Tag: housebound patients

Telehealth as a care solution for homebound people: systematic review and meta-analysis of healthcare utilization, quality of life, and well-being outcomes

Abstract:

Homebound individuals residing in community settings with severe health conditions and disabilities could arguably benefit from telehealth interventions. However, the effectiveness of telehealth compared to in-person care remains underexplored, considering the diversity of these groups. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of telehealth in reducing healthcare utilization and improving health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and well-being in homebound populations.

Adhering and expanding on a published protocol, we conducted comprehensive search across multiple databases: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, LILACS, and the Web of Science, with no restrictions on language or publication date, and experimental and quasiexperimental studies considered. Eleven independent reviewers were responsible for study selection, and three for data extraction. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using JBI checklists. A meta-analysis was then performed using Stata software, which reported standardized mean differences (SMDs) as the effect measure, with the quality of evidence evaluated using the GRADE approach. From an initial screening of 3289 articles, ten studies met our inclusion criteria, with eight suitable for meta-analysis. These studies encompassed data from 2245 participants.

Our findings revealed that telehealth interventions significantly reduced healthcare utilization (SMD: −0.49; 95% CI: −0.76 to −0.22; p < 0.01, GRADE: low certainty), significantly enhanced HRQOL (SMD: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.35; p = 0.04, GRADE: moderate certainty), and significantly improved well-being (SMD: −0.31; 95% CI: −0.47 to −0.15; p < 0.01, GRADE: moderate certainty) compared to in-person care. Thus, telehealth emerges as a viable alternative to conventional care, significantly reducing healthcare utilization and enhancing both HRQOL and well-being for homebound people.

These findings underscore the potential of telehealth to mitigate healthcare disparities and emphasize the need for accessible, equitable telehealth services codeveloped with end users and relevant stakeholders to save resources and maximize health outcomes for vulnerable populations in community settings.

Source: Pinero de Plaza, Maria Alejandra, Gulyani, Aarti, Bulto, Lemma N., Allande-Cussó, Regina, Pearson, Vincent, Lange, Belinda, Marin, Tania, Gebremichael, Lemlem, Brown, Shannon, Dafny, Hila, Sajeev, Shelda, Bulamu, Norma, Beleigoli, Alline, Nesbitt, Katie, McMillan, Penelope, Clark, Robyn, Tieu, Matthew, Kitson, Alison, Champion, Stephanie, Hines, Sonia, Hendriks, Jeroen M., Telehealth as a Care Solution for Homebound People: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Healthcare Utilization, Quality of Life, and Well-Being Outcomes, Health & Social Care in the Community, 2025, 7224151, 32 pages, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1155/hsc/7224151 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1155/hsc/7224151 (Full text)

Severe and Very Severe Myalgic Encephalopathy/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ME/CFS in Norway: Symptom Burden and Access to Care

Abstract:

There is a striking lack of systematic knowledge regarding the symptom burden, capacity for activities of daily living, and supportive measures for the most severely ill ME/CFS patients. The present study seeks to address this through a national, Internet-based survey targeting patients with severe and very severe ME/CFS and their carers.
Responses from 491 patients were included, with 444 having severe and 47 very severe ME/CFS with the classification based on the best estimate from patient responses. In addition, 95 respondents were reclassified from patients’ own classification to moderate and included for comparison. The onset was before 15 years of age for 45% in the very severe and 32% in the severe group. Disease duration was more than 15 years for 19% in the very severe and 27% in the severe group. Patient symptom burden was extensive. The most severely affected were totally bedridden, unable to talk, and experienced dramatic worsening of symptoms after minimal activity or sensory stimuli.
Care and assistance from healthcare and social services were often described as insufficient or inadequate, often worsening the symptom load and burden of care. A substantial lack of disease knowledge among healthcare providers in general was reported. Yet approximately 60% in the severe and very severe groups found services provided by occupational therapists and family doctors (general practitioners) helpful, while a smaller proportion experienced appropriate help from other health personnel groups. This indicates that help and support are highly needed and possible to provide. On the other hand, this must be approached carefully, as a substantial number of patients experienced deterioration from contact with healthcare personnel. Family carers described an extensive burden of care with often inadequate help from healthcare providers or municipal authorities.
Patient care by family members of very severe ME/CFS patients constituted more than 40 h a week for 71% of this patient group. The carers described a large negative impact on their work and financial situation, and on their mental wellbeing. We conclude that childhood onset was common, burden of disease was extensive, and support from responsible societal health and social support providers was commonly grossly inadequate.
Source: Sommerfelt K, Schei T, Angelsen A. Severe and Very Severe Myalgic Encephalopathy/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ME/CFS in Norway: Symptom Burden and Access to Care. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12(4):1487. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041487 https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/4/1487 (Full text)

Housebound versus nonhousebound patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis and chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to examine individuals with myalgic encephalomyelitis and chronic fatigue syndrome who are confined to their homes due to severe symptomatology. The existing literature fails to address differences between this group, and less severe, nonhousebound patient populations.

METHODS: Participants completed the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire, a measure of myalgic encephalomyelitis and chronic fatigue syndrome symptomology, and the SF-36, a measure of health impact on physical/mental functioning. ANOVAs and, where appropriate, MANCOVAS were used to compare housebound and nonhousebound patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis and chronic fatigue syndrome across areas of functioning, symptomatology, and illness onset characteristics.

RESULTS: Findings indicated that the housebound group represented one quarter of the sample, and were significantly more impaired with regards to physical functioning, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, fatigue, postexertional malaise, sleep, pain, neurocognitive, autonomic, neuroendocrine, and immune functioning compared to individuals who were not housebound.

DISCUSSION: Findings indicated that housebound patients have more impairment on functional and symptom outcomes compared to those who were not housebound. Understanding the differences between housebound and not housebound groups holds implications for physicians and researchers as they develop interventions intended for patients who are most severely affected by this chronic illness.

© The Author(s) 2016.

 

Source: Pendergrast T, Brown A, Sunnquist M, Jantke R, Newton JL, Strand EB, Jason LA. Housebound versus nonhousebound patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis and chronic fatigue syndrome. Chronic Illn. 2016 Dec;12(4):292-307. Epub 2016 Apr 28. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27127189