Tag: lived experience

Approach to nursing diagnoses of people with myalgic encephalomyelitis / chronic fatigue syndrome: a qualitative meta-synthesis

Abstract:

Objective: To identify human responses (diagnostic foci) that shape the experience of living with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and how they manifest throughout the course of the illness.

Methods: A qualitative meta-synthesis was conducted. Original studies exploring the experience of living with ME/CFS in adults with a confirmed diagnosis, published in English or Spanish between 1994 and June 2024, were included. The literature search was carried out in Medline/Medline In-Process, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, SciELO, Lilacs, and Cuiden. Data analysis was based on the human responses (diagnostic foci) from the NANDA-I Nursing Diagnoses Classification, 2021–2023, with findings structured according to Fennell’s Four-Phase Model.

Results: A total of 42 articles were selected. Twenty human responses (diagnostic foci) and three classes of the NANDA-I Nursing Diagnoses Classification were identified, interwoven across the different phases of the model. Some responses were present throughout all phases, while others, such as Energy Balance and Health Self-Management, became particularly relevant from Phase 2 onwards. Phases 3 and 4 were characterised by losses and processes of subjective reconstruction, with diagnostic foci such as Sorrow, Spiritual Distress, and Personal Identity being predominant.

Conclusions: The identified human responses (diagnostic foci) highlight how the contested and chronic nature of ME/CFS profoundly shapes the lived experience of those affected. The model derived from this review provides a structured framework for targeted nursing interventions, aligned with the phase each individual is experiencing.

Source: Oter-Quintana, C., Esteban-Hernandez, J., Cuellar-Pompa, L., Gil-Carballo, C., Brito-Brito, P. R., Martín-García, A., … Alameda-Cuesta, A. (2025). Approach to nursing diagnoses of people with myalgic encephalomyelitis / chronic fatigue syndrome: a qualitative meta-synthesis. Fatigue: Biomedicine, Health & Behavior, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/21641846.2025.2522028 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21641846.2025.2522028

Assessing the influence of lived-experience experts on healthcare providers in a virtual community of practice: a qualitative study

Abstract:

Long COVID, myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), and other poorly understood post-acute infection syndromes (PAIS) can present with unexplained symptoms or conditions that may be misunderstood by healthcare providers, causing delays in diagnosis and care. To address these issues, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funded the Long COVID and Fatiguing Illness Recovery Program (LC&FIRP), initiated as a pilot project to assess whether providing tele-mentoring and other online education for primary care providers could help them improve the quality of life and support the recovery of their patients with these conditions.

The LC&FIRP multi-disciplinary team-based care approach is built on the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) learning model, which is an evidence-based virtual learning framework developed by the University of New Mexico and designed to disseminate and implement best practices, especially in under-resourced areas. A distinctive feature of LC&FIRP was the inclusion of lived-experience experts. To explore the influence of lived-experience experts on the care patients received, we collected the educational recommendations provided by the lived-experience experts during webinar sessions (January 2022-March 2024) and grouped these by themes.

The major themes that emerged included validation of patients’ illness experience; attitudes and beliefs about Long COVID, ME/CFS, and PAIS; understanding patients’ challenges and communicating with empathy; navigating referrals; recognizing and supporting disability; and supporting self-care. Investigators also interviewed patients of the Family Health Centers of San Diego (FHCSD) about their experiences receiving care from participating primary care providers and employed content analysis methods to code interview transcripts to identify themes among patients’ perspectives. Positive comments from the patients about topics emphasized by the lived-experience experts provided evidence of providers’ uptake and application of the experts’ recommendations and support the value of involving lived-experience experts in medical education to improve health services.

Source: Weaver SS, Carry M, Bertolli J, Godino J, Struminger B, Taren D, Scott JD, Sharp SP, Samaniego J, Bean DR, Issa A, Lin JS, Unger ER, Ramers CB. Assessing the influence of lived-experience experts on healthcare providers in a virtual community of practice: a qualitative study. Front Health Serv. 2025 Jun 27;5:1562651. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1562651. PMID: 40656206; PMCID: PMC12245761. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12245761/ (Full text)