficial effects of SIM01 in other chronic or post-infection conditions.

Source: Lau RI, Su Q, Lau ISF, Ching JYL, Wong MCS, Lau LHS, Tun HM, Mok CKP, Chau SWH, Tse YK, Cheung CP, Li MKT, Yeung GTY, Cheong PK, Chan FKL, Ng SC. A synbiotic preparation (SIM01) for post-acute COVID-19 syndrome in Hong Kong (RECOVERY): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Dec 7:S1473-3099(23)00685-0. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00685-0. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38071990. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(23)00685-0/fulltext (Full text)

Long-term symptom profiles after COVID-19 vs other acute respiratory infections: a population-based observational study (COVIDENCE UK)

Abstract:

Summary:

Background: Long COVID is a well recognised, if heterogeneous, entity. Acute respiratory infections (ARIs) due to other pathogens may cause long-term symptoms, but few studies compare post-acute sequelae between SARS-CoV-2 and other ARIs. We aimed to compare symptom profiles between people with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, people with previous non-COVID-19 ARIs, and contemporaneous controls, and to identify clusters of long-term symptoms.

Methods: COVIDENCE UK is a prospective, population-based UK study of ARIs in adults. We analysed data on 16 potential long COVID symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), reported in January, 2021, by participants unvaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. We classified participants as having previous SARS-CoV-2 infection or previous non-COVID-19 ARI (≥4 weeks prior) or no reported ARI. We compared symptoms by infection status using logistic and fractional regression, and identified symptom clusters using latent class analysis (LCA).

Findings: We included 10,203 participants (1343 [13.2%] with SARS-CoV-2 infection, 472 [4.6%] with non-COVID-19 ARI). Both types of infection were associated with increased prevalence/severity of most symptoms and decreased HRQoL compared with no infection. Participants with SARS-CoV-2 infection had increased odds of taste/smell problems and hair loss compared with participants with non-COVID-19 ARIs. Separate LCA models identified three symptom severity groups for each infection type. In the most severe groups (including 23% of participants with SARS-CoV-2, and 21% with non-COVID-19 ARI), SARS-CoV-2 infection presented with a higher probability of memory problems, difficulty concentrating, hair loss, and taste/smell problems than non-COVID-19 ARI.

Interpretation: Both SARS-CoV-2 and non-COVID-19 ARIs are associated with a wide range of long-term symptoms. Research on post-acute sequelae of ARIs should extend from SARS-CoV-2 to include other pathogens.

Source: Vivaldi G, Pfeffer PE, Talaei M, et al. Long-term symptom profiles after COVID-19 vs other acute respiratory infections: a population-based observational study (COVIDENCE UK). medRxiv; 2023. DOI: 10.1101/2023.07.06.23292296. https://europepmc.org/article/PPR/ppr687749 (Full text)

Comparison of post-acute sequelae following hospitalization for COVID-19 and influenza

Abstract

Background: Few studies have directly compared the risk and magnitude of post-acute sequelae following COVID-19 and influenza, and most of these studies were conducted before emergence of the Omicron. This study investigated the prevalence of post-COVID conditions and the long-term risk of emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and deaths in patients with COVID-19 and compared their risk with that of patients with influenza.

Methods: A retrospective study based on the TriNetX databases, a global health research network. We identified patients with COVID-19 and influenza who required hospitalization between January 1, 2022, and January 1, 2023. We compared the risk of developing any post-COVID conditions between the two groups and also analyzed each post-COVID-19 condition and all-cause ED visits, hospitalizations, and deaths in both populations during the follow-up 90-180 days.

Results: Before matching, 7,187 patients with COVID-19 were older (63.9 ± 16.7 vs. 55.4 ± 21.2) and were predominantly male (54.0% vs. 45.4%), and overweight/obese (16.1% vs. 11.2%) than 11,266 individuals with influenza. After propensity score matching, 6,614 patients were identified in each group, resulting in well-balanced baseline characteristics. During follow-up, the COVID-19 group had a higher incidence of any post-COVID-19 condition when compared with the influenza group (17.9% vs. 13.0%), with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.398 (95% CI, 1.251-1.562). Compared to the influenza group, the COVID-19 group had a significantly higher incidence of abnormal breathing (HR, 1.506; 95% CI, 1.246-1.822), abdominal symptoms (HR, 1.313; HR, 1.034-1.664), fatigue (HR, 1.486; 95% CI, 1.158-1.907), and cognitive symptoms (HR, 1.815; 95% CI, 1.235-2.668). Moreover, the COVID-19 group had a significantly higher risk of the composite outcomes during all-cause ED visits, hospitalizations, and deaths when compared with the influenza group (27.5% vs. 21.7; HR, 1.303; 95% CI, 1.194-1.422).

Conclusions: This study indicates that hospitalized COVID-19 patients are at a higher risk of long-term complications when compared with influenza survivors.

Source: Liu TH, Huang PY, Wu JY, Chuang MH, Hsu WH, Tsai YW, Lai CC. Comparison of post-acute sequelae following hospitalization for COVID-19 and influenza. BMC Med. 2023 Dec 5;21(1):480. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03200-2. PMID: 38049876; PMCID: PMC10696681. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10696681/ (Full text)